« first day (1686 days earlier)      last day (3250 days later) » 
01:00 - 13:0013:00 - 21:00

1:00 PM
But mostly, the list is named ls -ltr.
 
@RegDwigнt Bring 'em on, spineless little buggers that they are.
 
ls -tldr
2
 
@RegDwigнt Debra married last year. She is another Maria, actually.
 
Someone whoosh Jasper for me.
 
@RegDwigнt I understand you, but I am telling you two facts.
 
1:01 PM
I don't understand you, and that's one fact I'm telling you.
 
nobody really understands anybody
 
I have a question for the programmers.
Is it safe to use unlimited scrollback in the terminal?
 
It is never safe to use unlimited things. That's what unlimited means.
 
@JasperLoy What happens when you run out of memory?
 
It will not be limited by anything, including any concerns of safety.
 
1:04 PM
@Robusto I don't know. Forced shutdown?
 
Red Ring of Blue Screen.
 
"Unlimited" is just an advertising term. In actual fact, when the memory's gone the game's over, man.
 
And 3k memory should be enough for everyone.
 
My memory is 2GB only, quite small for 2015.
 
I forgot what you were talking about already.
 
1:05 PM
@JasperLoy Yes, why not? Unless you have only a few kilobytes of memory, it shouldn't be an issue. I've been using it for years.
 
@Robusto pop your stack. pop it. pop it now.
 
I only get the last entry.
 
@RegDwigнt Poop, poop.
 
@Robusto It's fine, because I'm always last.
 
I pop stacks like millennials pop zits.
 
1:06 PM
@RegDwigнt I always lust. I am very lusty.
 
@tchrist: De todos modos, la bienvenida de nuevo.
 
The other day I read that the scientists of the world were working on creating yet another pointless millenium bug hysteria, because the last pointless millenium bug hysteria is a while ago.
 
@JasperLoy Having lust and being lusty are different things.
 
@Robusto Now I need to check the dictionary.
 
@RegDwigнt Who are these Scientists of the World? Do they wear matching lab coats?
 
1:08 PM
Get this. This time it's not because of a millenium, but because of a second.
These scientists of the world really have nothing to do.
 
@RegDwigнt Millennium*
 
Leap second?
 
Yeah.
 
@RegDwigнt That has to be a first.
 
Everything will explode, and your computers will blend themselves to death in your toasters.
 
1:09 PM
The Internet of Everything Awful.
 
Also, nuclear plants will automatically fly into jet planes.
It will all come true.
Which is why American scientists of the world are now working on telling Unamerican scientists of the world that the leap second must not prevail.
Instead they propose that every hundred years we have an additional year added or something.
 
I thought the Mayan calendar had failed to fly nuclear plants into airliners.
 
And the Unamerican scientists of the world counter, "um, if you can't remember now all the things that you must keep an eye on and update because of a leap second, then how does it help to try and remember them all in a hundred years?"
It's a funny little argument those funnly little scientists are having. Unfunny big tax money at work.
 
The security guards here have stars on their uniform, like generals lol.
@RegDwigнt When will you bring back the viscacha?
 
The viscacha will bring back itself in due time, to announce the age of all things exploding and toasters flying into blenders.
 
1:15 PM
@RegDwigнt Maybe then a miracle will happen in my life.
 
You shall not question the timeplan of the viscacha.
 
Jasper, stop spamming the starboard.
 
How did you know?
 
The worldcupstarboard.
 
@JasperLoy How do you think I knew?
 
1:17 PM
@Robusto Why do you think he thinks?
 
A fair question.
 
Ah, mods removing my stars. Moderator abuse, lol.
 
Not a mod. It was me. Now behave.
 
Where I live, they cane people at home, in school and in prison. Barbaric country.
 
This room is so anarchistic, even non-mods do mod things. This room is the opposite of England.
 
1:20 PM
@JasperLoy Maybe you shouldn't be living in Caneada.
 
Barbaric county.
 
@Robusto I plan to move after I get well.
 
Maybe moving would itself be therapeutic.
 
@RegDwigнt UCSB is a pretty good university.
 
He is the rape Gotham deserves, not the rape you tick.
 
1:22 PM
I don't like Batman. I like Spiderman.
 
It's tough to like Spiderman, he constantly has full-body surgery.
 
What happened to them? Accidents?
 
39 mins ago, by RegDwigнt
user image
 
@RegDwigнt And now, Miles Morales is African-American.
@JasperLoy No no, they're all in different universes.
 
And then, you know, in 2017 they'll announce that the next Spider-Man is Ben Affleck.
 
1:24 PM
Ugh
@RegDwigнt At least this guy is a good actor.
 
@Nick The Ubuntu repositories are called Main, Restricted, Universe, and Multiverse.
 
@RegDwigнt Because it all boils down to him.
 
@terdon I wouldn't know. He looks so cheesy I can't look past that.
 
@JasperLoy Thank you for that wonderfully interesting fact.
 
He literally looks at me like "ignore my acting, pay attention to my annoying".
 
1:25 PM
@RegDwigнt He was fine in The Imaginarium of Dr. Parnsasus.
 
@RegDwigнt All three are handsome.
 
@terdon Oh, he must have worn a lot of makeup.
 
@RegDwigнt I have never combed my hair in my entire life.
 
Also, being fine in a Monty Python anime is not hard. It's not like you have to make sense or what have you.
@JasperLoy I have never combed your hair in my entire life, either.
 
Today, I walked 1 hour to see the doctor, waited 2 hours, then walked 1 hour home.
I carry an umbrella in my left shorts pocket, which may be mistaken as my banana.
 
1:28 PM
Math quiz time: how many doctors would have Jasper seen if he waited 6 hours?
 
The plastic bag they gave me says "Loving hearts, beautiful minds"
 
Jesus, you expect me to have recognized him?
 
@RegDwigнt He's busy screwing lightbulbs
 
I would have rather guessed she was Spider-Man.
 
@RegDwigнt I recognised immediately.
 
1:30 PM
Yeah yeah like you ever watched Imaginarium?
 
Me: The url you gave me does the wrong thing.
Them: It should do the right thing.
Me: ...
 
Well, that settles it!
 
Yep, QED.
 
Again, you're missing the fine difference between should and do.
 
You should both say what right thing and what wrong thing to make progress.
 
1:31 PM
Pineapple salad.
 
Yesterday you missed the one between access and see.
I can't wait to learn what fine difference they will teach you tomorrow.
It's like a Santa Barbara episode.
 
@JasperLoy That sounds unpleasant. Where was this?
 
@FaheemMitha Ah, where I live is secret for secret reasons. =)
 
@JasperLoy if you say so.
 
@FaheemMitha You recently joined this room?
 
1:33 PM
I think people here tend to carry paranoia a bit too far. Even Gilles is willing to tell us he lives in France.
@JasperLoy I've been here for a while. Don't normally say much, though.
 
@FaheemMitha That is because France is a good country.
 
@JasperLoy Define "good".
 
Full of French wine but not French fries.
 
@RegDwigнt I was very impressed with the kid when I watched that movie so I'd been keeping an eye out for him. It's nice to get leading actors who can actually act for a change (I'm looking at you Keanu)
 
The thing with Keanu is, he is the nicest person ever. He is nicer than Buddah would be to Jesus.
 
1:35 PM
@terdon People give Mr. Reeves a hard time. At least he is (apparently) a reasonable human being. From what I've read.
Oh, @terdon, didn't see it was you there.
 
This Garfield thing, I dunno. He looks like I dunno. Would he ever feed pigeons with his last breadcrumb?
 
@FaheemMitha Good for him. Just don't make me watch him try to act. Actually, I doubt he even tries.
 
@RegDwigнt should we say jinx or something?
@terdon Well, he's really rather attractive. So he gets a pass, I think.
 
I will say jinx for $3000.
 
@RegDwigнt Yes, a lot of mentally challenged people are really sweet.
 
1:37 PM
He's probably among the 10 ten most attractive male human beings I've seen in person or in media.
 
Can you imagine Mr Garfield in The Matrix? I know I can't.
 
And among the 10 worst actors, too. Why couldn't he just model or something?
 
If you can do only one thing good, do that one thing good. If that thing is not acting, then that thing is not acting.
 
@terdon Maybe he does/did. I actually though that bus film was fun. He worked well in that.
Speed, it was, I think.
 
He was in Speed?
 
1:38 PM
And The Matrix, etc.
 
Hello?
 
@terdon 10 worst actors is definitely an exaggeration. Though he does seem to play the same character over and over. Not much of a range.
@terdon You're kidding, right?
 
He's no Edward Norton.
 
You wouldn't believe it, but he was also in Constantine and in Bill and Ted's Excellent Adventure.
 
@Robusto No! He did not act in the matrix. He was just about acceptable because he didn't need to show any emotion. He just stood around throwing religious propaganda and sappy cliches through all the gaping plot holes.
 
1:39 PM
@Robusto Do you think Edward Norton is a good actor?
 
@FaheemMitha Not for me, seriously, he can't act. He just can't.
 
And he was horribly miscast in The Devil's Advocate.
 
Well, there are certainly some very accomplished actors out there. Often quite minor names.
 
@Robusto see, Edward Norton does only one thing good, too. Play a person that's two different persons. Fight Club, The Score, American History X.
 
@FaheemMitha I do. He has done some great roles. Should have had more.
 
1:40 PM
@FaheemMitha No, I saw it in the movies when it came out 20 years ago. I didn't remember.
 
@RegDwigнt Oh, really? How about Rounders?
 
I've seen people who looked exactly the same in Film 1 and Film 2, and completely failed to connect them because they were playing completely different personalities.
Has anyone here ever watched "Party Down"?
 
Norton is great! Shame he's been getting no roles/bar parts recently.
 
@Robusto Ok. The Incredible Hulk, right?
 
@Robusto I've not seen that one. Also, I made the mistake of watching 23, after which I sort of gave up on all poker movies forever.
 
1:41 PM
@RegDwigнt American History X is about showing a character arc. It's editing that makes that look like two different people.
 
^^
 
Ken Marino is a really good actor -> en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ken_Marino
In Party Down.
Case in point.
 
@FaheemMitha Poor guy did what he could there. He wasn't bad. But he really shone in American History X.
 
I've seen him in three different places, and didn't connect them at all. And he wasn't wearing a disguise in any of them. You probably wouldn't have that problem with Keanu.
@terdon I've not seen that.
 
@Robusto it doesn't matter how it is accomplished. At the end of the day, the script still requires him to play two different characters.
 
1:43 PM
@FaheemMitha No, 'cause he doesn't act, you know, that thing where you change the way your face looks and body moves and try to impersonate a character?
 
@terdon Yes, quite.
 
@FaheemMitha Excellent movie. Hard-hitting but very good.
 
@RegDwigнt So you have some kind of problem with range now?
 
Though I personally don't care that much whether people are excellent actors or not.
 
Jesus Christ, I was cracking my usual jokes, but then Rob started taking them seriously.
 
1:44 PM
Though I will point out that you didn't have a problem with Walter White being, essentially, two different persons.
 
It's kind of fun to watch the really accomplished people though. For example Helen Mirren.
 
Er. I did not have a problem with anyone being two different persons.
 
@FaheemMitha Yes! Excellent actress.
@RegDwigнt Wevs, I'm only sharing my attention with chat. So I may not pick up on all your fol de rol.
 
But if you want this discussion to get all serious, then I will point out that Bryan Cranston does play a wide range of roles, not just dentists all over and over and over again.
 
@Robusto yes. The problem with having her in a film is she makes everyone else look silly.
Apparently she was also well known once upon a time for taking her clothes off a lot. But the then prevailing standards.
But I guess that was a while back.
 
1:47 PM
So in conclusion, I have to conclude that Bryan Cranston is totally not Keanu Reeves. And you can do nothing to prevent me from concluding that.
 
She was great in The Tempest. Surprisingly, for me.
 
She was acting in that crime drama, and I was riveted. And I can't stand crime dramas.
What was it called again?
 
Dunno. Never saw it.
 
I think Prime Suspect.
Yes, that is right.
But yes, poor Keanu is not in Helen's weight class.
 
Teaching Mrs Tingle.
 
1:50 PM
@JasperLoy So how is the weather in Antarctica? Is it raining there now? How long is the rainy season?
 
@RegDwigнt Yes, I saw that. I remember a review which pointed out that having Barry Watson and Helen Mirren in the same film was cruel and unusual punishment towards Barry.
Not to mention the other young things acting alongside.
Dinner time. Take care everyone.
 
2:19 PM
@RegDwigнt Where do you get these pictures from?
@RegDwigнt Hey, isn't that the last Heath Leger movie after The Dark Knight
 
2:42 PM
@Nick No Heath Ledger in DKR. Maybe why it sucked.
 
And Leger is an actor from another movie altogether, California Dream.
@Robusto I myself like to put my mind at ease with that thought, and yet somewhere deep down it knows that that isn't true. If you look at Nolan's last three movies, he's simply caught the same virus Peter Jackson got from George Lucas.
"Keep making all things ever grander, with no understanding whatsoever of why the little things we did worked".
 
2:57 PM
Sounds about right.
 
I just sent 2 comments to Kris, LOL.
 
0
A: In baseball, is it proper to pluralize "RBI"?

user126519The buck stops here: No letter s on this acronym....EVER! It's probably ok to "s" it on some occasions - particularly possessive ones; "His RBIs have come in bunches". For sanity's sake though, lets drop the s forever because no thing sounds goofier than to hear a broadcaster say, "Batting 270 wi...

This guy is just ranting.
 
> No letter s on this acronym....EVER! It's probably ok to "s" it on some occasions
from ever to sometimes in the blink of an eye
inb4 reg
 
I wasted too much time contemplating how on Earth "his RBIs" was possessive.
 
3:02 PM
Then I realized he means not the RBIs but the his.
 
which in turn makes things make less sense
 
It is okay to pluralize the acronym when it's modified by a possessive pronoun.
 
English has so many weird rules that you never know which ones you never know.
 
It is not OK to write okay for OK.
 
user116848
3:05 PM
Hi all
 
Hello one.
 
Hi five.
 
Low rider
 
Low randorder.
 
3:06 PM
I get many downvotes these days.
 
@JasperLoy Okay.
 
@JasperLoy That's because you started posting again.
Protip: people can't vote on what you don't post.
I have literally OVER 20000 answers nobody ever downvoted, and never will.
 
Ants are crawling out from holes in my laptop.
 
They must be running away from the bugs.
 
sudo apt-get dist-upgrade to fix the bugs
The internet has posted lots of misleading Ubuntu tips.
Like many people still don't know that dist-upgrade exists, and use only upgrade
@RegDwigнt You must be the culprit.
 
3:19 PM
@Robusto It sucked because it relied on momentum from the dark knight and reintroduced a villain we previously saw chauffeuring Poison Ivy in that batman movie with Arnold The Terminator
 
yesterday, by RegDwigнt
Die Hard IV was actually the first movie ever that I turned off before it ended. The other one was The Dark Knight Rises.
I even sat through Titanic, mind you.
And Sex and the City 2.
 
@Robusto I'm sure someone must have asked about appending an 's' to acronym before this guy. If that's the first time, then this site is screwed.
 
It's not even the 1001st time.
It is literally the 9001st time.
145
Q: What is the correct way to pluralize an acronym?

JohnFxFor example, if I wanted to write the equivalent of There are many automated teller machines in this city. Would it be There are many ATMs in this city. or There are many ATM's in this city. (could get confused with possessive form or contraction). or just There are many...

 
@RegDwigнt Why don't you just duplicate all those to this more general one.
 
I have. I always do.
This one question is different, though.
It is not asking how to spell ATMs. It is asking if the plural is ATM.
 
3:24 PM
auto teller machine = ATM = at the moment
Quiet Elegant Dude, Quit Explaining Dictionaries.
 
@RegDwigнt The noun has a plural. The phrase does not require it.
 
> And the name Mayakovsky hangs in the clean air.
 
Quick question, which is correct: "He was at court." or "He was at the court."
 
@Nick right, now can you count all the ways in which saying that is radically different from saying "The Chicago Manual of Style omits the apostrophe, unless there are periods in the abbreviation"?
 
@Nick How about he was in court?
 
3:29 PM
Is it a golf court or a court of law?
 
@RegDwigнt Court of law.
@RegDwigнt I will take that as some sort of insult to my injured punctuation for I don't know exactly what you mean.
 
@Robusto Mayakovsky was so disappointed with not getting enough attention, he held an exhibition titled "20 years of work", at the age of 30, then killed himself. I say bravo. Not everyone can pull off that kind of stunt.
@Nick then you haven't read the answer to the canonical question, or what I was saying, or what you were saying. :))
 
@RegDwigнt I say stupid.
 
Eh, forget it. I found an answer.
 
(Not that the word court appears anywhere on that page.)
((But I'll let it pass, since you never said you found an answer to your question, you only said you found an answer.))
 
3:45 PM
@RegDwigнt This room failed the quick question test. This will be in future used to generate a rank list of all rooms. Have a nice day.
@RegDwigнt You're right I wasn't paying attention to that. Who the hell uses periods in abbv.'s anymore?
@JasperLoy This is confuzzling but I think that's acceptable too.
 
@Nick this room didn't fail the quick question test. This room answers quick questions all day long, every day, for five years. So obviously it must be you who have failed. This will be in future used to generate a rank list of you.
But only in the future for I have to mute commies now.
 
@RegDwigнt I was just kidding but you never know when something like that jumps up.
 
 
1 hour later…
5:16 PM
> And sorry for my English the lessons were poor.
 
crl
6:08 PM
poor education system
 
6:26 PM
at least the lessons weren't pour
 
 
2 hours later…
8:34 PM
@MattE.Эллен Too much would make a mess. That's why you pour less in.
 
01:00 - 13:0013:00 - 21:00

« first day (1686 days earlier)      last day (3250 days later) »