« first day (2743 days earlier)      last day (2481 days later) » 

20:00
eh. comparing undergrad to phd is a bit problematic. (less so in the first year or so, but once you get into research it's really not a good comparison)
relatively few people do PhD
although the number was rising for a while
I don't know the numbers currently
Anonymous
@NovaliumCompany Well, for one, while you are younger you can pick up new skills faster. That decays as you grow older. 15 is the good time to learn whatever you want to learn
Anonymous
By learning I don't only mean academic learning
depends on what kinds of skills one is talking about
What's the problem with learning 'as you grow older'?
20:02
for academic learning, I think it's usually easier for me to learn stuff now because I have enough range that I can place it in context
i think he means it's easier to pick up completely new things
which probably has some truth because you're still developing and have lots of free time
plus there's a certain level of confidence which phd level research instills.
Hmm, ok, for now, I'll try to put as much as possible useful information into my brain. That's the plan :D
that's a bad plan
20:04
Then again learn things properly and not dip in and out.
you should just try new things and see what you like best because you have that freedom right now.
the following is meant entirely in jest: "don't trust him, he's backwards"
jamming as much stuff into your brain as possible as early as possible won't help you that much in the long run except for being better than all your peers for a few years until everyone normalizes in their research.
@Droleulb What should I do then, what do you mean by 'trying new things'. I think I've found my passion and what I want to do.
consider that you might be wrong.
overspecialization is dangerous especially if done really early.
20:07
@Droleulb I'll have to agree there
I was convinced I wanted to do medicine until I was 16
try to be well rounded in a lot of things
so when the ACTUAL time to fully decide what you want to do for a living comes years down the road you'll have a much better idea and lots of more doors open for you
then again, there's some things you really do need to be very young to start in order to become tip top
e.g. professional sports
if you don't start at a young age, it's unlikely you'll become the next Chess World Champion for example
@enumaris I'd agree.
I mean, look at Einstein. He started Physics and Math from a very young age, he knew what he wanted to do, and did it.
@enumaris it's unlikely anyway
vastly more unlikely if you start at an older age for those though
20:12
to think that "if i start really early i'll have a super duper edge over everyone else and definitely become the next big name" is wrong. you'll only incrementally have a greater chance of contributing something important to your field than everyone else in it, but you'll also feel much worse if you don't because you set yourself up for expecting it.
that's in the context of academics, not activities like sports or games.
I'm sure what I want to do, and I prefer to start early, in order to be ready when the time comes. The chance of loosing the interest or failing is always there, but I'd rather take it. I'm the kind of person, that if I start many things at once, I won't finish any of them, but If I concentrate on one or two things, the chances of finishing them are higher. (Btw I have no idea what I'm talking about, It's really late and I'm sleepy, please excuse me.)
this changes a lot if you end up on the bad side of the average, like starting your degree in some area of science at 30 while doing something irrelevant prior to it.
you'll have lower chances of success obviously but it boils down to the individual in the end.
@Droleulb Thanks for the advice but I'd rather follow my heart and take the chances. I learn by making mistakes. You don't learn to swim by reading a book on how to swim right. I will focus on the things that interest me (Physics and Engineering are not the only ones) No hard feelings.
Goodnight guys.
Anonymous
@NovaliumCompany By all means, start early! But don't do it in hope of becoming the next Einstein, as that is not a reasonable goal. Moreover, keep in mind that your likes and dislikes will change with time. :)
Anonymous
Goodnight
20:22
Taking a break from code to do laundry. Fresh and sweet smelling clothes tends to be something people judge others on, don't want people to poo poo my ideas because i don't have clean laundry.
@NovaliumCompany i don't know why you're saying "but i'd rather" because what you said after that has nothing to do with what i said and your last sentence agrees with what i said before too.
Today should be an epic day of exploration of some cool math and cs ideas. 🐒
@Droleulb It's really late, my eyes are closing, I'm sorry If I am making mistakes.
starting early is not a high risk high reward thing, by all means start early. there's no "taking chances".
i'm just saying don't think it will help you be better than your friends who did not start early in their research later on.
(though it could)
I'm not studying these stuff because 'I want to be better'. I have never said that I want to be a physicist or a professor. I just study 'technology' overall, becuase it's interesting to me. I have no problems with learning something, giving it up, start something new, give it up... in the end, that way I'll know from everything.
@Cows Do you program?
20:28
hullo blue
how're you
@NovaliumCompany i said that in general. feel free to learn as much as you want as soon as possible if you love doing it.
Ok, that is what I wanted to say.
I hope this is not an argument, we are just discussing right?
i'm just kind of weary of doing that now because that's more or less what i did in high school and it screwed up my first year of undergrad but it was mostly my fault rather than the fault of me learning.
no it's not an argument lol
Oks, because I don't want any bad feelings :D
20:32
And also. Learn it properly.
Otherwise you’ll carry through your misunderstandings to when you learn it in class
Ok.
By the way, is it a problem if I give you a link of a website I made :D?
Anonymous
Sure, why not
Anonymous
What's it about?
triobots.com It was a 1 month project I did. Nothing fancy, still waiting for customers :D
@CooperCape this is something i thought about too
but then i realized that it's pretty difficult to learn improperly.
if you read the right books and not wrong stuff like JD's book as your only source of physics.
you could learn badly though
in which case the classes will help you fill the gaps
Anonymous
20:36
@NovaliumCompany You made it yourself? That's looks quite nice :D (I personally have 0 knowledge about web development)
All coded by me :D for around 1 month.
Anonymous
Awesome!
I hope this is not considered an advertisment and hbar will not ban me or something?
Anonymous
Lol :P
Anonymous
That "Contact" button at the bottom is a bit strange
Anonymous
20:38
And the "Follow Us" looks a bit big
For 14 years old, that's what you get :D
Anonymous
Maybe you could improve that. But apart from that it looks excellent
@Droleulb good point. But I still think it’s important to be thorough
Anonymous
You should consider teaching me some web designing at some point :)
I would love to.
20:39
@NovaliumCompany same
i have code phobia
i just hate symbols
Anonymous
@NovaliumCompany What language did you use?
i hate writing too
just like pictures
I will happily admit to being worst in my class for moments and stuff because I don’t find it interesting and subsequently never learnt it properly
I see a ladder against a wall and literally cry
Ain’t about that
@Blue Javascript and Php are the main languages I used for the website. (Html and Css are included, but they are not exactly programming languages.)
Anonymous
Nice. I have no idea about either of those apart from the fact that javascript is a notoriously hard language to master
Anonymous
20:41
HTML and CSS are markup languages, right?
@Blue you forgot the ;
@Blue Yep. I would love to talk programming but I really have to go sleep now. I'll be back tommorow.
Anonymous
See you around. Bye!
Anonymous
@CooperCape I don't really know where semicolons are suitable...
@Blue oh me neither. I was just making a joke on having to end every js line with a ‘;’
Anonymous
20:45
Ah. That's a common feature in many programming languages
not in python
muahahahaha
Anonymous
Java, C, C++, ...
Anonymous
@enumaris Yep
or Fortran...
which covers both languages I've used extensively lol
Anonymous
FORTRAN is on its dead bed
20:46
still used in numerical computing
for pure speed
Pretty sure only time I’ve seen Fortran as a word is when celo complains.
Anonymous
@enumaris Yeah. The condensed matter guys at my uni use it still now. Somehow managed to convince them to partly shift to C
when I did fortran I didn't vectorize anything tho...so I'm actually not sure about the speed
@enumaris Fortran compilers have supported vectorization on platforms that support it for ... more or less as long as any high level languages have supported that.
yeah, I'm sure that since I used the linear algebra library to diagonalize my Hamiltonian that it was vectorized in some sense...
but vectorization wasn't really an issue that I was aware about when I was coding fortran lol
20:52
But until the mid 1990s there simple wasn't much vectorization worth speaking about on consumer platforms.
21:05
I assume that the rise of vectorization must have something to do with the rise of multi-threaded computing or some such? o.O
Anonymous
Multi-threading does save a lot of time, when you run big and complex programs
It started with the incorporation of SIMD math instructions on the Power and Pentium lines.
Anonymous
Parallel computing is a type of computation in which many calculations or the execution of processes are carried out concurrently. Large problems can often be divided into smaller ones, which can then be solved at the same time. There are several different forms of parallel computing: bit-level, instruction-level, data, and task parallelism. Parallelism has long been employed in high-performance computing, but it's gaining broader interest due to the physical constraints preventing frequency scaling. As power consumption (and consequently heat generation) by computers has become a concern in recent...
Multi-core CPUs and therefore multiprocessing being common rather than special to multi-CPU motherboards came later.
Anonymous
Also, parallel computing ^
21:08
no idea what SIMD is
Anonymous
Single instruction, multiple data (SIMD) is a class of parallel computers in Flynn's taxonomy. It describes computers with multiple processing elements that perform the same operation on multiple data points simultaneously. Such machines exploit data level parallelism, but not concurrency: there are simultaneous (parallel) computations, but only a single process (instruction) at a given moment. SIMD is particularly applicable to common tasks such as adjusting the contrast in a digital image or adjusting the volume of digital audio. Most modern CPU designs include SIMD instructions to improve the...
hmmmm
You could buy 2 and 4 sockets motherboards in the 80s, but they were expensive and of limited help because the main OSes lacked sufficient support. Only uber-geeks bothered with them.
so they used to have motherboards with like 2 CPUs rather than 1 CPU with a dual core?
I didn't know that lol
@enumaris It's what made Crays special back when Crays were special.
21:10
never heard of Crays...D:
was that what a Pentium D was?
I had a Pentium D back in the day...
::begins sobbing into his prune juice::
lol
hmmm so that gives rise to a question of how to delineate multiple cores vs multiple CPUs...I suppose it has to do with the architecture of how the memory is shared between the processing units or some such...
hmmmm
@enumaris There is no fundamental difference.
or probably architecture in how the cores communicate with each other?
oh really?
it's all just...convention?
In principle there is more flexibility in separate sockets because the chip designer doesn't lock you into a particular cache architecture, but in practice it's useful to have the cache "close" so you can't take advantage of the theoretical improvement.
21:15
hmmm
@enumaris You have a bus of some kind connecting the separate computation units. In one case the bus is on a board, in the other it is in the chip, but they still do the same thing.
I see
but where the bus is located could be the "delineation" I guess...integrated into the chip, or not integrated
I saw some article about vertically stacking GPU cores and how that architecture has some advantage over horizontal stacking...was interesting...but computer hardware is pretty outside my field lol
crap, my entity linking algorithm is horrible lol
@NovaliumCompany Yes I do
back home . . . . Doing some light reading while watching TV
dam, it seems this problem I have is a totally non trivial problem...
will take a while to solv eit
@enumaris what are you trying to make?
21:24
well I'm building a NLP pipeline
Oh nice
work or research?
and at the end of the pipeline I want to aggregate the named entities that it outputs
work
but I'm running into a mild version of the entity linking problem...my problem is not as big as that one, but still non trivial
Are you allowed to share the algorithm you are using :P
can't really share it in its entirety
nor can I share the data that goes into it
awwww
yeah I know the data can't be share for sure
21:26
I mean, it's not research level stuff, I'm using open source pieces
so like there wouldn't be much value to me sharing my code anyways
it's kinda special tailored to my data
well I was just looking at a hint, like the name of the algorithm if it is a well known one?
may be
uh...well the NLP pipeline itself is pretty standard
clean-tokenization-POS tagging-Parsing-Named Entity Recognition
almost all done through Spacy
I see
but I gotta like filter stuff
and all that jazz
get named entity relationships
stuff like that...
I've not used Spacy before. Just looked it up. It is described as "Industrial-Strength
Natural Language Processing" .Sounds scary
21:30
lol, it's pretty good
I like it better than NLTK because it's more streamlined
and also I think the support for NLTK is kinda lacking since it's primarily academics based
I use NLTK . That's my jam, but it's for babies though hehe
NLTK doesn't even have deep learning tho :P
yeah
spacy has deep convolutional networks in there
scrolling through the api now
it looks pretty nice
21:33
yeah, pretty intuitive mostly
I'm not at the point yet where i want to retrain their models
we'll see how burdensome that is lol
The documentation looks pretty good too
yeah, they are backed by a start up
so, they gotta make the presentation really nice
Just going through the video on their api page
wow
hehehe he says interacting with the database is poison to researchers hehehehehe
He is able to convey his ideas nicely and effectively
I like that, and I want to be able to do that
@enumaris ^^^^
there's a video?
I didn't even notice lol
yeah hehe
21:43
maybe cus I can't view videos at work lol
oh
lol
Why is $- i P_0$ positive-definite?
Oh wait, $P_0 = \partial_t$ in this case
I don't think there's a proof of this, that's just a general QFT assumption
really?
why can we assume this
About the momentum operator having values in the future light cone
@Cows we expect particles to go from the past to the future, not the other way around
21:54
oh, yes a physical argument
So doesn't this mean energy is always positive if you assume that
@bolbteppa are you trying to write some kind of a proof?
I feel like one has to first sketch a hyperbola
@bolbteppa do you have the full statement of the problem?
cruuud
this linking is unusable -.-
@bolbteppa Yes
you can also develop QFT for weirder fields, but usually it doesn't work
@Slereah I thought that assumption of positive definiteness comes because of the hyperbolic constraint(SR) , . . . . just a guess
anyways i am not sure if I am making sense
let me just leave this convo while I have some dignity left :P
@Slereah ^^ thoughts?
22:09
it's part of the whole Wigner business
oh cool
Wigner's fake time-axis rotation thingy?
at some point I really gotta actually learn QFT...-.-
how fast is our galaxy moving?
with respect to what
in respect to the universe i guess
22:16
like the CMB?
is the universe really expanding or just reaching our eyes
wut
I think the Earth's peculiar velocity w.r.t. the CMB is around 300km/s
but I don't know about the Milky Way's
I'm sick of high school level questions getting boosted by SE. The 'Hot Network Questions' are the SE equivalent of clickbait. /rant
much of the 300 km/s is coming from the Sun's rotation around the Milky way and the Earth's rotation around the Sun tho.
i think of the universe as the main body that holds our laws to be true
22:21
arxiv.org/pdf/astro-ph/9803306.pdf this paper seems to suggest the local group moves w.r.t. CMB frame at around 668km/s ... hmmm...that's quite fast
so if time dilation were true which i assume it is, we should actually feel longer and shorter days as we accelerate or decelerate and the galaxy should play a part in that acceleration, using the universe as the constant
@enumaris that's Wick :p
Wigner is the little group of the Poincaré group thing
o
yeah...
Wigner is the Wigner-Eckhart theorem thing?
Subgroups of the Poincaré group that preserve momentum
spherical tensors and what not?
22:23
there has to be reference points or something we can use to see our position in the universe
the Wigner classification
it is called
like if we put rovers on mars, we can use the observations against ours on earth and pinpoint a location
because we know it's distance from us so then create the universe from our position and our theories and formulas of time
and calculate how fast time is moving somehow... maybe carbon dating or what not
if E = mc^2 and F = MA
The motion that's left must be the particular motion of our Galaxy through the universe! And how fast is the Milky Way Galaxy moving? The speed turns out to be an astounding 1.3 million miles per hour (2.1 million km/hr)!
ok and the speed of light is 669 miles per hour
million*
So we're 1/514th the speed needed to stop time or go back in time
So to live forever we need to hop the nearest star leaving the galaxy, going to the nearest fastest galaxy and so on, until our bodies can repair faster than the surroundings can destroy it
right
22:46
wat
could a pole shift cause matter to start changing form, or reversing?
23:02
by a pole shift you mean like Earth's magnetic poles flipping?
yeah
and correct me if I'm wrong but the average human life is 80 and 80 x 514 is 41,000
the last pole shift happened 41,000 years ago
i can't really connect to the two though
probably not much connection between that...
and the average human life right now is 80, but it was much shorter 41000 years ago
lol
yeah ok but look at this..
"Other than incomplete genealogies, there are other measures of the age of humanity found in the Bible. First, the Bible says that the Lord made a covenant and commanded his law to 1,000 generations:

Remember His covenant forever, The word which He commanded to a thousand generations, (1 Chronicles 16:15)
He has remembered His covenant forever, The word which He commanded to a thousand generations, (Psalm 105:8)
but showing love to a thousand generations of those who love me and keep my commandments. (Exodus 20:6)
well a generation is only roughly 25 years
1000 generations is like 25000 years tho
so definitely a long way to go from since when the Bible was written
23:17
we are about 1/6 of the way through I guess...
seems a bit crackpotty tho tbh
have you ever seen the explanation of physics in the hindu scriptures called vedas
it tells the speed of light thousand of years before einstein
and funny Krishna is the same God as Mithras and Jesus and was the first monotheistic religion
@GettingNifty I think you might be looking for one of the religious rooms, not this one...
That's not what i'm saying.
Christianity was certainly not he first monotheistic religion...
Krishnah
23:21
probably Zorastrianism is the first recorded monotheistic religion...?
not sure tho
If all of these are ancient science and the ideas are expressed metaphorically so that people of all kind could understand them.
That's why they repeat themselves.
Maybe?
And that's why they're true and nobody can explain it. Because we're not the first people to find out.
o.O
I dunno man...I tend to keep religion and science separate...
Well of course but Einstein was Jewish.
Jewish by heritage
He was not a religious Jew though
Oh is that what he said. He's only the most famous scientist in the world.
23:26
I think his writings and quotes and stuff sorta show that he wasn't a very religious person
He probably believe in a God, but not a personal one like that depicted by Christianity
@enumaris He was likely some sort of pantheist, whether to call that "religious" or not is probably not a very useful debate :P
hmmm
And he helped make Nuclear weapons. I'm sure he said a lot of things, for a lot of reasons.
Did he ever label himself as such? I feel like people just look at his words and make conclusions for themselves...
23:29
I mean, you can quote mine him for quotes that come across as rather anti-religious as well as for those that seem to imply a very charitable view of religion (e.g. "Science without religion is blind, religion without science is lame"), but that's also probably not a very useful exercise
Most of the sources that I've read about Einstein say only that he probably believed in a God, but not a personal one.
Albert Einstein's religious views have been widely studied and often misunderstood. Einstein ... Einstein was raised by secular Jewish parents, and attended a local Catholic public elementary school in Munich.
@enumaris The most explicit statement you'll find is that he wrote once that he believed in "Spinoza's god", which is indeed not personal
I see
I'd imagine that his views probably also changed throughout his life
like most people...
Well I mean I'm Jewish and I was Atheist for four years but I was raised Christian.
So if you quoted me my whole life you'd get a lot of different answers..
23:33
well most people who aren't like super devout adherents to one religion
which might not be "most people"
And then you also find him calling himself an agnostic but it is not clear to me whether he thought of this as compatible with Spinoza's pantheism or whether this represents a shift in his views. As I said, probably not a very useful exercise to try to get a coherent picture, because there may not be one
hmmm
I feel like also agnostic is like...a multi-level thing
if you believe in Christianity but have doubts, are you agnostic? o.O
like how unsure do you have to be before you are an agnostic...lol
Yeah, that's a frequent debate about the term. In the weak sense, i.e. not having absolute certainty, most people are agnostics
yeah
But usually people don't really deliver a definition when they say "I'm agnostic", so that makes the term kinda hard to nail down :P
23:37
indeed...
On 17 April 1955, Einstein experienced internal bleeding caused by the rupture of an abdominal aortic aneurysm, which had previously been reinforced surgically by Rudolph Nissen in 1948.[141] He took the draft of a speech he was preparing for a television appearance commemorating the State of Israel's seventh anniversary with him to the hospital, but he did not live long enough to complete it.[142]

Einstein refused surgery, saying: "I want to go when I want. It is tasteless to prolong life artificially. I have done my share, it is time to go. I will do it elegantly."[143] He died in Prince
like the entire bridge between hard atheists who know there is no God or gods, and hard theists...
and his last words were in German so the nurse didn't know what he said
his FBI file was 1,427 pages long
I mean, depending on your epistemology, if you don't think you can ever be absolutely certain of anything, then you're agnostic about everything in that weak sense, so it's not really a religious viewpoint when you say you're agnostic.
possible
term too broad
please remake
23:41
That's why we should stick to physics, where things are always well-defined.
things are always well defined...hmm...not sure I believe that :P
is the path integral in QFT well defined? It seems like it wouldn't be a well defined integral...
I thought the link I provided would indicate I'm perhaps being slightly ironic :P
I spent some time studying the math behind path integrals...but it still doesn't seem well defined
hold on as I try to get around my firewall lol
It's an xkcd, what kind of draconian firewall blocks that?
yeah...this firewall is weird...
it blocks xkcd but not reddit
lol
23:45
"We need God to prosper. Those without him will not." Nostradamas
@enumaris That's certainly quite a puzzling decision :P
I think images might be a factor
a lot of places with images are blocked
imgur is blocked
I don't really know...
Oh no, someone doesn't want you to see stick figures? Whose firewall is this anyway, are you at work?
yeah I'm at work lol
I think it's like for productivity or something
don't want me spending my time reading xkcd

« first day (2743 days earlier)      last day (2481 days later) »