« first day (1964 days earlier)      last day (3260 days later) » 

00:00
Gnnnnnnnnnh, why do some users have so much trouble understanding what the proper attribution for quoted or copied material is?
2
@ACuriousMind Because they never produced anything
You mean...they don't understand why what they're doing is wrong because they have no concept of the difference between copying and coming up with the content by themselves?
@ACuriousMind This might be a stupid question, but if there is some smooth timelike curve connecting two points why can't there also be a spacelike curve connecting them?
@ACuriousMind I mean they don't see it as such a big issue because they're not familiar with the hard work of coming it up by themselves
@0celo7 Formally? No clue, I don't speak your kind of GR.
00:11
@ACuriousMind Uh, what?
How about in SR?
Why can't a point inside of the light cone be reached by a spacelike curve?
The opposite is not true -- a point with spacelike separation to another can be connected by a timelike curve.
...what?
I seem to parse at least one of the statements wrong
@ACuriousMind Let me rephrase :)
Take Minkowski space with...
wait
Take Minkowski space on a cylinder, time cyclical.
Because "If there's a timelike curve between two points, there's no spacelike one" seems to contradict "There can be timelike curve between them if there are spacelike ones".
@ACuriousMind Yes
If you take some surface in this space
Then you have an "almost ctc" that goes around and nails a point close to the original one
so that point $q\in I^+(p)$ (the first point)
but if you take the surface as a constant spatial slice, then there is a spacelike curve connecting the two
@ACuriousMind Ok, you're right, that's wrong.
00:21
@Slereah You said something wrong in our Skype chat yesterday
and now I have even less of a clue why we need to define $\ll$, etc. only with smooth curves
@ACuriousMind thanks for pointing out that derp...but in causal spacetimes it's probably true
it's certainly true in standard $\mathbb{R}^{3,1}$
@ACuriousMind Do you see an obvious proof for Minkowski?
@ACuriousMind Yes. However, I tried that with scipy.stats.kstest and the resulting p-value was literally random upon repeated trials.
@ACuriousMind Do you interpret "a curve never intersects $U$ in a disconnected set" as $\lambda\cap U$ has one component?
Furthermore, the "KS-statistic" is a dumb measure of fitness.
@DanielSank Maybe your sample isn't large enough?
A million samples?
00:31
not as good as 10 million
get to measuring
Hm...I have honestly no idea how large the sample has to be for that test to reliably work
@0celo7 Uh, probably?
But I'd guess that the resulting p-value fluctuating widly probably indicates your data is not being generated according to the distribution you're testing against
@ACuriousMind If I visually compare the function I calculated against a histogram of the numerical samples, they match exactly.
I need to write a software test though.
@DanielSank Oh
@DanielSank This says you should perhaps try the Anderson-Darling test
Perhaps you should ask at Cross Validated which test is appropriate for your specific situation?
@ACuriousMind That would be like asking "how do I solve a physics" on this site.
I am inclined to ask there why the p value is fluctuating.
I'm trying to understand the idea behind this.
Consider each bin in the histogram of sampled values, one at a time.
00:47
0
Q: When does causal separation imply no spacelike separation?

0celo7(See here for notation) In Minkowski space, if $p\prec q$, then there is no spacelike curve $c:[0,1]\to \mathbb{R}^{n-1,1}$ with $c(0)=p$ and $c(1)=q$. This is obvious from a spacetime diagram. (Here a "spacelike curve" is a $C^1$ mapping from a nondegenerate inverval into a Lorentzian manifold w...

Maybe PSE will know better than ACM
The number of counts in that bin should be Poisson distributed with mean equal to the value predicted by my calculated expression.
Is it legitimate to ask an answerer "proof?"
Do you have some sort of allergy against using a fully formed and polite sentence for that? :P
@ACuriousMind I was reading BEE earlier and literally said "proof?" out loud
that and "huh"
it's a disease
@DanielSank Is that sufficient to conclude the distribution is the correct one? My statistical knowledge is quite weak.
00:52
@ACuriousMind Could you please provide a proof?
@0celo7 For what?
@ACuriousMind I'm showing you I have no allergy
@ACuriousMind Yes. in this case.
I have a ton of data, etc, etc.
@ACuriousMind I would not be a bit surprised if the necessary and sufficient condition is global hyperbolicity.
that's really the condition for spacetimes to be "nice"
I think that's sufficient.
If we have closed timelike geodesics, then we can do stuff with Jacobi fields
But that seems really complicated
I think I accidentally found a bug in SE
01:01
reported
I made an account on one website, upvoted a comment, deleted the account, and the upvote stayed
So I curiously made a profile again, upvoted it, deleted the account, and the upvoted stayed
So I guess you can get infinite upvotes on comments
@SirCumference How long have you waited since deleting the accounts?
A minute?
Caching.
There is a lot that is chached on SE, and that stuff can take a while to notice deletions.
01:03
Nope, reloaded my cache
0
Q: How to impress my lover who is in the verge of breaking up with me

DarkLordHow to impress my lover who is in the verge of breaking up with me please,any way to revieve my dying love,please help me out,I won live without her

Does one of the comments here have 5 upvotes?
It had 1 before
hmm
I'l favorite that for future reference.
@SirCumference Not your cache. The one on the server farm.
01:04
And possible the ones on the machines your ISP matains for that purpose.
I guess we'll find out
Also a potential bug
You create an account, set a bounty on a question, and it gets popular. Award the bounty, delete your account, then recreate the account
@James OP need not be a man. — 0celo7 12 secs ago
You'll now have 101 more rep and can repeat the process
Welp, going SJW
@0celo7 Check back on your comment
Jesus this is broken
I think
If it isn't the cache
01:12
How do I have that many votes already
Cough
I just told you I found a bug
I can also set infinite bounties on a question
oh, I wasn't paying attention to you
I just realized
what did you say
By deleting my account and remaking it
Sigh...
01:14
I'm doing GR
If you make an account, upvote a comment, delete the account, the upvote will stay
did you delete your account a dozen times just now
So just keep making accounts, upvoting and deleting
Yep
Testing it out on ya
Not like I'm actually gonna use that trick, but it's cool
Dang, your comment was deleted
So nevermind
wtf??
Yeah, mods ruin fun
01:42
@SirCumference how much GR do you know
Less than I know QM
Should I take you on as my GR padawan
Is that a star wars thing?
....
have you not watched Star Wars
I don't watch sci fi
I love real astronomy
not fake astronomy
By the way
love this
01:46
I don't get it
...
dude, stop
what
you know what you're doing
that's simply not true
there we go
all right, explain
01:47
if it's rotating or charged you can go through the ring singularity
ain't the event horizon defined as the point where no information escapes?
and there's another universe on the other side of the black hole
another what?
@SirCumference yeah, back into the first universe
Isn't the Universe, you know, everything?
01:48
well, yeah
but there are parts
all of spacetime
what "parts"?
I don't like multiverse theory
It falls into that realm of sci-fi
What is this?
Yeah, okay, and?
it's multiverse hypothesis
01:50
lel
you're so cute when you say wrong things
"Lel" means penis in Dutch ಠ_ಠ
Wait, shit
that's lul
All right, continue
continue?
That's like if I asked you intricate questions about things you haven't studied
like astronomy
but I'm not interested in astronomy
you claim to be interested in this
Fuck it
Stop messing with my head
01:53
?
all I'm saying is that you can get out of the black hole
How?
Its escape velocity > speed of light
by going all the way through
@SirCumference lol
Usually, you know, you'd die
maybe!
maybe not
Okay, what happens if you don't die?
01:54
you go through
to where?
another universe
Why?
Isn't a black hole just an infinitely dense mass of matter?
hehe
...
I want to know how much you're laughing
01:56
Do you want to be redpilled on what a black hole is
Okay, what's a lack hole?
Fine, enlighten me
fuck. lost a pencil, brb
it's a $50 pencil
Why do you have a $50 pencil?
I'm going to guess you're delving into white holes?
01:58
I like nice things.
So...?
Are you looking for the pencil or...?
just wait a moment, I have 14 books on my bed
have to clear some shit off before I can search for it
@SirCumference trying to prove something
What?
What's your point?
02:03
fuck, dropped my analysis homework under my bed
ok, what was I talking about?
Goddammit man
I'm about to lose it
huh?
I was waiting for your explanation so I'd be able to go to sleep
Jesus christ man, why you waste my time?
explanation of what?
What is your point about black holes?
02:05
sorry
Multiverses?
GR
Ok, so you solve the Einstein equations for a rotating mass, right
you get the Kerr solution
Yes, sure
Okay good
but it turns out that you can do some crazy shit (cf. Hawking and Ellis (1973) for details) and you can glue a second Kerr spacetime to the first one
and you can glue a third one to that
All right
02:06
etc.
it follows that you can glue the first one to a zeroth one
and so you get an infinite chain of Kerr spacetimes connected at the singularity
so you can go through the black hole and be in another universe!
no crazy tidal forces, you're free
until you hit the next one
I feel like you're pulling my leg
You've done this before
02:07
have I ever lied about GR
Yes
Yes you have...
fucking when
When you told me how to "derive" the Schwarzschild radius formula
that wasn't GR
Screw that, how would I know when to trust you?
02:09
read Hawking and Ellis for yourself
Oh wait, you'd need to know calculus for that.
.......
I don't think keyboards can convey anger
You kept me up to tell me "you need to learn calculus"?
Kept you up?
It's 10PM EST
It's 3:09am
Ain't in New York right now
what country are you in
you must be in central Europe
Yeah, actually
02:10
where
No wait, it's 4:10...
Oh my god
lol
Israel
Oh my god
maybe now you'll learn calculus
I said that was Europe
I'm that tired
02:12
@SirCumference oy vey
don't use His name in vain
Yeah, I'll just pray here that I'll learn calc by tomorrow
go to the wall
In what world is that a name of God?
Already been there
You jewish?
02:13
stick a piece of paper "teach me calc pls YHWH"
Really?????
@SirCumference no
I feel guilty that I'm laughing
I dig the little hats though
Yarmulkes...
The least phonetic word ever
02:14
@SirCumference God is typically the name of God in English
@SirCumference I know what they're called.
I thought you were talking about "Ohahaha"
probably in some Polynesian dialect
So yes, what I've gained out of here is:
Black holes may (if you're not lying) open new universes
Israel is now in Europe
Yarmulkes are funny hats
I need to learn calculus
Excellent...
I'm going to sleep
'night
I never lie about GR.
I don't know if that's a lie tho
Why lie about other physics and not GR...?
02:17
GR is holy
Oh really now?
Any other physics is garbage
physics in general is garbage
GR has interesting math though
Physics in general explains the universe
or the other universes you talk about
no, that's math
physics is looking at shit
Physics is math actually taking effect
02:19
go to sleep
you're not making any sense.
No you
snores
Wow this book is literally HE, what a ripoff
High explosive?
Somehow I don't think that's what you meant
By the way, I would like to sleep
then sleep
But I think I got insomnia...so fun...
02:21
I'm not stopping you
Haven't slept well in days
no, you're just not used to the time zone
That too, but even back at home
I might've forgotten how to sleep
Wow, I am amazed at how much of a copy this is of HE
High explosive?
02:22
no
What then?
Helium?
Oh dude, you willing to do me a favor?
what
test out a program I made?
02:25
huh?
In JS
about physics
I don't have JS
that's javascript
I know what fucking JS is
the thing you use for making websites
Your browser should run it
02:27
nope
Chrome is 32 bit, can't run JS
@0celo7 There are literally zero web browsers in existence that do not run JS.
@DanielSank besides Chrome.
Well, this chat is running on JS
I think you're fine
@SirCumference nope
02:28
?
Dude, it runs on jQuery
@0celo7 Uh, what?
Which is a plugin for JS
I guess you just don't want to try it?
Chrome doesn't run it
Dude
You're on the chat
I'm using chrome
@SirCumference Give up.
He's either trolling, drunk, or I don't know what else.
02:30
@DanielSank All right...
@DanielSank None of the above, I know Chrome doesn't support Java.
Java ≠ javascript
One is for making programs, the other is for websites
Perhaps.
 
2 hours later…
04:28
0
Q: Causes of down downvoting questions

Abdul Moiz QureshiWhy can't I ask hypothetical questions about situations that cant't happen in the first place, if I'm interested in the resulting phenomena and/or said situation will cause? And can I try to funny,or is that looked down upon here.


« first day (1964 days earlier)      last day (3260 days later) »