« first day (2112 days earlier)      last day (2812 days later) » 

2:00 PM
@MattE.Эллен Right, right, I failed to make that (to me fine) distinction.
Which is interesting.
 
@tchrist That's a tissyue of lies!
@KitZ.Fox Don't use Schweinsteiger
Sounds like a soccer player
 
@Mitch I think that since the BBC has started to employ people with varying dialects in quite some number, RP has become less important
 
but that's conjecture
 
Thar be thine affricates, sibilant and otherwise.
 
2:04 PM
I'm struggling with a third pick for ELL's new mod...
 
@MattE.Эллен In Harry Potter, everyone has a regional accent. Except HP, Hermione, and ... Voldemort
 
Spanish has the voiced dorsal one [ɟʝ] as an allophone that occurs naturally in things like el yugo in the same way that English affricates did you without thinking.
 
Coincidence?
 
@MattE.Эллен So am I.
I've cast two votes.
 
@MattE.Эллен I've read exactly that.
But it's so hard to tell, not being able to label the accents.
 
2:05 PM
@Mitch so... you're saying Voldemort is a half blood?! But wouldn't that invalidate all the Death Eater claims that full bloods are more powerful wizards and witches?
 
@tchrist 1) that's not a plain fricative? 2) That's universal for Spanish, not just Mexico?
 
@Cerberus I should really participate there more often
 
And I.
 
@Mitch It's not quite universal; for example, the rioplatense dialects have [ʒ] for phonemic /j/ everywhere, not just in emphatic position or after an /l/. But for the most part yes. It's certainly common in Spain and Mexico, at the very least.
 
@MattE.Эллен That would explain a lot. Hitler was Austrian, a German wannabe. Napoleon Corsican. Stalin Georgian. Genghis Khan wanted to be Chinese when he grew up so he ate the whole thing. Eisenhower from Kansas. All becomes clear.
@MattE.Эллен So what is the Weasley's accents? Ginger?
 
2:12 PM
@Mitch The tale is longer than is comfy here in a single paste but....
> /ʝ/ es la mayoría de variantes una aproximante entre vocales en todos los contextos salvo después de una consonante nasal, /l/, o después de pausa, donde es una africada ([ɟʝ]).2 10
El alófono aproximante se diferencia de [j] de varias maneras; tiene un F2 de amplitud más baja, es más largo, puede aparecer solamente en inicio de sílaba (esto incluye inicio de palabra donde [j] no aparece), es una fricativa palatal sonora en pronunciaciones enfáticas, y no está especificado para el redondeo de los labios (e.g. viuda [ˈbjuða] vs ayuda [aˈʝʷuða]).11
Read the part past the clip.
 
I think English does it only with 'you'. Or maybe that's the only /j/
 
> Los dos también aparecen, y se solapan en la distribución, después de /l/ y */n/: enyesar [e̞ɲˈɟʝe̞saɾ] aniego [anje̞ɣo̞].
 
@Mitch hmmm. They're a mishmash I would say. Ron's estuary, but not RP. Arthur is Birmingham, but weakened by years of working in London. I can't remember the rest.
 
These is the same force that gave rise to words like añejo (think tequila).
 
@tchrist oh. just the affricate in that position. elsewhere the fricative?
 
2:14 PM
@Mitch Yeah.
 
I think Molly is the same as Ron
 
But it depends on the speaker.
 
@MattE.Эллен Were those all intentional or just how they normally speak?
 
It happens when people are excited or forceful.
 
@Mitch how the actors speak, I think.
 
2:14 PM
It is very common after /l/, and not uncommon after /n/.
My citations are from here in case you care.
 
is the 'll' usually a fricative now? 'Como se [ʒama?' ?
 
Fred and George are midlands, too
 
@MattE.Эллен brummie?
 
@Mitch I think so. it's very weak
 
@Mitch Yes and no.
That's only in the rioplatense dialects where it is always always [ʒ], but that is not just Argentina alone.
 
2:19 PM
Ginnie is RP (at least in the interview of the actress), so maybe she's adopted?
 
Wildly off topic... does anyone here know python?
 
@tchrist I'm being woefully uneducated here but the usual Mexican accent in the US tends to have lots of /ʒ/ in place of /j/ when speaking English, like whenever they say 'you' it sounds like /ʒu:/ or /dʒu:/. So the naive thing is to overgeneralize and think they do it everywhere in Spanish too. But it seems like you're saying only in Uruguay/Argentina?
 
The command ¡Llámame often has an affricated start, which your anglophone brain would map to [dʒ] but which technically is really [ɟʝ].
@Mitch It's pretty common, yes.
 
@MattE.Эллен hahaha. one of those kids doesn't have red hair. you get locked in with the casting at one point.
 
2:29 PM
@Mitch 🐍
 
@MattE.Эллен OK. I feel like it is a syntactic one liner to get a list back from multiple indices. E.g I have {3,6,2} and the string 'abcdef' and I want to get 'cfb'.
is it as simple as 'abcdef'[x] where x is {3,6,2}?
 
In some language somewhere that is the case (Scheme/Mathematica)
 
['abcdef'[x] for x in [3,6,2]]
I think
 
Python doesn't really have arrays, does it? Just 'maps/hashtables/' that use array-like syntax, right?
@MattE.Эллен I will try that. I am 'programming by random perturbation' at the moment.
Which frankly is almost always.
 
2:32 PM
change [3,6,2] for [2,5,1]
strings being 0 indexed
 
oh
 
@MattE.Эллен I was just going to mention that.
 
stupid 0
 
:D I hadn't noticed before I ran it
 
IndexOutOfRange exception.
Or my favorite "why does this keep giving me one letter off the one I'm looking for??"
I've done both of those.
 
2:34 PM
yeah, it's lucky 6 was in there :D I'd have been stumped
''.join(['abcdef'[x] for x in [2,5,1]]) will get you a string not an array
 
@MattE.Эллен nice...so that's what I keep seeing.
 
@Tonepoet Thanks.
Also, that seems like a duplicate question.
So I edited an answer that was flagged as VLQ to make it not VLQ, and it cleared the flag and downvoted the post. I'm annoyed by that.
 
2:50 PM
That is strange. It vaguely reminds me of an answer I edited to include a citation. Granted, that might have been a human voting against it.
 
I suppose it could be coincidence.
 
You would think that if it is the system though, that whomever designed it would realize that the edit probably solves the problem, hence negating the need for a vote.
 
I guess I can see that an edit means "yes, this was VLQ".
 
@JasperLoy Happy birthday! :)
 
It penalizes the correction though.
 
2:53 PM
@JasperLoy I hope you had a pleasant day, regardless.
 
NVZ
@KitZ.Fox happens all the time! I'm also annoyed by that. I have read metas explaining why that is by design, but forgot it.
@KitZ.Fox yes, sort of.. that's the idea.
@Tonepoet if the correction improved the post, more people would upvote it eventually. or maybe not.
 
@NVZ Even if they do, it seems like an injustice to have the system judge a post.
 
NVZ
@Tonepoet trade-offs. it is disappointing, yes.
One thing I can't fully fathom is how you people stay online chatting while you have jobs and family to keep you busy. :)
 
3:14 PM
You're making assumptions that don't apply to me. =P
 
Yay Tumbleweed
0
Q: Intelligibility & Grammaticality of "Switch one's sth. to <adjective>"

HelmarI wanted to describe a helmet visor which can have separate settings, opaque and transparent. Thus I wrote the following sentence. She switched her visor to transparent. I thought it an ellipsis of a noun phrase: She switched her visor to the transparent mode. However after my spellch...

What should I change to attract more interest to my question? Ideas?
 
@Helmar Drop the Headline Style.
And what do you mean by "Intelligibility"?
 
I don't know but I'd probably write "She switched her visor to transparency mode." The article may still technically be omitted though...
 
Hmm. I guess you meant intelligibility. That's a thing, after all. My bad!
 
She switched her visor to transparent. shrugs Sounds fine to me.
Switch is a little unusual, but I would think twice about it in a sci-fi story.
 
3:20 PM
@terdon Seems the word is not real common than, good to know. I am no native speaker.
 
I think I'd probably use set instead of switch.
@Helmar Intelligible is common. Intelligibility less so.
 
@terdon Set is a nice variation, I like that
 
NVZ
@Helmar you could add a bounty, clarify your question, etc.
 
Yeah, I think all your problems would go away if you just wrote she set her visor to transparent instead.
 
NVZ
@Helmar Or if you can't afford a bounty, you may ask high-rep users in chat to help you.
 
3:21 PM
@KitZ.Fox The 'sounds fine to me' is what I meant with intelligibility :) Guess I stick to the adjective from now on
 
the female human changed the visual mode of her head apparatus to "transparent"
 
@NVZ Damn, that's a revolutionary idea :)
Though I could without falling below 2k
@MattE.Эллен The human part is an assumption, albeit hitting the mark ;)
 
NVZ
@Helmar it's nothing new. I think if your question was a little more interesting to me personally, I'd be adding a bounty on it. :)
 
@Helmar phew! I don't mean to be speciesist
 
Well I guess I'll find a better title for starters, that will bump it. Although I have to admit that from Friday on I was kinda gunning for the tumbleweed badge :D
 
NVZ
3:26 PM
@Helmar Chase good questions and answers, and badges will follow.
 
@NVZ Well I there was a summer weekend keeping me from improving the question as well ;)
Well, thanks for the input, learned to stick to intelligible, found a new verb for my sentence and will edit the title to solve the initial mystery :)
 
@Helmar Avoid uncommon contractions (sth.), and rephrase the title so that it looks like a question instead of a section heading.
 
NVZ
@Helmar this comment by John Lawler, on my post, might be interesting to you.
Ellipsis isn't used a whole lot in syntax, actually. One refers to the kind of thing that's missing, or the variety of missingness that it has. See, for instance, "Deletion rules" on pages 6-9 of this list of English syntactic rules. — John Lawler 19 hours ago
 
@NVZ I'll have a look
 
I need to be more aware of what I'm reading before I comment.
 
3:37 PM
@NVZ If it's not an ellipsis, what the hell did I do with the sentence? :D
And what's the tag for it?
@Tonepoet That's generally a good rule when writing or speaking ;)
 
Am I the only one among us who hates the lack of space between a block quote and the following text? I always add a break return after my block quotes. I wish the margins were better.
 
> If you think about it, Voldemort is no different from a teenage girl. He has a locket, a diary, a tiara, a pet, a teacup, a special ring and he's obsessed with a famous teenage guy.
 
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 Don't forget that he's also a horror to look at without any makeup. =P
 
Nah, I remember being a teenage boy, makeup or lack of it never bothered me any
 
Maybe if you could remember being teenage girl you'd be thinking about it differently. =P
 
4:26 PM
I'm really curious about what SmokeDet removed. Something salacious I bet. About themselves.
 
NVZ
@Mitch new word today: salacious: "having or conveying undue or indecent interest in sexual matters." :)
 
@Mitch Spam
 
NVZ
@tchrist yes, but why would smokey withdraw that msg?
 
If it gets deleted in time.
Or somebody in ChHQ || Tavern twiddles something.
 
No sense in preserving a link to spam, I suppose.
 
NVZ
4:30 PM
Oh, so it retracts such messages after a post gets at least one "spam" flag, eh? :)
 
@NVZ or maybe prurient. SD is always into stuff like that.
 
@NVZ I deleted it. I (mistakenly) thought it was a wrong call. It is actually spam though. My bad!
Should have looked more closely.
 
Despite SD being so pervy, I think they'd make a perfectly fine moderator.
Can we get them to nominate themselves like a week ago?
 
NVZ
@terdon oh, you're not a mod in this community, yet you have the power? I see. :)
 
@NVZ a mod in one site is a mod in the whole chat
 
4:34 PM
@NVZ Yes, all SE mods are also chat mods network-wide. With the exception of chat.so and chat.mse which run on different domains.
 
@Mitch Mods are supposed to be human and exception handlers. Unfortunately, SD is neither.
 
@KitZ.Fox I know! They are entirely lacking in ruth.
 
NVZ
@Mitch yea, I'm working on that time machine.
 
@NVZ A chat mod is a chat mod. There are only a few little-used special things that differ if you're actually a site mod for the room that the chat is bound to.
chat.so mods are also chat.se mods; chat.mse mods are also chat.so mods and thence also chat.se mods.
 
NVZ
I see.
 
4:36 PM
@Mitch ruth?
 
Reference to ruthless.
 
@KitZ.Fox I realize that you are attempting to ut words in 'her' mouth. But really why does 'she' (if you can continue to attempt to speak for her) have such difficulty with comments that provide answers?
 
NVZ
So... Reck from reckless, similarly?
 
@terdon Thanks.
 
@Lawrence That's so roboticist!
 
4:37 PM
@Mitch I can elaborate when I'm back from lunch.
 
@NVZ Thanks! Or rather, thanks in advance to the past
 
NVZ
@Lawrence Does smokey obey the laws of robotics?
 
@NVZ gruntle from disgruntled
 
@Mitch Well, if SD actually handled some exceptions, we might consider an exception.
@NVZ Arguably, it violates the second law. Have you tried telling SD to do anything?
 
@NVZ Currently created robots follow the 3 laws only be accident. Those car assembling robots just have signs on them 'Stay away when in operation'.
 
NVZ
4:40 PM
I can't see a link to all my "self-removed" flags. Can you guys see yours?
 
The Three Laws of Robotics (often shortened to The Three Laws or Three Laws, also known as Asimov's Laws) are a set of rules devised by the science fiction author Isaac Asimov. The rules were introduced in his 1942 short story "Runaround", although they had been foreshadowed in a few earlier stories. The Three Laws, quoted as being from the "Handbook of Robotics, 56th Edition, 2058 A.D.", are: A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm. A robot must obey the orders given it by human beings except where such orders would conflict with the First...
 
@NVZ ?
 
NVZ
@DEAD I see a question mark, and no words there.
 
@DEAD ?? I can't see what you've linked to.
 
4:42 PM
What's a self-removed flag
?
 
NVZ
@DEAD oh. it's a new feature. You can now retract flags that you've cast.
 
Im excited to see the election results. Only three hours!
 
Why would you have a link to a list of things you didn't act upon?
 
I just finished reading all the essays.
and voted
 
@NVZ Also sounds like flags that mysteriously remove themselves.
 
4:43 PM
I chose Pikachu
@DEAD You don't get it, do you?
 
@DEAD The system does have that, actually. Mods can see "user removed" next to flags that were, well, user removed, when looking at a user's profile. I don't know if the user can see them anywhere though. Probably in your own profile.
 
NVZ
@Lawrence well, you can try it out. Next time you flag something, try to flag again. You'll be given an option to "retract flag"
 
That's like when kids yell bad things at each other and one says "You take that back!"
 
@NVZ Only kidding. That's actually a good feature.
 
How can you unsay something?
 
NVZ
4:45 PM
@Mitch with the time machine, duh :)
 
You meant it then, but now you don't?
@NVZ Oh. Haha. Then I take back what I said
 
NVZ
I'm actually living this very day over and over again.
Like, Groundhog day or something. :P
 
@Mitch I don't get it, do I?
 
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 wait... a teacup?
 
@Mitch I guess that's Helga Hufflecup's cup
I never pictured it as a teacup
but then again I didn't write that youtube comment I quoted either
 
4:47 PM
@DEAD In this kind of information management, 1-1 != 0.
 
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 Oh. It's like book 7 zipped through a bunch of the horcruxes like afterthoughts. I totally forgot about that one. (and even now I'm having trouble remembering it)
How dare they flag as 'not a word' horcrux?
@JasperLoy do you like spicy or not? If so is breakfast ever spicy?
 
@Mitch yeah, remember in book 6 when that one horcrux was crazy hard to get to? It took the greatest wizard alive, and his good luck charm, to get it, and they barely got out alive. The other ones were just sorta lying around.
 
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 Just because of that, I am never reading that again.
At least not in one sitting
 
lol. My 8yo reads it in one sitting. You should be able to do it in less.
 
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 Wasn't it the dud (no, the other dud) that was crazy hard to access in the story?
 
4:52 PM
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 the diary I think was OK
 
@Lawrence beside the point.
 
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 Wow. Not the whole series I hope.
 
@Mitch it was totally unprotected. Although it was also weaponized to some degree... still some lucky 12-year-olds were able to beat it.
 
#5 was difficult to get through. too much whining about being a teenager
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 Being 'the one' is not luck.
 
NVZ
@Mitch let me in? What are we talking about?
 
4:54 PM
Wait, yeah it totally is.
@NVZ The Harry Potter series
 
NVZ
Oh, nice. :)
 
@Mitch he didn't beat it because he was "the one". He beat it because a phoenix came up and pecked out the monster's eyes and then healed his fatal wounds.
 
I wonder where JK Rowling goes for vacation. Blackpool?
 
0
A: Is 'petrichor' the only noun in English that means a specific scent?

SteveHere's a good one I believe: Decomposition?

 
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 nobody complains that HP was written about a boy by a woman. Wouldn't she have more insight into being a girl?
I take that back. Look at the bottom line.
By that I mean the last line of the book.
It's a 'horcrux' about being a boy trapped in a girl's body acting like a boy.
@tchrist haha.
but seriously, I just thought of one... rancid.
"That smells rancid"
 
4:59 PM
@tchrist fetid comes to mind
 
ha! another!
 
Dolorous
 
'funky' was originally a smell but now means 'cool'
 
@Mitch Actually lots of people complained that she should have made the hero a girl.
 
@KitZ.Fox That isn't a specific smell though. Various things can be fetid smells.
 
5:00 PM
@KitZ.Fox I had an aunt named that!
 
Mildewy
 
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 Oh.
@KitZ.Fox too transparent. or 'thingy'. what's the word for when a thing that has the property is used as the property itsef?
 
@terdon it is as specific as petrichor.
 
like "that is blood colored"
 
> The distinctive scent which accompanies the first rain after a long warm dry spell.
 
5:01 PM
@terdon No it's perfect. Petrichor is a made up word anyway.
 
That seems pretty specific.
 
Synedoche?
 
@KitZ.Fox yeah, like that town in upstate New York.
Except I thought there was a less technical term.
 
Schenectady?
 
or less greek sounding
 
5:02 PM
damn you
 
Look, I woo
 
Yeah we know you woo
 
D argue but I'm on mobile
 
D too but that's no excuse
 
l
 
5:03 PM
And eating a sandwich and swiping text using my non dominant pointer
 
everyone always forgets the poor l
 
smutty
 
And my fingernails need a trim.
 
’Bout time, you! :)
Where "you" is masculine.
 
So yeah, it's specific, as is "the smell of rotting meat".
 
5:06 PM
@KitZ.Fox that's the worst. People are saying things that need replying to, but there's that crumb you can't get off your finger and dammit now it's on the screen and getting rid of it makes you call the president and now the secret service is running across the plaza towards you with 9 mms drawn and from the lip of the yogurt drink it's just about to drip one sploosh onto your screen and...
got it.. that goddam little crumb.
@terdon how crazily specific is not the point,
 
@Mitch Seemed to be the point of the question. And it's a neat question. I can't think of any other noun that means a specific smell.
 
it's all about a word that describes a sense. vision has color words like red. hearing has loud, touch has rough, taste has bitter, smell has... nouns that have the property. "That smells like burnt toast"
 
I'm also trying to cram in the mental space of spiritually connecting to my father via our shared love of this kind of sandwich as a little celebration of the fact that I have some weird virus or fungus but probably not terminal cancer.
 
checks for stroke symptoms
 
smells chicken
 
5:10 PM
Today I learned of a case where a guy got a brain tumour and it made him a pedophile. They removed the tumour and he got better. It grew back and he relapsed. they removed it again and he got better again.
 
Huh. Prefrontal?
 
@KitZ.Fox Roast chicken smell is a symptom of prefrontal lesions?
@terdon red is pretty specific for vision don't you think.
 
Or just intracranial pressure removing his ability to control his actions?
 
> The cancer was located in the right lobe of the orbifrontal cortex
 
@KitZ.Fox oh just finished reading transcript
 
5:13 PM
@Mitch For vision, sure. But I can't think of any equivalently specific term for smells.
 
@terdon we've just come up with some
 
@Mitch Where?
 
fetid, rancid
 
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 I am so good.
@Mitch dolorous
 
@Mitch Neither is specific though. I can think of multiple, different smells I could describe as either fetid or rancid.
 
5:14 PM
@KitZ.Fox that sounds painful
literally
 
And those are adjectives, not nouns.
 
Those are adjectives describing the smell as opposed to nouns meaning that smell.
jinx!
 
@KitZ.Fox and petrichor is a noun so really isn't a good sense word. "The petrichor wind reminded him of his childhood home"
that is, the neologism of 'petrichor' doesn't even do what it should do.
@terdon likewise with 'red' or 'bitter'
actually fetid and rancid are pretty specific.
 
Rock essence
 
petrichor can only be used to speak of 1) a very uncommon state of affairs or 2) the act of naming a very uncommon state of affairs., and usually the latter.
How do you use 'petrichor' in a sentence?
 
5:18 PM
@Mitch You just did.
 
"'Petrichor' is the only word to describe a smell"
by quoting it!
You're not even using it.
 
Azahar.
 
@Mitch So fetor and rancour seem suitable?
 
@Cerberus 'rank'
but 'rancour' just means irascibleness or something like that
 
Is rank a noun?
Rancour can also mean a foul smell.
It's rare/old-fashioned.
 
5:21 PM
Time to go. Congratulations to the new mods once the results are announced.
 
I just heard a movie critque introducing the Russian film studies vocabulary as 'fuh BOO luh' and 'SOO djet'
@Lawrence THey're going to have their hands full with the petrichor drama. Also cleaning up after that awful smell from the rocks after it rains.
@Cerberus I'm not old enough yet.
@tchrist Bless you.
 
NVZ
I was pinged by "The Overlook Hotel" room.
Don't know why. Did I sign up to get notified?
And also, there is no one active there. Looks like a ghost town.
 
sound of everybody swooshing over to the Overlook
 
@NVZ You can't be pinged by a room. Did you receive a message along the lines of "You were mentioned in room X a room you're not currently in"?
 
NVZ
I saw a banner on my screen. Did not mention me by name, though.
 
5:28 PM
Ah. The "An event is starting in X minutes" thing?
 
unswooshes
 
NVZ
yes.
 
OK. I don't know how those work, really
 
Magic
mostly
 
@Lawrence good luck!
 
5:29 PM
some tinkering
 
NVZ
I believe in magic. I call it science that is yet to be explained. :)
 
@NVZ you must have subscribed to it.
 
@NVZ The science of the gaps!
 
NVZ
@KitZ.Fox maybe I did. Don't recall doing it, however.
 
gasps
 
5:31 PM
Where is the oxygen mask? Stand back! Give him air!
 
NVZ
@tchrist I may be asleep when the results arrive. Congratulations in advance, mod sir! :)
 
Are there words for other senses that are nouns? 'Redness'? that shouldn't count because it is just word formation. I think the intent of the whole petrichor brouhaha is not for a noun, because most senses don't have nouns for sensory feeling but rather adjectives.
 
@Mitch The way I read the question was that the OP was intrigued by the one example of a noun for a smell they found and was looking for more.
Interesting point about the other senses though.
 
@terdon don't forget that you read it as 'highly overspecific noun'
but yes, they explicitly said 'noun'
but I am saying that that is a wrong desire to have.
 
5:35 PM
And specific :P
 
just because you say something doesn't mean you mean it. or understand it.
or can complete sentences.
fully.
@terdon just be happy I closed off my quotes.
 
I saw; and was humbled by your generosity and consideration.
 
"I am honored and humbled to be chosen as your leader. Now release the Kraken!"
"Why is the Kraken coming toward the podium?"
 
"AAAAAAAAAAAAaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaagulp"
 
"I love these things; chewy on the outside with a crunchy center"
 
5:41 PM
@Mitch Yay! One of my all time favorite Far Side cartoons :)
That and "Sandwiches!"
 
Yep, I know. Recognized the quote.
@Mitch Would those scientists happen to be British by any chance?
 
"Some scientists believe that humans appreciate the beautiful landscape because ancestors may have relied on distant irregular terrain for survival."
 
Great. That was wikipedia linking to some science blog that makes the "Some scientists believe. . ." claim but has no reference for it.
 
Is there a better word than 'load of horseshit'?
Seriously.
'Quatsch'
similar to the sound of stepping in it.
 
5:51 PM
Gives a whole new dimension to the Sasquatch legend.
 
A German was walking through the great Northwest when he fell on his butt in some scat. He yelled out "Sasquatsch!"
 
> What I did was watch TV.
> What I was doing was watching TV. (Not watch)
Do you agree? Why do you think watch doesn't work in the second sentence?
 
@Mitch I did earlier today.
 

« first day (2112 days earlier)      last day (2812 days later) »