« first day (641 days earlier)      last day (4575 days later) » 

23:00
If you go out with a 19 year old when you are 15, you are precocious.
Feature, not bug.
@RegDwightАΑA Well, I don't know, I could get past that if she were really mature.
And if you do so at 49, you are perverse.
@tchrist Of course.
@Cerberus see that's another soft variable. And how many mature 20-somethings do you know anyway.
23:00
I certainly understand the desire, from two sides, even.
I don't believe they exist.
@RegDwightАΑA 20-somethings, many, of course, including myself!
@tchrist they themselves stop believing that as soon as they reach 40.
Oh, I meant twenty-year-olds.
Thanks.
23:01
@Cerberus you yourself will stop believing that as soon as you turn 40. Probably earlier.
20-y-o's are a but difficult. I might not be weirded out by 20 with 30 if 20 is really mature, but I don't remember ever seeing such a fabled animal.
But I'm not here anyway. Will catsup with your crazy talk tomorrow.
Ouvert et haut !
@RegDwightАΑA Yes. It is more about the difference: same perspective + same interests is what I expect. If you don't have that, the marriage looks odd to me. Other huge differences have the exact same mental effect on me, like in education or class.
@RegDwightАΑA Bye!
Sigh.
God yes.
The education/class thing.
It is sad.
Yeah.
Sad in what way?
23:05
So hard to connect.
Yeah.
There are only three classes. Those who don't work. Those who do work. And those who don't try.
And I must say different cultures looks similarly difficult to me, if they are wildly different.
@tchrist Huh?
Which creed is this?
The rich, the middle class, and the poor, respectively.
Eh.
I do not perceive classes like that at all.
23:07
As for whose creed, "The poor shall be with you always." (Matthew 14:7)
I don't know what class is.
I do know what education is.
Social background.
That isn't helping. Much.
Manners, speech, habits, friends, interests.
More like that.
Education is connected with it.
When they don't match, you have a problem.
I think of that is education, but . . .
How so?
23:09
I know different sets of people with 4-6 years of university who act completely unlike in those regards. Tastes and such.
Yeah.
So education is not everything.
Although those with 8-10 years are more similar.
Educations affects class, changes it a bit.
Like the people you socialise with.
I am just thinking of my own family. Both parents are one of five, so I have many couples to observe.
Do you see many odd couples?
23:11
No, not that way.
Not a class difference.
Just that the pastimes of the MD/PhD sorts are somewhat different than those of the others. More interesting to talk to.
My two favorite uncles are the ones with the most education. But they were my favorites from before then!
I mean, I knew them before they did all that, and I always liked them best.
They just seemed the most interesting.
Interests and education are interconnected in ways.
One influences the other.
They had curious minds.
Yes.
They've both lived abroad, studied other tongues.
And both went into research fields.
And their higher education also caused them to meet certain kind of people and shaped their interests a bit more.
23:15
Their wives are the most interesting of any of my non-blood aunts.
My one blood-aunt is an RN, and quite interesting.
She is only 7 years older than me, and lives nearby.
Registered Nurse.
23:15
She runs a government food aid program to single and poor mothers.
Do non-registered nurses exist?
There are "ranks".
Licensed practical nurse, whatever that is.
23:16
Nurse practitioner.
I think most couples are fairly alike.
She has a return of cancer. It is hard. The chemo wasn't very effective. They will take it out next week I think.
But some very different ones seem to be quite happy.
She is the youngest of all ten, and has had the hardest time with her health.
Oh, that sucks.
Is the prognosis good, bad, or no idea?
23:18
I see her mother in her. We all do. But she is sweet as anything.
Unclear.
They think they will get it.
Hmm.
She had colon cancer 7 years ago.
She stopped getting scans because of no health coverage.
And it came back, this time in the liver.
Oh, dear.
So they will take an entire lobe, and the gall bladder.
I have heard some surprisingly good recovery cases from liver cancer.
23:19
My sister had just had a son. She lost her insurance coverage that lingered from her previous job, and was going to school. She couldn't get coverage from the father whom she lives with, because his divorce could not be finalized for one year by state law.
And so they are coming after him to pay the bills from the delivery.
She would have been covered by his insurance if he had been allowed to marry her.
But the state wouldn't allow it.
And now they are coming after him for a great deal of money.
My friend's mother was told by hospital 1 that it was a lost cause, they wouldn't even try. It was in her lung, liver, and somewhere else. Next hospital said "meh, well, we could give it a try". They cut out most of her liver and the other stuff. She has been going strong for several years now.
You have no idea how much I hate this nonhealthcare system.
My father has made it almost 20 years longer than he was told it was over.
Not doing well, though.
Oh...why not well? Has it returned?
Even this is another travesty situation I don't want to get into. Evil are the ways of men.
No, not cancer.
Diabetes.
Oh, OK.
So will all this change with Obama's project?
23:22
Some, yes.
What won't?
Because in 2014, they will not be allowed to turn people down, nor treat them differently.
user19161
I am late to an interesting conversation. BTW, where does n/2+7 come from?
age of partners, Jasper.
It's an off-the-cuff calculation.
user19161
I know, but why?
23:23
36 year old can date a 36/2+7 = 25 year old.
user19161
-x sounds more sensible to me though.
@tchrist That is good.
What does that mean?
user19161
As in -x instead of n/2+7
23:25
But -x is not reasonable.
Let's say -5.
Now apply that to age 15, 20, 30, 50, 70.
user19161
@tchrist I am always amazed by the stupidity and evil of mankind.
See the problem?
user19161
@tchrist Actually they all work quite well except for the first one.
15 with 3, great idea.
@JasperLoy I'm not a huge fan of 20 with 5 either.
Ok, so you are saying that 50 and 44 is wrong?
user19161
23:27
@Cerberus You mean 20 with 15.
@Cerberus No.
Oh, in that way.
I think everyone agrees that differences matter less as you get older.
user19161
I think +/-5 is good.
How about 60 with 70?
user19161
But maximum is +/-10.
23:29
How about 61 with 73?
user19161
There can always be exceptions in special cases.
You must scale for age.
You cannot apply a minus that does not do so.
It leads to paradoxes.
I'll stick with the traditional formula.
To wit?
user19161
@Cerberus Which is?
23:30
@tchrist The one your mentioned.
@Mitch I figured someone would do this. :)
It's not really traditional, but often heard, you know.
Yes.
And I really think health and looks matter too.
user19161
23:31
So according to both formulas, @Cerb and I can get married, hehe.
user19161
...
crosses eyes
Hehe.
Hehe marriages are controversial.
user19161
@tchrist Hehe!
1
Q: What does “If women were a country, the Japanese World Cup champion soccer team wouldn’t have flown coach” mean?

Yoichi OishiThe Washington Post’s (August 13) article titled “The Women’s Olympic success: a flood that began as a trickle” begins with the following lines: “The phrase running around the Olympic Village on the last day of the London Games was, “If women were a country. . .” The phrase will be one of the le...

I can speak no ill of Yoichi-san.
user19161
23:34
@tchrist I wonder whether he eats sushi every day.
Sometimes, though, his naïveté reminds me of someone much younger.
Why would he do that?
user19161
@tchrist I am Non Sequitur.
I felt bad when us grownups were talking over Luke’s head, too.
user19161
Robusto gave me that name for a reason.
It is too easy to forget that people have ages.
user19161
23:35
@tchrist What did you do? I saw nothing bad.
Off the net.
People said things he didn’t understand.
And we knew he wouldn’t understand them.
user19161
Well, this room is called Incomprehensible for a reason.
Nor did we explain them.
I really really hated it when grownups would do that to me.
user19161
There are people talking in foreign tongues too.
We may have well been.
I don't know. I still feel bad.
user19161
23:37
Talking about sushi or rather sashimi, I really only like raw salmon.
saba
I have a dirty little secret.
I am a . . . sushitarian.
@tchrist In general, we shouldn't, although parallel conversations are exempt.
user19161
Salmon is so wonderful. It is nice however you eat it.
Half-cooked is not so good.
Raw is fine.
user19161
@Cerberus Well, as long as we don't consciously bully someone.
23:38
Cooked is also fine.
By the way, I don't quite understand the "if women were a country" either.
But half-cooked is a bit weird.
user19161
@tchrist I am not even sure what that means.
I don't think it matches up.
First of all, it would have to a "female country", not "women".
I cooked some salmon once and someone took ill at the texture of the uncooked insides.
Perhaps I should have gutted it first.
JUST KIDDING!
23:39
Eww.
user19161
@tchrist What!
user19161
I can't even fry an egg properly.
"insides" has a double meaning in English.
For what it's worth, some people like salmon to be bit raw on the inside, like a steak, while others like it cooked.
Yes, that was the problem.
One’s insides are one’s intestines and such, sometimes.
user19161
23:41
Salmon is nice raw, smoked or boiled in plain water.
I think the latter group is larger, but the former may have tradition on its side.
user19161
@tchrist That was my first reading. Though I have a small vocab, I understand the words I understand.
user19161
Pig's insides are very popular food here.
@tchrist Still waiting for this, btw.
Can modesty be a vice?
23:42
When you are as modest as I am, then yes.
@KitFox EEK!
user19161
@KitFox So modest!
Exceedingly.
So modest, I make angels blush.
user19161
@kit Any motivation for your new avatar?
Blowing things up.
And I thought people might like to see the real me.
23:44
user19161
@KitFox Erm, I see nothing there.
But the response has been slim to non-existent, so I will probably go back.
@JasperLoy You can't see a girl with a bazooka?
user19161
@KitFox Yes, but that is not you.
@tchrist That's not remotely gory.
@JasperLoy Yes, it is.
@tchrist Aww, purdy.
user19161
23:47
What's with the recent use of purdy?
user19161
We may summon Jon with too many copies of it.
Dunno.
Wow.
I didn't know you were black.
user19161
That black fox looks evil.
You have some sort of problem with black foxen?
user19161
23:49
Nope.
It looks cute.
user19161
Wow, Yoichi is almost 10k with newspaper articles.
By the way, you purple boxen, could you change your colours or feathers a bit?
A new icon will do you good.
You know who you are, you purple box.
user19161
23:51
@Cerberus I have been thinking of a "permanent one" but have not decided.
If you say so.
@JasperLoy Good thinking.
user19161
@tchrist You are purple too actually.
I spent 99% of my time on SE unable to see icons.
Haha.
How would you feel if I looked almost the same as Kit?
23:52
So it has never mattered to me.
I was first.
And you can be first again!, to change.
user19161
@Cerberus Actually we should all not use animals!
Animals are good.
You were first what now?
user19161
23:53
I think my default one is very ugly.
user19161
I am still waiting for TPTB to delete 8 accounts.
Kitty!
Jump!
Wow.
@JasperLoy I thought you had a new recent pic for some sort of ID?
23:54
Superkitty.
I like.
user19161
@KitFox Oh, I put up two even more recent ones after that a few months ago. I think you saw them.
Is that your cat?
23:55
Or I am his.
He’s 20 years old.
And he is still superkitty.
He climbs up the side of the house to get to the balcony.
Me and Cerb demonstrate the English alphabet.
23:56
@Cerberus Thanks. I've wondered about that for a while now.
@tchrist Ohh that's the one. Great.
@KitFox I love this one too. Even better in motion.
@KitFox Although the y looks a bit too think on the left side.
@tchrist Also cute.

« first day (641 days earlier)      last day (4575 days later) »