« first day (3051 days earlier)      last day (1879 days later) » 

1:09 AM
@marmot in this wonderful answer, how can we change the position of the / in nonfillable subject? I am changing the values of \hspace{1.55em}~/~\hspace{1.6em}~/~\hspace{1.55em}{} to e.g. 0.55em but it changes the size of the lower rectangle. Could you tell me what portion of code I have to change, please?
(The / on the left is also shifted to the left)
I tried adding xshift={...em} but it did not work
 
1:42 AM
@manooooh You can change the \hspaces individually as long as you make sure that the sum is constant. That is, if you decrease one by, say, 0.2em, you need to increase another one by the same amount.
 
 
2 hours later…
3:44 AM
What offline LaTeX editor do you all use? I've primarily been using Overleaf, but I'd like to have an offline option for when I do not have internet access...
 
 
1 hour later…
vlg
4:57 AM
@zylitoL Any text editor would do. If you want suggestions and auto-completion, plugins exist for a lot of editors; e.g., I use Sublime Text 3 with latextools.
 
i suppose the most important things would be ease of implementing packages (though im sure they all are ?) and live preview
 
vlg
Package implementation? I know only of package loading, creating and documentation reading. Live preview I don't use, but tex works, I recall, had it, and so does vs code.
 
@zylitoL hello! Can TeXnicCenter be a solution?
 
@vlg i meant loading, my apologies
@manooooh ill take a look, thank you
 
vlg
I forgot to sleep :( I'm trying to get a decimal from the division of a `count` and two, maybe 2 hours in and I can't get it to work T_T. I was using `\fp_eval:n` in the place where the number should be, tried doing the calc beforehand with `\fp_set:Nn l_tmpa_fp {...}` and using that, tried with `\fp_new: N` I'm unsure what the command is expecting. What I found out in testing was that I also couldn't print it, neither with `\fp_show`, nor with a `\the` in front of the cs- always getting a `misused float point` error.
 
5:11 AM
@marmot ohh THAT WAS THE SOLUTION! Thank you!!
You are a smarmot
3
I swear to you by my mother that in a moment I thought that the sum should always be constant, but as my first impulse was to change a single value to values very close to the old I thought "What happens here that does not work?". I was almost there :)
@CarLaTeX I think I know who gave that comment a star... :)
 
@manooooh not I!
 
@CarLaTeX really?! Wow, my apologies hahaha
 
@manooooh Yes, I didn't star it :)
 
vlg
I did, first chuckle I've had since I started troubleshooting my awful code. @manooooh
 
@vlg oh, is terrible when you spend a lot of time trying to decipher the code :C, why do not you publish a question to receive attention (maybe faster than in the comments)?
 
5:20 AM
@zylitoL For offline use, you need to install your own TeX distribution. There are two main options: TeX Live and MikTeX. Generally Mac and Linux users use TeX Live and Windows users use either TeX Live or MikTeX. Your editor has nothing to do with the distribution itself. No editors really supply live preview in the way that Overleaf does.
 
@vlg if you allow me to share a song, here is one that is very good and also has a touch of grace (is what I would like to be in a supermarket if everyone were a little crazy): Galantis - Peanut Butter Jelly (Official Video) :)
 
vlg
In stackexcahnge you get much scorn from at times correct, at times faux self-righteous elitist, users with more rep, you get: down-voted, your question not answered, your time wasted and your day ruined. I ask small things here. If I don't get an answer I read more documentation, questions, etc. or give up.
 
vlg
5:34 AM
So strange seeing seemingly happy people
 
 
1 hour later…
vlg
6:45 AM
Hmmm. gotta love the old trick of \StrGobbleRight{\the\dimexpr(\@potato pt/2-1pt)\relax}{2}[\newpotato] then using the potato string macro as a decimal; @potato being a mere count.
 
 
1 hour later…
8:03 AM
@vlg strgobbleright a bit overengineered for that (and not expandable) simply use \strip@pt which needs no package.
 
vlg
8:48 AM
@DavidCarlisle You're golden.
 
9:13 AM
@vlg especially in TikZ regards he is. He has a batch that confirms this!
 
@Skillmon tikz and menu choices
 
@DavidCarlisle ooh
 
@PauloCereda crispy pancakes
Jun 29 '17 at 16:15, by Paulo Cereda
@DavidCarlisle you are not mean :)
 
@DavidCarlisle you are... oh wait
@vlg most of us suffer from Pollyannaism. :)
Which is a good thing.
 
9:39 AM
@JosephWright ooh a duck
 
10:19 AM
@samcarter welcome back!
3
 
10:58 AM
@Raaja Thanks :)
 
 
2 hours later…
vlg
12:30 PM
@PauloCereda what if nice things don't happen?
 
If someone show you a figure made in LaTeX, can you decide whether the figure is made with TikZ or PSTricks?
 
@vlg we make them happen. :)
 
@JouleV yes
 
@DavidCarlisle How to do so? I don't see much difference...
 
12:46 PM
@JouleV I was being cruel:-) You asked if you can decide...You can decide, but you might be wrong, anyway the good diagrams might not use either
 
@DavidCarlisle That is a legendary plane ;-)
 
@JouleV pstricks used to be better at 3d and at deforming text along a path but maybe tikz has caught up these days, I don't really follow the tikz details
 
 
3 hours later…
4:09 PM
Consider the following situation for a page style header, as in image, where text header could have more than 1 line.
I'd like some opinion on how to format it? What would you do? Keep like this, or move the text up so the last line would be aligned to the bottom?
In the second case, should I move the page number up also? I think not.
Opinions are welcome.
 
@Sigur definitely don't move the page number, I don't think I'd move the heading either (if possible, I suppose if it's really long you'd have to adjust the page body)
 
@Sigur shorten the text.
 
@DavidCarlisle, the problem with the 1st option is that a 3rd line could overlap the text. So I would have to increase header sep.
@UlrikeFischer, that would be the perfect solution, but since some users really want some longer text title, I was trying to produce a header to support at least 2 lines.
So, I think that a second line below the header area is not too problematic, right?
 
@Sigur yes or start higher up, basically your header areas needs to be big enough to contain all headers...
 
@DavidCarlisle, so you prefer the 2nd option, right? Since the 1st does not contain the header text inside the header area.
 
4:22 PM
@Sigur no I prefer the 3rd option:-) keep the top line of the heading and the page number at the same place, but in a box big enough to contain the text. Although if you leave room for 3 lines and 99% of your headings only have one, it will look a bit spacy.....
 
@Sigur "It is not good but the users want it" is the way to hell. I would simple not allow this sort of header (and a decent publisher wouldn't allow it either).
 
@UlrikeFischer that is a good translation of my "a bit spacy" :-)
 
lol
 
@DavidCarlisle three potential lines are worse than hell ;-)
 
Sometimes it is harder to convince others to insert a short title than try to find a solution... lol
@DavidCarlisle, @UlrikeFischer, thanks for attention and discussion.
 
4:25 PM
@Sigur clip the second line.
 
@UlrikeFischer, how? Manually? If not, could you explain how would you do that?
 
@Sigur set it in a box, if that is more than a line high, discard the box and re-set in \tiny comic sans on one line and tell the user egreg recommended it that way.
 
@DavidCarlisle, comis sans!!!!! Great idea
 
@DavidCarlisle that's a nice solution too ;-)
 
... with some Wingdings symbols around it :-)
 
5:17 PM
I am struggling with this but must be easy. Is there a way to force numbers in a table to be print as numbers, but not decimal aligned (centered instead)?
 
@G.Bay Just use a c column? What column specification are you using?
 
@G.Bay ? normally numbers are printed as numbers so where is the problem?
 
Yes there is a problem
@AlanMunn The issue is that the minus sign gets short if I dont use like \num and the decimal separator isnt converted to comma as I need. It would require me to go over all tables and replace dot for comma...
 
@G.Bay So I assume you're using siunitx S columns?
 
If I do, then they get align by decimal
 
5:24 PM
@G.Bay use S[table-parse-only].
 
hmmmmmmmm
@UlrikeFischer aha! that does the trick! Many thanks
 
@G.Bay that was easy, I only checked the manual ;-)
 
LOL, i did that too... but apparently I let i pass
 
 
1 hour later…
6:31 PM
@DavidCarlisle I've done the unicode-data update
 
 
2 hours later…
8:01 PM
@JosephWright yep saw the checkin (I've updated w3c.github.io/xml-entities as well)
@JosephWright perhaps @barbarabeeton can get script and calligraphic in separately for unicode 13.....
 
8:17 PM
@DavidCarlisle @PauloCereda would say you are mean ;-)
 
@UlrikeFischer he would, if he had a head.
 
@DavidCarlisle ;-). I better no discuss our diner tonight ;-).
 
@UlrikeFischer Yes, best to duck that conversation.
 
8:55 PM
@AlanMunn Just found out few days ago that "to duck" means "to avoid" :)
 
@CarLaTeX Yes, in this context. Its more literal meaning is to lower your head to avoid something. So you can't use it as a straightforward replacement for 'avoid'. For example, you can't say "I duck putting pineapple on pizza".
 
@AlanMunn Thank you for the clarification!
 
9:15 PM
@CarLaTeX a common sign above low doorways in old hotels etc is "duck or grouse" which are two birds with alternative reading of dip your head or complain (that your head hurts)
 
@DavidCarlisle :)
 
@DavidCarlisle Very useful information for a next trip to UK :)
 
@CarLaTeX it never works, you always hit your head anyway
 
@DavidCarlisle lol
 
9:26 PM
@DavidCarlisle I need one of those in my basement.
 
@AlanMunn get @samcarter to make you a grouse to go with a duck:-)
 
@DavidCarlisle You could draw it in picture mode :)
 
@DavidCarlisle -- In the residences of several navy veterans I know, where the loo has a low doorway, there's a sign on the door that says (using recognizable coded indicators) "{\Small Watch your}{\LARGE HEAD}"
@DavidCarlisle -- Re calligraphic, I'll try.
 
9:53 PM
@CarLaTeX good idea:
\documentclass{article}

\begin{document}


\begin{picture}(100,100)
\put(0,80){\Huge\bfseries Duck}
\put(50,50){\oval(50,20){}}
\put(70,65){\circle{20}}
\put(35,50){\line(1,0){30}}
\put(70,65){\circle*{2}}
\put(75,67){\line(6,-1){10}}
\put(75,63){\line(6,1){10}}



\put(90,40){\LARGE\bfseries or}


\put(140,0){\Huge\bfseries Grouse}
\put(150,50){\oval(50,20){}}
\put(170,65){\oval(10,15){}}
\put(135,50){\line(1,0){30}}
\put(170,65){\circle*{2}}
\put(175,67){\line(6,-1){10}}
\put(175,63){\line(6,1){10}}
far better than this one I found on the net
 
@CarLaTeX You better hurry: after 29 March it will be very difficult.
 
@egreg might call it off yet:-)
@barbarabeeton I guess a variant selector has best chance, although another alphabet block would be simpler
 
10:10 PM
@DavidCarlisle A masterpiece, as always :)
@egreg It is not sure it will be 29 March
 
@CarLaTeX Well, Mrs May is trying to make everything to break apart in a way or another.
 
@egreg Let's come back on this topic on 30 March :)
 
I got a new very nice palindrome:
user image
5
 

« first day (3051 days earlier)      last day (1879 days later) »