« first day (2599 days earlier)      last day (2425 days later) » 

11:00 PM
That's awesome Ted.
 
@KasmirKhaan aH left Ha right coset
 
It was a lot of administrative work, Nate. But someone had to do it. I taught a bit less, but still more than most people in that position.
 
@Faust thanks, it is a bit odd because H is in the wrong side =p
 
its about the element a not H =)
 
11:01 PM
@Ted how much did you usually teach?
 
@TedShifrin imgur.com/a/vniQK
 
@TedShifrin did you take less grad students because of it?
lol Dodsy
 
Demonark: I normally taught the equivalent of 5 3-hour classes, whereas most research-active faculty did 3 1/2. (Calculus counted as 1 1/3 because of the fourth hour.)
Faust: I only had one grad student in my whole career. I was more into working with undergrads.
 
wow
 
3 hour classes would be awesome.
I have 1 hour classes and I always leave wanting more.
 
11:04 PM
i had a 3hr biology class once a week could never stay awake for all of it
 
No, no, 3 1-hour classes.
A 3 credit course.
 
I think it's 3 hours per week
Sniped again...
 
:(
 
Yeah, literature with discussions works for one 3-hour meeting, but I taught very few math classes (diff geo and some grad courses) where we met 1 1/4 hours each session.
 
if we have a map in general, and we found it inverse
 
11:05 PM
most of my classes are 1.5hrs twice a week
 
does this tell us that the map is bijective?
 
no
consider the map on the natural numbers
 
why did my teacher use that as an argument then grrr
 
where f takes 1 to 2 and 2 to 3 etc
 
What's domain and range?
 
11:06 PM
@TedShifrin I bet next year I'll feel differently when I have more math courses/am full time.
 
consider g that takes 1 to 1 and 2 to 1 and 3 to 2 etc
 
aH --> bH , ah---> bh where h in H
the map from aH to bH is multiplication by ba'
 
That is obviously a bijection.
 
g is a right inverse of f but neighier are a bijection into the naturals
 
the other way around is ab'
 
11:07 PM
Too many conversations happening.
 
@TedShifrin why you say avious?
@Faust you took an infinite case =p
 
@Daminark hows the start of your term going?
 
Class is starting for me in about 10 days
 
Hey, from the top of your head, what are usual ways to prove two subgroups intersect as ${e}$ if you've defined them as a normal closure? E.g. in the rubik's cube group, you generate subgroups by certain moves and use them to describe the group as a semidirect product, but I didn't see proofs of that.
 
I'm still actually trying to figure out my last class
 
11:09 PM
@Kasmir: Even if $H$ is infinite, it's obviously a bijection.
 
you can have infinite cosets but that still never happens :p
dam you Ted
 
<--- should just shut up
 
lol
 
Ted's just gunning us down
:P
 
Erhmm Ted is awesome thats y :D
 
11:10 PM
@Dodsy how's it going on your side?
 
Okay guys i think I got it =p thanks
 
@Daminark 10 days!? that's crazy. And pretty good. I'm really enjoying calculus and my teacher is really great. But physics seems slow atm, and it turns out that it is not going to be calc based this term. And then lin alg is a massive mess. So we'll see how it goes. I love calc though.
 
@TedShifrin Suppose that G is a cyclic group of even order. How do i prove that G has only one element of order 2?
 
Write down what the group is.
 
But my physics teacher said something silly today about finding the instantaneous velocity being difficult due to calculus, and also didn't recognise that you can get a very good approximation using the secant method.
 
11:13 PM
i need to prove it for any cyclic group with even order
 
difficult due to calculus?
 
but i guess $ Z_4$ with addition works the element of order 2 is the number 2
i feel like im missing something critical in my understanding of groups cause i keep thinking why not two elements of order 2
 
Try $\Bbb Z_{2n}$.
 
@TedShifrin yeah really weird...
 
well the element n will always have order 2
 
11:15 PM
He said that calculus was messy and said we're just going to use "the big four" kinematic equations.
 
@Faust: Could there be another?
 
there's a few other things he says / does that just seem off.
 
Ugh ... physics without calculus is just memorized formulas.
 
and he said we won't do integrals and will just assume that acceleration is always constant.
Yeah exactly.
 
@TedShifrin well no
now i sound crazy =P
 
11:16 PM
Now write a proof.
 
well everything smaller than n will need more than two steps to get to 2n
 
Let x be my broken dreams- like that? @TedShifrin
 
Hush, Nate.
 
and everything bigger will go over 2n in two steps
thats not a proof but its my logic into why
 
:P
 
11:18 PM
@Dodsy I think he is just saying that the course doesn't assume knowledge of calculus, so you will be doing the simplified version of everything.
 
Yeah and that's what I hate.
 
@Jasper Sup old man >.>
 
I signed up for the "enriched" physics course for a reason.
 
You can make that a solid proof very easily, @Faust. I dunno if you want to use additive or multiplicative notation for the group.
 
@Faust LOL. Nothing's up. Everything's down for me. =(
 
11:19 PM
cheer up buttercup @Jasper
I did happen to walk by a gentleman on the phone (presumably to his mother) explaining that his classes were too easy and "beneath him"
 
@TedShifrin yeah i think ive actually done the proof before thanks =)
 
@Dodsy The other simplification is doing things in 1 dimension instead of 3. When the switch is made, some get confused.
@Dodsy I believe that sometimes not simplifying things makes things clearer, for example, using vectors in 3 dimensions instead of making one direction positive and the other direction negative when doing motion in 1 dimension.
 
@Jasper i noticed you pulled the trigger on the mse boom boom button yet again
 
Yeah, it should be fine. I'll just focus on getting a good grade.
 
@Faust Yes, lol. How's your studies going?
@Dodsy Yeah, just try to get a perfect GPA for starters.
 
11:22 PM
haha when pigs fly!
 
I have 5 classes its a bit long but i got all my assignments basically done just need to rewrite out a couple good copies so i have the weekend to study w.e i want.
 
Oh yeah. It's the weekend.
 
You know, I used to be really interested in physics, but not anymore. There's too much math to learn already, so I can't be bothered with physics now, lol.
 
@TedShifrin yes, Ted.
 
@TedShifrin your permanently on weekend
 
11:24 PM
Well, no. Remember I now work on Sundays. :P
Plus you guys make me work.
 
@TedShifrin You are on permanent vacation, lol.
 
@Jasper I took it because at another school here in Canada, it's recommended for an honours specialization, to take a first year course in physics. So I figured I'd take it and if anything it'd give me some basis for decision on applied math vs pure math or whatever.
 
@TedShifrin just trying to prevent you from getting dementia cause we care Ted.
 
Ha ha, Faust.
 
O.o
 
11:25 PM
one guy said medical physics.
There's people here in first year general science telling people they're majoring in astrophysics. O_O
 
@Dodsy Yeah, it's good to at least do some mechanics. It's actually done in a lot of math courses in the UK.
 
OK, I have dinner to prepare for company coming later. Bye, all. Have a good evening/weekend.
 
bye Ted.
 
thanks ted
@Dodsy just try not to get too distracted if its your first year at uni
 
Ofc not.
I can't afford to drink away from home anymore
and too old to fraternise
 
11:26 PM
@Semiclassical Your avatar is kind of weird because of the colour and the pattern. It must be very strange that you got that one, lol.
 
eh, so it goes
i'm too lazy to get another
 
I like it, Semi.
 
i wouldnt mind a fracal pattern
 
@Dodsy What've you got as the 'big 4' of kinematics?
 
11:27 PM
Haven't started yet :(
 
@Dodsy Why did you use an old man for your pic, lol
 
I assume that it's going to be high school physics all over again semi.
 
In physics the way I like to describe kinematics is "a machine we use to turn information about the system at one time into information at another time"
 
but I feel like for physics and linear algebra, I could've saved 1500 dollars and read the textbook instead of going to school.
2
 
tbh, I think physics doesn't really start until you get to forces
before that it's really just consequences of how motion etc is defined
 
11:29 PM
But then, calculus is crazy. The teacher knows his content so much and basically just forces us to read the textbook. He wants us to sleep with it under our pillow, but doesn't even teach from it (for the most part) he basically uses the readings as a foundation for whatever else he's teaching us.
I love calculus.
at least that's my opinion on what is happening in that class.
 
re: the big 4, I mostly wonder b/c here one talks about the big 3
 
Calculus is a very intresting subject
2
 
:o
I keep timing out.
 
$x_f=x_i+v_i t+\frac12 a t^2$,
$v_f=v_i+at$,
$v_f^2=v_f^2+2a(x_f-x_i)$.
 
@Semiclassical one of them ate the other?
 
11:31 PM
?
oh
 
Back.
 
whats $f^2$4
nvm
 
though I also really don't like including the third one
 
So I didn't write down exactly what he said, perhaps he said 3.
 
that looks more familair
 
11:32 PM
The first two are immediate consequences of "acceleration is constant"---just take antiderivatives w/r/t time
 
user228700
Hi, everyone :-) Can anybody help me with some multivariable calculus?
 
maybe
 
Today in calculus teacher asked what the range of $f(x)=\sqrt{3x-9}+\sqrt{4-(x-4)^2}$ was and it ended up being complicated.
 
the last one is what you get when you eliminate $t$ from the first two. Or, at least, that's how you obtain it in the context of elementary kinematics
hrm, I can imagine.
 
user228700
 
user228700
11:34 PM
Mine is a simple question, really. The theorem itself is stated using slightly different words in my textbook and I was wondering if anybody could please help me to parse it.
 
never seen it called that before but its familiar
 
the reason I object to calling it one of the big 3 is two-fold. one is what I just said: it's a derived result, so treating it as fundamental seems silly.
 
user228700
In my textbook, it states "If $f_{xy}$ and $f_{yx}$ are continuous on some open disk, then $f_{xy}=f_{yx}$ on that disk."
 
hm.
I think I need to restart my computer
 
the second is that, on the other hand, it anticipates energy conservation. so later on there's very good reasons why that equation should show up
but putting it in as one of the big 3 separates it from that.
 
user228700
11:36 PM
What is this disk business of which they speak?
 
user228700
@Semiclassical Oops! Edited it, thanks :-)
 
np
In geometry, a disk (also spelled disc) is the region in a plane bounded by a circle. A disk is said to be closed if it contains the circle that constitutes its boundary, and open if it does not. == Formulas == In Cartesian coordinates, the open disk of center ( a , b ) {\displaystyle (a,b)} and radius R is given by the formula D = { ( x , y ) ∈ R 2...
 
user228700
Oh, no, no, haha, I do know the definition of a disk!
 
I dunno what you're wondering about, then :/
 
I am back
@Semiclassical so I wrote my assignment for calc in LaTeX
:o
 
11:38 PM
@Dodsy The above said, there is some nice calculus to be had in relation to the equation I don't like
oh, nice
 
well he suggested it but when he asked if anyone had used it, I didn't put up my hand.
I use it here, but i don't feel like i've really "used" it.
 
yeah, there's different levels of latex usage
 
@Kaumudi.H normally you define a portion of the real line where something is continous on the real line, in $R^2$ or two variabels you define an open disc of a point
 
some definitions: $v=\dfrac{dx}{dt},$ $a=\dfrac{dv}{dt}$
 
in $R^3$ you define a sphereical ball
 
11:40 PM
for sure.
 
user228700
Oops, I'm sorry about that, my connection suddenly died for a bit there.
 
My messages are taking too long to send and keep timing out.
 
not anything surprising there. what is a bit less famliar is this:
 
From the chain rule, we have $a=\dfrac{dv}{dt}=\dfrac{dv}{dx}\dfrac{dx}{dt}=\dfrac{dv}{dx}v$
 
user228700
11:42 PM
@Faust Ah, hmm, we define a portion of space one dimension lesser than the graph of the function?
 
@Semiclassical this looks familiar.
 
in calculus of one variable something isnt continous just cause it exists a point it has to exist on both sides of it
 
And the last term can be written as $\frac{1}{2}\frac{d}{dx}v^2$.
 
Learned it today I believe.
 
in two variables that range of freedoms means you need a open disc to say anyhting meaniful about the continuity
 
11:43 PM
@Semiclassical then there's $\frac{d^2t}{dx^2}$
 
user228700
AH, right, of course! I understand!
 
If I move the 2 over, that's $2a=\frac{d}{dx}v^2$
 
user228700
@Faust: Thanks so much :-)
 
np
 
oh am I confused?
are we talking about physics or....
 
11:44 PM
Or calculus? Both, really.
 
is the chat all messed up atm?
 
not for me
 
@Dodsy im not sure i know the difference between physics and calculus at least i couldnt define it.
 
@Dodsy messed up in what sense?
 
I can't send a message without waiting
and there's usually a chance of timeout.
 
11:46 PM
Now, suppose $a$ is constant in time. Then it's also constant in $x$, so if I integrate both sides from $x=x_i$ to $x=f_f$ this becomes $2a(x_f-x_i)=v_f^2-v_i^2$---aka just the equation I wrote above.
 
@Dodsy did you get into my secret stash of D RUGS >)!@#
 
@Dodsy hrm, something wrong with your connection maybe?
 
@Semiclassical I was more asking if my $\frac{d^2t}{dx^2}$ applied to our conversation or if you were talking to kaumudi. H.
 
@Faust when it comes to kinematics, I'd argue there really isn't one.
ah
 
@Semiclassical glad im not the only one confused on the difference =)
 
11:47 PM
not sure where you're getting that from, though. that'd be $\dfrac{d^2 t}{dx^2}=\dfrac{d}{dx}\dfrac{dt}{dx}=\dfrac{d}{dx}\dfrac{1}{v}$
 
weird.
 
what
 
so I'm not seeing how you're getting $\frac{d^2 t}{dx^2}$ in this context
 
which problem?
oh
my teacher told us this equation today
 
@Semiclassical thats notation for the second derivative of time with respect to x isnt it?
it simple = acceleration
 
11:49 PM
no.
 
oh
nvm
sure it wasnt the opposite @Dodsy
 
acceleration = second derivative of x with respect to time
$a=\frac{d^2 x}{dt^2}$
 
displacement, velocity, acceleration, jerk, etc.
 
$a=\frac{dv}{dt}=\frac{d}{dt}(\frac{dx}{dt})=\frac{d^2x}{dt^2}$
 
11:50 PM
for acceleration
 
you wrote $\frac{d^2 t}{dx^2}$
 
I made a mistake
haha
I didn't realize until I typed it from my notes :3
 
i didnt even notice till semi pointed it out
 
yeah, I was wondering where you were getting that from :)
 
hey, I was pretty close for being from memory!
 
11:51 PM
I just had spinach and sausage, nice combo.
 
and having drank 6 beers.
Jasper that's literally horrifying.
 
w8 were they real beer or merican beer?
 
@Jasper reminds me of the omelet I like to get: cheese, bacon, and broccoli
3
 
Spinach makes PopEye the sailorman strong, lol.
 
@Faust Becks :o
 
11:52 PM
cause i could drink $\lim_{n \to \infty} e^n $ of merican beers and not get drunk
 
@Dodsy How did you drink so many beers? lol I can't even drink one.
 
true, light beers do nothing to me
@Jasper oh, I'm a degenerate. Didn't you know?
 
Honestly I hate alcohol
Its taste is terrible
 
actually, what I think is surprisingly awesome: roasted broccoli
 
i sat down with some friends while camping for the long weekend drank a 26er in under an hour the four of them barely finished the other 26er one of them got so drunk they puked and i was still the least drunk of the five of us.
 
11:54 PM
@Dodsy The empty set and the singleton are the degenerate intervals on the real line, lol.
 
@Faust I've never understood the appeal of "drink till you puke"
I can understand drinking to get a buzz and to make oneself less inhibited etc
 
@Semiclassical he only had like 4 oz's but hes alittle tiny asian guy and got super sick idk how
 
ah.
yeah, that's more understandable.
 
i have puked from drinking since i was 13
 
@Faust is it a Canadian thing to love drinking?
 
11:56 PM
@Faust lol you drink so early?
 
or are we both degenerates.
 
lol idk i am a red neck
 
lol
 
@Jasper eh. I don't drink with other people.
 
@Dodsy I'm reminded of the 'Wisconsin' entry of this: youtube.com/watch?v=h68UJaHvG_c
 
11:57 PM
i dont drink much the camping trip was the only time since new years
i did when i was 19-22 alot
 
@Dodsy Does your girlfriend drink?
 
@Jasper yeah she likes g and t's and wine and beer :D
but I don't feel guilty if I have a beer and relax, to be honest.
I'm not neglecting any of my duties when I drink.
 
Good. And don't drink and drive, lol.
 
Can I drink and derive?
 
@Dodsy nope only can drink while driving not before
 
11:59 PM
Talking about drinking, some guys use the excuse they were drinking when they cheat on their girlfriends.
 
ugh
 

« first day (2599 days earlier)      last day (2425 days later) »