@Piroooh there are no private messages but you can ping users here (as you just did) if they have been here recently, or under the post of course. (Basically if the @ prompts the user name the ping will work to that user)
@Piroooh SE does not have the functionality of sending PM. You can leave him a message in the comment's section of the question, quoting him. Even you could create a (public) room to thank him, but that would be like killing a fly with a cannon, so not recommended
@PrabhjotSingh that is a very vague question, the classic (and often best) way is simply to use begin{quote}..\end{quote} or an environment with similar definition but different indents, or a more invasive way is given by the geometry package and its \newgeometry command
@PrabhjotSingh there are 859 posts with examples of \newgeometry look at a couple of the high vote ones and if you can't apply that to your document, best to make a real example in a question, so people can debug the issue you have tex.stackexchange.com/search?q=%5Cnewgeometry
Do I have to patch things manually to fix the dreaded microtype.lua:145: attempt to call field 'warning' (a nil value) issue? Or is there TeX Live 2019 or some such?
./fontspec-errors.tex:4: Missing number, treated as zero.
<to be read again>
M
l.4 \begin
{document}
It's actually not as cryptic as it seems, since Scale obviously is looking for a number, but in the context of misspelling MatchLowercase which isn't obviously a number it's very hard to spot.
@DavidCarlisle Yes, I just noticed that. Maybe adding a minimum width column type would also be useful. (I don't know if I implemented it in the most sensible way.)
@UlrikeFischer how easy is it to handle variant selectors in luatex these days, that is if script A was/is U+1D49F and calligraphic A became the pair U+1D49F U+0FE03 ? (@JosephWright @barbarabeeton)
@DavidCarlisle -- yes, I know that's a real complication. But the UTC is ibnterested in their concept of coding purity. In this case, the Microsoft choice between script/calligraphic in Cambria doesn't make the UTC decision easier.
@UlrikeFischer no more like a combining character. so it would be two actual codepoints U+1D49F U+0FE03 instead of just U+1D49F
@UlrikeFischer the math block already use VS-1 (U+FE00) in some cases (not sure how well supported) eg U+222A is union but U+222A U+FE00 is union-with-serifs
@DavidCarlisle ;-) But Hans did included the correction. So it should be okay with the next update. (But for some reason he currently updates the "current" branch and not "beta" and now I'm confused where the newest stuff is ...).
I use the prerex package to draw a simple prerequisite diagram. It works well, but changes the table of contents color to red, what looks ugly. I tried to change it back with
{\color{black}\tableofcontents}
but it remains red.
Sample code:
\documentclass{report}
\usepackage{prerex}
\usepacka...
I use the prerex package to draw a simple prerequisite diagram. It works well, but changes the table of contents color to red, what looks ugly. I tried to change it back with
{\color{black}\tableofcontents}
but it remains red.
Sample code:
\documentclass{report}
\usepackage{prerex}
\usepacka...
