Demonark: I normally taught the equivalent of 5 3-hour classes, whereas most research-active faculty did 3 1/2. (Calculus counted as 1 1/3 because of the fourth hour.)
Faust: I only had one grad student in my whole career. I was more into working with undergrads.
Yeah, literature with discussions works for one 3-hour meeting, but I taught very few math classes (diff geo and some grad courses) where we met 1 1/4 hours each session.
Hey, from the top of your head, what are usual ways to prove two subgroups intersect as ${e}$ if you've defined them as a normal closure? E.g. in the rubik's cube group, you generate subgroups by certain moves and use them to describe the group as a semidirect product, but I didn't see proofs of that.
@Daminark 10 days!? that's crazy. And pretty good. I'm really enjoying calculus and my teacher is really great. But physics seems slow atm, and it turns out that it is not going to be calc based this term. And then lin alg is a massive mess. So we'll see how it goes. I love calc though.
But my physics teacher said something silly today about finding the instantaneous velocity being difficult due to calculus, and also didn't recognise that you can get a very good approximation using the secant method.
@Dodsy The other simplification is doing things in 1 dimension instead of 3. When the switch is made, some get confused.
@Dodsy I believe that sometimes not simplifying things makes things clearer, for example, using vectors in 3 dimensions instead of making one direction positive and the other direction negative when doing motion in 1 dimension.
I have 5 classes its a bit long but i got all my assignments basically done just need to rewrite out a couple good copies so i have the weekend to study w.e i want.
You know, I used to be really interested in physics, but not anymore. There's too much math to learn already, so I can't be bothered with physics now, lol.
@Jasper I took it because at another school here in Canada, it's recommended for an honours specialization, to take a first year course in physics. So I figured I'd take it and if anything it'd give me some basis for decision on applied math vs pure math or whatever.
In physics the way I like to describe kinematics is "a machine we use to turn information about the system at one time into information at another time"
But then, calculus is crazy. The teacher knows his content so much and basically just forces us to read the textbook. He wants us to sleep with it under our pillow, but doesn't even teach from it (for the most part) he basically uses the readings as a foundation for whatever else he's teaching us.
I love calculus.
at least that's my opinion on what is happening in that class.
Mine is a simple question, really. The theorem itself is stated using slightly different words in my textbook and I was wondering if anybody could please help me to parse it.
the reason I object to calling it one of the big 3 is two-fold. one is what I just said: it's a derived result, so treating it as fundamental seems silly.
user228700
In my textbook, it states "If $f_{xy}$ and $f_{yx}$ are continuous on some open disk, then $f_{xy}=f_{yx}$ on that disk."
In geometry, a disk (also spelled disc) is the region in a plane bounded by a circle. A disk is said to be closed if it contains the circle that constitutes its boundary, and open if it does not.
== Formulas ==
In Cartesian coordinates, the open disk of center
(
a
,
b
)
{\displaystyle (a,b)}
and radius R is given by the formula
D
=
{
(
x
,
y
)
∈
R
2...
user228700
Oh, no, no, haha, I do know the definition of a disk!
@Kaumudi.H normally you define a portion of the real line where something is continous on the real line, in $R^2$ or two variabels you define an open disc of a point
Now, suppose $a$ is constant in time. Then it's also constant in $x$, so if I integrate both sides from $x=x_i$ to $x=f_f$ this becomes $2a(x_f-x_i)=v_f^2-v_i^2$---aka just the equation I wrote above.
i sat down with some friends while camping for the long weekend drank a 26er in under an hour the four of them barely finished the other 26er one of them got so drunk they puked and i was still the least drunk of the five of us.