So, for the past number of months (since late march), I have been waiting and waiting for an election so that I could use that as a logical break-point to step down....
@gnat: Maybe not "chatty" but in the sense that it asks a question about being a programmer rather than about a piece of code. If that's not on-topic for Programmers.SE then frak knows what that site's for — Lightness Races in Orbit29 mins ago
@o11c SirPython has a bot to pimp questions and answers. Currently, the bot isn't working. The idea is that a user goes there, subscribes to a few tags and then you are free to pimp a few questions and answers. The users subscribed to the tags in the question would be notified.
@Vogel612 The question I'm talking about is https://codereview.stackexchange.com/questions/43230/clone-of-boost-variant It's a great problem but really mind-warping.
and then add in pointer arithmetics and version issues everyone seems to magically know their way around as well as portability and compiler considerations ...
and then I'm completely lost in a forest of pointy braces, colons, ampersands and asterisks.
No, it's a clone of a common data structure, that happens to have an implementation in Boost. I've also implemented one myself, so I know I'm qualified (as much as anyone can be).
If you don't use MSVC, then the only time compiler versions make a difference is for new standards. If you *do* use MSVC, you don't even have a full implementation of old standards.
I am Submitting new Posts with a Front End Form, using:
http://malsup.github.com/jquery.form.js
Default WP jQuery (wp_enqueue_script("jquery");)
below code to submit form (new post)
jQuery(document).ready(function() {
jQuery("[id^=cred_form_1614]").ajaxForm(function() {
alert("Thank you for ...
e.g. I had to support GCC 4.6 for a while for a certain distro, then a newer release of the distro happened so I could raise my minimum requirement to a different distro.
GCC 4.7 is a pretty nice target, even if it's not quite complete for C++11 stuff.
clang sucks as a target since the version numbers are all screwy and there aren't many point releases.
I've never written C++14 yet. One of the reasons is I still use Windows for C++ development and my MSVC '13 Ultimate is doing relatively good. No need for change yet.
Although I hear C++14 has some very nifty features, like lambda.
Which would solve one of my current problems in a heartbeat. (And probably create 3 new ones, like every solution does).
The only C++14 feature I've played with is template string literals, and even that I can implement in an ifdef'd manner so I can still support C++11 (albeit with less checking).
To address how you can review your own code: you read a lot of good code, and you constantly compare how it is better than your own. What constitutes good code? You'll know it when you see it, after having read a lot of other code. Do read books about design patterns. Do not learn from books like How to learn PHP in 48 Hours. Post your code to Code Review and learn from others. (Don't worry about asking others; the whole point of that site is reviewing code!) Then you start writing reviews of other users' code, and see what feedback you get in comments and votes. — 200_success31 secs ago
So, basically, you say that you don't want your code reviewed, but this is actually a Code Review question in disguise. — 200_success54 secs ago
Say someone writes a question about some JavaScript code that does not use jQuery. Then, someone comes along to write a review.
In their review, the first thing they write is that the OP should use jQuery. Maybe they include a specific reason, or maybe they just say it will help overall.
Then, ...
@Quill codereview.stackexchange.com/q/96932/36366 You said you thought this was off-topic. You left no comment, made no close vote... and didn't make very much of a convincing case in here either.
You could write this in a fraction of the code, by consolidating some of your very similar lines. We can give you suggestions about how to do this on codereview.stackexchange.com, although these suggestions would be out of scope for StackOverflow. Don't worry - you're doing great and we were there too. — La-comadreja52 secs ago