« first day (1337 days earlier)      last day (3585 days later) » 

2:00 PM
@MattЭллен I already have the headline if Germany loses the final: "Klose, but no cigar!"
But they're not going to lose.
 
@Robusto rimshot
 
OK, this is weird.
1
Q: Single word for thing which will never repeat in life

VeerConsider: Childhood never comes again in life. What might be single word that means never come again in life?

I voted to close this because it's a dupe. I have a gold badge in . Why didn't that close it?
 
curious
@Shog9 do you know why a gold badge holder wouldn't get to dupe-close a question?
 
@MattЭллен was the tag they hold the gold in added after the question was posted?
 
@MattЭллен original tag was "synonyms"
 
2:10 PM
ah
thanks!
 
Well, but it wasn't synonyms when I voted to close.
Also, I didn't edit the post.
But tchrist was right: was decidedly not the tag to use there.
 
Apparently the rule is:
> If a question has a tag where you have a gold badge, and it was part of the original set of tags applied to the question, you can mark it as a duplicate with a single vote.
tag-edited questions don't count
 
Well, but someone could game the system easily by simply making up a tag to ensure that it could never be one-vote-closed.
 
Nobody has gold in that one.
I suppose it would be worse to allow people to edit to include a gold-badge tag just so that they could one-vote close it.
 
2:15 PM
@Robusto The only people with enough rep to make up tags ought to know better that to game the system to avoid duplicate closures.
 
@Caleb Ah, but man's reach exceeds his grasp—especially on the Intertoobz.
 
but, by the same token, you should be able to trust someone with a gold badge in a tag to know how to tag a question with that tag
that's why they've got the binding vote, after all
 
All I'm saying is, I was promised god-like powers and I have yet to take delivery. WTF?
 
Meanwhile FumbleFingers is god-voting all over the frickin' place.
Not bloody fair.
 
2:18 PM
@MattЭллен It might be improved if the gold hammer worked on tags you hadn't edited in yourself.
 
@AndrewLeach I concur.
 
user116848
Hello people :)
 
@cornbreadninja麵包忍者 They're all 99¢
Hello
 
2:25 PM
@MattЭллен I'll take five!
 
user116848
I have a grammar question
 
@cornbreadninja麵包忍者 it's only $10 for ten!
 
user116848
May I?
 
yes, please do
 
@MattЭллен Don't forget the handling fee.
 
user116848
"I knew we shouldn’t have involved with that guy"-------> Here why not "I knew we shouldn’t involve with that guy"
 
Neither of those are correct.
 
I'm not sure whether you mean "got/been involved with" or just "involved"
 
I knew we shouldn't have involved that guy or I knew we shouldn't have been involved with that guy are correct.
 
user116848
@cornbreadninja麵包忍者 So what would be the correct form?
 
2:28 PM
@Arrowfar The first one minus with is correct if you mean to say that he shouldn't have been a part of it.
The second one would be better stated as "I knew we shouldn't have involved that guy"
 
user116848
@cornbreadninja麵包忍者 Right. So in first one can I say------------> "I knew we shouldn’t involve that guy"
 
Wy are you making such long arrows?
 
You need "have" in there.
Don't begrudge a man his arrow length.
His name is Arrowfar, after all.
 
user116848
@KitFox I can't?
 
user116848
:)
 
2:30 PM
You can say "I knew we shouldn't involve that guy."
@cornbreadninja麵包忍者 Fair enough.
 
user116848
@cornbreadninja麵包忍者 You are a good ninja too yourself haha
 
@KitFox You don't think have is necessary?
 
thinks
 
user116848
@KitFox Yeah so "have " isn't necessary?
 
I agree with Kit
 
2:32 PM
I know we shouldn't involve that guy.
I knew we shouldn't have involved that guy.
I told you we shouldn't have involved that guy.
Ima go do some work and eat some blueberry biscuits.
 
user116848
@MattЭллен So guys there are two opinions here now. So which is it?
 
"Who are we going to involve?"
"Matt, Andrew, Kit, and Reg."
"No, I think Matt is out."
"He's fine. ... Oh, actually, he's in prison."
"See? I knew we shouldn't involve that guy in our activities."
 
I knew we shouldn't involve that guy -> that guy is currently causing a problem
I know we shouldn't involve that guy -> that guy will cause a problem
 
Oh yeah. That's better.
 
I knew we shouldn't have involved that guy -> that guy caused the problem
 
user116848
2:34 PM
I see. So both Kitfox and ninja are correct.
 
@cornbreadninja麵包忍者 Nice work if you can get it.
 
although the "knew + involve" and "knew + have involved" are pretty close in meaning and could probably be interchanged in some cases
 
@Robusto Indeed.
 
user116848
okay...
 
user116848
2:39 PM
@MattЭллен And here: "How did you know I was with Kenny?" Can I say "How did you know I am with Kenny?"
 
user116848
@cornbreadninja麵包忍者 You eat that? :D
 
@Arrowfar They are tasty.
 
user116848
I see haha
 
@Arrowfar Are you with Kenny now or not?
 
user116848
@KitFox If yes, then can I say "am"?
 
2:41 PM
If you say "How did you know I am with Kenny?" and he is not physically in your presence, you will give the impression that you are dating Kenny.
 
user116848
Oh, I see.
 
It is more natural to use "How did you know that I was with Kenny?" even though he might still be with you.
Unless maybe you are talking on the phone.
 
user116848
Yeah, if on the phone. Then?
 
"Hey, Mom. Uh. How did you know I am with Kenny? Oh. OK. Yeah. I'll put him on." hands phone to Kenny
Even then, was works fine there.
 
user116848
2:44 PM
I see :) Now I get the picture.
 
"I'm with the Connor group." "I'm with the senator."
Come to think of it, the present tense tends to imply some kind of affiliation.
 
user116848
So to be with someone doesn't necessarily mean dating, right? I could be sitting with the person, playing tennis etc. Yes?
 
That's right.
Existing near someone else.
 
user116848
Yeah
 
also works if you're a ghost and are near someone else.
in this case, you do not exist.
 
2:49 PM
sorry gotta concentrate on w**k
 
user116848
What's wrong with saying "work"? :)
 
You're assuming he did mean work.
 
user116848
So he didn't?
 
Only he knows.
 
user116848
I can't find the right word here.
 
2:51 PM
for the time being, it's left to our imaginations.
 
W-rk is a bad word here.
 
user116848
So Matty which word is it?
 
user116848
@KitFox "Work"?
 
Aah! You said it!
 
@Arrowfar Yes.
It's a joke.
 
user116848
2:53 PM
So it's people's pass time here. I see :D
 
Pastime.
Pastime?
Great, now that looks weird.
!!define pastime
 
@KitFox pastime That which amuses, and serves to make time pass agreeably; sport; amusement; diversion; games.
 
user116848
So what would be the perfect word here?
 
I think pastime works. Doesn't it? I don't know.
 
user116848
Leisure? Free-time? chit-chat time?
 
2:58 PM
the time has passed, the time has past.
 
I think I want pizza and soda for lunch.
 
pizza time
 
Oh, oh, people pass the time here.
 
user116848
Pizza sounds nice.
 
@Arrowfar It's a four-letter word.
 
user116848
2:59 PM
@Mitch Which is?
 
I'm supposed to be doing this 'clean eating' thing this week, but even though the food is nice, it's ...
Not pizza.
 
user116848
@KitFox By 'clean eating' you mean Organic eating? :)
 
@Arrowfar Work. Also, what and with.
@Arrowfar It's supposed to get the "toxins" out. rolls eyes So organic, but also, anti-oxidants, complete proteins, etc, etc.
 
user116848
@KitFox I didn't get your reply (Work. Also, what and with.)?
 
@Arrowfar Four letter words.
 
user116848
3:05 PM
I see :D
 
user116848
@KitFox I see Jason isn't here. He was being a real 'something' the other day.
 
haha. I had rolled back into a branch that wasn't functional
so I rolled all the way forwards and now the system is only as bad as I found it, but not worse
 
Yay!
For uh, stagnation!
 
:D yeah!
 
@Arrowfar Yes.
 
3:13 PM
May 16 '13 at 22:04, by Mitch
@Cerberus I know this is perverse, but I like it to be sunny, and then I sit in the shade because, you know, it's so sunny.
@Mitch So true, so nice!
 
he said that over a year ago?! it feels like just yesterday
 
in a good way
 
4:00 PM
@KitFox Pizza is totally clean eating, if you drop it crust -down-. The other way is gross.
@Arrowfar Follow the links. "Work" is a four letter word, and the humor is that a 'four letter' word is a 'bad' (taboo, dirty) word. ha ha ha.
@KitFox I always think of oxidants as -good-, you know all oxygeny and breathy and fresh and stuff. "Our new laundry detergent oxidizes your sheets so they smell sunny!"
 
I think I'm just going to have tomato, mozz, basil on English muffin.
And have juice instead of soda.
 
Have water!
You need water to live.
You need life to moderate.
 
Water is boring.
 
This place needs moderation. QED.
 
user58869
is there a single word that specifically describes "search for meaning when there is no meaning"
 
4:06 PM
Existential futility.
 
user58869
@cornbreadninja麵包忍者 oh yes... but what i mean is, if I were to say it in one word without setting it up first. i want to use it as a verb. for example "bob is Futilitying" doesn't make sense at all.
 
Bob is performing an exercise in futility.
 
user58869
that certainly makes sense, but it doesn't say anything about what bob is actually doing, nor is it a single word
 
Bob is failing.
 
user58869
that is pretty much the same... for example "bob is drowning" tells me something about what bob is doing but only that he might be in water
 
user58869
4:11 PM
though he might not be
 
user58869
how can i say that bob is searching for meaning where there is no meaning, in the form of "bob is ..." where ... is just one word
 
user58869
is this a valid question for the english language and usage site?
 
user58869
on topic at all?
 
user58869
i would have thought so...
 
user58869
might make it into a question later
 
4:16 PM
Is a single word necessary?
 
user58869
perhaps if i start by trying to find a single word that accurately equates to searching for meaning, and from there find another word that equates to searching for meaning that is not there
 
Why is a single word necessary?
 
@cornbreadninja麵包忍者 You need moderation to ... um ... keep regular.
 
@Mitch Oh yes.
!!afk nomtiem
 
@cornbreadninja麵包忍者 Can you pick up some milk on your way back?
 
4:17 PM
You could use floundering or pondering.
 
Bob is looking for headlight fluid.
 
@KitFox drink fizzy water. it bites back.
 
Frittering or puttering or masturbating.
 
user58869
@KitFox i was trying to think of a way to say that in a single word, so yes, but part of the question is whether it exists or not
 
Why a single word though?
 
4:19 PM
@cornbreadninja麵包忍者 Bob should get more exercise.
@cornbreadninja麵包忍者 !!om nom nom or nummy
 
@Mitch nummy
 
user58869
@KitFox no reason as such, but if not a single word then you might as well say "search for meaning where there is no meaning"
 
@Alex Right. So why isn't that sufficient?
 
user58869
@KitFox because I want know if there is a single word that says that
 
@Alex um.. yeah?
@Alex The French have a word for that.
 
user58869
4:21 PM
@Mitch oooh, what is it?
 
@Alex That is not a compelling reason.
 
Or is it the Germans?
 
Are you thinking of angst?
 
user58869
@KitFox really? simply wanting to know is not enough?
 
Cripes, I'm sure the Russians have a drinking toast for it.
 
4:22 PM
@Alex Is there a single word that describes the feeling you get when a foreign stranger arrives at your door during the day?
 
user58869
@KitFox searching for meaning where there is no meaning can most likely cause angst
 
@KitFox "That dude in college was always angsting, when he should have been doing his chem lab notes."
 
Grasping at straws probably won't do it...
 
user58869
@KitFox there might be
 
What is it?
 
4:23 PM
@KitFox Yeah... "dammit"
 
user58869
@KitFox i dont know, but that doesn't mean it doesn't exist
 
@Mitch No, it needs to specifically capture foreign, stranger, my door, and daytime.
 
@Alraxite Yeah, if you already have a straw that makes sense. and maybe you don't even have a drink.
 
Also feeling.
 
Unless it's fizzy. That makes the difference.
 
4:24 PM
In one word.
 
@KitFox That's the only time I ever use that word.
 
Because I want just one word. Because.
 
user58869
@KitFox perhas someone could invent a word that means that or use an existing word to describe that, and if enough people use it for that meaning, then it means that
 
@KitFox also 'the'.
 
But that is why it is uncompelling.
 
user58869
4:25 PM
fecundity
 
Pardon?
 
@Alex Dampfschifffahrtsausdehnungslehrerkapitan.
@Alex Same to you pal! You know there are ladies present.
 
You know Alex is a lady?
 
@KitFox I do? Is that one of my unknown knowns?
 
I don't know.
 
user58869
4:27 PM
@KitFox there are words like that, that mean something that isn't at all simple, and also have several meanings, so i was wondering if there is a word that can be used to describe "searching for meaning when there is no meaning"
 
@KitFox I'm waiting for
@KitFox !!rimshot
 
@Alex I gave a list up there.
You could also add descriptive qualifiers, like "fruitless search for meaning" etc
 
@Alex Maybe Apophenia
 
It needs to be a verb.
 
user58869
4:30 PM
@JohanLarsson yes, i think that might be it or is in the right area
 
I'm so English!
 
headdesk
 
don't be sore Fox, you are Americanlish
 
Finding patterns where there are none is not the same thing. And it was supposed to be a verb.
 
ok sry
 
4:31 PM
grumbles
 
is there a way to verb it?
 
No.
Not without sounding dumb or using more than one word.
 
rewrite the sentence so it fits then
..., is a clear case of apophenia.
 
That's more than one word.
 
user58869
bob was apophenising all day
 
4:34 PM
That sounds dumb.
Glad you both just illustrated my options there.
Ima get lunch.
 
what was your suggestion?
 
user58869
doesn't quite sound right
 
@JohanLarsson Don't ask for one word.
Because there is no point in having one word.
 
user58869
agenticity
 
user58869
bos is agenticicating
 
4:36 PM
chasing rainbows?
Does that work?
It's not a single word.
But it fits well.
 
Chimär is another similar word, still no verb. Pretty sure there is an English version.
 
Chimeric
There is chimerize.
 
@JohanLarsson I love The Who!
 
I fail to connect them dots
 
@JohanLarsson (Quadrophenia)
 
4:44 PM
tricky
 
Cogitate
That's a good word.
Also, so is this thing I'm eating.
 
Don't put words in your mouth.
2
 
Chimera? I don't see how that fits.
 
5:08 PM
And by a long winding rabbit hole, I am returned to the subject of the pissflaps question.
 
On another note, does anyone use a StackExchange OpenID to log in here?
 
I do sometimes.
 
You have multiple logins?
 
Yes.
Well. Two.
I use SE and Gmail.
Or GoogleID or whatever that is called.
 
Does logging in through your SE account log you in openid.stackexchange.com?
Well, you probably don't know.
Are you logged in on that page right now?
 
5:13 PM
Um.
I have the option to Log In. Does that mean I am not?
 
Yes.
OK.
Then I am not the only one.
So that's not unintended.
Good. One weird thing less with my account.
@KitFox When you log in to SE through your Google account, do you get logged into Google as well?
 
I can't remember. I know if I log out of Google, I am still logged into SE.
 
OK.
Matt said he does get logged into Google when logging in to SE.
 
Are you on Chrome?
 
Yes. Right now.
So, I don't understand why we don't automatically get logged into openid.SE whenever we log in to SE with our Stack OpenID account.
If it works that way with Google, why not here?
 
5:21 PM
OK. Yes. It did log me into Google.
 
Right.
 
@Alraxite Because it's not set up that way.
 
@KitFox Ooh, so that's why.
Now why isn't it set up that way? aka the same question I asked earlier.
 
@KitFox anomie
 
Not a verb.
 
5:24 PM
Example: "Dude, don't anomie the whole joint"
 
Dude.
Remember the piss-flaps question?
 
I remember feeling slightly uncomfortable with that entire conversation.
I'm feeling that now again. Or maybe I'm anomizing it.
 
The various questions then the whole Meta thing.
 
That was years ago.
I need a name to blame.
 
You won't remember.
 
5:26 PM
JB? Gigili?
 
I didn't.
anna
 
Oh you're right. I don't remember.
 
aka the infamous troll named 'gamahucher'.
 
I would remember that. And I don't. Searching is not helping.
 
I think it was around the time of the Persian Cat.
@Mitch I can't remember how we knew the gamahucher thing.
It's all deleted stuff now.
 
5:28 PM
NOt so long ago (Feb 12)
 
I just came across it when I was looking for something else.
@Mitch Really? Seems like ancient history.
 
rabbit hole, pissflaps, sure.
Ancient history is Jan '12. That's the cutoff.
 
Oh. Feb 2012.
I thought you meant Feb 12, 2014.
 
Hmm, I wish I could make Keepass autotype entries based on the URL of the currently opened page.
I can only do it for titles.
And page titles can sometimes be something like "Login".
That's unhelpful.
 
@KitFox If I had meant that I would have.. oh right, I didn't say it right.
 
user116848
Video seemed nice.
 
user116848
Thought I should share.
 
6:00 PM
Neat.
 
6:12 PM
Here's my joke.
This proves php developers can make money...
 
Shakespeare was dumb. — Mitch 36 secs ago
 
What the shit? Why is that question still open? Must be a dupe.
 
@Mitch It was nummy.
 
@cornbreadninja麵包忍者 Where's the milk?
 
@JarvistheBot In your tits.
 
6:24 PM
@cornbreadninja麵包忍者 Snap!
 
"What is word for collection of diaries?" A collection of effing diaries! Now shut the front door for cheese and rice sake.
 
What they want me to do: sign in to read the article. What I do: close the tab in my browser and sigh.
@Mitch I think they mean the word for the activity, like philaleo- phil- like whatever they call stamp collecting.
 
Philately.
Philately ( ) is the study of stamps and postal history and other related items. Philately involves more than just stamp collecting, which does not necessarily involve the study of stamps. It is possible to be a philatelist without owning any stamps. For instance, the stamps being studied may be very rare, or reside only in museums. Etymology The word "philately" is the English version of the French word "philatélie", coined by Georges Herpin in 1864. Herpin stated that stamps had been collected and studied for the previous six or seven years and a better name was required for the n...
 
That sounds dirty.
 
"Always start with new search - REFINE should not be the default - NEW Search should be the default" This seems counter-intuitive.
Tasty.
 
user116848
What's nummy?
 
It's a silly word for saying something tastes good.
 
user116848
Yeah very silly
 
user116848
So I guess someone should take Kitfox to take a bite haha
 
6:38 PM
I'm sorry, I don't get what you are trying to say.
 
user116848
To take a bite means--> To eat something, right?
 
yes
You mean, take me to get something to eat?
 
user116848
It was a joke. You know with all the talk of pizza and drinks etc. earlier. I didn't offend you or anything, right. I know you are very older than me. :)
 
Because that would be take Kit to get a bite.
If you mean to convince me to eat something, it would be "get Kit to take a bite".
 
user116848
So my sentence structure was not grammatical?
 
6:41 PM
@Rob I think most sports are an acquired taste. Prolly trivial to reduce them all to 'chasing a ball' or equivalent.
 
@Arrowfar I'm not offended. I understood you were joking, I just didn't get it.
@Arrowfar Grammatical, I just didn't understand it.
 
user116848
I see. ha
 
Take me to take a bite would imply that someone would bring me somewhere so I could literally take a bite out of some food.
So one of those "take" should be a "get", and I think it's the second.
 
user116848
Yeah that's what I meant
 
OK. hahaha
I have eaten already though, now.
 
user116848
6:43 PM
Good
 
Pasta can be replaced with broccoli and cauliflower, tastes better and looks better. If it is healthier depends on the amount of bs sprayed on it I guess.
 
I can't be that much older than you.
 
user116848
Me?
 
Yes.
Hello, IPU!
 
user116848
I think you are. :) But don't mind that though. haha
 
user116848
6:56 PM
I am in mid twenties.
 
user116848
How old do I look then?
 
I was going to guess 25.
 
user116848
Yeah 26.
 
Afternoon!
 
user116848
6:59 PM
@aediaλ Hi
 
Evening.
 
user116848
Hi
 

« first day (1337 days earlier)      last day (3585 days later) »