« first day (998 days earlier)      last day (4219 days later) » 

03:00
Then it is the same.
Depends on your model.
They are different functions or senses of the word at the very least.
In a traditional dependency model, it has to be either one or the other.
I call it an -ing word. It serves.
And they are distinguished by different forms in many other languages. Because it gets confusing :)
03:00
Stop talking about other languages.
@JosephWeissman Yes. Even the Chomskeyesque model recognises this.
Is talking a gerund or partipeople?
@tchrist You are allowed to use whichever model suits you.
You can’t even tell me what talking is.
Is that a conjunction, or a relative pronoun, or a demonstrative pronoun/adjective?
03:02
Stop talking about other languages.
What is talking?
Or does it perhaps depend on the context?
Stop talking without saying anything.
What is talking?
Talking for our purposes here is expressing ideas through a universal or abstract grammar that, among other things, distinguishes between gerunds and participles :)
And why should we care?
2 mins ago, by Cerberus
In a traditional dependency model, it has to be either one or the other.
03:02
So you just pick a random label.
What does that buy you?
What can you use that to prove or disprove?
Stop making sense.
@JosephWeissman Right, that's the model I was describing! But there are other models, and no doubt they has a satisfactory way of dealing with this phenomenon...
8 mins ago, by Cerberus
Well, a participle is basically an adjective that can have verbal arguments. A gerund is a noun that can have verbal arguments (just like an infinitive).
It’s a word with arguments.
You said that twice.
Thrice, even, if we count carefully.
Making sense is what we do. Then stop making sense.
Pretty damned sure those are the same thing.
I mean, the structures and hierarchies in language matter. Grammar is political as much as God is... If anything, this is what Chomsky misses -- perhaps surprisingly, given politics, right? The way language in its syntax organizes knowledge and power
Semantics and control; making people programmable, capable of instruction and so on
@JosephWeissman You’re a krafty one, aren’t you?
I'm tempted to talk about the two models of education: whether you inculcate or indoctrinate, cause wisdom to arrive from without or arise from within
But I worry I'm on a tangent :)
03:05
@tchrist Stop can normally have a noun as its secondary argument, so you could say it is a gerund there. I'm on the fence. But go does not.
Stop and go.
Sounds like traffic lights to me.
Start making sense?
@JosephWeissman That is certainly an important aspect of language!
Sociolinguistics.
@tchrist I hurt my head and my friend.
The fact that both phrases can be used as a secondary argument to the "same" verb doesn't mean they function in the same way.
Well, maybe you need more room.
In other words, it proves nothing.
Oh, I think hurting your head and hurting your friend are quite the same thing.
03:08
Then you need lessons in syntax and semantics.
If you bump your head, it hurts.
If you bump your friend, she hurts.
Same thing.
You can hurt your head by bumping it, and you can hurt your friend by bumping her.
At which point both your head and your friend will be hurting.
You really should apologize.
It will help them both stop hurting.
The verb hurt can have different meanings and correspondingly different predicate frames.
Different semantic roles.
Interesting that the difference we're trying to articulate is that between hurting someone and someone hurting...
My head hurts.
@JosephWeissman Yes!
03:11
So does Cerberus.
When you hurt without a patient/experiencer as an object, it is you who are in pain. And the limb in which you experience this pain can be expressed as the object of hurt: I hurt my foot. Subject = experiencer; object = [a semantic role I'd have to look up, maybe location?]. I hurt my friend: subject = agent; object = patient or experiencer.
Those aren’t different.
In one case, your foot hurts, and in the other, your friend does.
Both of your sentences are of type A.
But, in my example, you see both types A and B.
Patience versus agency.
If you hurt your foot or your friend, your foot or your friend hurts.
Unless you hurt your friend’s foot. Then it’s the lucky one that gets to hurt.
03:15
Tautology. Petitio principii.
Yes, you are hurting your foot and your foot is being-hurt (patiently undergoing a "hurting," or a becoming-hurt, etc.)
What, you’re taking signatures now?
Who taut you to do that?
Wait, it's petitio pricipii. I knew that.
Stupid princes.
@JosephWeissman So then the foot would become a kind of agent or experiencer, which would be...weird. Aren't you still the person experiencing the pain, instead of your foot?
03:17
Why do people name their dogs Prince but not King or Emperor? “Here Emperor, fetch boy!” just doesn’t work. Why not?
At any rate, the predicate frames / semantic roles are not identical.
Well, it seems like effectively the same to say that you're experiencing a hurting in your foot. --Maybe I'm missing the point though :)
@JosephWeissman That's right.
I hurt my foot = I'm experiencing a hurting in my foot.
I hurt my friend ≠ I'm experiencing a hurting in my friend.
It might be fun to name a dog Count.
Different constructions.
Or at least sentences that are different in some important aspect.
03:19
Why is it always about you?
Yeah. That seems to bring out the reflexivity; that in case the movement is circular or there's finally no gap between the understanding/knowledge of the experience of the subject and the patient. Unlike loving or hurting others, etc.
You could say the foot is metaphoric: you're talking about your foot as if it were an experiencer separate from you.
You’re hurting your chances now.
@JosephWeissman Right, if you consider yourself and your foot as part of the same entity, then it is in a way reflexive.
But only partially.
Like I hurt myself.
If you hurt your chances, why can’t your chances hurt?
They could be hurting, I suppose.
03:22
Why should they?
Because you hurt them.
If you hurt them, they hurt.
You're caught in an English trap.
The same word does not always mean the same thing.
I mean, it's interesting. I think the orthographical collapse inspires certain aesthetic and poetic resonances that are unique. Because of the muddling, mixing.
Absolutely!
Meanings or senses can escape across the gap.
03:24
Although I don't think there was ever a collapse in a temporal sense in the case of hurt.
I guess Ealy hurt Williams’s chances by catching the ball.
Many verbs can be used medially (as in the middle verb) as well as actively.
Rather interesting, don’t you think?
So chances are like feelings.
I read books. This book reads like pornography.
They can be hurt.
@Cerberus What, you mean its pages are stuck together?
03:26
Et plurima cetera.
That’s an interesting use of reads.
> One always dies too soon-- or too late. And yet one's whole life is complete at that moment, with a line drawn neatly under it, ready for the summing up. You are-- your life, and nothing else. (No Exit)
It’s like when a wine drinks well.
Heh.
Toujours Sarte!
Et tousoirs aussi.
03:27
I read Huis Clos in high school without knowing what to expect.
Immediately after this, a character complains about how poisonous it is to have an answer for everything... :)
Oops!
@Cerberus What did you think? I bounced off the text a few times without really getting much. Took a long time.
Right, okay; the only thing is that traditional grammar, as I know it, agrees with your bullet points 1 and 2 without any doubt; it also agrees with point 4, except for the small minded; as to 3, you may be partially right there, but, even if you're talking strictly about syntactic modification, there are enough widely recognised constructions apo koinou... in short, beware of the strawman! — Cerberus 12 secs ago
@JosephWeissman To be honest, it was too long ago. I probably missed a lot of stuff.
But l'enfer, c'est les autres...
I probably still don't understand all the nuances of how Sarte intended it.
I understood it mainly in the sense of judgement, I think.
03:46
It is definitely a little about judgment, yeah. :)
You were paying attention, I think. --I'm certainly not a Sartre expert, though.
You more so than I, no doubt!
I now think it may also be even broader.
@JosephWeissman As in, seeing oneself as a thing ruled by the deterministic rules of the natural/mechanist universe, as opposed to a subject with a free will.
But I'm not sure whether that was what Sarte intended.
What is free will when other people are our reality principle? :)
Our reality principle?
Is nothing real if one lives alone?
I definitely think we oscillate between zero and the multiple. Desert islands and the sea.
I mean, I guess one thought here is that our freedom is tied up with economics, the law, language, the unconscious, etc.
I don't know...a Stoic would disagree!
03:53
It has to mean freedom for the whole world or it's kind of meaningless. So it's also an unfreedom; we're hostage to others, to the ethical demand they make just by existing.
@JosephWeissman Sure, that is definitely an essential part of Sarte's enfer.
Two freedoms, right? One of judgment or responsibility, one of the free spirit and daybreak.
I don't know...
Well, just perhaps to say that the real jailbreak is maybe that of culture itself; freedom from subservience to the aims of the state, the church, the market, etc.
Is being a free spirit not similar to being free of responsibilitieS?
@JosephWeissman Right, that one is closely related to Sarte's idea.
It is also an important concept in most Ancient philosophies.
Especially Epicurism and Stoicism.
Most especially of the Stoa.
Epicurus would perhaps tolerate it to some degree.
04:02
I'm tempted to say it has to mean mixture and rupture are first principles. Drift, flow, delirium beneath any supposed transcendental self, reason, truth, etc. And in Critique of Dialectical Reasoning he will say some interesting things about groups-in-fusion. --He goes very far in this direction, really.
Hmm...
In terms of trying to use fiction and so on to reconfigure how we think about the construction of reality, social and economic existence, texts and artistic works, etc. And the two lines are always mixed up, in motion.
Ah OK.
Yes, that's what fiction is very good at.
There are unexpected plot holes in Sartre's work, missing places where people and events should be :)
Oh, dear...
No Satan in Huis Clos.
04:07
Sure. Or anything happening at all. It's Beckett, a sober subtraction, an aesthetics of analysis rather than synthesis and connection.
Is such a form of analysis more or less effective than a simple one that is straight to the point?
I don't know...I think it depends.
I often crave the other where one is used.
Although, in the case of Huis Clos, it was fairly satisfactory, at least to me.
It's an ambitious failure. Perhaps consciously.
At any rate, it obviously set a lot of black holes resonating. Consciousness and signification and subjection. Sartre's very good at showing how these are obstructions, white walls to break down somehow, decode.
It has us discussing the play, has it not?
Black holes and white walls?
Sure. Or just his work thinks a lot about people, their extension in the world as a series of absences.
> "Will night never come?"
Faciality is the black hole/white wall system. Categorizing faces according to binary coordinates. Black/white; male/female...
Picasso says that tradition isn't wearing your father's hat, it's having a baby.
@JosephWeissman Not sure I understand this...
Haha, why a baby?
04:18
Well, to my mind, it's opposing sexual (re)production to machinic connection of n-sexes according to the different kinds of afferent and efferent couplings they permit (inputs, outputs)
Uhh...
That was about Picasso?
Sure, why not?
I couldn't tell you, because I don't understand it!
And as far as faces -- well, it's a complicated question, they're monstrous hoods -- but the white wall is also at least in part the white face, Christs' face if you like.
Not sure Tchrist will agree...
04:22
I'm really talking about majoritarianism. And the repression, often clandestine, of minor lines of variation.
Is a white wall different from any other kind of limiting paradigm?
Or...a glass ceiling?
Well, it's Melville's wall, his white whale, the cost of his becoming-Whale if you like
Hmm I need to look that up...
Minoritarian becomings are revolutionary; this is a big point here I think.
They produce rhythms that disorient and decode the major powers and languages, set them drifting along a line of continuous variation.
Becomings?
Can't a minority cause gradual change also, rather than a revolution?
04:26
@Cerberus As opposed to beings, I suppose. We are not static.
Sure; like music takes on a minor key :) --Transporting us along a line that evokes the night, perhaps even the East and so on. Melancholy.
(But I am butting in, I fear.)
@MετάEd People?
I prefer gradual change over revolutions...but I think we have already talked about this, haven't we?
I mean, minor movements and variations operate strategically, in guerilla fashion; making use of what is at hand and so on. Using what speeds and slowness are needed to activate a nomad war machine which doesn't take war as its object, but composes a smooth space and sets people in movement through the space
I suppose.
It is basically a lot less destructive of good things.
And a lot more durable than a revolution.
04:45
Probably gotta get some rest. Thanks for bearing with the gobbledygook.
Haha, the same to you!
Good night.
I will go soon too.
05:16
I fully understood about ARM7TDMI CPU
=D....
Took me 1.5 days
 
3 hours later…
07:51
Hello
Anyone there?:
@DavidWallace
How are you?
Assalaamu alaykum wa rahmatullah wa barakatuh, Akhi Noah. How are you?
 
2 hours later…
10:12
@Cerberus It definitely isn't perfect. The bubble is even sometimes not displayed correct for me. I'll have to fix it sometime
10:55
Morning.
11:11
@KitFox Hello
The disadvantage of your new avatar, Kit, is that nothing changes as it fades.
11:58
I see that as a feature.
Hiya!
For some reason I didn't get those emails, yesterday
looks like you're on a black list...
or maybe I'm on a black list
maybe I'm not allowed to receive personal emails. only emails from corporations
Oh.
Um.
Should I try again?
You know what? I'll try sending you a link via Tumblr fan mail.
I'll check later.
OK! that has not knowingly failed :D
12:11
Sent.
And now for some coffee.
@KitFox You say tomato. I say tomato. Literally.
Oh my God, there's no tomatoes.
You say tomato liturgically!
@MattЭллен Do I?
No, Kit. "Oh my God, there's no tomatoes"
12:24
Oh, yeah, that's right.
I ALMOST said that, last time I was in Los Angeles.
I should have replied to Kit, to remove confusion
Which was also the first time I was in Los Angeles.
There were no tomatoes.
Was it a good time?
@MattЭллен I do?
Was it the invocation of a deity what did it?
I didn't leave the airport. But I bought a disgusting burger that had reconstituted chicken in it, and lettuce, and no tomatoes.
12:26
@KitFox Those deities are always listening.
There was some kind of outbreak of a tomato disease, and there were no tomatoes anywhere in the western United States.
Or at least, none that anybody was allowed to eat.
@DavidWallace I prefer burgers like that. I'm not a fan of tomatoes in sandwich type things
I like ketchup on them, though
gasp
Oh.
Well, same thing.
I thought it would be a decent chunk of chicken. For the price it should have been. But it was this horrible thing that tasted like cardboard. It was probably a good thing that no tomatoes were wasted on it.
I mean, like the burgers from KFC. But it wasn't.
You should really bring your own food when traveling.
Also, a towel.
12:29
except then they won't let you in the country
A towel is good.
@MattЭллен Only if it's wet stuff.
Oh yes, towels are very important
They won't let me into New Zealand with food. But usually, when I get to New Zealand, I've finished travelling.
But maybe that was part of my plan, eh?
12:30
@KitFox Tell that to the border guard who confiscated my brother's candy (each piece individually wrapped)
Bastard!
Which country?
@MattЭллен In which country?
although this was over a decade ago
@KitFox the USA
12:30
Probably thought it was acid.
Which border crossing?
he would have been 14 at the time
So?
It's lucky he wasn't 4. There would have been tears.
@KitFox hmmm. I think we'd flown into LV
Sorry. That was a bit aggressive.
@MattЭллен Well, there you go. Sin City.
So any kid is carrying drugs.
12:31
The word is feisty. Feisty is good.
Nah, that came across as mean and I didn't mean it that way.
Hey, I got an email from Jasper.
How is the old fruit?
@KitFox Lovely.
Sounds like he is doing pretty OK.
(Just thought I'd better clarify which line I was replying to)
12:32
that's good to hear. I should write to him
He'd probably like that.
You could write to me too.
Me! Me! Pick me!
yeah, but we chat daily :D I'd have nothing to say
Oh right. Or David. You could write to David.
speaking of having nothing to say
12:35
Hahaha.
But you DO talk to me less than you talk to Kit.
Most people do. I'm starting to think that Kit has something I don't.
not an avatar, that's for sure
She has one. It's just monotonous. Literally.
@MattЭллен Jesus Christ, what kind of sick thug ... wait, what -kind- of candy?
12:39
@Mitch I don't recall
@DavidWallace I have several things that you don't.
You have no idea what I've got.
True, but I have a good idea of what you lack.
zing!
AFAIK you don't share a husband
or children
or nationality
or house
and neither of have this banana
So you talk to me more because I'm a USA person?
Oh, USA! Just like in Riddley Walker!
Riddley Walker is a science fiction novel by Russell Hoban, first published in 1980. It won the John W. Campbell Memorial Award for best science fiction novel in 1982, as well as an Australian Science Fiction Achievement Award in 1983. It was additionally nominated for the Nebula Award for Best Novel in 1981. Hoban began writing the novel in 1974, inspired by the medieval wall painting of the legend of Saint Eustace at Canterbury Cathedral. It is Hoban's best-known adult novel and a drastic departure from his other work, although he continued to explore some of the same themes in other...
@MattЭллен Who said anything about sharing?
What?
And I have my OWN banana.
BTW, @Kit, I left you some graffiti.
12:43
... house, nationality and child.
@MattЭллен If it was Twizzlers, you and you family should be imprisoned for transporting hi-tech chemical weapons across state borders. He of course should be given a top job at NSA. That border guard should be fired for not being more aggressive. I bet he was secretly Canadian.
@Robusto kthx
@DavidWallace thus you don't have the ones that Kit does.
@MattЭллен sad face because my banana just isn't good enough
@Mitch it was some kind of fruit flavoured, hard candy
12:44
@MattЭллен That doesn't really count, though, does it?
@DavidWallace why wouldn't they count?
He means in terms of topics of conversation, they don't have to be the same ones.
anyway. The fun of facetiousness is short lived
In the category of "something that Kit has but I don't", it's not fair to count Kit's jacket, Kit's stockings, Kit's house, Kit's bookcase, or anything else that I have equivalents of.
Yes it is, because they separate the two of you
12:46
@MattЭллен Oh... Lemonheads ... those can be used as an accelerant in aerosol bioattack missiles ... weapon ... things.
@Mitch Did you try that?
@MattЭллен but bears repeating.
@KitFox true, but in terms of content of conversations they do.
Diet coke and mentos are so last decade.
@DavidWallace I'm not allowed to answer that.
12:48
facetiousness*
@DavidWallace technology advances.
Remember when jaffas were used as weapons in movies?
What's a jaffa?
@Mitch Really?
Really.
12:48
@MattЭллен That means you are afflicted with facets. I can only sympathize.
I think it is a town in Israel.
It's orange-flavoured hard candy with a chocolate centre.
Gack!
That's totally wrong!
Don't tell me you don't have jaffas where you come from?
@MattЭллен ftfy
12:49
thanks :D
Oh, @Mitch, your banana is plenty good enough. @Matt is always boasting about his banana in this chat, but so far he has offered no evidence of its quality.
2
However a tootsiepop is a fruitflavored hard candy lollipop with a tootsie roll center.
@KitFox Oh. I was looking at that, wondering why you would spell "fuck the fuck up" with a Y.
@Robusto You just need to have faith in my banana
@Robusto sad face turned upside down My banana is OK!
12:50
@MattЭллен I will not worship false bananas. Get thee behind me! Oh, wait ...
Out of the many bananas I have sampled in my lifetime, only a very small percentage were not OK.
It is the nature of bananas to be pretty much OK.
Well, I've just learned that Jaffas are an antipodean thing. Amazing.
Jaffas is the registered trademark for a small round sweet consisting of a soft chocolate centre with a hard covering of orange flavoured, orange coloured confectionery. The name derives from the Jaffa orange. The sweet is part of Australian and New Zealand cultural folklore. Jaffas have often been sold in cinemas and have gained iconic status because of the noise made when they are dropped (accidentally or deliberately) and rolled down sloping wooden floors. Through association with this sweet, Jaffa is sometimes used to describe a chocolate-orange flavour. James Stedman-Henderson's S...
The banana experience is pretty much uniform worldwide. It is the McDonald's of fruit.
5
12:52
@DavidWallace Oh! I thought you mean Jaffa Cakes
@DavidWallace What is the sound they make when deliberately dropped rolling down sloping wooden floors?
@MattЭллен No. You wouldn't throw those in a movie theatre.
@Robusto similar litter levels, but less obessity problem
@DavidWallace no
@Robusto What? Apples are the McDonald's. Bananas are the ... Taco Bell of fruits.
Mmm, Taco Bell.
wants gordita
12:53
@Mitch No. It is possible to have bad apples. And they spoil the whole bunch.
@Mitch You should get some and try it.
@KitFox oh dear, not that again!
Gordita sounds like a term of endearment for a fat granma.
@Robusto It is possible to have bad McDonald's. I know these things first hand.
@KitFox Haha, You like little fatties.
12:54
@Robusto It takes just one.
Dec 21 '11 at 20:16, by RegDwight Ѭſ道
No Gordita in this chat.
@DavidWallace All McDonald's are bad. My point was that they were uniform. The same experience everywhere.
Feb 15 '12 at 19:39, by Robusto
Oh, well, screw that. If we're banning Gorditas, I'm out of here.
Wait, do I have to leave now?
@Robusto I get what you meant; I just disagree. I have had BAD McDonald's, WORSE McDonald's and EVEN WORSE THAN THAT McDonald's.
12:56
OK, well we have to look at those as statistical outliers.
@Robusto now you have to leave then
@MattЭллен But I did leave then. Wait, I'm confused.
@Robusto They have McD's in India. Their chickpea BigMac (called EatMeGanesh) tastes exactly like a BigMac (the secret is the bun).
@Robusto If you've already left then I think you've fulfilled your leaving obligations
Has anyone here actually bought a Big Mac in the evening, taken it home, put it in the fridge overnight, then microwaved it for breakfast? It's hard to imagine anything more disgusting.
12:57
@DavidWallace So how was it?
I mean how did your 'friend' like it?
There are things that are not meant to be attempted by mortal man. You have crossed to the Dark Side if you are taking Big Macs home and refrigerating them. You'd better call in a HazMat team.
Haha. I have done this, other than the buying it part. I mean, I have microwaved yesterday's big macs for breakfast. I don't recommend the experience.
@Robusto But...most bananas are not bad. Now I'm confused about your analogy.
@Mitch Eat me Ganesh? Seriously? This isn't Bollywood pornography?
@KitFox There, there, it's all right. I was just trying to make a peace offering to David. You and I can secretly enjoy McDonald's, OK?
12:59
@DavidWallace What the hell? YOu openly claim to have stolen from McD's? Authorities notified.
@Robusto HazMac™

« first day (998 days earlier)      last day (4219 days later) »