« first day (2437 days earlier)      last day (2787 days later) » 

00:01
check skype
check the top corner
there's something wrong
I'm not maxing my CPU either
I don't know man
Google it
I don't know your settings
Has it always been like this?
I just started playing on this PC
turning off TSAA doesn't help
it's not a settings issue
Maybe your CPU is being a bottleneck
But I think that's highly unlikely
CPU usage is ~50
actually more like 30
Hm
I dunno
Ask online
I really don't know
00:07
Creating a room for Typhon was an excellent diplomatic idea @ACuriousMind
@BernardoMeurer people are saying it's a RAM frequency issue
I already overclocked my RAM
what gives
@BernardoMeurer if it's not the RAM, what could it be?
I'm not maxing out anything
the solution online seems to be "turn off things" but that doesn't actually help
I don't know
ask @JohnRennie
I don't know how games work
00:28
Hey everybody, you know how I'm always harping on the point that experimental physics requires a lot of engineering, and that we should accept questions about practical construction/lab technique/engineering stuff just as much as we do math questions?
Well, here's today's rant:
That is all.
@DanielSank Okay, I'll bite: What am I looking at?
It's a coaxial line, but with a length of braided copper wire soldered to the ground shield on either end, and with the copper wire lovingly made to follow the contours of the coaxial line by ever-so-delicate use of dental floss.
@DanielSank Maybe you'll have to explain it to me like I'm 5, but why is it curved?
reinstalling drivers
what a damn pain
@HDE226868 This cable goes inside a cryostat.
00:43
$1600 machine that can't even play GTA
When you cool something from room temperature to 20mK, there's thermal contraction. If the cable were under tension, that contraction could lead the cable breaking.
The bends are there to allow flexing.
@0celo7 You paid $1600 for a computer!?
Ho
Lee
Schit!
@DanielSank Oh, that makes sense.
@DanielSank I got budget components
@0celo7 I don't know what that means.
I think people need to look at what real gaming PCs cost
@DanielSank It means my PC is not expensive, relatively speaking.
00:45
You went $100 over budget?
Uh....
@LasVegasRaiders ye
$1600 is insane IMHO.
@DanielSank my laptop costs twice that
What game are you playing? Simulate 50 interacting qubits 2: Revenge of Decoherence?
6
00:46
Standard games
I'm apparently maxing out my system
Not sure what's going on
Messing around in the control panels now
Have you tried the game playing SE?
not yet
@BernardoMeurer I just turned of vsync in the Nvidia Control Panel and also put power utilization to maximum.
I'd like to see your budget breakdown because 1600 is twice what I would have expected.
twice?
GPU is $620
@0celo7 Yes.
@0celo7 You bought a new one?
00:49
Yes
Ah. Ok never mind.
Superclocked 1080
What did you pay for the CPU + mobo?
Note that the $1600 includes tax
Shoulda started with a cheap used one.
00:50
Without it's more like 14-something
@LasVegasRaiders Why?
Because you can get previous gen video cards for $50.
Which is easily worth the loss of performance.
Proof?
@0celo7 uhhh, go ask around. I'm not talking about online, I'm talking about talking to people you meet IRL.
And it's not worth it to me, clearly. My current one can't play two year old games.
00:51
You basically find someone like yourself trying to build a new system and offer to buy their old card.
@0celo7 Then you're doing something very wrong.
Clearly.
Not sure what.
The game doesn't want to use 100% of my GPU. CPU isn't bottlenecking...
Well then this statement is false.
How so?
Try Reinstalling everything from scratch
You went from "game no work" to "not worth it to buy last gen video card", but you admit that you're doing something wrong.
00:53
I have no idea what I'm doing wrong.
@LasVegasRaiders That's ridiculous.
That would take days.
What other options do you have?
Don't play the game?
Who knows.
I'll buy it off you for $800 :P
};-)
no tax
my CPU usage is <50%
Take it to a shop.
Phone around first.
01:01
What shop?
Computer shop
Repairs, games, etc.
01:15
Well, after doing some searching
I found a video that has similar frame drops
Apparently this game is just insanely hard on GPUs
I don't know how people are getting 140 fps
@LasVegasRaiders do you want to buy it?
I give u good price
@ACuriousMind ahahhaha I turned off vsync. I forgot that the Bethesda engine clock is fps based
Fallout 4 @ 220 fps is stupid
@LasVegasRaiders $1500
You call that a good price?
27 mins ago, by Las Vegas Raiders
I'll buy it off you for $800 :P
And there still would be shipping and handling
01:24
good for me
@0celo7 Give me 2k
so I can buy a motorbike
Please
@BernardoMeurer insurance varies wildly by state
Crap...Bernardo's asking for money just as I walk in.....Goodbye
01:45
Wow, 55 year olds are the safest drivers?
Makes sense. Slow reaction speeds + not particularly interested in dying in a car crash just to try saving 30 seconds on a 10 minute trip....
Statistically speaking, of course.
Dunno the details though.
I'll let you know in a dozen years
vzn
vzn
02:05
hey @Bernardo doing anything fun this summer? are you out of school right now?
02:48
@ACuriousMind lol elven tranny
The English room had a bot for a while. Don't know if they've still got it. Most of the time, people would just forget it was there. Until it interrupted, of course.
03:45
@LasVegasRaiders I've never looked into it, but @DavidZ got one runnning.
Not sure if it is still operation and I can't recall what it did or how to trigger it.
As a matter of good form you should definitely bring it up on meta before activating it and be open to tweaking it to keep down any annoyance it might cause.
Will do @dmckee
Especially if it acts on things that are not uniquely and obviously commands to the bot.
It should be tailored to the needs of this room.
@DawoodibnKareem I think they got rid of it.
04:22
@dmckee It doesn't run here, only in a mod room (but I'm working on that)
We have discussed having a chat bot here before. There are a few useful things it could do, but there are also a number of non-useful things it could do which I would be strongly opposed to. And most of the useful things it could do, at least as far as I've seen, would not be all that useful, or at least not all that necessary.
 
1 hour later…
05:51
Anybody here so I can ask one of my confusion regarding basic Newton Ian physics ?
@BernardoMeurer Going to OC my CPU tomorrow
will need help
06:31
@0celo7 OC?
user228700
Hi, everyone :-)
Morning
user228700
So I can't finish Portal.
user228700
And today is the last day of my driving class!
@JohnRennie I think OC stands for "over clock"
06:35
@Kaumudi.H I wonder if there's something you need to do before the door will open ...
Do they give you a grade? @Kaumudi.H
user228700
@JohnRennie I've looked into it and it doesn't seem like there is :-(
user228700
@LasVegasRaiders I don't think so. If they do, I'll tell you how I did.
@Kaumudi.H unless Steam have given you your very own personalised version of the game there must be something you've missed ...
user228700
I don't think so! I believe there is a glitch in this copy...
Sid
Sid
06:41
Playing Portal, the game?
user228700
Ah, apparently, you press e to get the door open.
user228700
@Sid Yep.
Sid
Sid
I have heard favourable reviews from people..
@Kaumudi.H so, are you through the door?
07:05
Mornin
user228700
@JohnRennie I sure am! :-D
@Kaumudi.H Is pressing E to open a door standard in the game or is it something specific to level 19? It seems a bit odd that this door should be different to all the others in the game.
user228700
There had been no other doors in this game thus far! :-) I had been using e to press buttons and pick up stuff.
07:27
@JohnRennie can I ask here a (simple) mechanics question ike I did two days before ?
@AlexKChen yes of course. As a general rule you don't need to ask if it's OK to ask a question here. Just ask the question.
Okay.
Imagine a cubical block lying in a frictionless place, and (a) When the block is cemented to the floor (b) When the block is just placed above the floor (i.e what happens normally).
When I hit the block, in case (a), I could understand that the block pushes back at me at exactly the same force I pushed it (except for ridiculously high forces which breaks it and then reduces it to case (b) ), but for (b), I don't understand how the third law applies.
The block and you are both on a frictionless surface, so when you push the block it moves away from you, and you also move away from the block. After the push both you and the block are sliding on the floor away from your start point. So far so good?
I couldn't understand the "you also move away from the block" portion, as when I push the carom striker with my finger, my hand doesn't gets pushed back.
That's because you aren't aren't standing on a frictionless surface.
When you push on the carom striker the floor you're standing on pushes on your feet. The net result is that you remain where you are.
07:37
Oh. So if I sit on a ice floor, and on the floor is a carom board, if strike the striker, I also get pushed back, albeit with very low velocity ?
Yes. Do you know about conservation of momentum?
Nope, but I heard of it.
Do you know what momentum is?
No (But I heard it's mass x velocity). And applying analogous reasoning for case (a), this means when I push a house wall standing on an ice floor, I just get pushed back from the wall ?
Momentum is just mass times velocity as you say. And if no external forces are acting then the total momentum of a system is conserved. Suppose your mass is M and the mass of the carom is m. Before you push you and the carom are both stationary so the total momentum is zero, because both of you have velocity = 0. So far so good?
07:43
>Momentum is just mass times velocity
You monster
@Slereah :-) Let's keep the discussion relevant to Alex's level.
@AlexKChen have you seen the equation: p = m*v
before?
where p = momentum
08:01
@AlexKChen yeah if you push a house wall real hard while standing on ice, you'r feet will slip
In fact, even if not standing on ice, if the wall is very strong and you have superhuman strength, you will probably slip on the floor before you can use your strength to push through the wall
he fell?
Sid
Sid
The things that happen due to lack of jobs...
People want to work?
Some say he jumped
But we know he was pushed.
He was just like you
Might have been
On the 99th floor of a suicide machine
- High Rise by Hawkwind from the album PXR5
08:10
Oh sorry @JohnRennie internet connection was lost for half an hour. Are you here now ?
Hi Alex
So he was pushed
the article said he fell
@AlexKChen Where did we get to?
@Kenshin Pushed by the pressures inflicted by society
but here he didn't jump or pushed, he just fell
At least I don't think anyone is suggesting he was murdered.
08:11
by accident
Accident?
maybe, the article doesn't make it clear
Let me think a bit on what you told earlier first.
I undersatnd the article is trying to imply suicide, but it simpy states that he "fell"
so who knows what really happene
@AlexKChen OK, take your time and ping me when you want me to get back to you.
08:12
Suicide is painless.
he could have been out trying to get something off the roof
and the article conveniently omits this part to gain more attention
Nah, they're just trying to be "nice."
"Mr Stewart said he could not rule Dr Elliott’s death as suicide because there could be other explanations."
Sid
Sid
@JohnRennie I don't agree with that. Pressures inflicted by society are but a drop in the ocean that causes someone to go for suicide
08:18
I thought people suicide because of "depression". Depression can occur even in the absence of an external (e.g. societal) trigger
In the Olbers paradox, what is the assumed star distribution?
Poisson distribution?
@JohnRennie In both cases, (movable and constant), the block pushes at you with equal force, so why the block goes at one case, and remains constant in another ?
@AlexKChen because in one case the block is fixed, and the other not
@AlexKChen in the case where the block is fixed, there is a force on the block, but the ground provides an opposing force stopping the block from moving
@AlexKChen If the block is fixed to the ground then in effect you are pushing at the whole Earth. That is the block and the planet Earth are fixed together.
So you move in one direction and the block+Earth move in the other direction.
oh, and it this thought experiment correct ?:
08:27
@JohnRennie so does this disrupt the Earth's rotation?
But since the Earth is much, much heavier than you the Earth moves only by a tiny, tiny amount.
Also, suppose in one end of the rope in this:
A block is there. And you are turning the handle. What's the opposing force here ?
Wow i guess physics is wrong
@AlexKChen You'll have to explain what you mean by replacing yourself by a spring.
@Kenshin Why ?
Oh yeah now I realize it's full of nonsense. What about my ohte question ?
08:29
@AlexKChen Kenshin is being sarcastic - ignore him
to explain why I'd have to invoke QFT and know if the spacetime is hyperbolic or not
@AlexKChen Can you go back to your question about replacing yourself by a spring when you push on the block?
Currently doing a proof of Olber's paradox for my GR book
How much physics have you studied in school? @AlexKChen
08:33
I am in 11th grade, one year before graduating from highschool, whatever that you call in your country.
@AlexKChen is the little red block on the right fixed to the floor? Is the big block fixed to the floor?
Yeah, both fixed to the floor. Red box to give support to the spring.
If both are fixed to the floor then neither can move. So nothing happens.
@AlexKChen what is your country?
Yeah, that's what I was trying to prove with thought experiment.
08:37
@AlexKChen and on the left diagram with you pushing on the block, if the floor isn't frictionless, so you don't slide away from the block, then again nothing happens.
Yeah, I was trying to tell that, not the contradiction of it. (Actually, by second question, I was referring to this)
That picture, is that meant to be you pulling on the block with rope?
@JohnRennie actually that is a simplification. You can still slide on a floor with friction. It all depends on how big the force of friction is relative to the force you push back on the ground.
@JohnRennie Nah, you are standing and pulling a block with a rope. On the other side of the rope, there's a block.
user228700
AGH, I'm almost done with Portal! Stupid GLaDOS won't die!
08:41
@AlexKChen That's what I meant. One end of the rope is tied to the block and you are pulling on the other end of the rope. Are we talking about a frictionless floor or not?
Both cases. In (a) frictionless floor, I guess you will be pulled at the block too, like two trains crashing at each other (Is this correct ?) in (b), the confusion the appearing.
Yes in (a) you and the block will both move towards each other.
I think in (b), same thing happens, but the friction is acting equally and oposite to your movement, so you don't move, right ?
In (b) if the block and you are both fixed to the floor nothing happens.
No, the box is a movable block, take a four wheeler car for example.
:38624484 Yeah, heard it (like everyone) since childhood, and never understood it properly. That's why I'm asking here.
08:48
I'll let John explain :-)
@AlexKChen: there are two easy cases to understand, when the floor is frictionless and when the friction is so high that nothing moves.
Are you asking about an intermediate case where the friction is low enough that the block will move if you pull hard enough?
Yeah, I could roughly undestand both - but what happens in real life - where if you pull a car hard enough with a rope, it moves, but you don't move.
@AlexKChen when you pull a car, the rope is pulling you backwards while the rope is pulling the carforwards
So @AlexKChen you're asking why don't we move backwards? Because the friction on the ground opposes the force the rope is pulling on us.
Blocks and cars and ships and helicopters and toy wagons all are same - a spherical cow.
(removed)
08:53
@AlexKChen Have you tried pulling a car with a rope? Unless you dig your feet in you do move i.e. your feet slip.
@Justwinbaby I removed because I thought orientation was wrong.
@AlexKChen yes they are the same cow, but let's not switch the cow mid discussion it just confuses things
@JohnRennie OK, I will conduct an experiment today afternoon and ping you later.
The orientation is what you are having trouble with @AlexKChen
Think about what "opposite directions" means.
Wait, how do you even write a Poisson distribution as a function of space, too
Is it just $$P(N=k, D) = \int_D \frac{(\rho V)^k e^{-\rho V}}{k!} dV$$
The probability of finding $k$ objects in the volume $D$
I kinda need it because the intensity depends on the distance
So it's gonna be like $$\bar I(B_R) = 4\pi \int_0^R \frac{I_0}{r^2} \frac{(\rho (4/3) \pi r^3)^k e^{- \rho (4/3) \pi r^3}}{k!} r^2 dr$$
Or something
does that make sense, I have doubts
09:42
@Slereah I'm not sure what you mean by having $V$ in the integrand, since $\mathrm{d}V$ is usually just short for $\mathrm{d}^n x$
It sounds to me as if you want a multivariate Poisson distribution, which I've not really seen used
09:57
No, not multivariate
the Poisson distribution is basically just that in a given volume $V$, we have a probability to find $N$ stars
But what if I want to integrate something over that volume
Because Poisson in a volume is just $$P(N=k) = \frac{(\rho V)^k e^{-\rho V}}{k!} $$
But since the intensity depends on the distance of the stars themselves, I can't just pick any volume
10:14
I don't think I really understand what you want to do, I think I'm lacking some context here
2
Q: Reporting a poster planning to commit a crime

malexmaveSomeone just posted a (hopefully bad-taste joke) question on maximizing the damage of a school shooting to Academia.SE (since deleted). I flagged for moderator attention, but this made me wonder: Is this the correct way to do this, especially if there was a really time-critical issue (e.g., if th...

Serious stuff.
10:39
Colorless green ideas sleep furiously is a sentence composed by Noam Chomsky in his 1957 book Syntactic Structures as an example of a sentence that is grammatically correct, but semantically nonsensical. The sentence was originally used in his 1955 thesis "Logical Structure of Linguistic Theory" and in his 1956 paper "Three Models for the Description of Language". Although the sentence is grammatically correct, no obvious understandable meaning can be derived from it, and thus it demonstrates the distinction between syntax and semantics. As an example of a category mistake, it was used to show...
As time progress and words gain more meaning, eventually phrases like these will make sense soon
Not without context.
10:56
The Meaning of Meaning: A Study of the Influence of Language upon Thought and of the Science of Symbolism (1923) is a book by C. K. Ogden and I. A. Richards, Magdalene College, University of Cambridge. It is accompanied by two supplementary essays by Bronisław Malinowski and F. G. Crookshank. Although the original text was published in 1923 it has been used as a textbook in many fields including linguistics, philosophy, language, cognitive science and most recently semantics and semiotics in general. The book has been in print continuously since 1923. The most recent edition is the critical edition...

« first day (2437 days earlier)      last day (2787 days later) »