« first day (19 days earlier)      last day (1242 days later) » 

04:00
I don't mean that if it follows that rule it must be true
haste is false, and we know that already
I'm trying to use a stone to get information
Guesses have to be guesses at the rule.
then it's not a guess
You can't just say "this is part of the rule"
04:01
do i get my stone back?
Yes. There is a known counterexample.
bobo's turn
mondo hassle guess false
guess true
04:04
hassle is false
mics: 2, bobo: 2
guess has h and t and isn't haste
(that's a way to get more information)
(if that's actually correct, JD, you're banned from Zendo forever)
intuition is true
04:06
but you could have gotten another false counterexample
you have a stone left
mics:2, bobo:1
master time
time is false
04:09
master intuitive
intuitive is true
pass?
guess: has at least two members in the set {'h','t'} with multiplicity and is not haste
:D
made the rule more explicit
@John?
You mean, at least one h and at least one t?
@JohnDvorak either >=2 h's or >= 2 t's or both an h and a t
oh.
octagon is true
mics:2, bobo: 0
Mics' turn
04:14
OHHHHHH!
@micsthepick
thinking
master post
post is false
mondo motor guess true
04:18
guess false
motor is false. Mics' turn.
mics:3, bobo:0
ok, just checking a case
hmm
master octal
octal is false
04:20
mondo operation guess true
guess true
operation is true
guess: has two identical letters separated by a gap of at least two letters
rotor is false
mics:4, bobo:0
04:22
grr... should have checked some more
master police
police is false
mondo tooting guess false
guess true
04:24
tooting is false
guess: has two identical letters and closest pair of identical letters is separated by at least two letters
arachnophobia is true
mics' turn
let me check something
ok, maybe now I have it
Do you want the log?
04:26
True:
rhythmic
thrust
truth
hypotenuse
heater
intuition
intuitive
octagon
operation
arachnophobia

False:
black
fail
falsity
shell
haste
guess
embodying
pass
post
motor
octal
rotor
police
tooting
oh, hold on
there goes my theory, unless
intuition is already known, but I also revealed another word. Does Bobo lose the stone in this case?
@JohnDvorak presses the off button
@Deus rules clarification please!
I don't think he should lose it.
04:29
I'll give Bobo another guess then, but we need a ruling after the game
guess: there is a pair of identical letters separated by at least two more letters such that the separating letters and one of the identical letters are all unique
I don't think I understand your rule. Rotor is known false.
in RotoR, you have oto+R which has two O's
all the letters in between need to be unique ^ (and also not the same letter)
Oh. Understood.
Hold on, thinking
04:32
hears gears turning
it would be funny if this was nothing like the actual rule but happens to almost overlap for the set of words in the English language
Even funnier if there was no counterexample
afk for a few minutes
True:
rhythmic
thrust
truth
hypotenuse
heater
intuition
intuitive
octagon
operation
!arachnophobia

False:
black
fail
falsity
shell
haste
guess
embodying
pass
post
motor
octal
rotor
police
tooting
I can't think of a counterexample. Congratulations!
What.
04:36
You can't think of one either way?
My rule was: Word has a non-palindromic substring that begins and ends with the same letter
let me see
Any two-letter string with letters unique is non-palindromic, so I'd need a positive example
I believe ONE-ON-ONE fits your rule but not Bobo's
It contains ONEO
04:38
yes
so it fits your rule
but no letters are unique
They are within the substring.
aholla?
not a word
but something like that
The rule didn't say "within the substring".
@micsthepick SHELLS
nice find
so is that a valid counterexample?
04:41
Shells is a valid C/E
identical letters .. such that the separating letters and one of the identical letters are all unique
Shells is a valid counterexample indeed
I was looking for something in the form A.*BCBC.*A, forgot about A.*BB.*A
Anyways, Bobo's win
Can't play again, sorry.
and, he would have won after one more round or two even if I did bring up shells.
04:44
If I didn't
04:58
statistics is almost another counterexample
05:46
status, cobblestone are
06:29
Cobblestone is not, cobblEstonE
07:08
coBbleEstonE -> TRUE
@Wen1now yeah, so cobblestone isn't a counterexample
(I have no idea what's going on)
btw, if there're'nough players here then I could play another round
maybe ask in TSL
afk for a few minutes but will be back
07:34
oh well, I'm back, but have to leave again
07:54
o/
 
13 hours later…
20:38
o/
You
You
I don't know what this is. :P
@You still waiting for someone to write the rules for Meta
@You Look at the pinned message
Check the pinned message for the rules
You
You
20:40
Okay.
who wants to be master
I do
k then
give us dem rules
A valid koan is an integer. Example: 1. Non-example:2
um
Master 7
20:41
7 is true
master 120
Master -1
120 is true
-1 is true
are there any more players?
you is readin ghte rules
20:42
master 15
15 is false
Master 4
4 is false
master 30
30 is true
20:44
Master 9
9 is true
1, 7, 120, -1, 30, 9
Master 25
25 is true
hold on, dearie
oops sorry
20:45
master 5
5 is true
master 17
17 is false
then back to the regular schedule
coder?
Master 29
You
You
20:47
I think I understand now. So, there's two rules: one that declares valid koans and one that declares special ones. We take turns saying "master" followed by a valid koan to determine whether it has the special property, or "mondo" and a valid koan to have everyone guess whether it has the special property. Whoever guesses correctly gets a guessing stone, which allows a player to guess the special property at any time. The master must provide a counter example in order to continue the game.
You
You
If I play all the games, I will have a "rules for dummies" section in all of the games! :p
sorry, I missed this - 29 is true
You can only guess the special property during your turn
master 63
63 is true
You
You
20:48
Okay.
So am I playing in this round?
If you want to be
You
You
Okay, so when do I go?
now? :)
You
You
Okay.
Master 135.
135 is true
You
You
20:50
I think I know the rule now. :p
You don't have guessing stones, though
You
You
Yeah. That's a problem.
ugh i have a rule with 1 counterexample
@You on your next turn, mondo something
You
You
Okay.
20:51
Master 20
20 is false
master 8
8 is false
(pass)
20:52
@You your turn
You
You
Mondo 57 is false.
guess true
You
You
Yay! I'm doing well!
@thecoder16 guess?
guess false
20:54
57 is false
okay you, you can guess the rule
You
You
Okay.
The rule is a koran must have an odd number of odd digits (i.e., 1, 3, 5, 7, 9 repeated 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, .. times). Even digits are acceptable.
yes
that is the rule
20:56
Do you wish to master now?
You
You
Okay.
(I won't be playing in the next game)
You
You
Just give me a moment to create some rules.
A valid koran is one that satisfies the regex /\d+(\.\w+|\[\.\d+\])/ (one or more digits, followed by either a dot and alphanumeric (including underscore) characters or a decimal without a number before the dot surrounded by brackets). Examples: 623.BaNaNaa63, 7[.6070]
That's a rather complex validity rule
You
You
This might help: regex101.com/r/3Epgvm/1
Is that too complex? I feel like I made it way too complex.
21:06
When it takes a more-than-minimal effort just to determine if a proposed guess is even valid, You Might Be Doing It Wrongâ„¢.
Yeah, I think so
You
You
Okay. Give me a moment. :p
and we need a non-example
You
You
A valid koan is a string of alphanumeric characters. Example: HelloWorld1. Non example: Hello World!
also, it's a koan. a koran is something completely different :)
21:10
Those don't seem to be alphanumeric, unless you gave us multiple examples of each
wait, are those the rule examples? or valid koan examples?
You
You
I gave multiple examples.
You shouldn't
the non-example should be a valid, but non-matching, koan
You
You
Oh.
I have to rewrite it.
21:12
?
You
You
A valid koan is a string of alphanumeric characters. Example: HelloWorld1. Non example: hi.
That looks better :)
You
You
Thanks.
master 3dogs
You
You
It only took 5 tries.
3dogs is true.
21:14
Who else is playing?
master: abcdef
You
You
abcdef is true.
ppp? coder?
If not...
master C4
You
You
C4 is false.
master: c1B2
You
You
21:18
c1B2 is false.
master l33T
You
You
l33T is false
Thankfully. :p
master: elite
You
You
elite is false.
master DoGs3
You
You
21:22
DoGs3 is true.
Is this really just between the three of us?
yes
unless Mics want to join
master: fred1
You
You
fred1 is true.
master ema1L
You
You
ema1L is false.
21:26
master: cccc0
You
You
cccc0 is false.
I have to go now. If anyone wants to be the master, here's the rule: onetimesecret.com/secret/1f5vc93c3sqnckwgctd2l40dtal565x
There's not enough people to bother.
You
You
Oh, well. :p
reveal, I guess
You
You
Valid: alphanumeric
Special: incoherent words without numbers, or coherent words with numbers
21:27
define "coherent"
there really should be just one rule.
You
You
An English word or a name for a human that is not ridiculously uncommon.
define "English word", "name for a human", "ridiculously uncommon"
You
You
English word: a word in the Oxford dictionary, I guess?
You should clarify that for yourself before using it in a rule
and apply the definition strictly
You
You
21:29
Human name that is not ridiculously uncommon: a name that is actually given to humans, whether in reality or fiction, that isn't something that sounds riddiculous.
I really should have had better rules.
Anyways, I really have to go now. Bye, all!
once again, "ridiculously uncommon" is subjective. It shouldn't be.
Also depends what common means. Very few fictional names would be commonly given, but would likely be commonly known.
"at least one lowercase, at least one uppercase, at least one digit, at least six characters in total and at most 8" would be a valid rule.
I guess the quorum has dispersed now and it's time for me to head off to bed
after the whole regex thing I had low hopes for this rule :P
the rules should say that easier is better
yeah, rules must be objectively interpretable
(ironically, a regex-based rule would've been better since it would at least be valid)
but yeah, easier rules are definitely better
21:36
I'm still awake, though ;-)
OK, night
I'm here :p
o/
O/
Any willing defenders?
master is the proper term
21:44
meh
meh
@ppp you want to go?
if no one else is willing to, then sure
Why not? Nobody is objecting
Hello?
21:48
yes ...
Got a rule?
I'm thinking
master 111
...?
I've made a mistake
A valid koan is an integer. Example: 111; Non-example: 112
(restarting)
bed time, sorry
22:47
o/
1 hour ago, by ppperry
A valid koan is an integer. Example: 111; Non-example: 112
master: 123
123 is true

« first day (19 days earlier)      last day (1242 days later) »