What additional information might we request here so that it's clear enough to answer? (Or am I wrong to think it is not?)

I agree with duping this but if we do it then I think answers should be merged.

Not actually unclear.

This seems clear to me...

I think we should reopen this question, which was recently made clear by editing, and probably reclose it as a duplicate.

@Zanna That question got closed. I've voted to reopen it and replaced my comment with a new one.

VTC as unclear now since no feedfack from the OP: askubuntu.com/q/982600

VTC'd

[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Manually reported answer: Disable 2-Step ssh auth for only one user by ytfd123 on askubuntu.com

how are you today ? :)

Okay. You?

had a long long sleep and just woke up after i sleeped from late afternoon till now

sad to close this question i mentioned above but i now have this tab open since two days waiting for a response from the OP having my VM locked down in this state where i treid to reproduce the outcome of the OP. I might have an idea what he/she is seeing there but to be sure i as well would need feedback

My guess is after the installation of the themes-extension i got sent to a gnome -classic session which i think has happened to the OP

[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Chinese character in title, mostly non-Latin body: ubuntu 16.4 64位安装 winHQ 依赖问题 by D.Y.F on askubuntu.com

[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad keyword in body, bad keyword in title, blacklisted website in body, link at end of body: My activity, to InvigorateX the extent by kimsabim on askubuntu.com

[ SmokeDetector | MS ] URL-only title, bad keyword in body, bad keyword in title, blacklisted website in body, blacklisted website in title, +4 more: nutritionplanreview.com/dermagen-iq-fr/ by user768325 on askubuntu.com

This new user who signed up today at AU has posted multiple spam answers.

@karel one was just removed by my flag the other one needs two more flags

Deleted the other one too now.

yep posted it in Charcoal HQ seems smokey seems to not have catched this one

:41569760 !!/hats

I don't agree with the way this suggested edit has been done at all, but should the comment be added in a less awkward and confusing way?

Ah, the one i just skipped becasue i was unsure how to handle it

and yes i think this information might be useful but this should be put in words not in the command line, or made a complete comment line above the command line

@Videonauth I hopefully fixed it

:)

Zanna, when you read my answer here would then anything be unclear to you? Could/should I add something to make it more clear?

@Videonauth Re this comment: askubuntu.com/questions/983041/… -- It's too late, it was closed anyway, now it has to be reopened and the other question closed as a duplicate of it or it's no deal.

@karel or merged maybe

bot have good answers, but the newer one is probably more up to date with the current version of gnome-terminal

[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Mostly non-Latin answer: winehq package has dependency problem on Ubuntu 16.04 64-bit by D.Y.F on askubuntu.com

I've edited it to an English version... can we rescue that Q & A?

@Zanna retracted my close vote

thanks

NAA

NAA

I think this question is unclear without further information.

Same here.

NAA

NAA

I think it is reasonable to delete this answer.

guess no one checked the path on their system ... askubuntu.com/review/suggested-edits/783583

@Videonauth that was approved

yep it was but there is no such directory /usr/local/share/ca-certificates

at least not on my system, but maybe im running something else and only think it is ubuntu

while /usr/share/ca-certificates exists

this is why i rejected the edit

But why does /usr/local/share/ca-certificates have to already exist for that edit to be correct? Isn't the idea that if it exists and contains certificates, then they provide custom configuration?

NAA