@DavidCarlisle For example, at work, I'm not the administrator of my pc, I use Overleaf to write my LaTeX documents and CTAN to search for packages documentation.
@UlrikeFischer would you mind having a look at this one: tex.stackexchange.com/q/514361/3929 I've never heard that texstudio should have started asking people to update miktex
@daleif I don't use texstudio so I don't know. It could be that the user has some side effect from on-the-fly package installation. But imho it would be the best to go to the texstudio bug tracker or forum and ask there.
@TeXnician Hi! :) Just saw it and upvoted. :) I think that's a great answer. We could be wacky and suggest the OP to invoke arara for every file arara finds. :)
@CarLaTeX perhaps, but for almost everyone, if they are not admin then that's fine but go with what the admin gives you, for people who don't chat here and so don't know about and want to try this week's latest bleeding edge package release, using overleaf is fine but use it as tl2017 (or 18 if they have upgraded now) most people shouldn't be using overleaf then hand installing packages from ctan.
@DavidCarlisle I don't have a LaTeX distribution on my work pc, if I want to use LaTeX when I'm at work I'm obliged to use Overleaf. They upgraded to 2018 now. However, I've never installed a package from CTAN, I use it only to look at the package documentation instead of typing texdoc …
@JonasStein I suggested removing xmltex (on which passivetex is built) once and it was scary how many professional typesetters were still using it, but I suspect xmltex users are in single figures and that passivetex users are a small fraction of that....
The class as posted does not work at all. It starts off LaTeX Warning: You have requested document class `publisher', but the document class provides `actapoly'. which isn't a fatal error but a very bad sign that things are broken, then it reports ! Undefined control sequence. l.96 \ifactapoly@approc which means that the file is not usable. — David Carlisle33 mins ago
@yo' a google search for actapoly.cls only really turned up your comment asking @PauloCereda to look at it....
@UlrikeFischer thanks a lot for replying. It could really be \@ifunderfined{r@FirstPage}{\let\r@FirstPage\relax}{\relax} but it doesn't matter actually to the user. And the publisher's typesetter will have some working version...
@Skillmon there is a very limited repertoire of topics here, so whatever is being discussed, the search box on this page will usually turn up a relevant previous comment
@moewe I could extend the function here to pass a 'run number' argument, if that is helpful: you have to remember that really the idea with l3build is that it doesn't test BibTeX or Biber or whatever, so would 'expect' a pre-created bbl file
@moewe I was right, you need new features :)
@moewe, @UlrikeFischer I can set up runtest_task(name,run), then you just need local run = run or 1, etc.
@JosephWright There is a typo in the description "is is into a call to the system to run the engine". Is runtest_tasks always executed after the engine run?
A question to all: I just answered this: tex.stackexchange.com/questions/514490/… and I have seen again this \resize macro that seems to be called automatically before savedanchors in pgfdeclareshape. I am unable to find documentation... do anybody have a link? Thanks!
@DavidCarlisle the interesting part is that miktex actually allows to create the pdf in the (absolute) graphicspath folder (I knew that at some time, but had forgotten it again)
I use pdflatex from the command line interface and have gotten to what seems to be a quite common theme for beginners: relative includes. reading tex.stackexchange.com/questions/52486 and tex.stackexchange.com/questions/25572 seems to hint at ways to make includes relative to a file, but that stil does not seem to work when I launch the pdflatex command from, for instance, a working directory that is one level higher than the target .tex file.
Am I simply misunderstanding the answers, and it should actually allow direct cli commands to correctly import, or do I really need to change the working directory to where the .tex file is located for relative includes to work?
@FélixGagnon-Grenier the underlying tex system filepaths are always relative to the working directory, it's generally much easier to go with the flow and not try to hide that behaviour
@DavidCarlisle If the eps is in C:\Users\Figures (and the document somewhere else) and you run pdflatex the pdf is placed by epstopdf in the folder too, texlive wouldn't allow this.
@MarcelKrüger ;-). It will also break quite a lot tagpdf tests. But this numbers were quite useless anyway, it is a pity that the log no longer reports literals.
@UlrikeFischer Right. We could work-around that by setting .token instead of .data, but I fear that that would just lead to unnecessary catcode trouble.
@FélixGagnon-Grenier why would you want to nest them, rather than use \input ? (it would be possible to allow nested includes but would add a lot of complication for very little benefit.)