« first day (2601 days earlier)      last day (2624 days later) » 

12:00
@Blue suppose we want to run the app, let it work through some stuff then stop at the printf("line3")
@Blue I thought about it and realised that I had replaced the autocomplete features and all with manual googling, and now I feel it's a pain to do it now I've realised what I've been doing. So now I'm going to download VS the moment I get back home!
What we do is set a breakpoint by clicking in the left margin. I'll do it now ...
Anonymous
Okay so far
Hmm, why isn't it working ...
Ah, I wasn't clicking far enough to the left :-)
Anonymous
Now it shows the red dot
Anonymous
12:02
Yep
Now if we run the app (press F5) it will start running then stop where we've put the break point.
You try ...
Anonymous
Trying
There you go!
So with a big complicated app you can set a breakpoint at the bit where you think it's going wrong
Anonymous
Got it. Yes. Awesome :)
Anonymous
@JohnRennie Exactly
12:05
You can hover over variables to see their value
Fiv
Fiv
@JohnRennie Are you busy?
@Fiv five minutes
Fiv
Fiv
@JohnRennie Ok.
Anonymous
@JohnRennie Hover over where ?
Fiv
Fiv
@JohnRennie I'm waiting then
12:06
@Blue Let me show you. I'll run it to the getchar then type an x
See. If I put the cursor over the variable a it shows me what a is set to
Anonymous
Yes , it does !
Anonymous
That looks useful
The VS debugger is just awesomely brilliant. You'll really come to value it when you're working on huge complicated apps!
I'll disconnect from your PC now. Hang on ...
Anonymous
@JohnRennie Hehe, yes :)
BOOM! I'm gone.
Anonymous
12:10
@JohnRennie lolol
If you installed Team Viewer you can uninstall it now or maybe keep it in case we need it in the future.
Maybe have a play with VS and do something a bit more complicated ...
Anonymous
@JohnRennie I'll keep it actually. It looks pretty useful. But thanks a lot for all the help :D
@Fiv I think we've finished playing with VS. What did you want to ask?
Fiv
Fiv
@JohnRennie As first, It's too honorable to talk with you for me.
Anonymous
@JohnRennie Yep, sure
Fiv
Fiv
12:12
I was gonna ask a question about nuclear physics.
Do you think the significants digits are important for atomic radii calculations?
If you do an experiment to measure an atomic radius then your experiment will always have some error i.e. the value you get won't be exact.
Fiv
Fiv
is it better to use 3 significant?
When you're telling someone else what you measured you need to tell them how accurate your value is i.e. how many significant digits it has.
Fiv
Fiv
@JohnRennie That was the most important thing for me!
I was thinkin about how they give wrong answers.
@Fiv The number of significant digits depends on how accurate your experiment was.
Fiv
Fiv
12:16
and im seein the reason now.
what do you mean by tell them how accurate your value?
if you can show an example, it'd great.
Suppose I measure an atomic radius as 0.87654321 nanometres
But my experiment is only accurate to 1 picometer (i.e. 0.001 nanometres)
Fiv
Fiv
you rounded it right?
That means the real value could be 0.001 nm less than my value or 0.001 nm greater than my value.
Fiv
Fiv
so let's take a question
calculate the radius of iridium atom, given that ir has an ffc crystal structure, a density of 22.4g/cm3. and atomic weight of 192.2g/mol.
So it would be silly for me to tell people my measured radius is 0.87654321 nm. I would say it is 0.876 nm plus or minus 0.001 nm.
Fiv
Fiv
12:18
What do i need to tell them?
However, they're giving wrong answers without telling them to solve it with 5 significant digits.
OK. You're given the density as 22.4 g/cm^3.
Fiv
Fiv
Yes, absoulety.
That implies the error in the density is 0.1
i.e. the density could be as low as 22.3 or as high as 22.5
Fiv
Fiv
it seems 22.4
Generally speaking if you're given a value you should assume there is a possible error of 1 in the last digit.
Fiv
Fiv
12:22
oh got it now.
You're given the density as 22.4 not 22.40000
Fiv
Fiv
Atomic weight is same too.
that's given as 192.2
Well you're given the atomic weight as 192.2 so you assume the error is 0.1 i.e. the atomic weight could be as low as 192.1 or as high as 192.3
Fiv
Fiv
Yes, absoulety.
I'm gonna give them the avogadro's constant
as $N_{A} = 6.022 \times 10^{23}$
You have the density to three figures and the other parameters to four figures
Fiv
Fiv
12:25
so?
So the error in the density is the biggest
Fiv
Fiv
What would you recommend me to do?
When you're quoting the result you use the same number of figures as you have for the density
Fiv
Fiv
The thing is everyone whom I'm asking this question gives anohter answers.
like 1.34, 1.35 and 1.36
the correct one is 1.36
@DanielSank "put a pin on X" = take topic X and pin it to the wall = let's talk about this at some other time
;-)
Fiv
Fiv
12:28
I've been told that the reason they're giving different answers is significant digits.
What would you recommend me to do?
Fiv
Fiv
I mean how should I ask this question?
^ one of my slides from Friday
@DanielSank @DawoodibnKareem, also CC @BernardoMeurer, that slide was prepared by inking in with a stylus on Power Point.
if there is a non-proprietary way to achieve that, then I'm all ears
Fiv
Fiv
@JohnRennie Are you there?
@Fiv Well, what value do you get when you do the calculation?
Fiv
Fiv
12:31
@JohnRennie I'm getting 1.34
However, that's not correct answer.
Give me a moment, and I'll do the calculation myself ...
Fiv
Fiv
k
There's only an answer and that's 1.36
I wanna get the answer 1.36 when I ask this question to someone.
@Fiv are you named after the feline immunodeficience virus
Fiv
Fiv
lmao
Hmm, how are you doing the calculation?
i.e. what equation are you using?
12:39
I'm sorry to interrupt this conversation, but this user was, once again, a sockpuppet of a currently suspended user.
5 messages deleted
@ACuriousMind Oops :-)
@ACuriousMind ooof. I guess for some people there simply isn't any way to make them understand that sockpuppets really are not OK.
@EmilioPisanty Oh, I'm very certain the repeat offenders are perfectly understanding of the fact that socks aren't okay. They just don't care. :P
@ACuriousMind can you say who the offender is?
@0celo7 I see no reason to
12:54
👺
Google tells me that's a "Japanese Goblin Emoji". Truly, we live in a wonderful age.
it certainly beat penis nose
If you ever feel the urge not to lower the tone don't worry that we would be disappointed :-)
3
@JohnRennie is that English?
Why wouldn't it be?
13:04
@ACuriousMind I guess I meant "not OK" in the sense that their direct interlocutors find it an explicit breach of trust, more than just the abstract rules
@ACuriousMind the words are English but the sentence sounds like Engrish
@0celo7 Just because its grammar is more complicated than the average American sentence doesn't mean it's not English ;P
You could perhaps argue it's not idiomatic, but then again it sounds very British in its indirectness to me
What tone is he even talking about?
There’s also a double negative or something that doesn’t make sense
Please rewrite the sentence in simplified English in bullet points
if you keep the tone [of your messages?] the same, we won't be disappointed
What tone??
13:09
no idea
=P
Don’t worry, we’re just stupid Americans (MAGA)
Anonymous
@0celo7 Look at the message before JR's. You'll get it..
No, I saw that message
So what?
Anonymous
So, umm, do I need to explain the message? :P
I’m not sure what penisae have to do with this discussion but if you want to tell me that’s ok. I don’t judge
Anonymous
13:14
I'm not taking risks...lol
::chuckles quietly in the background::
@Blue if you were to say which book is better would you say the artin one or the axler one..
Cause I kinda want to get one in print cause I much prefer to read it
But idk which one now.
(Although the axler one is cheaper..)
Anonymous
@CooperCape Artin contains much more than Linear Algebra
Ahh okay... thanks.
Anonymous
Basically Linear Algebra+Abstract Algebra
13:23
(I'm just flicking through to contents of both)
Anonymous
BUT, another alternative to Artin is: Axler+Gallian
Anonymous
Axler is for LA
Anonymous
And Gallian is for the Abstract part
Hmmm
hard choices
Anonymous
Both are pretty nice and colorful (and easy to read)
13:24
(checks pricings)
Hall talks about nice functions a lot
He should just make the set of nice functions
Galian is $$
Anonymous
I got Gallian for about Rs. 500 I think. Pretty cheap
Anonymous
Around 6 British pounds i.e.
13:25
Oh wow
@0celo7 John was telling Slereah, in British Euphemistic English, not to talk about penises.
Anonymous
If you're able to find a version of that on Amazon.com
Hmmm yeah
I'll look around
gah
Anonymous
13:27
Found it
I'm beginning to think book companies don't like British people...
that one right?
Anonymous
@CooperCape Yeah, but that looks too expensive. Order from Amazon.com instead
Yeahg
Or I might just get Artin as one book
Euugh
Why not get a tablet? It'll feel like you re reading from the real book (almost)
Anonymous
@CooperCape There's a bit of problem with Artin i.e. it doesn't have great typography...and not good for first time learning. BUT it is complete as a book and has most of the stuff you'll ever need in Algebra (for Physics).
13:30
Huuugghguhhg
I gotta go I'LL THINK ON IT
Anonymous
So some tough choice there :P
Anonymous
Good luck deciding
@EmilioPisanty seemed like he was saying the opposite
@CooperCape aren't the books there in your library? (or any nearby one)
Anonymous
@PrathyushPoduval Reading technical books from a tablet is a bit of a problem for some people
Anonymous
13:32
I tried it...
Anonymous
Better to just download and print it, and then get it bounded
@Blue What kind of problems? eyesight?
Anonymous
@PrathyushPoduval Yeah, and some people just like scribbling on their books...like me
Yeah I always prefer the print edition, but if I bought all the books I wanted, my parents would be pretty broke
Anonymous
I don't feel like I've digested a book unless I scribble (notes) on the pages with a pen/pencil
13:34
Unless it's some marvelous proof, I don't write much on my books
@Blue I like my books to remain in the new condition
Anonymous
@PrathyushPoduval Printing and binding is actually pretty cheap
Anonymous
Just for Rs. 50 you can get any book bounded
Anonymous
@PrathyushPoduval Unlike me :D
@Blue I tried it once, price went too around 500
Anonymous
@PrathyushPoduval Where do you stay dude :P
Anonymous
13:35
It's dirt cheap here
Idk, it was a Xerox centre I went to. Where do you bind the books?
Are there specialised piracy shops?
Anonymous
@PrathyushPoduval Here
@Blue I thought you were talking about getting the books printed out then binded :P
Anonymous
@PrathyushPoduval No. I get it printed from my father's office printer for free. And then go there to get it binded
"The problem with is idea is that the function exp[−ithk 2 /(2m)] is not a “nice” function in the usual sense."
He's very concerned about niceness
13:38
@0celo7 well, BEE does take some practice to master
for a moment I thought you meant the other BEE
Brits often take a page from the Germans' Warum einfach, wenn es so schön kompliziert sein kann
@Blue I don't prefer the printouts. There's some feel to the book which you buy. Book>tablet>>laptop>>>>printout
I tried it once, didn't work out
Anonymous
@PrathyushPoduval Well, when you're broke, printouts seem the best....and I can't read math books from laptops or tablets
Anonymous
If it's a novel or something I might use a tablet to read
13:42
Feynman's book is great btw
@Slereah good
Who is this?
The second half of his book is his adventures during the investigation of the challenger disaster
Anonymous
@PrathyushPoduval Oh, nice!
@0celo7 Hall
Also he just used $\ll$
Physicist trash!
@Slereah you're French
you use « and »
13:47
Not really
I don't see how you can complain about $\ll$ with a straight face
They're not available on French keyboard
@Slereah no need
> In Microsoft Office applications, typing the US quotation mark (on the 3 key) will produce either a left Guillemet "«" or right Guillemet "»" based on the spacing.
What kind of dork uses Microsoft Words
@Slereah >95% of French computer users?
13:52
Dorks the lot of them
 
1 hour later…
15:00
Hall have mercy
Stop using results from the future
he keeps talking about the spectral theorem
Two chapters from now
@Slereah :(
What page are you on
119
"Now, a physicist would say that the operator A in (6.1) does have eigenvectors, namely the distributions δ(x − λ)."
Damn physicists!
"The operators of interest in quantum mechanics, however, are not compact."
Isn't spin compact
15:16
How do you remember the integral representation for the unit step function $\theta (t - t') = - \lim_{\varepsilon \to 0} \frac{1}{2 \pi i} \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \frac{e^{-i\omega(t - t')} d \omega}{\omega + i \varepsilon}$ :(
@Slereah Yes. But the "operators of interest" here are more likely position and momentum :P
@bolbteppa Looks like the scalar field propagator!
Derivative of Dirac delta function
Just remember Dirac delta, or scalar propagator yeah!
Hall is that rigorous qm book right
He mentions projective representations in there, which is a gold star for it
yeah
It's not like 100% rigorous math
But much more than a typical QM book
15:21
I even forget how to derive the Dirac delta from nothing and have to check notes :(
what do you mean derive the dirac delta
I need to read Hall to read Reed and Simon
But Hall references Reed and Simon
End my life
Derive the expression for it's Fourier expansion $\delta(x - x_0) = \frac{1}{2 \pi} \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} e^{i(x - x_0)t} dt$ one should know like the back of their hand
I guess take that
Apply it to a function
Switch the integrals?
Check that $$\int \int dt dx e^{i(x - x_0) t} f(x) = f(x_0)$$
I found a way to get it from the sinc integral which takes ages, that switching thing rings a bell as well
Sigh, there needs to be a way to trade hats
15:26
they're not pokemons
@Slereah Then we need a battle system for hats too
The reason I can't just sit down with Reed and Simon in a room and nothing else is the theorems are not motivated enough, e.g. who cares about Hahn-Banach, but it's not a fault of R&S, really well written what it does do, so I'm kind of side-prepping that book periodically
@bolbteppa This equation is equivalent to the integral of the Fourier transform of $f$
I think by using some properties of the Fourier transform you can get the appropriate thing
I think Zee does that switcharoo thing and I glossed over it
@0celo7 admittedly I grew up hearing that type of construction so I'm used to it, but was it really that hard to parse?
15:29
Decompose it as like
$$\int dt dx e^{i(x - x_0) t} f(x) = \int dt dx e^{ix t} e^{-i x_0 t} f(x) = \int dt e^{-ix_0 t} \hat f(t)$$
Which I think gives you back $f(x_0)$
badaboom badabing
i probably forgot a bunch of factors but that's the sketch
Yeah I should go over that method properly
You can also do the physicist way
$$\int dk e^{ikx} \delta(x) = e^{ik0} = 1$$
Hence the inverse transform is just $$\delta(x) = \int dk e^{ikx}$$
But that is turbo physicist proof
That's pretty awesome
(Spoiler $e^{ikx}$ isn't a test function)
It's not even of fast decay!
15:58
" the spectral projections being provided by a projection-valued measure and the functional calculus being provided by integration with respect to this measure"
Oh no
"The reader who is willing to take things on faith can simply take in the examples of the position and momentum operators in Sects.6.4 and 6.6 and accept these as prototypes of how the spectral theorem works."
I BELIEVE
At least Bourbaki put in very small writing the examples which use material not in logical step with the previous material, I can't read books which do that kind of thing with a straight face
@Slereah the book is very rigorous past like chapter 7
16:18
@Kaumudi.H Since you asked:
On the left is chicken in breadcrumbs, in the middle is sweet potato in a spicy batter and on the right is pepperoni and tomato in a pastry shell.
Posh chocolate biscuits for dessert.
16:58
delish
@EmilioPisanty Inkscape, gradient fill
@ooolb it was a very nice meal. I am currently finishing it off with some after dinner mints.
what kind of mints
Mint crumbles.
I think they are made by pressing icing sugar into a mould under a high enough pressure that it forms a firm solid. Then when you put them in your mouth it rapidly crumbles to release the peppermint flavour.
17:15
I am eating white pepper biscuits.
yo ho ho
I eat them because I feel so cold,
I also have a bag of garlic peanuts nearby.
17:31
@0celo7 Example a highly-multiple negatives from literature: goodreads.com/quotes/…
I would guess that is Adams making fun on that idiomatic style.
The English have long understood that language can be an entertaining toy to play with.
@Blue (you probs don't care but...) I went for Axler/Gallian combo
I just preferred the look of them - and I felt you were right about Artin, it really doesn't look for beginners at all!
Language is a virus from outer space
Extra-terrestial live has been found in the form of language
@DanielSank what?
I don't mean the background
I mean the math
17:38
@CaptainBohemian I hadn't heard of white pepper biscuits before. Do you mean Pfeffernüsse
@CooperCape wise choice with axler, a wonderful book
It looks quite nice and I liked the contents
Also in response to what you said earlier about libraries the closest is 15mins drive away and I'm too young to drive :c
what about your school?
Won't have it
I looked around...
maybe convince the librarian to buy it...
17:48
Nah I have four brothers divide the cost by four and it's reasonable! (for christmas...)
@CooperCape Yeah, which is also why I didn't like artin much it looks quite old
@CooperCape all your bros are interested in the same stuff?
@PrathyushPoduval Nah... they all over 25... I mean't like they by 1/4 of the book each for me :)
Artin looked like a book that would de-motivate me...
kek, no christmas presents for you then :P
@CooperCape Artin is the book you might need in the future
17:50
Is @BernardoMeurer or any other linux-knowledgeable person around?
I want to know what repo my machine is getting google chrome from
@PrathyushPoduval That's why I was considering it - But I guess they might have it in a uni library (at least they should, right?)
Yeah they should
are you accepted anywhere yet?
@JohnRennie they look different from Pfeffernüsse.
Bristol, Exeter and Manchester
(I'm an official Oxford reject now!)
oxford?
oh okay
17:51
lol yah
you applying next year, or taking from your current choices?
But Macnhester's got Brian Cox! (that's not why I like it...) and I really liked their course
I think I'll go Manchester.
I wasn't too bothered about Oxford.
Hey @JohnRennie, I've decided to format my laptop. There's a option to have a fresh start which keeps my personal files and removes all 3rd part software etc. Is it alright to do it like this?
@PrathyushPoduval ... OS?
@CooperCape liked it in the sense, the syllabus or proffesors?
@EmilioPisanty Windows 10
17:53
Both kinda... They have a ton of research groups and the extra options throughout seemed really good.
Is it a 4y or 3y course?
@PrathyushPoduval "Fresh start"? Is that an option offered by the manufacturers recovery DVD? I don't recall anything like that in the regular Win10 install.
@PrathyushPoduval I applied for four year
@PrathyushPoduval ah, you mean this?
@JohnRennie Settings->recovery option->Learn how to start fresh with a clean installation of windows
@JohnRennie Yeah
(btw, how do you add hyperlinks in chat?)
17:56
[text](link)
@PrathyushPoduval I've never used it, but what I would say is that the most stable option in the long term will always be to completely wipe the disk and do a bare metal install.
@CooperCape [okay thanks](www.google.com)
doesn;t seen to work
@JohnRennie How do I do that?
Uhh
[cc](www.google.com)
that link don't work?
17:57
@PrathyushPoduval You need the protocol, i.e. the https:// part.
yeah got it!
@JohnRennie and also, is partitioning the hard disk recommended? (I have around 3 in total)
@EmilioPisanty Ok then just use the drawing thingy in Google slides?
Or Inkscape.
Or literally any program...
@PrathyushPoduval when you boot off the Win10 install disk or USB key there are two options. The simplest route is to take the Custom option when you're offered the choice of Upgrade or Custom, and that takes you to a screen where you can delete the existing partitions and create new ones.

« first day (2601 days earlier)      last day (2624 days later) »