« first day (2349 days earlier)      last day (2581 days later) » 

10:00 AM
plus it's one of those papers that assume that you know all about the current state of the theory
Which for time symmetric theories is I think fairly cocky
 
Anonymous
@skullpetrol The problem is not with the exam. The problem is every child being forced to be an engineer or doctor. Most suicides are due to the family pressure and peer pressure. As far the jee is concerned, it is a necessary evil. I agree with that.
 
Why is it "necessary" to make the exam impossibly difficult? @blue
 
Anonymous
@skillpatrol India just doesn't have enough funds to provide quality education to all.
 
Anonymous
And same is the case with China
 
what do they do?
 
user228700
10:09 AM
Oh my God I wonder if this chat will see a day in which we don't mention India's screwed up system of education.
 
Anonymous
@Kaumudi.H Maybe when you fix the system =P
 
Anonymous
@skillpatrol What?
 
Now that would be a glorious day @Kaumudi.H
 
user228700
@blue There are so many other systems that are working under a less than perfect set of conditions, can we please talk about some of those please?
 
What kind of examination does China do? @blue
 
Anonymous
10:12 AM
@Kaumudi.H Like?
 
Well the UK is one example.
 
Anonymous
Every system has its flaws
 
user228700
Exactly. So let's talk about literally anything else.
 
Anonymous
@JohnRennie UK has a much larger funding for education.
 
Per capita
 
Anonymous
10:13 AM
Yes ^
 
@blue when I was an undergraduate students could get a full grant (unless their parents were rich). The grant paid all the fees and basic living expenses - though you wouldn't be living in luxury.
 
@JohnRennie lol
 
But there weren't that many grants available so the number of people able to go to university was quite small.
 
how about: "what is your love part and hate part about your research team?"
 
Anonymous
@Kaumudi.H You start. I'm not really the type of person who keeps whining about the education system. This topic came up and so I was just giving my views.
 
10:16 AM
The government decided that they needed to get more students going to university, but there simply wasn't the money avaliable to pay them all grants. So the government encouraged many more universities to open and offer places, but they withdrew the grant system.
 
user228700
@JohnRennie Lol. Even after all this preparation, the quality of living and all is exceedingly poor in these colleges here. Last year, the students of IITM held a protest against the canteen for serving them terrible food.
 
user228700
Yes, a protest.
 
So now students have to pay £9,000 per year, for four years if you go to Cambridge, and pay all their living expenses. Students face leaving university with a debt of £60,000 or thereabouts.
 
Thank goodness exams aren't terribly hard or education horribly expensive here
I mean you still don't find a job after
but the school part ain't too bad
 
@Kaumudi.H I struggle to raise much sympathy I'm afraid. If the food is cheap then eat it and shut up. If the food is poor value compared to street food then buy street food instead.
 
10:20 AM
Yeah^
 
user228700
Hmm. I don't know the exact circumstances that lead to the protest but I suspect that it was something truly terrible. For some context, let me submit that one time, they found a dead snake in our water cooling system at school after several people noticed that the water tasted and smelled weird.
 
Anonymous
@JohnRennie Well, see in the UK atleast all the universities have a basic standard. Right? Over here the private colleges are so ridiculously bad that 60 percent or more engineers who graduate out are jobless and underqualified. In UK everyone isn't forced to become a doctor or engineer, right?
 
Anonymous
In private colleges the professors know almost nothing about the subject they are teaching. The students are more knowledgeable than the teachers =P
 
user228700
(My school is inside the IIT campus, which is close to 620 acres of forest, which explains the snake)
 
@blue I have a sneaking suspicion that in the UK lots of students go to university just because they think it will be fun, and without any real career plan. So they end up with a large debt and no special qualification for paying it off.
 
Anonymous
10:22 AM
@Kaumudi.H Yuck!
 
Anonymous
@JohnRennie "lots of students go to university just because they think it will be fun"....NO..they are forced by their family to become engineers or doctors! Debt is not a problem here...education is cheap...here the problem is....stupid professors in private colleges
 
@Kaumudi.H It's a bit harsh to criticise the school for that. The school didn't put the snake in th water tank!
 
620 acres of forest?
 
@blue ah, sorry, I meant in the UK
 
user228700
@JohnRennie ...which is why we didn't conduct a protest or anything :-P Still, it was proof that the tanks weren't being maintained properly or that snake wouldn't have been lying there for weeks!
 
10:24 AM
I feel sorry for the person who had to reach into the tank and pull out a decomposing snake. I mean Eeeeeeeeeeewwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww!!! :-)
 
user228700
Indian Institute of Technology Madras is a public engineering institute located in Chennai, Tamil Nadu and is one of India's most prestigious universities. It is recognised as an Institute of National Importance by the Government of India. Founded in 1959 with technical and financial assistance from the former government of West Germany, it was the third Indian Institute of Technology that was established by the Government of India through an Act of Parliament, to provide education and research facilities in engineering and technology. IIT Madras is a residential institute that occupies a 2.5 km²...
 
ah, Madras
I mostly know it from Leprechaun 3
 
user228700
@Slereah Hmm?
 
There once was a man from Madras
Who had balls made of fine brass
 
Anonymous
@Slereah lol
 
10:25 AM
So in stormy weather, they both clanged together
And sparks came out of his ass
 
user228700
Lol. Madras is the old name for "Chennai".
 
(it is a great movie)
although I had to give up on the 4th movie
Leprechaun 4 was set in space and that was too much greatness for me
 
Anonymous
Leprechaun 3 (also known as Leprechaun III and Leprechaun 3: In Las Vegas) is a 1995 American slasher film and the third installment and first direct-to-video entry in the Leprechaun series. == Plot == After being pawned to a Las Vegas shop owner, Gupta, the Leprechaun (Davis) jumps on his back and bites off a part of his ear, accusing him of being a greedy thief. He then beats the Gupta's legs with his walking stick and notices that he's wearing leather shoes. He removes one and states that he "appreciates a good pair of shoes." He looks down and notices Gupta's sock has a hole in it, revealing...
 
Anonymous
looks funny =D
 
user228700
10:27 AM
@JohnRennie Oh God, I hadn't even thought about that >.<
 
Leprechaun is what happens when the slasher genre becomes unable to be taken seriously
 
Anonymous
I've many snakes around my house =)
 
Anonymous
We use carbolic acid
 
Anonymous
To keep them away
 
Anonymous
hehe
 
10:28 AM
Keep a mongoose
 
Anonymous
We have a few mongooses
 
mongeese
 
mongooses?
 
user228700
Our school was truly strange in that regard. Monkeys learned to turn the taps and drink water from our washrooms. They also steal our lunchboxes and fish for food in our trash cans; they'd walk right into class.
 
10:30 AM
how many managed to pass the JEE though
 
Mongooses - what did we do before Wikipedia existed?
 
@JohnRennie the dictionary
 
user228700
@Slereah x'D
 
Anonymous
"The word "mongoose" is likely derived from the Marathi name mungūs (मुंगूस) (pronounced as [muŋɡuːs]) or probably ultimately from Telugu name mangisu ." hehe =P
 
10:31 AM
In the olden days, I had CD ROMs of encyclopedias
 
user228700
(::Beginning to realise that nobody cares but continuing anyway::) The deer were friendlier; they'd take food right out of our hands during lunch break.
 
all animals are friendly if you have food
 
@Kaumudi.H it's when the monkeys start correcting your work you need to be worried :-)
@Kaumudi.H Mmm, venison.
 
user228700
@Slereah Not the monkeys! They can be cruel.
 
that is when you punch its monkey face
 
10:33 AM
And get bitten!
 
teach them some respect
 
They have rabies
 
Anonymous
A monkey once slapped me =P They are naughty creatures
 
user228700
@JohnRennie Ah, the deer; so elegant and beautiful but nope. Venison. I expected nothing less of you -_-
 
that is the magic of animals
they can be friends and food
 
10:34 AM
Little known fact, monkey muscles are intrinsically stronger than human muscle. Weight for weight they are a lot stronger than us.
 
truly magical
although the same is true of people
little known fact
 
user228700
Dude.
 
Anonymous
@Slereah Friends, food and foes are interchangeable depending on the situation =D
 
user228700
@blue When I was 4, 3 monkeys climbed atop my small body to steal my packet of biscuits at a park.
 
though i have not eaten any monkeys so far
 
10:35 AM
@Kaumudi.H your Mum said, now which of these four is Kaumudi? :-)
 
user228700
x'D You know, she probably did.
 
Anonymous
@Slereah Eat my school teacher...he is a monkey.
 
Anonymous
@JohnRennie lol
 
What one monkey can do, another can.
 
user228700
I'm so glad I brought up monkeys x'D
 
10:38 AM
Better than jee
:D
 
Oh god
 
user228700
^
 
Feynman uses Fraktur for the EM potential
Oh wait, it's the acceleration, actually
$-(e \mathfrak{A} / r_k c^2) \sin(\mathfrak{A}, r_k)$
I don't think it should be legal to use a fancy script for functions
fancy scripts are for sets only
 
physicist notation is like, crap
 
plz
 
Anonymous
10:44 AM
 
don't act all innocent
I know what math people do
 
at least we don't use a million indices
 
you should
Einstein notation is great
 
bleh
 
what's the largest amount of indices a tensor is likely to have, anyway
I think Riemann tensor in spinor notation would have 8
yeah
${R_{AA'BB'CC'}}^{DD'}$
 
user228700
10:50 AM
Damn, I wish I could get away with something like this:
 
user228700
 
i don't think there's any upper bound to the no of indices of a tensor
 
yeah but I mean
What's the largest you're likely to see
You can have a $(132146,48941)$ rank tensor but it's not likely to be useful
 
vOv
 
Anonymous
 
Anonymous
10:53 AM
@Kaumudi.H
 
Anonymous
This would be the result ^
 
user228700
:-P
 
mind-expanding drugs aren't the good ones
(the mind-melting ones are)
 
Anonymous
@Kaumudi.H Just reminded me of a boy in 6th grade who wrote in his environmental science test that one of the ways of increasing soil fertility is urinating on the soil =P The answer was scientifically correct (?) but his parents were immediately called and he was suspended for a few days. Lol
 
To my considerable surprise I appear to have repaired the keyboard that I spilled beer over!
 
11:05 AM
@JohnRennie Do you have some spare HD space so I can have an offsite backup for my music
You can get any music you want in return :P
It's all FLAC with carefully filled metadata
Manually by me
 
How much space do you need?
 
Lemme see
165G
 
@BernardoMeurer you get 100GB online storage for 2$
access anywhere in the world at any time + high speed
 
@Yashas I have 100GB on Google Drive that I pay for, but it's filled with stuff already
Mostly documents and things like that
and 100GB isn't enough, I need 200GB
 
get 1TB :P
it is 10$ I think
 
Anonymous
11:09 AM
Make 10 google accounts 10*15=150
 
and then most plans go 100, 500 or 1TB
Bah, 10$ a month is too much, I can't afford it
 
You get 5TB for 5$ per month
 
@JohnRennie You may also request the addition of any given music to the library, since I LOVE tracking down FLAC versions of music and tagging it nicely
@Yashas Where?
 
It also gives access to 5 users
 
@Yashas One drive :(
 
11:11 AM
you can team up with your friends
pay 1$ each :P
 
Hahahaha, you think I have friends, how cute
 
aw
 
My only friend is my picture of alan turing
 
Anonymous
Tell your girlfriends to pay
 
jk, jk I have friends
they are just cheap
@blue Never a good idea for anything
 
Anonymous
11:13 AM
@BernardoMeurer Learn to utilize your girlfriends...you need some tutoring =P
 
:O Turing fan :O
 
@blue I do utilize them, just not for their money, lol
That sounds so awfully wrong
 
:|
 
Anonymous
I am shamelessly money-minded and capitalist =P
 
Anonymous
lol
 
11:14 AM
's all the same. money is labor is people, according to Karl Marx
 
I am the other way round; I spend money to get fish for over 20 cats everyday!
 
@BalarkaSen Stop reading Marx's malware
 
You're talking like a pettibourgeois lumpen
 
@EmilioPisanty I'm confused - did they change the "after casting 300 votes, you cannot downvote non community wiki posts at more than a 2:1 ratio" at some point later? It doesn't seem to be currently active, perhaps that's only in effect on SO? Also, the original discussion on meta.SE about that is also a rather interesting read.
In unrelated news, I just logged in and am already recapped for the day - thanks HNQ, but I still hate you :P
 
11:32 AM
Most of the times, I feel that some silly random question becomes a HNQ.
 
@ACuriousMind Do you want to be my offsite music backup?
 
What would that involve?
 
@ACuriousMind Having 165GB of storage
That's it
 
I don't have 165 GB of free storage, actually
 
Geddammit
Guess I'll try and buy some FTP server
 
Anonymous
11:40 AM
@BernardoMeurer This might be useful (degoo.com)
 
Anonymous
Haven't tried it though.
 
help
I bumped my toe on a barbell
doesn't look good
 
Anonymous
@Slereah Apply some ice!
 
opposite, actually
 
@blue Seems to good to be true, I'll read their terms and conditions to check
 
11:42 AM
I need warm salt water
 
thanks though :)
@Slereah Lick it
 
@BernardoMeurer My hosting provider theoretically doesn't limit storage space, I don't use much of it
 
@JaimeGallego ::smiles::
 
What I don't know is if I can useradd to the server, let me check
 
What the hell is this hosting provider who doesn't limit storage? :P
You don't necessarily need to useradd, just to have FTP access
or SSH even
I guess SSH would need a user though
 
@Secret why different title in chemistry chat and physics?
 
That's called tailoring to the audience
 
@BalarkaSen It's the unit group of the Banach algebra of bounded linear operators on the Hilbert space.
 
@BernardoMeurer :P
 
Jesus
Yes, just make me an FTP account
you can get any of my music you want in return :P
and it's a lot of music
 
11:58 AM
The chem folks will relate more with the VOC analysis thing than the h barers, which is why I emphasize the history aspect when sharing it here in h bar (which is more general purpose science sharing platform)
 
@BernardoMeurer Ready, email me
 
@JaimeGallego Emailed, from @meurer.xyz
@JaimeGallego Gotta go meet my mom for lunch, brb
 
12:22 PM
@0celouvsky does the space invader make sense
Consider a point particle with an unbounded acceleration applied to it
Let's say $1/t^2$ for $t < 0$
The particle fucks off to infinity
What happens after $t^*$
Is the particle indeed gone from the space
The space invader scenario is what happens under time reversal
Particle pops up from nowhere
 
Is this relativistic or gallelian, cause if it is relativiatic the particle cannot cross the 45 deg line at all?
 
Galilean
 
Hmm, this paper claims that if I have a manifold $X$ with a submanifold $Y$, that there is an "inclusion" $Y\to (X-Y)$, which strikes me as...unlikely
 
@0celouvsky Huh, fun.
 
Ah, lol, as usual the physicists have been a bit sloppy copying from the mathematicians :P
 
12:33 PM
Hmm, space invaders speed up for each row it advanced closer to the bottom of the screen...(missing thought process to complete the sentence)
 
@ACuriousMind um, lol?
@BalarkaSen in fact the unitary group of an infinite dimensional Hilb space is contractible.
In very stark contrast to the finite dimensional case
@ACuriousMind do you know what they actually mean?
@Slereah doesn't an acceleration have to start at a definite time, what does it mean for it to happen for t>0?
 
Well replace $1/t^2$ by some other function of compact support that is unbounded at $0$
 
Then it's not going to be continuous and I don't trust discontinuous physics.
 
yeah but does it make sense mathematically, at least
I mean obviously it's not a realistic physical scenario
even worse than Norton's dome
 
@0celouvsky gotcha
wait. is this not the same as $\varinjlim U(n)$?
 
12:40 PM
@0celouvsky The mystery is solved by $Y$ having trivial normal bundle and the original paper actually stating that the "inclusion" is only defined up to homotopy (I guess by choosing some non-vanishing normal vector field and perturbing the manifold along it)
 
@BalarkaSen don't think so, unless that's contractible. Is U(infty) actually a unitary group on some space?
I mean the honest to god unitary group on a separable complex Hilbert space
 
It's not contractible.
I guess I don't believe that result. In any case, I gotta go.
 
@BalarkaSen it's on nlab you nonbeliever
You haven't given a reason why your object is the same as mine
@ACuriousMind I'm with you up till the last part
 
@0celouvsky A vector field generates a diffeo, right? So if I choose a non-vanishing normal vector field and transform $Y$ by the diffeo it generates, I get some $Y'$ that doesn't intersect $Y$ and so lies in $X-Y$. The "inclusion" is the homotopy class of that map (and I'm only interested in the homotopy class because I really only want to know what it does on cohomology)
 
@ACuriousMind Isnt that vector only
fuck what is up with me hitting send too early
 
12:55 PM
@0celouvsky Your message could not be parsed. Please try again.
 
@ACuriousMind the vector field is only defined on Y but I guess you can extend it?
So it's like the gradient flow argument in Morse theory
@ACuriousMind I'm trying to picture how this works for an open disk in the plane
 
Ugh, take $Y$ to be a closed submanifold of at least codimension 1
I make no claim about open stuff
I mean, the open disk in the plane doesn't even have a normal bundle, does it? (Or rather, it's the zero bundle)
 
It doesn't
@ACuriousMind jeez
Sorry for asking
 
Oh, no, it's fine
 
1:15 PM
I just want a proof of the Maxwell Green function but people keep doing it in E + B formalism
What is that madness
When A is so much easier
 
Maxwell green function?
Won't that involve some functional analysis
 
Yes
It's just $$\Box G(x,y) = \delta(x - y)$$
 
if two opposite charges moving forward each other: in the free fall frame of one of them, is that charge in an inertial frame?
(like the gravity case)
 
1:30 PM
@Slereah isn't that the dalembert greens function?
See Cahill "physical mathematics" or Zee for the proof
 
yes
$\delta(r - vt)/r$ or something
 
Yeah...so what's the issue? You want to see a distributional proof?
 
a proper proof would be nice yeah
 
1:50 PM
does anybody know what the $\bar{c}$ in the Faddeev-Popov method means when working in U(1)
Surely it can't be $\gamma_0 c^\dagger$
 
@gertian It's just a second Graßmann-valued field that's suggestively called $\bar{c}$, but there's no actual relation between $c$ and $\bar{c}$.
 
Aha i was already suspecting something like that !
But how is one hermitian and the other antihermitian ?
I know you need this for your action to be real but what does it mean ? How do you see it from the path integral
 
@Slereah I'll see what I can find.
 
2:09 PM
Howdy
 
page 11 ff
@ACuriousMind You mean Grassmann.
 
thx
 
> By the theorem of Guido Fubini, the closed linear span of the n-fold products
That's got to be a meme
 
@gertian They're Lie-algebra valued, not complex-valued, so "Hermitian" doesn't really have a meaning for them. I guess the proper statement would be that $c$ transforms in the adjoint and $\bar{c}$ in the conjugate adjoint.
@0celouvsky nope :P
 
2:26 PM
@ACuriousMind Let $\omega$ be a $C^0$ exact 1-form defined on an open $U\subset\Bbb R^n$. Can $\omega$ be approximated by closed $C^1$ 1-forms uniformly on compact sets?
 
@ACuriousMind could you elaborate on this ?
Sounds like exaclty what I need but I don't fully understand it.
How does it explain the series expansion in this thread ?
http://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/44250/faddeev-popov-ghost-propagator-in-canonical-quantization
 
@0celouvsky I know nothing about these sorts of approximations. My stuff is always smooth, even when it isn't ;)
 
The whole initial value theorem of GR supposes a lot of conditions on the initial data
 
@gertian Ah, yes, there's a very annoying thing where physicists throw around the operation $\dagger$ without actually having defined it. I'm afraid you'll be better off looking into the reference that answer gives (Kugo) than having me guess what may be meant
 
Is there any paper on what happens if those are not met?
Like if a metric is insufficiently Solobev
or whatever else
 
2:33 PM
Note also the comment there that says that Weinberg has both fields Hermitian, so there's additionally an issue with differing conventions
Which is no surprise, really, the factors of $\mathrm{i}$ are always a mess in gauge theory :P
 
@ACuriousMind : let me help you with $\dagger$ for physicist
 
@Slereah curvature has no meaning if you
 
"You just take the transpose and the conjugate!"
 
holy fuck
Why does my thing keep sending early
 
@Slereah ::twitches::
 
2:35 PM
Yeah I saw that comment I may want to check up Weinberg notes as well...
As for the link in the link. THey don't really elaborate on it they just say Proceeding in strict analogy with the B-F oscillator
 
write out the operator as the infinite matrix ranging over the continuum of values ${a^i}_j$
 
Sadly I have to go now for half an hour :/
I'll be back asap !
 
Then $a^\dagger = {a^j}_i^*$
 
That is the explanation I always get but to identify the space the conjugate transpose lands in with the original space you need to choose an inner product - the identification is not canonical!
 
heheh
 
2:36 PM
@ACuriousMind dude just write the matrix elements
<i|A|j>
 
It's fine for gauge theories where the representations are unitary, I guess.
 
Just admit that QFT is broke
 
Although i'm guessing it gets harder to define operators as matrices for like
Weird operators like $T$
 
(It's not fine for finite-dimensional Lorentz representations, which is where the whole Majorana shenanigans begin :P)
 
Is it even possible to write $T$ as a matrix
 
2:38 PM
Sure, $T_{ij}$
(I don't know what $T$ is)
 
Time inversion
 
I don't think you can do that
 
Sure, it's just an anti-unitary matrix.
 
Wtf is that
 
Doesn't it do like
$T e^{iHt} = e^{-iHt}$
 
2:39 PM
How are you going to get an antilinear business with a matrix
 
Well
 
Not sure how you'd work it out
 
it's not a matrix, that's right
 
you can't even do it as a fake matrix like the momentum operator
 
I think you can write those as a matrix times the complex conjugation operator, though, since composing an anti-linear map with complex conjugation makes it linear
So...good enough? :P
 
2:40 PM
yeah I don't think you can break it down completely as a matrix
that's probably the easiest example of an operator where the matrix representation doesn't make sense
 
@ACuriousMind you can but that's cheating.
 
Guess I'm a cheetah then. ;) At least I can outrun ocelots.
 
Wald mentions a formalism of Hilbert space operators in Einstein notation
But it's "unpublished"
that swine
 
@BernardoMeurer Is it working okay?
 
@ACuriousMind you can't outrun the colt single action army.
And if you don't get the reference I don't know what to say
@Slereah it should be fairly trivial
Also rather useless
You don't get crazy GR expressions in functional analysis
 
2:47 PM
@0celouvsky I think I get it :)
 
Can we republish HE, except with modern notation
 
@ACuriousMind did you play MGS1?
@Slereah what's wrong now?
 
I mean seriously, $D/\partial t$ for the parallel transport along a curve?
It's fairly tedious to read
 
What else do you want it to be
 
Just the usual
$\nabla_{T}$
Or $\nabla_{\gamma'}$
Or something
it even uses less characters
 
2:52 PM
Well...the reason is that they're conceptually very different
One is a pullback covariant derivative, and the other isn't
They happen to be equal
 
But mostly I want to change the basis vectors
$\partial/\partial_t$ is a bit long
 
Yeah that does get tedious
 
basically i'm not that fond of having to write derivatives as fractions, if I can avoid it
especially for inline equations
they get very ugly
 
@0celouvsky more evidence to not believe it >:)
 

« first day (2349 days earlier)      last day (2581 days later) »