Please folks, I would like to learn The Art of Debate . Is there any good radio to learn that, currently i'm listening to podcast of Fox talk radio ? or anyway to dot that ?
It is true that as a fox, I should know this, so consider this a spoilers warning.
In a recent post, Geek Girl mentions that the mating call of the fox is a series of sharp, eerie barks and that this is called gekkering. This is supported by a citation in Wikipedia, but the reference is not one ...
And green and golden I was huntsman and herdsman, the calves
Sang to my horn, the foxes on the hills barked clear and cold,
And the sabbath rang slowly
In the pebbles of the holy streams.
Asians often use belong in funny ways in English that don't make sense. I never know why. Some Hindu thing I thought, but that's obviously not your case.
> Do you know any good radio from New York City? Do you know any good radio out of New York City? Do you know any good radio broadcasting from New York City? Do you know any good New York City radio? Do you know any good NYC radio?
Belong in English is "mostly" about ownership.
So I can see why you said it.
It also is for something being in its right place.
The way you are using the simple present tense to describe a current event
Look, the bus comes.
is probably the most obvious giveaway that you are not a native speaker of English.
Languages like German
Der Bus kommt.
or Spanish
El autobús viene.
commonly use simple present to e...
It's like how people don't "belong" to countries in English. Stations don't "belong" to cities unless in fact the city itself should happen to own them.
What do you call a line of block stacked in a line that when one block falls it falls on top of the block next to it and the effect continues until all the blocks have fallen down
> None can say that this was not good advice, The only mischief was, it came too late; Of all experience 't is the usual price, A sort of income-tax laid on by fate.
@Educ Whichever American corporate media news outlet you choose they just can't afford to break some unspoken unstated limitations that make sure American sovereignty is not questioned too harshly.
Nowhere can you find in any of the most liberal corporate media outlets that the US invaded Iraq, which it freakin' did. Simple as that. Never can you see the table turned on Israelis. Their story with Palestinians is always narrated upside-down in the US. I've even heard Israel being knocked hard on BBC (or some other TV), but in America, don't think so.
You might want to try some social media news channels that run on donations or independent websites etc, but you have to rummage hard to find watchable reliable good stuff.
I watch Democracy Now on YouTube sometimes. Respectable newscasts.
> Many people ridiculed our capabilities and laughed at me because they said it was impossible to achieve such high profits. Some even labeled me a four-Pinocchio.
Does the army have its gay soldiers sleep in the same barracks as each other and use the same locker room? If so, then I don't understand why straight men and straight women aren't allowed to do the same.
I'm thinking we need to take down all these signs.
I had to turn it off. I'm sure it's funny but it makes me too uncomfortable when that's all you hear.
I actually think the whole "trans" issue with bathrooms hides the real problem, which is that we already make people share bathrooms who get off on each other.
If that is a problem, then the trans problem is nothing in comparison.
If that is NOT a problem, then the trans problem is a delusion.
We trust our gay soldiers more than our straight soldiers. We don't trust straight soldiers to treat each other professionally with dignity and respect and NO LEERING AT PRIVATE BITS so we house each gender in separate barracks and showers and bathrooms.
But gay soldiers, we know they're better than that.
Huh.
This is too weird.
Did somebody put some drugs in my coffee?
We trust our gay soldiers in important ways that we do not trust our straight soldiers.
Is it possible that we're wrong, but if so, which direction?
And that is that gender is more important than sexual orientation.
I guess maybe it is. I don't know.
Everything we've seen in this year of massive sexual harassment scandals is that men cannot be trusted.
In that regard, it appears true.
> In Louisiana, by 1900, black voters were reduced to 5,320 on the rolls, although they comprised the majority of the state's population. By 1910, only 730 blacks were registered, less than 0.5% of eligible black men. "In 27 of the state's 60 parishes, not a single black voter was registered any longer; in 9 more parishes, only one black voter was."