« first day (2601 days earlier)      last day (2624 days later) » 

18:00
The complicated option is to press shift-F10 at the first install screen and that will open a command prompt. Then you can use the diskpart command to wipe the disk.
okay, so I have to install the windows 10 image first?
@PrathyushPoduval I like to keep the OS and user data separate, so I always use a 128GB C: drive for Windows and the rest of the disk as a D: drive where I keep my data. But for most users I'd say just partition it all as a single C: drive.
@PrathyushPoduval I'm not sure what you mean by that ...
the installer
for windows 10, the .iso file
18:03
Typically you download the installer from MS as an ISO. Then you either burn it to a DVD disk or extract it to a USB key. I recommend using the USB key as it's faster.
okay
I can download it from here right?
That's the very latest version direct from MS.
Click the Download tool now button
done it, "getting a few things ready" now
@JohnRennie I have a laptop with Windows 8. It doesn't work because MS released an update years ago that makes the updater program run all the time.
I haven't found any documentation about how to reliably fix this.
Advice?
@JohnRennie should I chose the "use recommended options"?
18:07
@DanielSank Copy off all the data, wipe the disk completely, then do a bare metal install using the ISO downloaded from the link above. Your Windows 8 licence key will work with Windows 10.
@PrathyushPoduval in the Download tool?
Erm, yes, I think so. The recommeded options normally get everything right.
okay, continuing..
it's downloading
@JohnRennie Is this recommendation based on the specific problem I have, or is this what you'd recommend whenever Windows does something non-ideal?
I'll do the install this sunday] @JohnRennie, I'll do the backup of my data before then
18:11
How big is the iso?
@DanielSank The latter. Windows is a hugely complicated OS and like all complex systems when it breaks weird emergent behaviour results. You can waste a lifetime figuring out exactly what is going wrong, or you can spend 15 minutes reinstalling Windows.
@DanielSank about 3GB
@JohnRennie Oh god, so a 32G drive might work?
@PrathyushPoduval If you want me to talk you through it I'll be happy to help. I've already done it for Kaumudi and Blue :-)
@JohnRennie You can install an OS, all your programs, and your user data in fifteen minutes?! o_O
@JohnRennie Yeah, that would be wonderful
18:12
Teach me the way.
@DanielSank Win10 will fit ona 32GB drive, but the problem is that apps will want to install themselves onto the same drive and lots of apps are big these days.
@JohnRennie Why would there by user programs on the USB?
@DanielSank ah, you mean a 32GB USB key for doing the install?
Yes, that's tons big enough. A 4GB key would work. ISOs aren't compressed.
@JohnRennie Ah, yes.
I want Windows for one program!
@PrathyushPoduval I'll be around from about 05:30 UTC on Saturday. Note I'm not around on Sunday 24th as I'll be driving to my Mum's house.
@DanielSank buy a spare laptop.
18:16
How about the week after that then? (I realised even I wont be here this sunday :P)
@DanielSank I know that seems a bit decadent, but you'll get a really good Dell laptop for less than $200 on eBay.
@JohnRennie I have one! It's really nice, but the OS received a patch that killed it and I never fixed it.
@PrathyushPoduval I'm around pretty much every day as I work from about 5:00 every day. Just not on Christmas eve :-)
@DanielSank ah, OK.
It's a fantastic Asus zenbook.
I loved it.
Yeah no problem, whenever you're free. So I'll ping you when I'm free next week (after christmas)?
18:18
@DanielSank Pro-tip - buy an SSD to replace the hard disk. The speed increase is unbelievable.
@PrathyushPoduval yes fine.
@JohnRennie It already has one. Does that make me a pro?
It does :-)
@EmilioPisanty I'm here now
Still need help?
@JohnRennie hot diggity!
18:23
@DanielSank Use a VM
Run Windows 7 inside VirtualBox
It's what I do whenever I need to use the dark side
@EmilioPisanty If you ever need me when I'm not here I'm usually reachable on Hangouts on [email protected]
@BernardoMeurer no, IT sorted it out
thanks tho
could use your input on the inking thing
@DanielSank Inkscape for a presentation?
sounds like a recipe for disaster
never used Google slides
might give them a try, but it doesn't sound like it's going to be a particularly reliable platform
@EmilioPisanty Inking thing?
but in any case, that's not really what "getting away from proprietary software" really looks like, is it?
@EmilioPisanty Here are some realistic solutions:
What is happening
18:34
Beamer (LaTeX), Google slides (there is probably a math plugin), uh.. not sure what else.
@BernardoMeurer adding this kind of inking in via stylus onto a set of conference slides
using non-proprietary software
@DanielSank how do you ink in math onto beamer?
Let me think for a moment
You mean using like a wacom tablet thingy?
@EmilioPisanty Wait, you want the funny looking script?
@BernardoMeurer I mean using a laptop touchscreen and a stylus. but the wacom tablet thingy also works.
@DanielSank yes
@EmilioPisanty oh. Ok I give up.
18:36
I find it to be very effective at conveying information in a simple way
@EmilioPisanty I would use Inkscape to make the drawings with SVG, and then make my presentations with Beamer (LaTeX) and import them there
#FREEDOM
@BernardoMeurer that sounds nice in the abstract, but it's nowhere near a scalable workflow
@EmilioPisanty Define scalable in this context
Actually, it's very scalable.
@BernardoMeurer I mean something that can produce the slides for an hour-long presentation and have them sit in a single file without creating a shower of auxiliary .svgs
18:38
You can import slides you've already made into a presentation.
where I can edit all of them within a single application
What's wrong with having your figures not embedded into the presentation?
It's considerably more scalable to not imbed them.
@EmilioPisanty I agree with Daniel, however I understand your critic
In that case I would consider making your images in Inkscape and the presentations in LibreOffice or OpenOffice
where I can add and substract elements directly onto the page (so I can e.g. slowly build up a diagram over several slides)
Or Google Slides if you want to use proprietary javascript
18:39
Libre/Open-Office's presentation program's kind of aren't that good.
where I can make the ink react to the typeset elements of the page
@EmilioPisanty Beamer has commands for that.
@DanielSank No, they are not good. But they work. I've done plenty presentations on them
(But ok, I admit beamer has its problems)
@EmilioPisanty Beamer supports all that, it's just kind of a PITA tbh
18:40
@DanielSank yes, but it'll take some very sophisticated interplay between beamer and the svgs to get it to work with the ink
but the real killer there is that if I e.g. need to translate the slides, or otherwise make small changes to the typeset elements, then it would require a lot of fine-tuned adjustment and/or re-creating a bunch of svgs from scratch
... and this might happen a full six months (or way more) after I made the original, so I don't have the details fresh
@EmilioPisanty Translation is no more work with beamer than with anything else...
I'm confused.
on power point, if you re-typeset some bit and the ink needs to respond, it's a few adjustments on the ink or possibly just adding some extra lines
What do you mean "ink"?
18:43
@DanielSank translating between English and Spanish will radically change the text lengths. If the ink is e.g. arrows between bits of text, then it'll likely need to be re-done
@DanielSank most everything you can't select as text in the pdf I linked
@EmilioPisanty Have you tried just using LibreOffice and embrancing the horrible UI?
@BernardoMeurer yes
That's what I did in HS, I hated my life but I was happy knowing I pleased the Gods
it is ranked, far and away, as the most painful experience I've ever had making a presentation
I am never doing that again
Honestly, If you really want good presentations AND you don't want to bother with complex software; I'd use Apple's Keynote software
it's gorgeous
Otherwise Malwaresoft's Office is supposedly good too
18:46
Or, you know, beamer...
> AND you don't want to bother with complex software;
Or Google slides, which is actually pretty nice.
beamer is complex
another nice example: ppt, pdf (with some font substitutions in the export)
GSlides is nice but last time I used it (a long time ago admittedly) it lacked features
18:47
@BernardoMeurer can you install keynote on windows? linux?
I assure you, @BernardoMeurer, that beamer is a bajillion times simpler than Keynote.
@DanielSank beamer has its purposes, and I do use it a fair bit
but there are design goals that it simply cannot reach
@DanielSank That is definitely not true. Think about that statement for one second.
My grandma uses keynote
If I told her to use beamer she would spontaneously combust
@EmilioPisanty Sadly no. Unless you have the, painful and illegal, knowhow of macOS VM setup
18:49
@DanielSank I think you have a programmer's mind and have forgotten that most people do not find typing arcane commands into a file and having it fail to compile a dozen times before getting any output "simple" :P
most likely
@DanielSank beamer is very simple to use if you're after a presentation that follows a very rigid template
@ACuriousMind No, I think I know I'm talking to a physicist who can operate with the software I'm recommending..
I wouldn't recommend Beamer to others.
Same as I wouldn't recommend vim to others.
@DanielSank But his whole point is he wants something v. simple and usable; no?
i.e. he doesn't want to bother with beamer's magic
He said "scalable".
@DanielSank scalable once the ink is taken into account ;-)
seriously, have a peek at them links I just posted and tell me they don't have a worthwhile aesthetic
it might not be your style
but it's my style ;-)
19:00
@EmilioPisanty I don't like them, but I always encourage making things you find beautiful
Unless you find truly egregious things beautiful
@BernardoMeurer where does comic sans fall on the egriegiousness scale?
::grins::
@EmilioPisanty They are very good.
no, just kidding, I wouldn't use comic sans on a professional presentation
Didn't know that "campo" is used in that sense.
I do use comic neue fairly often though, mostly to very nice effect
19:02
ugh
@DanielSank as in the "field" of "electric field"?
typesetting chat
yes, it is
@0celo7 yes, it is
=P
@DanielSank thank you
@EmilioPisanty Pretty low, Comic Sans is pretty much the staple of egregious
@BernardoMeurer =P
what about Comic Neue?
19:04
Was comic sans a joke font?
@EmilioPisanty yes
High school teachers seemed to like comic sans though
@DanielSank yeah, same etymology
@0celo7 joke fonts are a perilous line to walk
@EmilioPisanty Comic Neue is better, but still NO
So what's a field in terms of algebra then...
19:06
@CooperCape a ring with inverses
Okay I'll let that question slide then (for now...)
@BernardoMeurer ah, c'mon, Bernie, learn to love the com
@BernardoMeurer got an A in fortran
teach me C now
@EmilioPisanty @ACuriousMind I am being visually harassed
@CooperCape something that has all the properties you'd actually want to be able to call something "numbers"
19:07
Using Comic Sans goes against the Be Nice policy
@EmilioPisanty that's an awful thing to say
@0celo7 Nice, congrats!
natural numbers aren't numbers?
@0celo7 =P
Right...
19:08
they get about a 7/10 on number-ness
I'll leave this for a time I understand things better
integers aren't numbers?
@0celo7 those get an 8/10
rationals get a proper 10/10
complex numbers are 10+i/10
@EmilioPisanty I feel uncomfortable rating the integers with a rational :P
2
19:09
@ACuriousMind True
@ACuriousMind have you watched the Sopranos
@CooperCape To appease @0celo7 a bit: a field is a set that's endowed with all the operations that fit within the standard definition of arithmetic (addition, subtraction, multiplication, division) and they work just as well as they do for the rationals with no ifs or buts
@CooperCape Just google field and read the property list, it's pretty easy
(by contrast, on a ring, you might not be able to divide properly)
If I can understand it anyone can
19:11
ok, maybe with a couple ifs or buts
@0celo7 Not yet, no. I don't think I'll do that anytime soon
you might not be able to do something like $(1+1+1)/(1+1)$ over some fields
you what...
crikey
@CooperCape =P
$\mathbb Z_2={0,1}$ is a field
idk what the significance of that is either
19:12
under standard multiplication and addition
work in a field of characteristic 3 and then 1+1+1=0
where you define $1+1=0$
why is 1+1 0
Actually don't answer that I'll learn sometime soon
Like a week
@CooperCape because in some circumstances it can be a useful thing to do
because mathematicians can't count so they made up new spaces where their shit arithmetic is correct
2
why do you think physicists invented fermions? the minus signs didn't work out so they said "fuck you nature I'll invent anticommuting variables"
Ahh yeah fair that makes sense of course
@CooperCape Maybe give this tutorial a whirl
adapt. overcome.
there's a third one but I forgot it
I haven't read that one specifically but, generally speaking,
19:15
@EmilioPisanty I've just bought a book wit all of this in arriving soon just read contents and hadn't heard of a fieldy-wieldy in terms of algebra
So sometime in le future
@CooperCape sure
I'll check the linky out tho
@CooperCape yeah, maybe not that one specifically but there's lots of cool stuff there
One useful resource.
I went through the elliptic curves one recently and it's awesome
Anonymous
19:16
@CooperCape I'd advice not moving too fast through this stuff...
Oh yeah I know I just wondered what it was
I don't have a clue about any of this, however.
Anonymous
I tried that...it doesn't work. Do LA properly first
linear algebra is worthless
@Slereah do you understand the spectral crap now?
Not yet
I had to go home!
I'll read on more tomorrow
@Blue this. Do linear algebra properly first.
19:18
@Slereah you're gonna learn direct integration which is awesome
Anonymous
@0celo7 It's probably the most useful part of math
particularly if you're a physicist
I don't think there are any physicists in here
I'm a physicist
@Blue don't debate that point, P(0celo7 is trolling)>50%
19:19
you're a programmer
I'm a physicist
Apparently the work matrix has been said 2466 times in the h bar...
@EmilioPisanty you're the single exception
(2467 now)
Anonymous
@0celo7 I have never understood your definition of "physicist" :P
19:19
@Blue if the person knows what a field is, they're likely not a physicist, for one
@0celo7 @DanielSank is still vaguely around
he's a physicist
@EmilioPisanty he's a "quantum engineer"
wtf is a quantum engineer
Anonymous
@0celo7 That's such nonsense. Pretty sure all good theoretical physicists know what field is
whatever Daniel is
19:20
other than a catchy name to call yourself when you're a physicist but you want Google to hire you
@EmilioPisanty Mithrandir for one...
lmao
Anonymous
@EmilioPisanty lol
@Blue Yeah that's completely wrong
Anonymous
@0celo7 Proof?
You want me to prove a negative?
19:21
I'm a physicist in my SOUL
First prove to me that there weren't WMDs in Iraq!
@0celo7 well, @Blue could happily define "good", in the context of theoretical physicists, as somebody who knows what a field is
@EmilioPisanty I was going to point that out but decided not to go that route
But the "proof" is that 95% of theoretical physicists don't need to know what a field is, hence there are some who don't.
What do you mean by "knowing what a field is"
fuckin... maths.
19:23
I don't even know
Do you mean like the fancy bundle definition
No, an algebraic field
o
I think physicists are likely to see what a field is but to forget it very fast
It's one of those things you might see in a math module and never use again
5 years olds know what a field is, without knowing the words people attached to such obvious concepts
Anonymous
@bolbteppa Hehe :D
19:24
It's hard to respond to @bolbteppa without getting banned
@0celo7 is there some quote similarity I'm missing there, btw?
Perhaps impossible
@EmilioPisanty ??
I swear most times I've been 'talking' to you, you get banned 0celo...
@0celo7 the Sopranos and rating stuff?
@EmilioPisanty No, he literally just recommended I should watch the Sopranos
19:25
oh
Should I watch the sopranos
@Slereah yes
or the altos
@Slereah do you know the fancy bundle definition, was thinking of reviewing it today
when is BCS coming back?
also Westworld in April (?)
19:26
@0celo7 "2018"
@bolbteppa It's a bundle section
bam
If $g$ is an element of the Poincare group and $V(g)$ is a representation of this group element, then apparently $V(g)$ 'acts in fibres $\psi(x) \in V_x$'
@0celo7 how offensive is the show to italians
Whatever that means
depends on if you get offended by being associated with the "mafia"
19:33
yeah, that^ is the idea
I'm all for italian racism
let's download it
I mean buy it legally
replace "racist" with "mafia"
Do they say "badaboom badabing" a lot
Sold
19:37
iirc, we had a HUGE dispute in here about the the use of the "mafia" metaphor
The physics mafia
mods in particular
seen on facebook recently:
Writing proposals and justifications is so much easier when you work on superconductivity. It's like activating a science cheat code.
Superconductivity and nanotech
I imagine @DanielSank's been on the cheater hookup for too long to even notice =P
19:39
that's where the GDP is at
i think quantum computing still leaves some people skeptical
@Slereah yeah, but if you're doing superconducting QC though
What can quantum computing do well, outside of prime factorization
I mean that's a useful thing for cryptography, but that's a pretty narrow use
prime factorization is the back bone of number theory
Anonymous
It can possibly have some uses in chemistry
Anonymous
Specifically computational chemistry
19:43
@skullpatrol And number theory is good for cryptography
And....
....
...
!
anyway that's why quantum computing is great
Anonymous
@Slereah Quantum ______ is great. You can fill in the blank with anything you want :P
@DanielSank why is computing great
why are computers great
19:49
@Slereah it's not what it can do well now
Modular forms Jacobi nonsense in string theory
it's what you can write on grant applications that it could potentially do someday
Well right now it can do nothing well
@EmilioPisanty like what
They just throw it at you like you should know these insane number theory calculations as in GSW appendix
@Slereah optimization problems, machine learning, solving quantum chemistry, curing cancer, solving global warming
19:51
How many of those have a solid foundation for it though
Anonymous
@EmilioPisanty Could you elaborate on the "solving global warming"? (This is a serious question. I'm curious)
(it's a joke)
@Blue same as curing cancer
except change "quantum chemistry of molecules" for "quantum chemistry of solids" and apply to solar cells
Anonymous
@EmilioPisanty Ah
also "solve materials science"
and apply to any branch of technology where progress is aided by better materials
Anonymous
19:53
It's a long way to reach that level. But yeah, I agree
@Blue well, yes
Can't we just admit that we fucked up global warming and just evolve heat resistant bodies
but it's also a place where if you scale enough, then you do know that there are good things to be had
the exponential wall that you hit with quantum chemistry past some ten electrons or so is very real

« first day (2601 days earlier)      last day (2624 days later) »