« first day (1989 days earlier)      last day (136 days later) » 

12:39 AM
What additional information might we request here so that it's clear enough to answer? (Or am I wrong to think it is not?)
I agree with duping this but if we do it then I think answers should be merged.
I think we should reopen this question, which was recently made clear by editing, and probably reclose it as a duplicate.
@Zanna That question got closed. I've voted to reopen it and replaced my comment with a new one.
 
1:11 AM
VTC as unclear now since no feedfack from the OP: askubuntu.com/q/982600
 
1:22 AM
VTC'd
 
how are you today ? :)
 
Okay. You?
 
had a long long sleep and just woke up after i sleeped from late afternoon till now
sad to close this question i mentioned above but i now have this tab open since two days waiting for a response from the OP having my VM locked down in this state where i treid to reproduce the outcome of the OP. I might have an idea what he/she is seeing there but to be sure i as well would need feedback
My guess is after the installation of the themes-extension i got sent to a gnome -classic session which i think has happened to the OP
 
 
3 hours later…
4:57 AM
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Chinese character in title, mostly non-Latin body: ubuntu 16.4 64位安装 winHQ 依赖问题 by D.Y.F on askubuntu.com
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad keyword in body, bad keyword in title, blacklisted website in body, link at end of body: My activity, to InvigorateX the extent by kimsabim on askubuntu.com
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] URL-only title, bad keyword in body, bad keyword in title, blacklisted website in body, blacklisted website in title, +4 more: nutritionplanreview.com/dermagen-iq-fr/ by user768325 on askubuntu.com
 
 
2 hours later…
6:36 AM
This new user who signed up today at AU has posted multiple spam answers.
 
@karel one was just removed by my flag the other one needs two more flags
 
Deleted the other one too now.
 
yep posted it in Charcoal HQ seems smokey seems to not have catched this one
:41569760 !!/hats
 
7:18 AM
I don't agree with the way this suggested edit has been done at all, but should the comment be added in a less awkward and confusing way?
 
Ah, the one i just skipped becasue i was unsure how to handle it
and yes i think this information might be useful but this should be put in words not in the command line, or made a complete comment line above the command line
 
7:44 AM
in Ask Ubuntu General Room, 1 hour ago, by Videonauth
Anyone capable of chinese? https://askubuntu.com/q/983651
 
7:58 AM
Zanna, when you read my answer here would then anything be unclear to you? Could/should I add something to make it more clear?
 
 
1 hour later…
9:04 AM
@Videonauth Re this comment: askubuntu.com/questions/983041/… -- It's too late, it was closed anyway, now it has to be reopened and the other question closed as a duplicate of it or it's no deal.
 
@karel or merged maybe
bot have good answers, but the newer one is probably more up to date with the current version of gnome-terminal
 
 
1 hour later…
10:33 AM
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Mostly non-Latin answer: winehq package has dependency problem on Ubuntu 16.04 64-bit by D.Y.F on askubuntu.com
 
10:44 AM
I've edited it to an English version... can we rescue that Q & A?
 
@Zanna retracted my close vote
 
thanks
 
 
5 hours later…
3:32 PM
 
4:00 PM
I think this question is unclear without further information.
 
 
2 hours later…
5:58 PM
I think it is reasonable to delete this answer.
 
 
2 hours later…
7:40 PM
guess no one checked the path on their system ... askubuntu.com/review/suggested-edits/783583
 
 
1 hour later…
8:49 PM
@Videonauth that was approved
 
yep it was but there is no such directory /usr/local/share/ca-certificates
at least not on my system, but maybe im running something else and only think it is ubuntu
while /usr/share/ca-certificates exists
this is why i rejected the edit
 
But why does /usr/local/share/ca-certificates have to already exist for that edit to be correct? Isn't the idea that if it exists and contains certificates, then they provide custom configuration?
I believe that should be /usr/local/share/ca-certificates/. See man update-ca-certificates, which talks about there being a whitelist for /usr/share/ca-certificates/ but about how it implicitly trusts everything in the /usr/local/share/ca-certificates/ directory. — Ian Hickson Oct 6 at 7:46
 

« first day (1989 days earlier)      last day (136 days later) »