There is confusion as to whether it was the rebels or the Ukranian government troops. The rebels say they don't have access to anything that could shoot that high
@Robusto no you are not, but the "you" in this case is the Ukrainian army, not Putin. Also, they didn't give it to the crazy person, they let him steal it.
@Cerberus Look, you're in the Russian army, you have missiles available, you're bored, and you see a jet go by at 33,000 feet. How do you not shoot it down?
I'm just trying to put things in perspective here.
@MattЭллен Google Translate: 'Self-propelled anti-aircraft missile systems "Buk" in the territory of anti-missile defense regiment A1402 take control of the DNI'
Thanks. They were saying on the radio this morning that Robusto's humorous comment was actually quite likely EXCEPT that it was the rebels, not the Russians. That, and that it was deliberate and they didn't actually know what they were shooting at, and they didn't know how to use the radar to identify the plane.
You can say "Putin dunit", and there's certainly no shortage of people doing just that as we speak, but in no way shape or form is any Russian Bill Gates remotely interested in any of this shit.
There are no billionaires in the Russian military. They all made their billions with oil and shit. There's no Russian Halliburton, no Russian Dick Cheney.
@AndrewLeach they bragged about shooting down a military AN-16 on the Russian Facebook-knockoff, complete with videos of it coming down, ten minutes before anyone else in the world even noticed the Malaysia plane had disappeared from the radar.
The Ukrainian intelligence agency has since leaked alleged radio communication between rebels, where they go to the site and slowly realize their mistake. It's on YouTube.
> The imprecision and the lack of immediate perspicuity into which English occasionally deviates and from which German occasionally emerges, is quite foreign to Greek. — H.D.F. Kitto, The Greeks
@RegDwigнt I think I may have been confusing two different postings. Was there something posted somewhere within the first 10 minutes that was gloating but then deleted, and then a second supposedly-leaked Ukrainian intelligence intercept?
@AndrewLeach they bragged about shooting down a military AN-16 on the Russian Facebook-knockoff, complete with videos of it coming down, ten minutes before anyone else in the world even noticed the Malaysia plane had disappeared from the radar.
The Ukrainian intelligence agency has since leaked alleged radio communication between rebels, where they go to the site and slowly realize their mistake. It's on YouTube.
But as that Spiegel article says, anyone with a brain would know that 30k feet cannot be military aircraft. Too high for most things, too low for AVACS and shit.
And even after firing by accident you still have a full 30 seconds to self-destruct it.
Then again, a coyote who goes a-scavenging may be eating from whatever the restaurant threw out into its dumpster.
@RegDwigнt Do you think that somebody who made such a bad decision as to launch it in the first place would have realized his error within 30 seconds and then also had the nerve to issue the self-destruct order without losing more face?
@tchrist I am saying that apparently 20 trained people are needed to operate that thing, and that if I grab 20 untrained people off the street at random there's likely to be one among them who knows that 30000 is too damn high.
They must have specifically been on the lookout for morons.
And the training must have been specifically "push this button, upload video to YouTube, is all".
At least one of them should have been able to read "Malaysian Airlines" on the plane when they looked at it through field glasses to confirm the target.
Again as Spiegel says, their radar likely sent a "Friend of Foe" request, and the craft likely replied with a "Friend here" code, but nobody was around to know what the fuck that all meant, or to even notice these things were happening.