"Eötvös, Pekar and Fekete checked to an accuracy of 5 parts in $10^9$ that the earth imparts the same acceleration to wood, platinium, copper, asbestos, water, magnalium (90% Al, 10% Mg), copper sulphate and tallow. Renner checked ammonium fluoride, and an alloy of 30% Mg, 70% Cu."
GR experiments involve a lot of finding objects to throw
A metal umlaut (also known as röck döts) is a diacritic that is sometimes used gratuitously or decoratively over letters in the names of hard rock or heavy metal bands—for example those of Blue Öyster Cult, Queensrÿche, Motörhead, The Accüsed and Mötley Crüe.
Among English speakers, the use of umlaut marks and other diacritics with a blackletter style typeface is a form of foreign branding intended to give a band's logo a Teutonic quality—connoting stereotypes of boldness and brutality presumably associated with Germanic and Nordic cultures. Its use has also been attributed to a desire for a "gothic...
I thought that umlauts were used like "hey, I know that this word doesn't quite fit here, but if you stretch the pronunciation a bit, the metrics kinda work"
Wikipedia defines proper acceleration as the acceleration measured by an accelerometer; at the same time, an accelerometer is defined as a device that measures proper acceleration. From what I understood, proper acceleration is the acceleration not due to gravity, that is not caused by gravity. But are we talking about Newton's gravity or Einstein's?
Because if General relativity is correct, then it's a pseudoforce. But if you consider non-inertial frames of reference, then it's absolutely a force that exists.
A force that vanishes with co-ordinate transformation
like centrifugal
Well, not transformation
just choice of frame
"In relativity theory, proper acceleration[1] is the physical acceleration (i.e., measurable acceleration as by an accelerometer) experienced by an object. It is thus acceleration relative to a free-fall, or inertial, observer who is momentarily at rest relative to the object being measured. Gravitation therefore does not cause proper acceleration, since gravity acts upon the inertial observer that any proper acceleration must depart from (accelerate from).
A corollary is that all inertial observers always have a proper acceleration of zero."
Becker is an American sitcom that ran from 1998 to 2004 on CBS. Set in the New York City borough of The Bronx, the show starred Ted Danson as John Becker, a misanthropic doctor who operates a small practice and is constantly annoyed by his patients, co-workers, friends, and practically everything and everybody else in his world. Despite everything, his patients and friends are loyal because Becker genuinely cares about them. The series was produced by Paramount Network Television.
== PremiseEdit ==
The show revolved around Becker and the things that annoyed him, although the supporting cast also...
Ok so, this is a chat full of bright intellectuals and people like me, so I'm sure we can solve this conundrum: Pick 3 fizzy drinks, [top tier, middle, worst]
So, let me see if I understood correctly what proper acceleration actually is. We're first of all in Einstein's context. We have frames of reference (inertial and non). Proper acceleration is measured by an observer in free-fall or by an observer in an inertial frame, i.e. a frame of reference which is not accelerating. Proper acceleration is not due to gravity, because gravity acts upon the inertial observer as well as upon the objects being measured...
Being a while guy with enough physical presence to settle a room I've never felt the need to insist on a title even in the classroom, but that a sign of my having it easy.
We have a couple of professors here with difficult (for rural Americans) names from other parts of the world. One goes by "Dr [firstname]", and the other by is often "Dr. [initial]", though I have heard that he doesn't like that very much.
@Slereah My school has a non-trivalal population of instructors without terminal degrees. They are called "Prof. [so-and-so]", which kinda inverts the usual sense that professor is more senior than a mere doctor.
"Another series of experiments, called "ether-drift experiments", places stringent limits on any unknown, long-range vector field that couples directly to mass energy."
@BernardoMeurer The first thing is to try to avoid him. The second is to bring it to the attention of the department head. Or if it is the department head someone from the office of academic affairs.
They may also be an official grievance policy in the student handbook.
@dmckee He took points away from me because I used getline() in a way so that all the arrays are allocated automatically to the perfect size, instead of doing some realloc() brouhaha (which is what he expected us to do)
I mean expect as in, thought we were going to, not explicitely told us to
@BernardoMeurer hint, from what I'm finding at university: try to do what professors expect, even if you know it's not the right way. They like taking marks away for not doing exactly what the spec says.
Hmmm ... getline isn't part of the standard c library (and hasn't been part of the POSIX standard for terrible long ... maybe a decade now), so he may feel that it is cheating in some way.
I'm trying! But the guy takes points from me for anything! I implemented a way to do ops on a linked list without ever needed to go over the whole list by using a nicer struct and he took points from me because it wasn't "like everyone else did it"
@BernardoMeurer also what I've found: think dumb. That sounds kinda harsh, but if your programming abilities are beyond everyone else in your class, try to think as they would and code accordingly
@BernardoMeurer SO, providing your own implementation with a copious documentation comment at the front solves your problem and shows him that you know how to deal with alloc class function.
"Birkhoff's theory predicts the same redshift, perihelion shift, deflection, and time-delay as general relativity. But it requires that the pressure inside gravitating bodies equal the total density of mass-energy; and as a consequence, it demands that sound waves travel with the speed of light."
"Not until the work of Will was it realized that Whitehead's theory predicts a time-dependance for the ebb and flow of ocean tides that is completely contradicted by everyday experience."
@dmckee Aye, I've got one at the moment too. Refused to let me use static in a Java assignment a couple months ago because the course hadn't taught it yet.
@ArtOfCode I implemented 2048 in SDL2 in pure C without any structs, all in a single file, and with no extra libraries (apart from SDL and standard stuff)
Compiling is hard work and you didn't want to compile the code for anything more than once if possible. Those the whole separate compilation infrastructure.
In quantum mechanics, it is not obvious (for me) how to deduce the perceived dimensionality of the world from the (mathematical) description by high-dimensional wave functions. To simplify the problem, let us restrict the question to how the world looks like when perceived (only) with the help of...
Short answer: No.
Long answer: Nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo.
Moral of the story: Gravity and EM are two very different things that look similar to some people because they both fall off like $\frac{1}{r^2}$. Be careful what you trust. When someone makes a claim like th...
Guys, I don't really understand why they mention a "field of view"? I've seen it in a post* here on Stack, but I still don't understand why we consider this. Why does it matter how much we see? * https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/126101/why-the-electric-field-vece-is-constant-position-independent-for-an-infi
@Slereah Since my question is referenced here already, let me just repeat my wish to get an explanation what is wrong with my question:
Why the downvotes? Seriously, it is unclear to me what is wrong with this question. Maybe I will ask on "The h Bar", perhaps somebody is willing to explain it to me. Feel free to also explain it here, then I don't have to ask. I won't take your explanation as indication that you downvoted... — Thomas Klimpel19 mins ago