« first day (174 days earlier)      last day (4741 days later) » 

2:00 PM
Re: the 'h' pronunciation question, I definitely recall one of the linguist-types (nohat? Kosmonaut?) answering this question, calling it a hypercorrection. But I can't find it.
 
I think it sounds a bit Spanish or something?
Pronouncing an h where there ain't none.
Wow we have two rows of people in chat.
What ever should we do without lurkers?
 
/kick lurkers
/start with=@Dori
Hm. That summoned kiamlaluno. Interesting.-
 
@Cerberus Well, I'm going to ensure that you don't have to find out, because it's lurker mode for me, gotta get to work.
 
@Martha I couldn't find anything by either nohat or Kosmonaut BTW.
You might be imagining it.
Absence of evidence is evidence of absence, after all.
 
@Martha: Thank you! You are too kind. Though I appreciate you even as a non-lurker.
 
2:08 PM
@RegDwight I imagine that's possible.
 
@JSBangs How about answering this one?
1
Q: in special cases, can you use "one such family are" vs. "one such family is"?

MichaelIs it correct to say "one such family are..." as opposed to "one such family is..." in some circumstances? Say, for instance as used in the article here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gene_family [...] One such family are the genes for human haemoglobin subunits; [...] The problem occurs wh...

It could use some help from a linguist.
 
I think that one is a mixture of two questions: 1. my commercialese question, and 2. can collective nouns have plural verbs?
 
The opinions are divided.
 
The latter of which is a big duplicate.
 
Some people say that it's just the one, others say that it's just the other.
Everybody has like 0-2 upvotes.
We should be able to do better than that.
 
2:13 PM
I think I got tired looking at that question. Perhaps I'll look at it again...
I also think that, while PSM probably answered all that is known about the workings of subject v. subject-complement agreement, there is more to be said on that topic, perhaps some systematic approach, with consistent tests or something. But I don't have the answer, obviously.
 
More to the point, I have no idea if matthias is right: "I think you have that backwards- the subject complement by definition follows the linking verb and serves to "rename" the subject. I can't find any case where the subject complement precedes the linking verb, or where the linking verb disagrees with its preceding noun."
If that is true, it renders your question meaningless.
 
Well, I believe most style books (and also PSM I think?) say the same.
 
So does Wikipedia, apparently.
 
But I am not fully convinced yet—nor of the opposite.
 
That's why I'm crying for halp from @JSBangs.
Personally, I am too spoiled by free-order languages.
 
2:19 PM
I think this is rather a matter of style than of science; but science may give us the building blocks for good style advice.
 
@RegDwight Better known as scrambling languages. Though German is not considered a scrambling language (but Russian is).
 
You will see singular noun - plural verb - plural noun in many cases; but is it proper style?
 
@Kosmonaut Yeah, I wasn't including German in my count.
 
I think it is too stylistic a matter for the CGEL; but, who knows, it might have something useful to say.
 
@RegDwight — It depends on how you define "dead".
 
2:22 PM
@Robusto as in "dead wrong".
 
Meh scrolling often doesn't work properly for me in this chat.
 
Apr 1 at 12:23, by RegDwight
Sie müssen nur den Nippel durch die Lasche ziehn, und mit der kleinen Kurbel ganz nach oben drehn. Da erscheint sofort ein Pfeil, und da drücken Sie dann drauf.
 
Ja danke sehr... aber das geht leider auch nicht.
 
Dann machst Du was falsch.
 
It just goes back to the bottom before I can see what it was pointing to.
 
2:24 PM
I'm having the same problem today.
 
Let me try again. It works occasionally, or after a lot of tries.
See? Now it works.
 
I'm just too lazy to restart.
 
Isn't that Murphy's Law?
Restart? Why would you want to restart?
 
Cause it might be ze brauserr.
 
It probably is.
 
2:26 PM
But since you're having the same problem, I have one reason less to restart.
 
It is a combination of Firefox and Windows 7 on an old PC.
 
Ubuntu here.
Ah, screw it, lemme try.
 
curious
 
I have already posted the problem on some SE sites but nobody had any help to offer.
 
@RegDwight i'm looking at that question you linked, but it's a puzzler
 
2:27 PM
@JSBangs See, I told you.
 
I think "a family is/are" and "my goal is/are the stars" together would solve it, to the extent that that is even possible.
 
What does "13 year-old experience" mean? Does Alenanno mean his experience is 13 years old, as in "not updated"?
 
I.e. it is like "my ultimate beacon is/are my family".
@Kiam: context?
 
@Cerberus Probably that train wreck.
 
@Cerberus It's a comment he wrote.
 
2:31 PM
Heh.
 
6
A: How does one correctly pronounce the letter 'H': "Aych" or "haych" ?

AlenannoAccording to the OALD, the standard way to pronounce the H is this one, which is without the "H" sound in its pronunciation. Although on Wikipedia, it says there is also the other pronunciation (with the "H" sound at the beginning) which, anyway, is considered to be nonstandard.

Ayup. It is the train wreck.
 
Oh he means "thirteen years of experience"?
 
F'x
@RegDwight when you see “add / show 20 more comments”, that's a very bad omen
 
Yeah I was afraid to even click it...
 
@Fx That's why such threads get auto-flagged for mod attention.
 
2:33 PM
I was about to lock it when @RegDwight posted another comment... :)
 
@Kosmonaut I was about to delete it wholesale when you started posting yours.
So I figured, we're having a party, I don't wanna be missing out.
 
@RegDwight I am about to delete you wholesale.
 
@RegDwight Ooh! Comment party?
 
@Kosmonaut You're a whoresale.
 
@Martha, please close this chat.
 
2:34 PM
@RegDwight I see what you did there.
 
@Kosmonaut Enjoy it while it lasts. You're about to get merged with that Cosmonut.
 
You know what's weird? I had the Tetris Effect yesterday, with some of your avatars.
Sick, huh.
 
@Cerberus Gross.
 
Yeah I know.
 
That strap-on I could handle, but this...
 
2:35 PM
Hmm! Guys, you all are really hilarious, but i am too slow to get to up your sense of humor, so I'll go. See you.
 
It is like saying "I dreamed about you"—which I didn't, by the way.
Aww. Hi and bye, @Brill!
By the way, if anyone's slow, it is I!
 
@MrHen Yeah, and as a mod, you have to read all that stuff so that other people don't have to. Grrrr.
@brilliant Not if I see you first.
@Cerberus Should be "it am I", you ananas.
 
@RegDwight Lucky you. :P
 
There you have your subject complement.
 
I will go find some random stuff and flag it for you; does that help?
/me proceeds to flag comments in the thread the mods already know about.
 
2:38 PM
@MrHen I will go find some spam stuff and un-delete it and merge it into your account. Would that help?
 
@Cerberus Uh... ok... Thwacks all around, I guess?
(And for this I interrupted my working. Hmph.)
 
"All around" is the bare minimum of the thwacks required.
 
@Reg: Right! And it gets even messier with relative clauses: The man that I am...
@Martha: Much appreciated!
 
It are them that am the man that I is.
 
Oh, and just to make sure things are good and properly derailed:
 
2:42 PM
noooooooo pics
 
23 secs ago, by RegDwight
noooooooo pics
 
There. My work here is done. Can I go back to work now?
 
Nobody reads the stuff you post under baby photos.
Too busy processing the photo.
So in the mean time you might just as well fly to Hungry and back, nobody would notice.
 
@RegDwight It's a baby. How much processing is needed?
 
2:45 PM
@MrHen Very. That's how much.
But if you're saying that @Martha can't go back to work because of you, go ahead and talk to her.
 
@RegDwight I'd hate to see what happens if someone showed you a Mandlebrot
 
You mean this Mandelbrot?
 
@RegDwight Not exactly; no.
But it apparently has the same effect.
 
Well, that's the only Mandelbrot I know.
 
 
2:50 PM
i assume that the real explosion would be if you showed us a picture of Mandelbrot's adorable grandchild
 
awwww
 
@Martha OLD.
 
Well, sorr-ee.
 
5 mins ago, by RegDwight
user image
 
2:53 PM
That is old, too.
 
@Cerberus " I didn't, I simply rely on an official source, which is the Oxford Advanced Learner's Dictionary (the NOAD and the OED confirm this as well), and also on my 13 year-old experience with English."
 
@kiamlaluno I just realized that my experience is way older than 13 years, and I still don't know jack shit about English.
 
Unfortunately, I don't have any of the newer pictures on this computer, so I can't put you guys into a proper sugar coma.
 
@RegDwight I reported what Alenanno wrote. :-)
 
2:55 PM
I know.
 
Anyway, that's it for me, back to lurking. Don't bug me unless the puns are truly egregious.
 
And I replied.
 
I have never heard anybody saying "my 13 year-old experience."
 
This is called "conversation".
Conversazzione.
 
@kiamlaluno unless you mean your vast experience with 13-year-olds
 
2:56 PM
@JSBangs That would be @Cerberus.
 
@JSBangs Hmm...
 
What?
 
Mar 7 at 21:40, by Cerberus
We probably need a native speaker for the correct term, preferably a 16-y-o girl from the Mid West.
 
Dear God.
 
@RegDwight Oh please! I kill English, but don't kill Italian! Conversazione!
 
2:57 PM
@Cerberus You can call me Reg.
@kiamlaluno Orly?
Mar 14 at 14:26, by kiamlaluno
"Nobless s'oblique" (whatever it is written in French).
 
Dearie, why are my girls always being quoted?
 
Apr 27 at 23:34, by kiamlaluno
@RegDwight Auf vidersen.
Should I go on, you language-killing mafioso?
 
@RegDwight I have never said I know French. :-) I can speak it, maybe, but not write it.
 
@kiamlaluno Please point me to the place where I said I know Italian.
 
Hey, is mafia spelled with one or two f's in Eyetalian?
 
2:59 PM
2 mins ago, by RegDwight
@Cerberus You can call me Reg.
 
@MrHen Yeah I saw that.
 
@MrHen — We are all @RegDwight.
 
Not another mad quoter!
 
@RegDwight Usually it's southern people that use double consonants. Mafiosi people are from South Italy. :-)
 
20
Q: We're all Rebecca Chernoff \o/

Yi JiangOn this frabjous day, our community manager Rebecca Chernoff has graciously allowed all of us *1 to be her for one day, and one day only. And so, ladies and gentlemen, let me present to you: We're all Rebecca Chernoff \o/ A userscript dedicated to making all of you Rebecca Chernoffs. Reall...

 
3:00 PM
@Cerberus — I could tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.
 
@kiamlaluno Please stop misspelling Cerberus as RegDwight.
 
@RegDwight — Put your macro away. Sheesh.
 
@Cerberus I follow God. Therefore I follow @RegDwight.
 
@Robusto Word.
 
@Rob" Ahh... well that's worth it!
 
3:00 PM
@RegDwight You are following the "Italian Language and Usage" proposal; isn't that a proof?
 
@MrH: Be careful, or you'll end up in an ugly compound in Pakistan too!
 
@kiamlaluno I am following every proposal ever.
 
Religion => ugly compound.
 
@Cerberus I follow metaphorically not physically.
 
Jan 28 at 15:27, by RegDwight
@kiamlaluno: just visit my user profile, click on "accounts", and you'll be surprised to learn how many StackExchanges are out there.
 
3:01 PM
That's how it starts!
 
So there. Put it in your pipe and smoke it.
 
Ewww.
 
@Cer: actually, CGEL should cover that. It has a whopping 7 pages on right and left dislocation. There is no reason it wouldn't cover number agreement.
 
Dislocation? Is that what they call inversion?
 
@RegDwight You said "Should I go on, you language-killing mafioso." It was not me to say conversazzione, though. ;-)
 
3:03 PM
In syntax, dislocation is a sentence structure in which a constituent which could otherwise be either an argument or an adjunct of the clause occurs outside the clause boundaries either to its left or to its right as in English They went to the store, Mary and Peter. The dislocated element is often separated by a pause (comma in writing) from the rest of the sentence. Its place within the clause is often occupied by a pronoun (e.g. they). There are two types of dislocation: right dislocation, in which the constituent is postponed (as in the above example), or a left dislocation, in w...
 
@kiamlaluno Read the posts in their order. Sheesh.
 
@Vit: It is no so much a matter of covering the subject, but rather of reporting on usage v. recommending proper style.
 
@RegDwight And I am not following any French proposal.
 
I said "conversazzione" -> you said I was killing Italian -> I pointed out a few languages you have killed. Now what?
Order matters.
 
@Cer: ah that. Well, they mention that it is more used in informal styles for dislocation.
 
3:04 PM
@RegDwight That is the order: conversazzione, and "Should I go on, you language-killing mafioso."
 
1
Q: What does "put it down on me" mean?

JayWhat does the phrase "put it down on me" mean? Thanks.

How does this have 3.7k views?!
 
@kiamlaluno No. See above.
 
@Vit: Ah, ok. But that does not cover inversion, then? In "what am I?", it all ahppens within the boundaries of teh clause.
 
Ah, it is from March.
 
@RegDwight In fact it matters; only southern Italians would say conversazzione, and Mafia comes from Southern Italy.
 
3:05 PM
@Cer: what was the matter exactly? I am struggling to figure it out from the transcript.
 
1
Q: in special cases, can you use "one such family are" vs. "one such family is"?

MichaelIs it correct to say "one such family are..." as opposed to "one such family is..." in some circumstances? Say, for instance as used in the article here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gene_family [...] One such family are the genes for human haemoglobin subunits; [...] The problem occurs wh...

 
Yeah, I figured as much @Reg, thanks.
Then the question is, how is “what am I?” relevant, @Cer?
 
The question would be: is "goal" subject or complement in the following sentence, and with which word should the verb agree? Our goal was/were the stars. If there is inversion, that would change things.
 
huh?
 
@JSBangs: Do you think would work for this question as well:
5
Q: Is the computer-related term "character" understood by the general population?

daveThe following kind message is common in programming: Your password must be at least six characters long and include at least one letter and one number Would an average person understand what that message means? Is it reasonable to assume they'd understand the distinction between a cha...

You seem to be the tag expert. :)
 
3:08 PM
@Vit: In "what am I?", the question would still be: how does it work? Why does the verb agree with the last nominal constituent instead of the first? That is conventionally explained by question inversion. But there is also "the man that I am", in which it is explained by some sort of relative inversion.
 
I vaguely remember CGEL saying that “our goal were the stars” would be simply ungrammatical, but let me check. It might take a while.
 
@Vit: By the way, I went to the library and scanned the pages of the CGEL about its definition of clauses.
Haven't read them yet, though.
 
Oh, yeah?
What's your impression?
 
I feel that I need to read the Preliminaries to understand their point of view.
2
Maybe I'll do that now, why not.
 
Opinion question (@RegDwight, if you are still here):
Should the suggested edit there be approved?
I am not sure how to handle that.
Ah, wait. Now I see that Kosmo approved it
Nevermind
Still getting used to that area of the interface. :P
 
3:15 PM
just to clarify, the actual book or the sample chapters, @Cer?
 
@Vit: Actual book: I went to the library and took photos of about 20 pages I found interesting with my phone.
 
Oh. Ok.
 
In fact it would be quite doable to scan the whole book. Just 900 photos. I'm a bit too lazy for that, though.
 
Sure, with this:
 
That thing is pretty sweet. But how does it separate sticky pages?
 
3:22 PM
With extreme violence.
1
A: Good movies for learning English

vgv8If to combine business with pleasure I'd recommed: A Beatiful Mind Apocalypto Cube Dark Matter Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind Fear and Trembling Memento Orhan Secretary The Reader

 
anyway, at p. 353 of CGEL, our is not listed among dependents that select a singular head @Cer
 
"Good movies for learning English: Apocalypto."
Hilarious.
 
Hm, that was an elongated lunch time...
 
@RegDwight — All of Charlie Chaplin's films were great for learning English.
 
@Robusto Stonk!
 
3:24 PM
@Vit: What does that mean?
 
I can tell there's been heaps of fun conversation all up in here, put it down on me.
Yikes.
 
@Cer: that means that “Our goal were the stars” is ungrammatical. More or less.
 
Oh. Well the word "our" doesn't really matter.
It could be "my" as well.
 
Unless I am mistaken of course. ;)
 
I think that example would be wrong in most respects. But it gets more complicated and less intuitive with longer sentences.
 
3:30 PM
Wow, I didn't know that moderators delete a comment, when they flag it as noisy/spam/etc.
I must remember that.
 
You know what? We should found a religion: Cgelianity, Cgelianism or something along those lines. Then we would get all kinds of CGEL hermeneutics. Well of course as a side-effect there would be loads of irrelevant textual “research,” but then again we would get to read one or two explanations of CGEL (preferably by Bart D. Ehrman). @Cerberus
 
So there you go. Vitaly is so sick and tired of religions, he's founding his own.
 
@Vit: That would be cool! You shall be its first prophet.
 
V. Ron Hubbard.
 
Comte, rather.
Much more respectable and rationalist.
That is, I have no idea what has become of Positivism. It is supposedly still significant in Brazil.
 
3:33 PM
Isn't Hubbard the person who made the first heart transplant?
 
@Cerberus You can't stay negative while dancing samba 24/7.
 
Haha that must be it!
No, Hubbard was the guy who invented fire, and the printing press, I believe.
 
You can stay negative, if you keep to hit your own foot.
 
*hitting
 
@Cerberus Hubbard invented hubs.
 
3:35 PM
@kiamlaluno Then you just stop to hit your own foot. Problem solved.
 
@RegDwight Then I should stop dancing.
 
Hubbard also invented Hubba-Bubba.
 
What are you saying @RegDwight? The Universe would have no meaning without hitting yourself in the foot! Blasphemy!
 
And the Hubbard telescope.
 
@RegDwight Nah! That was Bubbard; even rocks know it.
Bubbard was who first said "what are you bubbling?"
 
3:38 PM
And don't forget Sir Wrigley Sperm, who invented Wrigley's Sperm, Int.
 
@RegDwight Isn't that the Bubbard telescope?
Hubbard was all but a hubby.
 
Oh God, if my comment was an answer it wouldn't have been a comment. :/
 
Huh wha?
 
1
Q: Is there an English word for "awaiting for approval"?

egarciaHi there, I'm developing a web application. Some of the entities on that application require to be "approved" before they are considered "valid" by the system. I need to name the state in which they are "awaiting for approval". Is there a shorter construction to convey the same meaning as "awai...

 
Yeah, I'm in that thread already.
 
3:49 PM
Answering these kinds of questions would be so much simpler if there was either more context or none at all, methinks.
 
0
Q: english doubt - what "its not going to suck itself" means?

priteesh shankari see tourists wearing t-shirt that say "its not going to suck itself" with red arrow, in goa. what it means?

 
Jinx.
 
Just why do Indians keep using "doubt" when they mean "question"?
16
Q: A question regarding the use of "doubt" to mean "question".

Dennis WilliamsonI often see questions on Stack Exchange sites which I presume are written by non-native English speakers who use the word "doubt" in place of the word "question". Is this a case of misunderstanding the correct meaning or are people being taught that this is correct usage?

 
I edited the first one of those two, not quite perfectly.
 
I wonder if the T-shirts actually say "its".
 
3:55 PM
speaking of dialectal variation, I have recently talked to a guy from Uganda who insisted that “it's no use of bringing <…>” is correct, as opposed to “it's no use bringing <…>” or “it's no use in bringing <…>”
I wonder if it's just his idiolect or some local Ugandan dialect
 
I just wonder.
 
@Vitaly We have a site. It accepts questions.
You could be at 5k by now.
 
A rhetorical question is a figure of speech in the form of a question posed for its persuasive effect without the expectation of a reply. Rhetorical questions encourage the listener to think about what the (often obvious) answer to the question must be. When a speaker states, "How much longer must our people endure this injustice?", no formal answer is expected. Rather, it is a device used by the speaker to assert or deny something. (e.g.: "Why me?") While amusing and often humorous, rhetorical questions are rarely meant for pure, comedic effect. A carefully crafted question can, if deli...
 
It doesn't have to be rhetorical.
 
actually, I think I'd have a go at it
will I get cookies?
 
3:59 PM
I dunno, cause I have to leave, and I'm not sure if anyone else has cookies to handle out.
 
You always have to leave when I come here.
 
You could feature-request a 'cookies' badge, perhaps.
 
Suit yourselves.
 
later @RegDwight
 
I'm out!
 
4:02 PM
See ya.
 
@RegDwight I'm curious: how does one "handle out" cookies? What kind of handle do you use?
 
Does a hand count as handle?
That money is fake: the paper is too thin, and smooth.
 
That money might be fake, but not because it's too thin or smooth. Freshly-printed bills are very smooth, and thus thin. (If the ATM has been recently refilled with fresh money, I end up taking each individual bill, crumpling it up, and smoothing it back out. Otherwise, I'm likely to hand over $60 instead of the intended $20.)
 
@Martha But the paper is not the right one.
 
0
Q: “It's no use of doing something”

VitalyI have recently encountered a person from Uganda who insisted that the the phrase “It’s no use of doing something” is correct, as opposed to “It’s no use _ doing something” and “It’s no use in doing something.” Taking the descriptive approach, would that usage be correct in Ugandan English as op...

 
4:13 PM
Why not ask for opinions over at skeptics.SE?
They're bound to have all the facts regarding fake money.
Of any money, for that matter.
 
@Martha: would “There is no use in doing” sound correct to you?
 
@Vitaly I've heard 'It's of no use...' before, but not '... no use of'.
 
@MrDisappointment I have never though of that.
 
@Vitaly The in still seems superfluous, but it doesn't sound outright incorrect with "There's".
 
Hmph.
I think I will just edit the in version out.
Sorry @Martha, your comment doesn't make sense anymore. :(
 
4:19 PM
I'll delete it.
In fact, I have deleted it.
 
OK.
I wonder what contributes to it other than “There's”
 
wait, wait, could this possibly be a chance to create ?
 
Oh.
 
yeah, I tried that one already, it's out of the question
1 min ago, by Vitaly
I wonder what contributes to it other than “There's”
 
4:24 PM
I see no use in taming monkeys?
As long as it doesn't get too close to "x is no use", it might be acceptable with "in"...
"It is no use (in) x-ing" is too close.
 
Makes sense.
 
Oh I was going to read my Preliminaries.
 
If OT is the short for off-topic, what is the short for on-topic?
 
4:45 PM
1
A: “It's no use of doing something”

Colin FineI don't find any results on either COCA or BNC for "it's no use of", as expected, but there are a few on google, and not all are asking about the phrase. For example: Quote from Zora Neale Hurston "A warning to humanity" Lingua Franca Whether it is used in Uganda or not I can't say, but there...

so, an American folklorist, an Indonesian, and some weird guy
with a chance that those are just typos
No Ugandans so far.
 
Maybe he meant "nonuse," but he should not say "it's nonuse of."
 
0
A: “It's no use of doing something”

MrHenI am not a descriptive expert but I think there is a line to be drawn between literally describing what someone does and being able to identify how to communicate in English. In this case, the meaning is certainly clear and a Ugandan speaker claims that it is the correct way to speak something in...

I have just read it all. Give me my cookies. I deserve it.
I need a second opinion on @MrHen's answer.
He has certainly put some effort into it, but the post doesn't seem to answer the question conclusively, I think.
 
5:24 PM
@Vitaly Hey @Vitaly
 
Hi @MrHen
 
My answer ended up as not terribly conclusive but it was the best I could do with the resources I had.
 
Yeah, I realise it actually.
 
Part of what I was trying to do was show some sort of pattern for future questions like this
I think asking about Ugandan English is great but it seems we have a gap in our line of experts
 
I am currently trying to crack a password-protected ZIP file containing a corpus of Indian English. Unfortunately, one would need to send a paper letter to the author for the password (wow, what a… clever guy).
And the reason for it is that some Indian agreed with the Ugandan.
 
5:27 PM
@Vitaly Yeah, I noticed more hits from India than Uganda when I was searching
I suspect they have a larger online presence
Here we go:
Here is a long shot for contact:
They have a contact page:
And seem to care about both Uganda and English in Africa
I sent them a question
We shall see
 
I shall let you have the privilege of contacting them, for your answer is currently the longest one, @MrHen. ;P
Never mind. lol.
 
@Vitaly :)
In any case, I could probably answer this within 48 hours if I cared enough to use the phone. :P
But I really don't
 
Also, my password crackers don't recognize the file as password-protected
So that's a closed road for me
 
:(
The Cambridge article showed a little promise but it still seems like too narrow a usage question to be a sure shot.
 
Can salmon be used as verb too?
 
5:43 PM
1 hour ago, by RegDwight
@Vitaly We have a site. It accepts questions.
:)
For what it's worth, none of the dictionaries I have access to lists it as a verb
not even the OED
 
I thought it was cool to say "I salmon you!"
@Vitaly Mine was not a question; that is why I didn't post it.
 
Oh, those Italians. Using the question mark to indicate non-questions. :P
 
@Vitaly We are worst. :-)
 

« first day (174 days earlier)      last day (4741 days later) »