« first day (1963 days earlier)      last day (2966 days later) » 

12:05 AM
@ACuriousMind It means he's being a dick/socially unacceptable for the attention
 
@0celo7 What's into you today?
 
@BernardMeurer Wanna play something for an hour or two
 
War Thunder?
 
huh?
 
@0celo7 It's a pretty sick airplane game
 
12:17 AM
wtf is that
we should play 4 or 5
 
BF4 GTAV?
 
ya
I dunno how to play 5 online actually
 
4 then
Let me get into windows
bloody hell
 
ok, me too
@BernardMeurer agreed.
Been using Unix OSX
 
Hey, @Bass, haven't seen many questions by you lately, did you stop learning about QFT or do you just not have so many questions about it anymore?
 
12:21 AM
@BernardMeurer get in the Sym TS
@ACuriousMind how come you never ask me thoughtful questions like that?
 
Will do, sec, gotta finish reconfiguring the kernel
 
are you shitting me
 
its mkinitcpio, it's quicky
 
@0celo7 Because you're always here and you constantly ask me questions and tell me all sorts of stuff I didn't even ask about.
 
@ACuriousMind I like to keep you informed!
@ACuriousMind Einstein lost a toy under a thingie
Don't know if I want to help him get it
 
12:45 AM
@GPhys have you decided on a school?
 
How about you, @FenderLesPaul? UCSB?
 
12:59 AM
@ACuriousMind Einstein doesn't want to look at me for some reason
he rolled over so he's not sleeping facing me
 
Cats can see our true selves.
2
 
D:
@ACuriousMind He is seeing blackness, with bits of GR interspersed
 
 
1 hour later…
2:27 AM
@ACuriousMind Still deciding between UCSB and UC Berkeley
Their visit dates are in first week of April so I'll have a better idea after I visit
I have to decide by April 15th
I crossed UChicago off the list after visiting it
 
@FenderLesPaul As much as I loved UCSB I'd still go for Berkeley
they have their own element :p
 
Berkeley only has one person I want to work for though
 
Berkeley is just amuzzing
 
that's the main risk
UCSB has a bunch of people I wanna work for
granted that one person is Raphael Bousso but still
 
@FenderLesPaul This is a positive tough pick
As in it's tough because all options kick ass
 
2:31 AM
I'm skyping with Gary Horowitz sometime near the end of March
so we shall see :D
 
Congrats on getting accepted at Berkeley btw :)
 
Bousso sent me a cute little welcome email
thanks!
 
@FenderLesPaul That's pretty nice hahaha
 
alright gotta head out now ttyl!
 
See ya!
 
 
3 hours later…
5:06 AM
hello?
 
5:35 AM
Anyone here have Mathematica?
 
 
4 hours later…
9:06 AM
@DanielSank You'll never take it from me!!!
@FenderLesPaul Wooo California! What fields are you looking into at UCSB?
@DanielSank I remember when integrals 'n' chill just meant integrals 'n' chill.
Now it's all, "neurofuzzy, what about stat mech?" or "neurofuzzy, what does he mean on this quantum assignment"
@ACuriousMind I am tagging you in this message for my own amusement. Please don't read it.
 
user116211
9:37 AM
@DanielSank: Can you recommend me some good introductory solid state physics book; I remember you told me once not to get Kittel's Solid State Physics.....can you recommend me some good introductory one?
 
10:23 AM
Kittel
Oh, not kittel was recommended
I don't know then
 
@Slereah Penrose and Visser are on the way
 
Aight
 
I took @ACuriousMind 's advice and am not getting Steenrod, I'd only need it for one proof.
 
I like that I opened Steenrod at the page of that proof so often that it naturally opens to that page
 
Do you understand it?
 
10:28 AM
No
 
lel
 
I am missing some of the stuff in between :p
 
What will I learn from Visser
Will I learn why there are no wormholes
Maybe we should do a group reading with @JohnDuffield
@FenderLesPaul I saw that snap as I was waking up, accidentally clicked it off, no clue what it was.
 
10:52 AM
Visser is like
History of the concept of wormholes
Topology business in GR
Examples using the Morris Thorne wormhole
Thin shell wormholes
CTCs using wormholes
Quantum effects on CTCs
Energy conditions
stuff like that
 
user116211
@Slereah huh?
 
Well I recommended kittel
 
user116211
oh.
 
Then I read
"I remember you told me once not to get Kittel's Solid State Physics."
so i dunno
 
user116211
get it.
 
user116211
10:55 AM
@Slereah: Have you read Manchester Physics Series?
 
I have not
Frankly I'm not big in solid state physics
I only use Kittel because that is what we did in school
 
user116211
@Slereah: I once read Kittel's Statistical Mechanics but it was not as good as Reif's.
 
@NeuroFuzzy 'kay
 
I should do that idea I got once
Linearized gravity solid state physics
I am wondering what it would be like
 
11:11 AM
How would you even begin to go about that
@ACuriousMind going back to school, left Steiner at home
 
Find the SET of a solid
Calculate linearized metric
 
Is that a Green's function thing?
 
Well you calculate the metric with a source with a green function, yes
 
11:26 AM
@Slereah Now Amazon is recommending actual crackpot books
 
Ahahah
Which!
 
"The physics of stargates"
 
I've got that one
The cover is hilarious
It's... not actually too bad?
I wouldn't recommend it as a physics book
It's written for normies and all
But
It has a very good bibliographical section
Lots of interesting paper references
 
Does Rovelli treat the Hamiltonian theory really extensively?
ADM and all that stuff?
 
Well it's not the focus but he does a chapter on hamiltonian theory in general, and another chapter on ADM
The book is freely available online, if you wanna check
 
11:30 AM
I'm sure I have a legal copy already. But unless the GR is really good, I don't think I need it.
 
Then maybe not I guess
After chapter 6 it's all quantum gravity
 
There was some other quantum gravity book that had a lot of GR in it
Was like 700 pages
 
Most QG books have interesting GR bits in them
 
I think that's the one
Hmm. I can't find the table of contents
 
11:59 AM
@0celo7 yeah sorry about that dude
I was insanely drunk
and accidentally sent it to you
it was a friend of mine eating leaves
@NeuroFuzzy quantum gravity
mainly gauge/gravity duality and semi-classical gravity (black hole thermodynamics)
 
Nah celebration ended like a month ago
It was a marching band rooms party
 
I see...
Have you @0celo7 decided on a name?
I still can't understand why you rejected "cruiser."
 
Holy shit Zee has a new book coming out
 
12:11 PM
end of the month
 
Why did you Chicago?
after the visit
After all, it is closer to home...
 
I actually didn't want to be close to home
I wanted to step away from home as much as possible
and as far as Chicago goes
I really, really loved talking to Bob Wald
that was easily the highlight of the trip
but I tried scoping out the nature of practice of the high energy theory group there and their general research interests
and it's all like pure string theory stuff which I don't care for in the slightest
 
there's no one there doing quantum gravity along the lines of what Polchinski, Susskind, Strominger, Bousso etc.
which is where my interests lie
so I felt at Chicago I would be pigeonholed into one narrow area of research
i.e. classical or semi-classical GR (which, granted, I love)
 
Did you talk to Wald about this?
 
12:22 PM
Unfortunately not
they gave us a limited amount of time to talk to each professor of interest
only like 25 mins
and all of that time with Wald was spent talking about physics
specifically firewall/AMPS paradox and soft black hole hair
also I didn't know how to broach such a subject with him without sounding potentially offensive
I talked about it with my advisors though
they said UCSB or Berkeley is probably a much better choice than MIT or Chicago
 
Are your advisors into research too?
 
oh yeah these are my research advisors
one of them did their postdoc at UCSB before coming to Cornell as a professor actually
 
Dunno where my advisors would want me to go
@FenderLesPaul Just so you know, I've given up waiting for those solutions
 
I'm sorryyyy I've just been lazy
 
12:35 PM
It should really depend on how much you value their advice.
Or anyone's advice...
...as they say the price of wisdom is experience.
 
I do value their wisdom though
they know the nature of academia much much much better than I do
 
Don't be silly
You know more than them
 
They're old, probably have Alzheimer's
 
12:44 PM
one of them is like 34 though :/
 
12:56 PM
@FenderLesPaul What's the record?
27, according to Google.
Going back to school, will finally have Springer/journal access again
 
what record?
 
Record for youngest case of Alz
 
ohhh
damn 27
 
I think it was a person with Down's snydrome though
 
Upside down syndrome
 
1:12 PM
Is there anyone?
 
no
 
woo
I finally learned Landslide
 
@FenderLesPaul Do you know how to prove that causal relations are transitive
It's an exercise in Wald, but I'm not convinced one can do it with the tools he provides
 
I don't off the top of my head unfortunately
what problem though?
 
8.1 AFAIK.
The problem is that the concatenation of smooth timelike curves need not be smooth.
And causal relations are defined with smooth curves.
 
1:25 PM
concatenation?
 
Union
 
oh
Ok let me check it out after I shower
 
The "real" proof is given in Penrose (1972), but Wald and HE don't contain it AFAIK.
You have to do some crazy smoothing procedure.
 
oh shit I remember looking that up too
yeah now I remember
dude that proof is insanely non-trivial
 
I ordered Penrose because I want to know the proof.
I'm doing a reading course on diff topology this summer with my advisor. I'll ask him if we can cover that.
 
1:40 PM
cool
you doing research over summer too?
 
2:05 PM
Yes
 
2:16 PM
@user36790 I've only used two books, Kittel and Ashcroft & Mermin.
The latter is better.
@FenderLesPaul know where you're going to grad school?
 
user116211
2:34 PM
@DanielSank Thanks for the recommendation :)
 
user116211
Oh....this is way much cheaper than Kittel's.
 
Should I solve all exercises on Resnick & Halliday's book or can I solve only some exercises?
 
user116211
@hubot I don't think there is any harm to solve it.
 
2:50 PM
@Slereah Umm, HE doesn't use everywhere smooth curves, they use piecewise diff curves.
Then everything becomes trivial!
 
if it's piecewise, yeah
 
@Slereah Check out Prop 4.5.10 in HE.
 
3:26 PM
@Slereah Do you understand the proof?
I think I need to reread chap 4
Holy shit HE has terrible notation
 
 
1 hour later…
4:56 PM
@DanielSank not yet
still deciding between UCSB and Berkeley
I'll see you soon though if you're around for visit day!
 
@ACuriousMind Yup, I hate HE.
Worst book.
 
5:38 PM
Why is the chat dead today?
 
5:53 PM
My god, H&E are geniuses.
 
6:21 PM
@FenderLesPaul When's that?
@FenderLesPaul Wait I forget... are you going for grad or undergrad?
 
@DanielSank grad, of course
 
is the tennessee border dispute still going on?
 
What?
 
georgia and tennessee were fighting about their border
didn't you hear?
 
No
 
-1
Q: I screwed up horribly

Abdul Moiz QureshiWhile messing around with the laws of physics, I accidentally caused the entire planet to gain a net positive charge of five. What have I done, what are the consequences, and how do I fix it. Any suggestion? I won't risk playing around with the laws of Physics anymore, so if someone has a 'possib...

wat
 
+1 for effort
 
@0celo7 Don't upvote garbage.
 
Yes ma'am
 
6:41 PM
@ACuriousMind Came here to post that.
I love the tags.
We need a hall of fame and this should be on it.
 
@ACuriousMind I can't wait to hear the creative close reasons.
 
@HDE226868 ...someone already voted to close as homework-like oO
 
facepalm
 
That was me.
Didn't know what else to VTC as!
Maybe it's a writing prompt for his creative writing class.
 
6:45 PM
unclear what you asking? Or a custom close reason?
 
Didn't even think of that.
Too late now!
@ACuriousMind I voted on the answer as "not an answer"
 
Not a vote, but a flag, but al least that one's correct ;P
 
Whatever.
HE has scrambled my brains
 
7 hours ago, by Sᴋᴜʟʟ ᴘᴇᴛʀᴏʟ
Have you @0celo7 decided on a name?
what's wrong with "cruiser"?
 
Not very imaginative
And it should be physics/math related
Like "the parallel transporter"
 
6:57 PM
That sounds like it should be the name of a van
 
sounds "treky" to me
 
i think there's a typo in HE
But I don't want to do the calculation to verify it.
Oh the life of a lazy student
 
7:33 PM
Ah. Not a typo.
 
you did the calc?
 
Yes, took two pages.
Wow this is a nontrivial theorem if I've ever seen one!
I'm just a little confused by why they did everything the way they did, but hey
 
20 hours ago, by ACuriousMind
At some point in your life, you need to learn to take theorems as black boxes.
 
@skillpatrol I understand the concept of the proof
But they create this vector that I think could be simpler
I mean, the idea behind the proof is brilliant.
@ACuriousMind Suppose I have some curve where the tangent vector is discontinuous. If, at the point of discontinuity the discontinuity is just a scaling, can I adjust the curve parameter so there's no discontinuity anymore?
Like if before the discontinuity, th tangent vector is V, but right after, it's 5V
The components aren't technically continuous, but the direction is
 
8:14 PM
@DanielSank grad school
and it's on the 7th and 8th of April
right after Berkeley
 
@FenderLesPaul do you happen to understand Prop. 4.5.10 in HE
Damn, it's not the thing I need.
@skillpatrol lol, spent a good part of this day understanding a handful of theorems and proofs and now I realize it's not what I need.
 
0
Q: Using Copyrighted Material as Answers

JenHow do I use pictures and copyrighted stuff as material. If you can quote someone why can you not quote their work as well? The teacher said in your own words. Does that fix the problem? Does that mean have to redraw a picture or find one not copyrighted?

 
@0celo7 live and learn
 
@ChrisWhite suppose I have calculated a functional form for a pdf of some data.
Then on my computer I generate a bunch of data which should be distributed according to that pdf.
How do I write a test function which answers the question "Are these numerically generated random data in agreement with the pdf function I calculated?"?
 
8:39 PM
@Slereah Why exactly do the curves need to be C^1 everywhere? What's wrong with them being piecewise?
As long as they're continuous and at the corners the tangent vectors point into the same half of the light cone, I see no issue.
 
9:38 PM
@Slereah Why do the open sets $I^+(p)$ form an open cover? What guarantees some point is in the future of another?
Ah, I think geodesics are defined on open intervals on a boundaryless manifold.
 
 
2 hours later…
11:35 PM
@dmckee Is your spring break over tomorrow?
 
@0celo7 No. Tomorrow is my first day "off" for the break.
 
Ah.
@dmckee You should read some Arnold since you have some time.
 
@DanielSank Are you asking for the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test?
 

« first day (1963 days earlier)      last day (2966 days later) »