« first day (2486 days earlier)      last day (2436 days later) » 

8:00 PM
they at least knew the radioactive stuff wasn't good, and kind of contained it
they just put tons of Hg in the woods
random places in the woods
 
Anonymous
Is it possible to decontaminate radioactive regions? I had heard that research is going on
 
@Blue There is. What they've done is put concrete slabs over everything to minimize contamination and limited people accessing groundwater from those areas
the actual effects are minimal
 
Anonymous
That's nice
 
I need to order some school books. Yay
 
Anonymous
8:04 PM
"school" books?
 
Anonymous
@StefanBischof Hi
 
@Blue what?
 
Sci-Fi books to read during Class xD Not something to actually learn?
 
Anonymous
@0celo7 school=uni. Or did you mean something else?
 
yes
what else would school mean
 
Anonymous
8:07 PM
Actually it quite rare to use school as an alternative for uni in this part of the world
 
Anonymous
:P
 
Anonymous
Anyway
 
it is a school
we call the departments schools
or colleges
either works
 
Sid
Why is Uni not called College?
AH, that's better.
 
@Sid I call it college
@Blue's mastery of English is doubtful
 
Sid
8:09 PM
LOL
 
(see what I did there)
ok @Blue I'm bored
let's learn some measure theory
 
Anonymous
I want to learn AI stuff
 
Anonymous
Life's so short.
 
Anonymous
Meh
 
if you want to learn mathematical QM you need measure theory
Speactral theorem and whatnot
 
Anonymous
8:11 PM
Maybe, someday, I will learn it :P
 
Maybe learn about neural networks for use in AI? Play around with digital neurons: playground.tensorflow.org
 
Anonymous
@StefanBischof I don't have time XD Ok, I'll look at it. Thanks
 
@Blue Ok :) It's an intuitive app instead of a long text.
 
well what do you have time for?
 
Sid
I wonder how a freshman year guy has no time.
 
8:14 PM
your savior the lord Jesus Christ perhaps?
 
@0celo7 Eat, happyness, playing Hearthstone
 
AI reminds me that I should take a look at that 11 dimensional brain thing
 
Anonymous
@Sid A freshman year guy who has enrolled for 5 courses on Coursera and learning QM and Linear Algebra on their own.
 
@Sid It depends where in the world you are - for me, a College is very different to a University. There's a type of College that you could go to pre-Uni ('6th form College'), a College you could go to instead of a Uni, ~1 you could go to that is a Uni and a number that are parts of different Unis
 
@0celo7 Nope, not yet
 
8:15 PM
@BalarkaSen It's deeeeeep
 
Sid
@0celo7 If blue is refusing to even look at Measure theory, I doubt he wants to learn about God. :P
 
I sort of wanted to learn more extrinsic geometry but ran out of motivation fuel
I really enjoyed 6.2
 
Anonymous
@0celo7 Studies.
 
tfw the apartment randomly shakes
how does that even happen
 
@Sid First week of first year, we were sat down in my Director of Studies office and he listed out everything that was the minimum we needed to do and it totalled to 55 hours minimum per week. 'Minimum' is just about enough to pass...
 
8:17 PM
apocalypse has come, @0celo7
 
Sid
@Mithrandir24601 ....what? i don't understand any of that
 
@Sid lol me neither
 
Sid
@Mithrandir24601 Wow... we have only 23 hours of classes per week this semester.
 
@BalarkaSen check out the book "Curves and Surfaces" in the GSM series then
 
Sid
@0celo7 Earthquake. Enjoy that.
 
Anonymous
8:18 PM
@Mithrandir24601 Mine totals to more than 100 including the self-study courses :P
 
I think that's a deeper look at surfaces that's not just a PDE orgy
 
To drop a random fact about neural Networks: Instead of a CPU at the beginning of 2017 IBM introduced en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TrueNorth Instead Transistors relying on synamipsis/neurons
 
Anonymous
But okay, I should just stop complaining and get on with my work
 
Anonymous
:)
 
@Sid Essentially, I'm in the UK and (except for the I believe 1 University College London) a College $\neq$ University
 
Sid
8:19 PM
@Blue You brought it upon yourself
 
@Blue 100/7 = 14.3
you are not doing 14.3 hours of work a day
 
Sid
That. ^
 
Anonymous
@0celo7 Of course I am.
 
@0celo7 Sighh. I don't know, I still need to learn Jacobi fields.
 
Sid
Ridiculous
 
8:19 PM
I am just so clueless what resonates the best with me in differential geometry.
 
@Blue That sounds more like the actual work we had to do :P
 
@BalarkaSen so you're not a geometer
why are you trying to force it?
 
Sid
@Mithrandir24601 Oxford and Cambridge are not Universities?
 
@0celo7 ... That's a good question.
 
Anonymous
@Sid Okay man. I don't want to prove anything.
 
8:21 PM
@Sid Yeah, they are, but they're not Colleges - they're formed of Colleges
 
Anonymous
I am enjoying it
 
I am supposed to now get 12 books on fluids
My advisor looked at the book list for my fluids class and added 5
what the hell is wrong with everyone
 
Sid
@0celo7 ....what? I am going to eat my shoe if you are able to read all 12 in a year
 
@Sid exactly
some of them are 700 pages long
 
Sid
@0celo7 Your advisor is a dumbo
 
8:22 PM
@Sid I wouldn't say that
 
@Sid Get up at 7am, start work at 9am, stop for lunch at 12.30pm, start work again at 1pm, have dinner at either 6 or 7pm, start work an hour later (I gave myself an average of an extra hour per day at this point to do other stuff), then go to bed at about 1am
 
why y'all ranting about workload
if you don't like workload don't work
if you like workload work
 
although he does give me books that he hasn't read but owns in hope I tell him it's worth reading
 
just stop ranting man
watch some dank memes instead
 
Repeat every day (except for major, major holidays) for 3 years
 
8:23 PM
@BalarkaSen we can't all do weed enemas like you
 
I guess lmao is a good response to that
but weed is for kids
 
@Mithrandir24601 and look where that got you
 
Sid
@Mithrandir24601 ....That's too heavy a workload.
 
shitposting in a chatroom with a bunch of Indian kids
 
Anonymous
@BalarkaSen Uh, well it all started because @Sid claimed that a freshman year student can't have no time.
 
8:24 PM
@0celo7 Doing a PhD that I can't help but love :D
4
 
@Mithrandir24601 I thought you were a PhD student
 
@0celo7 That's what I meant... I edited it to be more clear :P
 
ayy
I can get it on Amazon for 48
still a bit much
 
@0celo7 Oh, the above 3 years were my undergrad...
 
@Blue That's true. None of us has enough time.
too much too learn
too little time
soon we all die
<3
 
Anonymous
8:27 PM
Either I want to die fast or not die at all. I don't like anything midway
 
Anonymous
:P
 
@BalarkaSen Got an idea why on $T^n$, $-\Delta u=f$, $f\in C^\infty$ has a solution iff $\int f=0$?
Using Hodge theory is cheating
 
nope
 
@Sid Yeah, I was borderline burned out after 3 years - I only really managed to fully recover from it a few months ago :P
 
@blue janar kono shesh nai, janar chesta britha tai
as a wise man once said
 
8:28 PM
please no indian
 
bengali \neq indian
that's a \ne!!!
 
Anonymous
indian is not a language...lol
 
bengali $\cong$ indian
 
Sid
@Mithrandir24601 I got burned out after 2 years of High School. :P
 
Anonymous
nah...bengali is congruent to bangladeshi
 
8:30 PM
that means isomorphic
 
Sid
But, that had more to do with the amount of competition than heavy coursework
 
learn some aljabr
 
Anonymous
i'm larning linear aljabr
 
actually i feel like bengal represents little to nothing about the generic india (in terms of language, culture, etc etc).
we're kind of an isolated bit of it
for geographical and historical reasons
well except the JEE craze
 
@BalarkaSen I'm actually pretty excited for that algebra course. It's taught by my former topology prof, who's a famous knot guy
 
8:33 PM
Sounds nice
 
@BalarkaSen today he brought in this book "atlas of finite groups" by Conway
 
Anonymous
@BalarkaSen There is no "generic" India. Every few hundred kms it changes drastically
 
it's absolutely huge
 
@Blue That's fair, I guess.
Oh I have heard of Conway's book
 
@BalarkaSen he was a grad student when they were writing it
they had the character tables spread out on the floor trying to figure out how to organize it
 
Anonymous
8:36 PM
 
Anonymous
@LeakyNun How are iterators helpful?
 
Anonymous
Can't we just use next() and hasNext() directly
 
@Blue you also need hasNext()
 
Anonymous
@LeakyNun Yeah. I mean why do we need such an interface?
 
@Blue because you want to be able to iterate over the same iterable twice
 
Anonymous
8:42 PM
@LeakyNun Ok. As an alternative for the while loop?
 
@Blue I don't get what you're asking.
 
Anonymous
8:52 PM
@LeakyNun Alright. I'm trying to break down my question into parts:
 
Anonymous
Iterator is an interface with next() and hasNext(). Okay so far
 
Anonymous
Now, what is the use of the Iterator<Item> iterator() ?
 
Anonymous
We are defining a generic datatype
 
Anonymous
But how can a function iterator() be a variable of Iterator<Item> type?
 
Anonymous
Functions aren't variables...right?
 
Anonymous
8:56 PM
I'm finding the syntax confusing
 
Anonymous
Or I should revise generics
 
9:07 PM
@Blue In Java, the order you declare things doesn't matter. There's no reason why it should.
 
@Blue What would you put in your while loop, if you didn't have iterators?
 
Anonymous
@DawoodibnKareem Yeah. I got it now
 
@Blue No, iterator() is a method that returns a value of type Iterator<Item>.
 
Anonymous
@DawoodibnKareem Then can't we just write return abc.iterator() ?
 
Anonymous
9:11 PM
abc being any object which is invoking the function interator()
 
@Blue Yes, but what context are you doing this in? You're asking general questions about very specific code, which you haven't shown.
 
Anonymous
@DawoodibnKareem Scroll up a bit. You'll see the screenshot
 
Anonymous
 
Anonymous
Look at the top right
 
Anonymous
I can't understand what the interface Iterable is doing
 
9:16 PM
@BalarkaSen Well I proved it but in the end I just repeated the proof of Hodge's theorem
success?
 
Could anyone point me to source for, or tell me about, co-ordinate transformations between say, some linear velocity co-ordinate frame and one like the earth? I.e accelerating but in circular motion
 
@Phase What?
 
Well between linear velocity frames of reference it's just the lorentz transform
But what about one with no proper acceleration, and one that is in circular motion?
 
Anonymous
What a co-incidence. I was thinking of asking the same question as Phase on the PSE main site. :P
 
Anonymous
I'd like to know the answer
 
9:21 PM
@Blue because you want to be able to iterate over it twice
you generate a new iterator every time iterator() is called
 
Oh
That is spooky
I just tabbed to this after hours of playing vidya
 
Anonymous
@LeakyNun Iterator<Item> iterator()....what does this particular line mean/do?
 
@Blue it is an abstract method
you get a brand new iterator if you call the method
 
Anonymous
Shouldn't abstract methods be overridden? I can't see where they did that
 
Anonymous
@LeakyNun
 
9:24 PM
they haven't. you should do that.
 
Anonymous
Oh I see
 
Anonymous
@LeakyNun Also, what is the Iterator<String> i=stack.iterator() doing? If we are creating a new object of Iterator<String> type, the should'nt we write something like Iterator<String> i=new Iterator<String>() ? And what is stack here?
 
@Blue stack is the previous stack which stores strings :)
we are getting the iterator of the stack
 
Anonymous
@LeakyNun You mean the overridden iterator() , right?
 
yes
 
Anonymous
9:31 PM
Aha
 
Anonymous
Gotcha
 
Anonymous
Thanks a ton :)
 
no problem
 
Anonymous
@LeakyNun You codegolf profile is quite impressive. Have you been learning coding by yourself (beyond the normal schoolwork)?
 
@Blue yes
 
Anonymous
9:35 PM
@LeakyNun Nice. I would like to know how you got started. Did you take MOOCs or read books or something else? I've started solving the basic Algorithms and Data Structure problems from sites like HackerRank and CodeChef but I'm not sure of the order to follow
 
@Blue my father taught me programming when I was young
well, I'm still young now, but whatever
 
Anonymous
@LeakyNun I don't think he taught you the advanced stuff, or did he? :P
 
@Blue All that means is that if you have a class with a method called iterator()that returns an Iterator<Something>, you can declare that it implements the interface Iterable<Something>, then refer to it with a variable of type Iterable<Something>, or use it in some other context where an Iterable<Something> is required. One special example of such a context is a for-each loop. Something that implements this interface can appear after the colon.
 
Anonymous
I know just basic java. Not sure how to move on from here. Enrolled in some MOOCs
 
@Blue well what do you want to learn?
 
9:39 PM
@BalarkaSen algebraic topology bat signal
 
Anonymous
@LeakyNun I'm mostly interested in competitive programming, simulations and machine learning /AI
 
@0celo7 [Raspberry voice] You called?
 
@Blue the last one is way out of my expertise and the first one is mostly algorithms?
 
@BalarkaSen Raspberry?
 
Anonymous
@LeakyNun Yes. The first one is mostly algorithms
 
Anonymous
9:41 PM
How did you go about it?
 
I meant the Batman voice lol
What's the q?
 
Anonymous
Any suggestions how to strengthen my algo skills?
 
@Blue practice.geeksforgeeks.org seems to be a good site
 
Anonymous
I heard good things about that site
 
@BalarkaSen I have an open set $\Omega$ in $\Bbb R^2$, and I'm looking at the graph of a smooth function $u:\Omega\to\Bbb R$. So this surface lives in the cylinder $\Omega\times\Bbb R$. I want to compare this with other surfaces in the cylinder that agree with $\Gamma(u)$ on the boundary
The claim is that $\Gamma(u)$ is homologous to any such surface, but is this true even if they intersect in the interior?
 
9:43 PM
Yes.
 
@BalarkaSen But the cycle will not necessarily be a manifold
 
Um, which cycle?
 
I mean chain
 
The nullhomology chain?
 
If $\Sigma $ is such a surface I want a chain $c$ s.t. $\partial c=\Gamma(u)-\Sigma$, no?
 
9:47 PM
right, that's what I meant
Well, no, I don't think $c$ is necessarily going to be a manifold
Like take graph of a function over a closed interval for a baby example
 
yes
that's what I drew
and why I'm asking
 
You can take the other curve (analogue of $\Sigma$) to intersect it a bunch of times, like you said
So, no, $c$ is not in general going to be a manifold
 
maybe not a manifold, but will Stoke's theorem work on it?
 
Yup. You can integrate over chains, right?
By cubulating the chain
 
Right, but is this actually what one calls a chain in the Stokes sense
 
9:50 PM
Right.
The chains in the smooth context are cubulated chains, not triangulated chains as in topology
 
According to Lee, they are smooth images of simplices
(or linear combinations thereof)
 
I have always seen smooth images of cubes.
 
I thought you didn't know geometry
In any case, we have these surfaces
It seems pretty obvious what $c$ should be
But how does one actually check that it's a smooth chain?
 
10:04 PM
 
 
1 hour later…
11:15 PM
hello
 
@heather Rytsas!
 
@Mithrandir24601 rytsas =)
4
Q: Discussion groups to assist those self-studying or enrolled students

heatherRecently, there has been a lot of discussion about an idea MathematicsAminPhysics came up with - a "MSE University". I think there was a meta post as well, though it seems to be deleted. While this idea grew out of that, it is not that, so please keep reading with an open mind. The idea to me s...

^ people here might be interested in the above since MathematicsAminPhysics posted in here too.
 
@heather I'm potentially willing to be a little involved, but I am really busy with working, although from October, I'll get paid to help out in demonstration classes :)
 
cool! i'll probably post updates on this topic here.
 
11:38 PM
and second relevant post to the above:
0
Q: A call for volunteers - "study group" coordinators and advisors

heatherYou may have read my meta post Discussion groups to assist those self-studying or enrolled students (if you haven't, you probably should, though a quick summary is provided below). Again, this idea grew out of the idea of a "MSE University" but it is not that, so please keep an open mind. So, ...

 
@heather what level is this geared towards - I'm a PhD student, so should I be a student or volunteer? (both?) When I say I want to teach/learn something, how do I know what level it'll be at?
 
you could be both, yes.
you might be able to teach calculus but want to learn topology (bad example, but hopefully you get what I mean).
probably best, in a situation like yours, to make clear the level you want to learn/teach at.
 
OK, is it just maths subjects for scientists, maths for mathematicians, or maths+science for whoever?
(don't get me wrong, this is a fantastic idea - I just like everything to be clear when I'm doing this sort of thing)
 
11:54 PM
for right now, it's math. who it's for doesn't matter.
maybe if this works well it can expand. but really, right now, the one goal in mind is to start a single trial course, with something like calculus, where many would be able to teach and interested to learn, just to get it started.
 
@heather Ah, OK. I think, for something like that, I'm willing (and apparently qualified) to teach that at some level (for physicists at least) but not by myself. i.e. I'm able to help a lecturer teach the course when someone has questions or a difficulty with something, so I think you need a middle 'demonstrator' level - you have the teacher, the student, then the demonstrator helps with students' questions, difficulties etc. but doesn't go through the main points with the students.
 

« first day (2486 days earlier)      last day (2436 days later) »