« first day (2089 days earlier)      last day (2844 days later) » 

6:00 PM
@BernardMeurer The best topology is the metric topology, honestly
You can use calculus stuff then
 
@0celo7 What others are there?
 
Manifolds are metric spaces, thank god
@BernardMeurer Innumerable
Not all spaces can be metrized
 
@0celo7 Sounds like a pain in the ass
 
What about
 
Why not?
 
6:01 PM
The metric $\forall x, y. d(x,y) = 0$
 
@BernardMeurer There's an obstruction, I'm not sure what it is though
@Slereah that's a pretty shitty metric
 
@Slereah Wat
 
But is it not a metric you could apply to all spaces
 
@Slereah That's not a metric
 
It's degenerate
 
6:02 PM
ur degenerate
 
You've been tainted by physics to call something that can be zero for two different things "metric".
 
it fails the positivity axiom, sam
fam
boi
 
I put the hinges on the fuckboy's hands
 
@ACuriousMind To be fair, the mathematical literature on GR (yes, it exists), does that too
 
Fampai
 
6:03 PM
@BernardMeurer Congratulations, you played yourself
Have you seen the shoe closet video @BernardMeurer ?
 
@0celo7 Yes
KNEEL DOWN
 
I'm a sneaker guy but I have no clue what he's going on about in that vid
He's like "know what I mean" and the dude interviewing just nods and thats's it
 
@0celo7 He names his bloody shoes
 
I name mine too
"comfortable walking shoes that are bad for driving"
"running shoes that are disgusting"
 
@0celo7 Like an average engineer you suck at naming things
 
6:05 PM
wtf are you people talking about
 
"cool gray shoes that make a weird noise"
 
let's just call it "ARM"
 
"sick AJ1s that blind you in the sun they so fresh"
 
Sure, let's have x86, x86_64 and x64 be different things
 
@ACuriousMind shoo old man
 
6:06 PM
Is this how you feel when you encounter algebra? :P
 
"these things look like alien shoes"
 
@ACuriousMind Idk what he's talking about, I'm complaining about hardware engineers
 
@ACuriousMind yes
I'm talking about shoes
Also trying to prove this damn theorem
 
@ACuriousMind 0celo7 has the ugliest shoes
 
@ACuriousMind Did you know that if $\Omega\subset\Bbb R^n$ is open and star-shaped, then $\Omega\approx\Bbb R^n$?
@ACuriousMind I need a yes or no!
It's for science
@BernardMeurer I will teach you topology
what do you want to know
 
6:13 PM
@0celo7 What's topology?
 
the study of open sets
 
What's an open set?
 
a set whose complement is closed
 
What's a complement?
 
do you know what a venn diagram is
 
6:16 PM
Yep
 
show me one
 
uhhh
@ACuriousMind can you take over?
 
lol
You got yourself into this, you're getting yourself out of this :P
 
6:18 PM
@BernardMeurer Do you know what a set is
Do you know what $\cup,\cap,\emptyset$ means?
 
@0celo7 the first two yeah, union and intersection (right?)
 
yes
 
the last one is what the bank shows me when I spend too much
 
brb laundry
@BernardMeurer A topological space is a set $X$ with a collection of subsets $\mathcal T$ called a "topology" such that $X,\emptyset\in\mathcal T$, $\mathcal T$ is closed under union and finite intersection.
Elements of $\mathcal T$ are called "open"
 
what's that funky 0?
 
6:25 PM
Empty set
@Slereah can give you the definition
note the union can be infinite
 
More like $\varnothing$
Definition of what
 
the definition of it
the empty set
 
Depends.
 
is it the set such that no set is a subset of it?
 
The one I usually see is $\varnothing = \{ x | x \neq x\}$
 
6:26 PM
Wait, if $\mathcal T$ is a collection of subsets of $X$ then why is it that $X \in \mathcal T$ and not the other way around?
 
that's not ZFC though
 
or does it not make a difference?
 
Because $X$ is a subset of $X$
 
Fuck you guys
 
what?
 
6:27 PM
Lol
 
@ACuriousMind help
 
How is $X$ a subset of $X$?
 
$\mathcal T$ is just the set of open sets
@BernardMeurer axiom of set theory
 
Empty set axiom is $$\exists x \forall y. \neg y \in x$$
 
lel
 
6:28 PM
wat
 
Well you asked
you can then prove that this set is unique and call it $\varnothing$
 
Well okay so given a set $Ç$ I can state that $Ç$ will always be a subset of $Ç$?
 
I love me some funky characters
@Slereah Oh, nice proof!
 
nice and short
 
6:33 PM
@BernardMeurer ok, next definition
$C\subset X$ is closed if $X-C$ is open.
THEOREM 1. $X$ and $\emptyset$ are clopen.
Can you provide the proof?
 
Wait wait
 
wrong
 
Guys
 
What
 
What's $X-C$? The elements in $X$ not in $C$?
 
6:35 PM
Is using a laser as a murder weapon at a very large distance viable
 
@BernardMeurer Yes
 
@Slereah Not yet
 
The pros are
 
@Slereah No
 
Infinite range, basically
Only limited by the curvature of the earth
But on the other hand
 
6:36 PM
@BernardMeurer other notation is $X\setminus C$
 
I don't know the attenuation by distance
How much power does a laser beam loses with distance
 
@Slereah are you trying to kill me
 
In generic atmospheric conditions
@0celo7 Don't be silly
As said
 
You said an open set has a complementary which is closed!
 
6:37 PM
Earth's curvature is the limiting factor
And you're too far for that
 
@BernardMeurer Yes
 
SO FAR
 
so if $X-C$ is Open, $C$ is closed, thus X is clopen!
 
You could hop on a plane
 
Right?
 
6:37 PM
@BernardMeurer No.
 
$U$ is open if $X-U$ is closed.
 
Apparently it's about 1-3 dB/km
Depending on humidity
So up to a factor of 1000 per km
I'm guessing doing it from another city is out of the question
 
Good luck getting that to work down here
100% humidity
Always
 
6:40 PM
Do you live in Atlantis
Oh well, my murder laser rampage will have to wait for another day
I mean there are lasers powerful enough to do that, obviously
 
I would go for ACM first if I were you
 
But they are military lasers
A bit suspiscious to get
 
@0celo7 So what's the proof?
 
$X-X=\emptyset$, which is open by definition, so $X$ is closed.
$X-\emptyset=X$, which is open by definition, so $\emptyset$ is closed.
 
Who the fuck came up with this crap?
 
6:46 PM
So anyway
Black holes have spaghettification
Neutron stars have the lasagna phase
What other pasta based physics exists
 
is spaghettification actually a thing?
 
yes
 
People should add a naming class to the physics curriculum
 
Proof?
 
vzn
my personal favorite maybe something for you all to look into :) en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flying_Spaghetti_Monster
 
6:51 PM
Pastafarianism :-)
 
@JohnRennie Do you want to adopt me?
 
@vzn That's offensive
 
@BernardMeurer I have not been lying awake at night considering the option.
 
@JohnRennie Dang it
 
ask bob
 
6:55 PM
Why do you want to be adopted? If it's to get into a European university you do realise we've just voted to leave the EU?
 
@0celo7 Bob doesn't like me
 
vzn
@0celo7 huh? why?
 
@JohnRennie Nah, you just seem like a suitable candidate
 
Thanks (I think)
 
he wants your blood
@vzn I don't have to explain
 
6:57 PM
@JohnRennie He means you're old enough so he can quickly inherit :P
 
@JohnRennie Have you built a large, exuberant fortune which I can inherit?
 
^see?
 
@ACuriousMind You're starting to know me too well :v
 
vzn
@0celo7 offensive to atheists or (most) theists maybe but not agnostics presumably, not sure about nihilists :P
 
@BernardMeurer sadly not, I spent most of my money on drink, drugs and sex
 
6:59 PM
@ACuriousMind If I have a continuous function defined on all of $\Bbb R$, will it be bounded above even on open sets as long as they are not all of $\Bbb R$?
 
@JohnRennie Do you still have the first two?
 
I know for compact sets it's bounded, of course
but if I can put the open set inside of a compact set
then apply the compact rule
it should apply to the open set inside of it, right?
 
@0celo7 Clearly not, consider the open set $\mathbb{R}-\{0\}$.
 
@BernardMeurer do you mean do I still indulge in the first two, and if so does that imply I stopped indulging in the third?
 
@ACuriousMind I meant bounded, ACM
 
7:00 PM
@JohnRennie Yes. No.
 
you know what I meant
 
Bugger! I just got outbid on a VDSL router on ebay. Damn!
 
open, bounded
 
@JohnRennie I just specified the first two because I don't want to have sex with you
 
uhhh
 
7:02 PM
@BernardMeurer Thanks (I think)
 
@JohnRennie No, he's saying you're too old for him
 
@0celo7 No. I'm saying I like women
 
Well matured like fine wine
 
lol, sure
 
7:02 PM
@JohnRennie More like white wine gone sour
 
Or alternatively stinky and oozing noxious fluids like matured cheese :-)
 
Oh god
 
fuck
 
... though preferably not me
@BernardMeurer: is it a CS degree you're thinking of doing?
 
@JohnRennie I shift between CS and CEng, but since I had to decide for Portugal I just said whatever and picked CEng there
but CS is cool too
 
vzn
7:07 PM
(gad everything ultimately deteriorates in here with 0celo7 around) :( ... hey @Bernard when does your school start anyway
 
@vzn September
 
what the hell
 
Moving to Lisbon next month
@0celo7 When's Michelle going to Romania?
 
It's just that I don't know anyone with an interesting job in IT who did a CS or CEng degree.
 
vzn
@BernardMeurer cant remember did you say you didnt have family there?
 
7:08 PM
didn't know she was
 
@JohnRennie I've heard that before
 
pretty sure she hates me anyway
 
I'm fairly certain I'm not competent to graduate in anything else though
@vzn Yeah, no family
@0celo7 Boohoo
 
she thinks I hate women!
no thanks to you
 
I'm sure you won't have any problem getting a good CS/CEng degree, but I think you might find the course a bit disappointing.
From my (limited) experience universities aren't into the sort of hard core hacking that's the most fun.
 
7:10 PM
@JohnRennie Yeah, everyone tells me that but, hell, what else will I do?
University seems to just be shit
 
Why not just join a startup?
 
Are there computer security undergrad degrees?
Bob does not associate with people who haven't gone to college @BernardMeurer
 
@JohnRennie I want a degree in something
Otherwise I'll loose my inheritance
@0celo7 Neither does my family
 
Fair enough, if you want the degree then I'm sure you'll ace it with your experience.
 
@0celo7 No, you do CS and focus on security
 
7:12 PM
And I'm sure you'll find lots of like minded hackers
 
@JohnRennie Also there's a lot I don't know, I'm a noob still
 
If you gather together several thousand highly motivated and smart youngsters they are more or less guaranteed to get to some interesting stuff.
 
>youngsters
 
@JohnRennie Problem is getting into a school where the smart youngsters are :v
 
@BernardMeurer Wait, after your whole experience with this application process and what you told us yesterday you still believe that the smart people end up at certain schools?
 
7:15 PM
Every university has several thousand highly motivated and smart youngsters. Just because a university isn't Ivy League doesn't mean all the students are doing janitorial science.
 
@ACuriousMind Well, yeah I guess they do
@JohnRennie I guess that's accurate, yeah
 
@ACuriousMind: is this answer correct in saying that uncharged particles like neutrinos do interact via the EM force courtesy of the higher loop diagrams:
2
A: Can neutrinos interact by the EM interaction and gravity?

Vishnu JKAll objects and fields that have a nonzero mass, energy, or momentum interact gravitationally, and so do neutrinos – although they're very light and hard to produce so the gravitational force from any neutrinos we know is undetectable at this time. Neutrinos also have negligible but nonzero inte...

 
@dmckee AAAh ksdjaf sadf pointers halp
 
@BernardMeurer Hmm?
 
I ask because I thought so and upvoted it ...
 
7:19 PM
@JohnRennie yes
 
Thanks, my upvote is justified then :-)
 
@dmckee If I have a variable foo that has a method foo.read, and I want to pass that onto a function as a pointer so that in that function I can do bar.read() and it will actually be changing foo (pass by reference) how do I do that?
 
@JohnRennie Well, you can have electromagnetic lines and loops in higher order diagrams. I wouldn't personally use the phrase "interact via the EM force", but the effect is there.
 
C++ keep's crying blood whenever I try and reference a method of a pointer
@ACuriousMind Do you know/like Kvelertak?
 
Uhg. Pointers to member functions are a special case with tricky syntax and nasty semantics.
 
7:21 PM
@dmckee See, salkdjfhassdaf pointers!
@ChrisWhite Halp
 
Or do you really mean just a pointer to object.
 
1-800-CHRIS-WHITE
 
Why would you pass a pointer to the member function rather a pointer to the object?
 
@BernardMeurer ...are that those experimental Swedish musicians you once linked?
 
@ACuriousMind That's Wintergatan, Kvelertak is a norwegian hard-rock metal-ish band
 
7:22 PM
fooObj *p = new fooObj();`
allows you to access a member function (method) by
p->bar(baz, quip);
 
@BernardMeurer: In the UK Radio One has a rock show on Sunday evening, and the DJ Daniel P. Carter is very keen on Kvelertak.
 
@JohnRennie I'm passing a pointer to the object, but the compiler isn't liking it when I try and access the member function
@JohnRennie Their new album is neat
 
@ACuriousMind A convex set is star-shaped about any interior point, right?
 
This is equivalent to (*p).bar(baz, quip) but easier to read.
 
@dmckee Lemme try
 
7:24 PM
@BernardMeurer I'm not so keen on the metal end of the rock spectrum.
 
@JohnRennie Do you like Jazz?
 
All my life I have hated Jazz with a passion. It is the most boring form of music there is.
 
@BernardMeurer I like jazz. I really do. But I never want to sit and listen to it for more than a few minutes at a time.
But most jazz players seem to like to cut ten minute tracks.
Impedance mismatch city.
 
I used to get dragged along to Jazz clubs at uni and I found drinking myself into insensibility was the only way to survive.
 
@JohnRennie yikes
even worse than pop gangster rap?
 
7:26 PM
@JohnRennie Oh god hahahaha
@dmckee Some cool new Jazz: youtube.com/watch?v=pTloZPT62IM
 
But then I like psychedelia and space rock, so my taste in music is highly suspect :-)
 
space rock?
 
This is fairly typical of my listening these days:
 
oh god
what is this
sounds like a 60s movie soundtrack
 
It's got a stupid intro
Fast forward past it
 
7:29 PM
@0celo7 Nothing can be worse than the soundtrack for Ladyhawke. Ruined what could have been a really good movie.
 
@dmckee No worky
cannot convert ‘cv::CascadeClassifier’ to ‘cv::CascadeClassifier*’ for argument ‘1’ to ‘void loadFromHeader(cv::CascadeClassifier*, char*)’
 
@dmckee I don't know, @BernardMeurer says my music is atrocious
 
It is, it really is
 
@JohnRennie this isn't bad at all
@BernardMeurer I actually listen to incredibly popular music
you don't know what you're talking about, clearly
 
@0celo7 That's why it's bad
Or, actually, that's not why it's bad
 
7:33 PM
what kind of logic is that
 
but in recent years incredibly popular has been a marker for bad
 
@BernardMeurer It says that you are trying to pass an object where it expects a pointer-to-object. But I can't help much without seeing your code.
In the code I used above, you would simply pass p as it is the pointer-to-object.
 
@dmckee Here you go
It's a little messy
the function I'm trying to implement is the one at the top
 
What line is throwing the error?
 
11
No, wait
wrong error
23
 
7:38 PM
Well, you defined faceCascade with
CascadeClassifier faceCascade;
So it is an object. Not a pointer to object.
Make line 23
loadFromHeader(&faceCascade, face_array);
or make line 21
 
CascadeClassifier *faceCascade = new CascadeClassifier();
 
for fucks sake me
Let's see :v
@dmckee Works! Thanks!
 
The former is probably better from a RAII prospectice as long you are happy with the default initialization.
 
RAII?
 
7:43 PM
Resource Acquisition Is Initialization. It's a set of practices for preventing memory leaks (ideally, or at least reducing their number).
If you're going to program in c++, you should look into it.
 
@dmckee Reading on it now
 
oooh, I found a rare moment when people aren't talking about differential geometry
 
No. We're talking about c++, instead. Because this is the physics chat room, that's why.
 
I guess these are the things we all have in common: programming and math. Everyone's specific interests in physics are too niche to provide any common ground.
 
Yeah. You hear a lot of programing and technology talk in the bar at conferences, after all.
 
7:57 PM
C++ is funky
 
well, that's one way to put it
 

« first day (2089 days earlier)      last day (2844 days later) »