« first day (16 days earlier)      last day (186 days later) » 

4:29 AM
Nice pieces, q_a! yours? midi? (no need for a quick answer, lotsa editing to do)
 
4:55 AM
The light velocity of arpeg1 is actually helping me work! (back to it...)
 
 
3 hours later…
7:59 AM
arpeg2 is not helping,,, except to dance!
 
@humn Please don't transform into me... I want to be the only manshu on this planet.
 
 
3 hours later…
10:40 AM
Well, ok, @manshu, sigh, guess I'll wait for a day when you're visiting another planet. May I still edit myourXXXXX my fortune cookies and play in the sandbox?
 
@humn yeah, those are things I put together years ago, playing around with arpeggiators in Logic (so, yeah, MIDI/sampled instruments)
 
those were samples too? i couldn't tell. anyway, nice variety and good morning but i'm pretty much checking out right now
a Q i had for you, though, is your computer soundless at the moment? for long?
[next time]
 
 
1 hour later…
12:02 PM
@humn I guess those things are for everyone. :p
 
12:20 PM
@humn My computer is soundless at the moment, but soundful in the evenings (work schedule, basically)
 
12:32 PM
That reminds me, q_a - I still need to get NotePerformer :/
And hi
 
lol the babyman mod got rid of my comments on that spanish language puzzle
 
babyman mod?
 
hello KK
the mod that is always deleting things of mine
 
ahh
 
I should be nicer
 
12:33 PM
:P
 
I keep forgetting that a lot of people here (though not everybody) is super young
but certain people especially
 
I was actually thinking about it, the other day...
I tend to forget something, when I'm online, that I never forget in real life.
People are stupid.
 
true!
 
Sometimes they have good reason for it, but -- regardless =D
I just forget
It's funny - the program I had to create to design that email puzzle...
I pieced together things, online, to make it, but I wasn't really sure that it worked the way I thought..
...So last night, I wrote a program to decrypt it, myself, to make sure I do understand - and it worked.
Yay
I can't believe no one has had a conniption about me editing that puzzle, yet.
 
haha
yeah people are wieners about this stuff
 
12:37 PM
wieners?
looks like I got here just in time
 
I just mean because:
1. I made it even longer.
2. I had to fix something.
 
and they tend to get riled up if anything is imperfect about a puzzle
 
HOT DOGS! GET YOUR HOT DOGS!
Yeah, I've noticed this, q_a
 
if it wasn't like 8:30AM I would want a hotdog now
 
I'll try to remember to let my robots write all my puzzles, from now on.
 
12:38 PM
yeah. I mean. I've even gotten annoyed at stuff like that
there was a puzzle where the answer was "NO ESCAPE" spelled out on a seven-segment display
but it came out to NO ESCAPP
 
No Eskimo Capps for you!
 
and I remember being kind of annoyed by that, but then thinking: who cares. number one, I was still able to solve it - the error didn't stand in the way of me using my damn brain to figure out what the actual answer was supposed to be. number two—and this is crucial—it's a puzzle on the internet
 
Morning, Matt.
I try not to do it, too much, though, or it affects my own typing. :P
 
it's what bothers me about the selfseriousness a lot of people have about closing puzzles they don't like etc
like, chill. even the worst puzzles here are not really hurting anybody
the only times I've ever seen anything I'd consider harmful here were 1) a couple of times people came by and legitimately vandalized the site by posting "answers" that were just slurs, and 2) the time one of the mods got doxed
 
366
Q: Jon Skeet Facts

Bill the LizardI'm looking for Chuck Norris Facts style answers. In case anyone is curious, this question was inspired by Jon's own comment to this question. EDIT: If you're into cryptography, you may enjoy these facts. Now with official sanction from the powers that be!

 
12:43 PM
I've seen Jon on SO for years, but I don't see what the big deal about him is.
 
me either
 
Some of his answers to posts are good - some are trash - just like everyone else.
 
(also I don't find chuck-norris-fact style jokes very interesting or funny. they're really low effort and formulaic)
(but I'm not trying to poop on anybody's good time here)
 
Meh, I agree
But I got bored with all of that back when it was "Barrens' Chat"
Internet Celebrities are amusing, to me, though.
Go to site where they are a celebrity: "All hail [Zod!]"
Go ANYWHERE else, in the world, or internet: "[Zod], who?"
Like that one youtuber that sites talk about. 1. A celebrity is not a celebrity because you said it was. I never even heard about the guy until he was mentioned on blog posts, etc. 2. Nearly everyone I've seen talk about the guy can't stand him. Infamy does not make a celebrity.
3. I don't even have reason to remember his name.
I really am done with my rant now - I think.
 
hahaha I'm very much with you on this
we used to have that problem on twitter a lot
people would end up getting really heated about somebody and you'd have to step back and go "ok, literally no one who isn't within a certain orbit on twitter has even heard of this person, so it's not like they have any significant reach"
 
12:52 PM
LoL
 
which, you know, is not to say that it's not worthwhile to be critical of people (and yourself), but... sometimes it just ain't that deep
 
=D
Oh, btw, I snuck a puzzle in, while you were out yesterday
It was a short one - I almost posted it, in here. Lol
 
oh no, it's been answered already!
hahahaha oh man, I might've actually gotten that one
 
haha
Oh wow, interesting - I figured something like this wasn't allowed.
 
speaking of making puzzles
 
12:55 PM
Someone posted a binary string that turns into an .EXE that has to be run. I'd considered that.
 
I came up with one this morning
I guess I should post it if I want anyone else to see it
 
True story =D
Also - you should want someone else to see it.
 
let me just say I wouldn't be comfortable running any binary strings
 
yeah
 
1:13 PM
man, my rhymes are so forced
meh
but I'm not poetically inclined enough to improve it by any significant amount
posted
 
1:29 PM
kk
Narcissism! Narcissism comes next!
j/k - actually reading now.
 
hahaha
 
I think I'm too tired to see any patterns here, right now.
All I can think of is ABA ABA ABA
 
yeah, that's the poetic form
but there's a sequence in there somewhere
I won't drop any hints yet - it's still very early
 
yeah
Well I've looked at it from 3 directions and I'm pretty sure it's not day-of-the-week related.
 
if you fit the poem to days of the week when there's 9 lines and 7 days, I would be impressed
 
1:36 PM
Literal 4-day weekends.
 
I was skipping lines that didn't have dotw abbreviations.
It wouldn't fit anyways, since it's wordplay and the words mean something.
 
maybe months...9 lines are given..3 to go
 
it's tagged word
 
word = months
 
Seems like an improper tag, though, if we're being asked what the next stanza is
 
1:38 PM
read the description of word tag please
 
"not a phrase, sentence, or sentences"
Like I said.
Being rude about it doesn't change anything
 
the solution is a single word
so I tagged it as such
 
tag it with the tag "poem"
 
I'm out of tags
eh, I got rid of riddle
 
all I can think of is ... quite a reach.
 
1:46 PM
as I said in the puzzle, it's not your average sequence
 
Is it a median sequence?
 
haha
 
I'm certain it's unrelated
But the stanzas have 15, 17, then 13 words.
No relation to wordplay, though, so likely not helpful
plausible answer posted
Yeah, that's what I was meaning, earlier, Matt (btw, gj)
"What comes next?" implies that it's looking for a line of the poem, next.
 
Answer is up and accepted.
 
I was expecting a word as the answer, but I got a little more
 
1:51 PM
Yeah
Though technically he didn't answer - but the answer can be implied =D
 
indeed
he knows what's going on
 
yeah
 
so I accepted it
 
Nice job, though - Not something I would have noticed, given any amount of time.
 
If you'd gone one line further, you could have asked, "what must come next?"
It would have had to be "elven"
 
1:53 PM
perhaps
 
leaven =D
 
but I liked 3 x 3 lines
and the ABA form
 
ABA is definitely hard to read.
 
Yeah, that was nice
 
yeah, there's an abruptness to it
 
1:55 PM
That's one of the things I like about...
ABAB CCDD ABAB
Or the one I used on skyscraper..
AA BC BC DD
 
@Matt great puzzle!
 
thanks!
 
It's a good example of a puzzle with many possible solutions that isn't "too broad"
because it's the reasoning itself that answers the question, not the specifics of the line
 
well I was expecting the answer to be "ten"
thus the word tag
 
still
you chose an answer that wasn't ten, because you could tell they "got" it
this is why people who expect every clue to be explained drive me up a tree
 
2:04 PM
yeah
I had hints prepared, too
 
if you made the riddle good enough, somebody won't just accidentally stumble on the right answer. somebody won't just brute force the right answer without knowing how the puzzle works
(also, "explain every clue" very often goes into "tell me what I was thinking" territory, even without people realizing it)
 
there's only one explanation that fits here
it's not a riddle, I guess
 
oh yeah no I just was speaking more generally
 
right
 
explaining why yours is good but others...not so much
 
2:07 PM
coming up with a good riddle is not easy at all
but this concept just hit me while I was in the shower this morning lol
 
I have a vague, "almost all of the hints are covered exactly, the rest are covered somewhat, and there's no blatantly incorrect information" rule of thumb
 
that makes a lot of sense
 
Yeah, that's a good way to go about things
like, if a riddle or puzzle or whatever consists of, say, ten clues that all follow the same rule, I'm willing to explain 3-4 of them - anything else is just literally making the solver do busywork for the sake of doing busywork, or for the sake of stroking the ego of the puzzle creator
 
That said, I still don't know what to do with this
7
Q: Musician Jumble

WillI have a lot of free time, so I asked my friend for music suggestions. My friend, knowing that I am bored with time on my hands agreed, but gave me the suggestions in the form of a puzzle. On a sheet of paper, they wrote down twelve words: BLAND BOY CHAPTER CLIP EARTH ELEMENTS IONIC MESS PICKE...

 
oh, a wiki can't be marked as correct ...
would it be kosher to answer it yourself?
Or ask Chris to repost the the answer since he's responsible for >50% of the wiki
or leave it
 
2:17 PM
I thought it could still be marked, but gave no rep. I've seen wikis with checkmarks.
 
oh, well then
 
^ that
@Chris If you're lurking here, I'll accept your answer if you list the stuff from the wiki. :P
 
Maybe later. Debugging a deadlock right now.
 
Fun stuff.
 
Yeah. I think I need to replace a " Foreach(stuff) roundtrip update " with a datatable bulk update, but I've never done that before.
It starts deadlocking when multiple users write at the same time.
 
2:21 PM
Yay, deadlocks...
Yeah, you're going to want to probably queue and/or chunk the save, so that it's smaller and more flexible.
 
Theres a varchar max in there.
 
Perhaps, but that's only 8000 characters
 
Oh FUDGE!!!! There's no keys or indexes on the table!!!
 
Gah
 
rip table
 
2:30 PM
Yeah, my wife is taking a SQL class, for work, and the tables they're working with are extremely simple. No identities, no foreign keys, etc. I keep having to tell her: "This is what they want you to do...but DON'T EVER DO THIS to the tables, at work."
 
I'm betting I dropped them while populating the original dataset and forgot to redo them.
 
all hail nosql!
 
I need to learn nosql/mongo
(Mostly because so many companies in my field use it)
(And I never have)
To be fair, though, I started using TSQL 4 years ago..
 
oh look it's nerd crew
 
you know it
 
2:32 PM
I used to be very good and knowledgeable about mysql
many years ago
 
I learned a decent amount, from working with very smart people
 
I went from a job using java/spring/hibernate/jsp etc to node/mongo/react ... it's so nice
 
I still have trouble with outer joins, though
@Matt yeah?
Well - going from java to anything is so nice... lol
 
yeah
 
I never even tried to learn java
 
2:33 PM
I have hated it, since it came out
 
java (and all c-related languages) are so gross to look at
they offend my sensibilities
 
Oh look a java program. Let me wait 10 minutes for this to start up.... Okay, click a button...look - another 2 minutes.
3
There we go... Got it. Now....oh, it crashed.
 
(I have the luxury of saying this, as I am not professionally involved with Computer Shit at all)
 
when I'm working locally, and edit server code, I don't have to wait minutes for tomcat to come back up (java). node bounces in 2 seconds
 
I'm even talking locally - ran into a program, recently, in fact, for steganography.
Couldn't use it because it only worked on rare occasion, and crashed every few clicks.
 
2:35 PM
@Khale_Kitha hahah YES. also: 99% of java UIs are the ugliest things I've ever seen
 
Yes. This.
 
java swing applications are the worst thing to happen to desktop applications
 
Actually, the only reason I haven't done any work on android apps is because of the language
Though, to be fair...that new iOS language is a complete joke
swift 2
 
webapps compiled into mobile apps are the future
 
lol
I greatly dislike webapps
but I've yet to run into one that wasn't buggy as all getout
Meanwhile - my email puzzle had an update
but brb
 
2:41 PM
oh, just looking at swift 2 right now, I don't hate it
 
(back)
I just dislike the confusion of the keywords
like the silly 'let' command
 
oh, that's a good point
 
es6 has let
 
but remember, I'm a big piece of shit who likes ruby
2
 
it's basically a replacement for var
 
2:44 PM
That's the problem, Matt.
in Swift, let does ONE thing
It instantiates constants. Nothing else.
 
ew
 
yeah
 
you would think, like other languages, there would be a "const" for constants
 
or that let would ... you know .... set other things
 
2:45 PM
yeah
 
I've seen languages with 'let' - I don't like it, but they weren't this bad, lol
 
it's swift outwardly strongly typed?
that is, do you initialize other variables with their type?
 
ML dialects' let keyword is great
 
I'd have to look into it further - it says implies types, but I don't know, yet.
ML?/
Ruby's a demon, q_a
...sorry - wrong show.
 
I love it
 
2:47 PM
Yeah, ML. Like SML or OCaml.
 
I mean, I know it's not a language that people writing "real" "programs" would use
 
Well that's because it's not a programming language, hehe
It'd be tough to do that
 
but it's great for smaller tasks (and works in surprisingly intuitive ways)
 
Yeah
I've found value in it's use, personally.
Same with LUA
 
Well, I mean, it's a programming language
but I get what you're saying
 
2:48 PM
It's a scripting language
imo
(stupid chat delay)
I need to think of a new puzzle while people are working on the email one.
I should have named that puzzle, better..
 
I won't get into the programming/scripting prescriptive debate
 
lol
 
27
Q: Difference between a script and a program?

giriWhat is the difference between a script and a program? Most of the time I hear that a script is running, is that not a program? I am bit puzzled, can anybody elaborate on this?

 
That first answer is exactly my thought, personally.
 
"closed as not constructive" - this is why I won't get into the debate
but yes, I agree with that first answer
 
2:51 PM
As for my Ruby's a demon comment..
I was teasing, about that show (thinking...)
oh
Supernatural
 
oh I haven't seen that
 
Why is that show still running
 
Ah, lol - my wife watched the entire thing, so I saw it all the time
Is it still running? I have no idea
They've all died and come back like 8 times each
And everyone has changed roles so often...
lol
 
I feel like my number one argument for AND against ruby is that one SO question I posed, and the accepted answer to it
 
"These are the days of our [supernatural] lives..."
2
lol
I found ruby really useful for the tool that I used it for
 
2:53 PM
I think that solved it. Just ran a 30 user test, all submitting Yuge, Classy blocks of Lorem Ipsum simultaneously and no deadlocks.
 
yay!
 
I can't believe I left the keys off. I'm smarter than that.
 
Gj, Chris
Yay for Yuge blocks!
:P
 
And of course, I never even bothered to check. I just assumed they would be there.
 
where the answer to my question was essentially "no you can just go ahead and toss that conditional into the array brackets"
like. of fucking course. naturally.
 
2:54 PM
lol
 
A colleague suggested I check the indexes, which led me to start poking around.
 
Yeah, Chris - I have a habit of programming my code so that someone, later, can't screw it up...
 
2 days ago, by You
When cursing, please put the curse word in brainf**k.
 
I keep getting told, by colleagues to trust the other developers, but I refuse.
I don't want to have to go back and fix or explain my code because someone else screwed up something, so I code, assuming they're going to screw it up.
 
No, this was all on me.
 
2:58 PM
No, I understand - I just mean that it's one of those things that you didn't check because you assumed it was done right - regardless of whomever didn't do it right to begin with. Haha
 
When I did the initial data load, I disabled the keys and FK constraints so that I didn't have to upload the data in a particular order. I just forgot to put them back.
 
Ahh, haha
Yeah, I've seen the same thing happen with disabling of identity restrictions - The company I worked for had an installer that had to do that when it would replace data in constrained tables.
 

« first day (16 days earlier)      last day (186 days later) »