« first day (2599 days earlier)      last day (2425 days later) » 

2:03 AM
Oh snap
Geeetttttt dunked on PewDiePie (@Balarka you'll understand this reference later)
 
lol I saw the fight
 
what's happening with that dude
i heard some sketchy shit
 
called someone a
well
 
well so basically he said the n-word, offensively thrown, on live stream
 
ah ok get rekt then
 
2:05 AM
yup
 
bubye
 
what is firewatch bout
 
cya
 
is that the game about a park ranger running from his problems
 
i honestly dunno
 
2:06 AM
i think that's what it is
it's in my steam library but idk if im right about what it is
 
but the developer dmca'd him because he didn't like the use of the word
 
whether or not it's fair use i think depends on the type of game
 
which some argue as unfair use of dmca
because he's using it for personal agenda against the streamer
but hey
 
tbh i think it's fair
also fuck that guy so
w.e.
 
lol
 
2:08 AM
@Meow i think it's like a narrative walking simulator type of thing
 
the youtube community is getting defamed for this guy though
like anyone can come up and dmca shit now
 
alright so thats more in the favor of "not fair use"
unfortunately DMCA abuse is widespread
i think the law should be objective
regardless of whether pewdiepie said it or not; whether that dev has the right to dmca is the same
(in this case yes, i think he has the right, considering its a story based gme)
 
i think with this type of game in particular it's more fair to do these things
 
yeah that's the logic that's been circulating around
 
but tbh im in favor of people screwing over pewdiepie regardless so idk d00ds
 
2:12 AM
@eric kh is so long lol
 
ya also the second game is like absurd
 
we played the first two. to be caught up we also need to play "birth by sleep" and "dream drop distance"
 
and its story makes 00000000 sense
 
yeah i love it
 
i never played dream drop distance
 
2:12 AM
it makes sense it's just completely needlessly convoluted
 
i played bbs, 1, chain, and 2
 
that's on ps4 now too
 
there's a mobile kh with an absurd story
i think its story is honestly hilarious
i want a compilation of everytime someone says darkness in the whole series
it'll be like 8 hours
 
Lol
 
2:25 AM
the whole pewdiepie thing is a good example of the law of unintended consequences, alas
on one hand, being notorious and getting attention is pretty much a business model for him
so the game devs not wanting to sanction that is understandable
on the other hand, the DMCA stuff can get pretty absurd
and it does put content makers in a spot
 
he's edgy but this thing was pretty serious and offensive imo
 
yep
the n-word is no joke
 
well, there are certainly contexts i'd think are okay (i'm no one to judge, but). eg idubbbz uses it all the time
 
right. it's a bit complicated
 
but pdp said it pretty nastily and it was meant as an insult to a particular person
@Semiclassical yeah i understand that
 
2:29 AM
but a white guy using it as a more emphatic form of 'asshole' is pretty well past the line
 
yuuup
 
it edges into broader questions regarding DMCA, though, and there I dunno
 
@Balarka I super don't think idubbbz saying it is ok
 
@Eric well when the whole channel is disgusting shit it's hard to say what's okay or not
 
lol
 
2:32 AM
idubbbz, filthyfrank and maxmoefoe are literally the disgusting freaks of youtube
 
i dont think people should use racial slurs with a difficult history even if it's for edgy comedy.
 
some say i look like idubbbz
 
But I still think what PDP did was way more offensive than any of what idubbbz says
 
sure i agree with that
 
Ok cool that's all I wanted to say
 
2:33 AM
To quote an old Mel Brooks line, regarding his films: "It rises below vulgarity."
that's in relation to the other guys, not pdp
(I haven't actually watched any of them, so I dunno either way)
 
loooool
 
I think there's a lot of weird ground with DMCA here but idt there can be a better answer than publishers have to use their better judgement to engender a healthy community
if you want to make a definitive answer about the law you're going to screw something up big time inevitably
 
part of what makes it complicated is that it's a conflict of business models
 
yea
 
does anyone want an out of context meme
 
2:35 AM
for sure
 
Uh...
wtf is this lol
 
welcome to the world of ironic and self-aware memes
 
@Semi i think that with humor there's a very thin line to tread with vulgarity. Racial politics in the states are so extremely complicated that it's pretty hard not to cross a line is my point. I think using a slur out of a certain context crosses a line personally
 
it's definitely "fools rush in, where angels fear to tread" territory
the one which I find myself personally bothered the most by---and I'm not particularly sure why, since with one exception I haven't had any interaction with that community---is transphobic language.
so for instance the word 'trap' as an epithet bothers the hell out of me
 
2:40 AM
hey everyone
 
yeah ugh
 
Maybe it's because the meme which is most connected to it is the "it's a trap" one
and connecting "it" with "trap" is just ugh
 
ya that's suuuuuuuper not ok imo
 
(I know that meme isn't exclusive to that usage, but when it does get used like that)
(ugh)
 
I mean i have trans friends but that shouldnt really be a factor, it should be obvious that that just isnt ok
 
2:42 AM
I remember seeing it as a descriptor on TVTropes and my eyes boggled that people think it's okay
 
i have seen that used below fantano reviews where people makes shithead jokes about the musical genre
 
An experiment is to flip a balanced coin 100 times and note the sequence of results. Assume all outcomes of this experiment are equally likely so that if E ⊆ Ω, P(E) is computed as |E|/|Ω|.
 
Evenin' folks. I'm trying to think about whether complex conjugation thought of a map of $\mathbb{C}$ onto itself is a smooth map. My argument is that it is because if I use the natural identification of $\mathbb{C}$ with $\mathbb{R}^2$ as a chart, then the coordinate representation of complex conjugation is $F(x,y) = (x, -y)$ which seems obviously smooth. Am I overlooking something here?
 
(a) Compute |Ω|.

Here's my answer:
2^100
 
I will acknowledge one bit of complexity: people have tended to use it in the anime community as a shorthand way of talking about certain gender character types in Japanese culture
 
2:44 AM
@KevinDriscoll Nope, you're right
 
and there is an issue of translation there, and it's probably true that such usage is intended entirely without malice
buuuuut you really shouldn't use it still
 
@Semi I've heard the anime community thing but anime communities seem to not understand Japanese culture like a lot. but idk because i really dont like anime and dont intersect with communities like that generally
 
ive never really seen trap used derogatorily
ive always just seen "Trap thread" where people who actually find it attractive share images
 
Sorry for interjecting, whenever you guys are done with your convo and would like to help me...

An experiment is to flip a balanced coin 100 times and note the sequence of results. Assume all outcomes of this experiment are equally likely so that if E ⊆ Ω, P(E) is computed as |E|/|Ω|.

(b) Let E be the event that the first toss results in head. Compute |E|. Rigorously show P(E) = 1.

So I think |E| is 1/2 * 2^100, but how do I show "rigerously" that the probability is 1/2?
 
the fact that the word being used is trap is probably bad, it has some built in pejorativeness
 
2:46 AM
yeah.
i mean, I could believe that some people have tried to reclaim the word, like how 'queer' got reclaimed
but it's hard to avoid the built-in nastiness of it
 
I dunno what adjective to use but its somewhat...... off by its nature as a term. Because it implies that people who are trans are tricking others into being interested in them romantically or sexually when they wouldn't if they knew what type of genitalia the trans person has or what gender they were assigned at birth
 
i tend to defer to listening to my friends who are trans about how they feel about terms like this and the people i interact with on a regular basis in the trans community hate the term
 
that's my suspicion of it as well.
 
Yeah i think that's why it feels icky as well
 
i feel like im going to sound like an asshole for this but
 
2:49 AM
What I find frustrating overall with that realm is: On the one hand, I can understand transphobia in the sense of being discomfited by it. But that does not justify hurting other people.
 
and take note that im not trying to be rude here
would gender dysphoria be considered a mental illness?
 
@Meow I think it has been listed in the diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, but whether or not the psychiatric community considers it a mental illness vs if it actually is one are two different things
 
There are countries where it has been officially declassified as a disorder
 
I think some significant parts of the community here supports having it be declassified because it reinforces some ideas about gender which might not really be true
 
I suspect in a few years it will majorly not be a diagnosis anymore
 
2:53 AM
I think that's a very difficult question, and the answer need not be the same for different aspects of a person's identity. For instance, I don't see how it could possibly be a mental illness if a person prefers to take she/her/hers pronouns, wear makeup, have a beard, and cut their fingernails.
 
@TedShifrin Hey, Ted!
 
Because all of those activities are gendered only by social construction. There's no 'proper functioning' of the brain with respect to these activities that you could possibly point to.
 
part of what makes it tricky is that having gender identity issues---within US society, at any rate---is something which engenders a lot of prejudice and discrimination
so whether or not one classifies gender dysphoria as a disorder, the likelihood to suffer trauma/depression/anxiety/etc if you're having to deal with that context is really high
 
i looked it up and the language seems to suggest that the american psychiatric association doesnt consider gender nonconformity a mental disorder but that gender dysphoria is about the distress related to nonconformity
 
right.
 
2:57 AM
which mostly comes from social pressures and whatnot
 
that's what I was aiming for, yeah.
 
i think the term gender dysphoria is kind of problematic to begin with, again because it kind of reinforces a model of gender which might not even be accurate to begin with
 
yeah that's understandable
 
nonconformity is maybe a better term
 
agreed
 
2:58 AM
true
 
dang, this conversation ends in agreement? that's anticlimactic.
 
Yea the more I think about it, the more I feel like nonconformity to assigned gender roles just cannot be a mental disorder, basically by definition. Because people are assigned a gender and those roles are determined entirely outside the individual. So there just cannot be an inherent 'proper functioning' of the brain or mind with respect to gender conformity/noncomformity. There just isn't any purely internal reference to use to designate proper and improper here
 
oh, there we go
 
@Semiclassical lool
well Kevin is agreeing
 
3:02 AM
so I guess we're mostly agreed lol
gg
 
@KevinDriscoll the simplest thought experiment for me is to imagine someone who is gender non-conforming who is raised in a society which doesn't have the stigmas US society does
So that person doesn't experience distress as a result. If they function healthily in that society, is it really meaningful to call it the condition a disorder?
 
@Semi the trouble is it might not just be the stigmas but the constant reinforcement of the concept of binary itself might cause distress even if there aren't negative stigmas
 
To me, its like asking if someone who grew up in the American South, but doesn't like country music, pickup trucks, or football has a mental disorder.
 
cis-normativity, sure.
 
tbh I don't care if it's an inherent proper functioning of the brain; it's a choice that's been made throughout human history and recently have there been people who are openly coming out in the society with their choices, with growing numbers. it's an entirely personal choice, the ones who make them have perfect capability to function in the society, so what's the point is diagnosing it?
 
3:05 AM
yeah @Semi that's exactly the term i wanted lol
 
There's a lot of people around here who study gender theory and it's led to some interesting conversations, one of my roommates is an incredibly bright burgeoning gender theorist and she has some cool shit to say
i think it's an interesting topic in any event
 
@BalarkaSen I think that's certainly true of conformance with the performative aspects of gender. The one area where I'm tempted to reserve judgment is specifically on the feeling some people have of just having the 'wrong' reproductive organs
I'm not sure anyone chooses that feeling in the way they might choose what clothes to wear or how to present themselves
 
@Kevin this is something ive always been kind of confused about
 
And its clear there that at least in this aspect its not necessarily non-conformance with externally imposed roles, but an internal dissonance between a person's body and their ideal mental representation of their body
 
3:10 AM
like exactly what is the relationship with actual biology, because it's probably not totally trivial, but then there are loads of aspects of gender that are obviously performative
 
And not everyone who has a body other than the one they want to have has a mental disorder, but there are some cases where we seem tempted to say that is the case
 
yeah that's an interesting issue to think about
 
im out for the night, interesting conversations tonight chat! maybe this chat room should go back to math one day tho
see y'all
 
lool. byebye
 
im still here. feel free to help me out with my math related question that is posted a few mins ago
 
3:13 AM
that was a wild string of conversations on rather controversial topics... but we all stayed more or less in agreement and civil. "Hey, that's pretty good"
 
An experiment is to flip a balanced coin 100 times and note the sequence of results. Assume all outcomes of this experiment are equally likely so that if E ⊆ Ω, P(E) is computed as |E|/|Ω|.

(b) Let E be the event that the first toss results in head. Compute |E|. Rigorously show P(E) = 1.

So I think |E| is 1/2 * 2^100, but how do I show "rigerously" that the probability is 1/2?
 
@Balarka we started it by memeing about zizek tbh so it's all our fault
 
ah, zizek
 
you little zizek
 
@TedShifrin I asked Prof. Etnyre and he said the only material that we're covering from G&P that isn't also in the Lee Smooth Manifolds book is a fair bit of intersection theory. So hopefully I have to fortitude to work through a section that might be a bit harder than some others.
 
3:14 AM
i really don't know much about him save a few of his jokes
 
"and so on"
 
I am eating from the trashcan all the time. The trashcan is ideology.
 
intersection theory is primo!
 
"God is dead, and as a matter of fact I don't feel too well myself..."
 
i loved one of his jokes about the superego
@Semiclasssical SNIFF
@Kevin Oh man you're taking a course from Etnyre?
 
3:16 AM
@JohnLocke: $P(E)=1$?
 
I just love listening to Zizek speak. His voice calms me. At the same time I dont understand the first thing about Lacanian Psychoanalysis and Hegel is utterly incomprehensible to me. So I make very little contact with Zizek's actual philosophy.
 
@TedShifrin, sorry it got cut off. 1/2
should be $P(E)=1/2$?
 
Lacan is pretty much BS from what I hear
 
Ah, OK.
 
there was a bit of Zizek I did read which I rather liked, but mostly because it was building off of stuff I already knew re: Kierkegaard
 
3:17 AM
@BalarkaSen I am. Differential Topology. It's my first real proof-based mathematics course, so its been an adventure so far.
 
@KevinDriscoll "10 hour Zizek talks inaudible mastercrafted whispers: Hegelian ASMR"
 
Your count is OK.
 
@KevinDriscoll Woo. Very nice!
 
@Semi i was about to close chat and i saw kierkegaard, maybe one of my favorite
 
3:18 AM
You were in computer science originally, right?
@Eric get outta here, don't bring more cancers
lol
 
LOL
 
I'm finishing up my physics PhD. I'm using this as one of those classes I'm required ot take outside physics.
 
@Balarka lmao
 
Ah, right, physics PhD.
 
good fight m8
 
3:19 AM
@Eric gg, gg
 
@Ted what'd you have for dinner
 
Leftovers
 
ah much sad
I am actually out now bye all
 
Cooking for a friend, tomorrow. Probably beef or pork in beer/onion stew with herbs.
 
on that note i'm gone too
 
3:21 AM
Yea!
 
@Semiclassical I sense there's generally a lot of skepticism about Freud and Lacan from a lot of directions. But I try to be very charitable and withhold judgment on things I don't really know about. Because there's also a lot of general skepticism of certain ideas (say many postmodern analyses) which I think might ultimately be fundamentally flawed, but are still 100% legitimate tries at understanding something.
@TedShifrin Have you ever used a Calabrian Chili Pepper? I recently discovered these and I think they're amazing. Not sure how you are on spicy ingredients though.
 
I love spicy, but my stomach has issues ...
 
Hey
 
It's past your bedtime, Meow.
 
Not if I'm programming
 
3:25 AM
I 100% feel you there. If I have to go anywhere or do anything, I'm a spicy no-fly zone. Otherwise, its upset stomach city and being trapped in a public restroom for me.
 
I have acid reflux issues, not yours :)
 
Aaah, I only had one experience with persistent heartburn during a period of lots of family stress. Wouldn't wish it on anyone.
 
3:57 AM
@KasmirKhaan back
 
 
2 hours later…
user308168
6:19 AM
Can I talk to one of the MSE moderators?
 
@WDNWBM what for?
 
user308168
@LeakyNun A serious problem. I prefer to talk about it when at least on of them is here.
 
@robjohn @mixedmath
 
user308168
@LeakyNun Thanks.
 
@LeakyNun:D
 
6:34 AM
@KasmirKhaan hi
 
@LeakyNun hello !
@LeakyNun all righty ill send you what I got so far :)
@LeakyNun Sent you 2 emails =p
 
@KasmirKhaan what is question 5?
 
@LeakyNun not done with it yet =p just sent you that so you tell me if latex is good
@LeakyNun you have the pdfs of the questions =p assigments 2 only atm
 
@KasmirKhaan use \langle 3 \rangle not <3>
Use \mathbb{Z} for $\mathbb{Z}$
 
@LeakyNun ill try that now
 
6:41 AM
Also, there is a huge difference between $\Bbb Z/7^*$ and $\Bbb Z/7$.
 
@oh i meant U (7)
How to put that on latex?
$\Bbb Z/7^*$
?
 
U(7) is fine
 
We dont use that notation ><
 
or put () around it before adding the ^*
 
the fourth line makes no sense
@TobiasKildetoft sorry :P
 
6:42 AM
Let me try it one sec guys :D
\langle 3 gives only this
<3
should be <3>
 
5 mins ago, by Leaky Nun
@KasmirKhaan use \langle 3 \rangle not <3>
read again
 
oups ><
missed half of it =p
 
6 mins ago, by Leaky Nun
the fourth line makes no sense
have you changed it?
 
Yes
let me see what you mean
Oh i said if G has order 4
then it is cyclic and isomorphic to Z/4
 
no, not that file, lol
 
6:50 AM
><
ok
got the right file now
 
Hello!! Is $A^T=A^{-1}$ a condition that a matrix is orthogonal or orthonormal?
 
thats the definition of the function
 
@MaryStar A matrix is said to be orthogonal if the columns are orthonormal
the latter term is not applied to matrices at all
 
f(x+y) = f(3^(x+y) ) = 3^x 3 ^y = f(x) f(y) @LeakyNun
 
In linear algebra, an orthogonal matrix or real orthogonal matrix is a square matrix with real entries whose columns and rows are orthogonal unit vectors (i.e., orthonormal vectors), i.e. Q T Q = Q Q T = I , {\displaystyle Q^{\mathrm {T} }Q=QQ^{\mathrm {T} }=I,} where I {\displaystyle I} is the...
 
6:52 AM
@LeakyNun need 10 mins please , gotta do something
 
Ah ok...Thanks!! @TobiasKildetoft @LeakyNun
 
@LeakyNun all righty back :)
@LeakyNun what was wrong with that line ?
 
@KasmirKhaan you tell me
 
x and y the operation on is +
3^x * 3^y operation is multiplication
the map is x --> 3^x
 
7:08 AM
think about it until you find out the error
 
is the error in the logic or latex?
I am really comfused
@LeakyNun .
 
logic
 
@LeakyNun oh I think i got the map backwards on that line
let me fix it
f(3^(x+y) ) = x+y = f(x) f(y)
@LeakyNun .
 
@TobiasKildetoft Lol I remember that confused me the first time
 
@Daminark Me too
 
7:15 AM
Actually do you know why it's called that?
 
@KasmirKhaan better but still wrong.
think about what you want to show.
 
@LeakyNun I want to show homomorphism
 
@KasmirKhaan i.e.?
 
f(xy) = f(x) f(y)
 
so?
 
7:18 AM
f(3^x 3^y) = f(3^(x+y) ) = x+y = f(x) f(y)
 
think about it again
 
oh darn
aaaaaaa
f(3^x) f(3^y)
I did this map the other way around in the first try
x--> 3^x
this is why it got messed up ><
 
so what is it now?
 
@Daminark I just went over the set of exercises I made for algebra a long time ago. Only found one error, and they still look good.
 
@TobiasKildetoft could I have a look?
 
7:21 AM
\documentclass[10pt,a4paper]{article}
\usepackage[latin1]{inputenc}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{amsfonts}
\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage{graphicx}
\begin{document}
	\(\Bbb Z/7^* ={1,2,3,4,5,6} = \langle 3 \rangle \)

	\(\Bbb Z/6 = {0,1,2,3,4,5}\)

	Let \(\phi(3^{x})=x\)

	\(\phi(3^{x}3^{y}) = x+y=\phi(3^{x})\phi(3^{y})\)

	\(\phi\) is a homomorphism.

	Assume that \(\phi(3^{x})=\phi(3^{y})  \iff x=y\)

	\(x-y=0 \iff 3^{x-y}=e\) ; thus \(3^{x}=3^{y}\)

	\(\phi\) is injective

	Let \(K\in (\Bbb Z/7^*\) with \(0 \leq K < 7\)
 
@leaky Sure
pure.au.dk/portal/files/56984875/exercises.pdf still has the error, as I need to figure out how to update it there
It is in exercises 5(5) where $g$ and $h$ should be switched
 
@LeakyNun better? :)
 
@KasmirKhaan I'll give you some time to identify and correct other mistakes.
@TobiasKildetoft ooh I'm interested
 
@LeakyNun logic still?
 
@KasmirKhaan sure
@TobiasKildetoft how should I submit my answers?
 
7:25 AM
@LeakyNun Why would you submit your answers?
 
@TobiasKildetoft for you to check
 
just ask in chat when I am around
 
@TobiasKildetoft I'm planning to do them all lol
 
good luck with the last one then :)
 
\documentclass[10pt,a4paper]{article}
\usepackage[latin1]{inputenc}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{amsfonts}
\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage{graphicx}
\begin{document}
	\(\Bbb Z/7^* ={1,2,3,4,5,6} = \langle 3 \rangle \)

	\(\Bbb Z/6 = {0,1,2,3,4,5}\)

	Let \(\phi(3^{x})=x\)

	\(\phi(3^{x}3^{y}) = x+y=\phi(3^{x})\phi(3^{y})\)

	\(\phi\) is a homomorphism.

	Assume that \(\phi(3^{x})=\phi(3^{y})  \iff x=y\)

	\(x-y=0 \iff 3^{x-y}=e\) ; thus \(3^{x}=3^{y}\)

	\(\phi\) is injective

	Let \(K\in \Bbb Z/6\) with \(0 \leq K < 6\)
 
7:27 AM
@TobiasKildetoft could I send you by email?
 
@LeakyNun mixed up all the exercice =p
 
If I taught an algebra course, I'd totally nab those exercises :^)
 
@KasmirKhaan Please don't paste a full latex file here
@LeakyNun Sure
 
@TobiasKildetoft Okay last time =p
 
@TobiasKildetoft what is your email?
 
7:28 AM
@SteamyRoot Go ahead, they were meant for just that
@LeakyNun tobias.kildetoft@gmail.com
 
@TobiasKildetoft ok
 
Hey can you please solve this math or give some hints please please math.stackexchange.com/q/317606/365615
It's on complex analysis math.stackexchange.com/q/317606/365615
 
@KasmirKhaan continue fixing
 
@LeakyNun I really dont know whats wrong with that, what line?
 
@KasmirKhaan injective (3 lines)
 
7:33 AM
@LeakyNun why is that wrong ?
f(3^x ) = f(3^y)
implies x=y
x-y=0
 
I'm not giving you any hint.
 
3^(x-y) = e
@LeakyNun have you chekecd the rest?
 
Hi chat!
 
@KasmirKhaan yes
many typos in the last part.
 
@LeakyNun ill fix those, but the proofs are ok ?
 
7:36 AM
@KasmirKhaan yes, except the injective part
 
grrrrrrrrr
Am very postive that is the correct way of proving it
we assume x is different from y
f( 3^x) = f(3^y)
we need to get that 3^x = 3^y
and I did all the steps
 
you won't make me give you hints by growling
 
haha
I dont use that "grrr" in that way
am mad at my self
anyway hmm
 
7:51 AM
@KasmirKhaan finished?
 
\documentclass[10pt,a4paper]{article}
\usepackage[latin1]{inputenc}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{amsfonts}
\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage{graphicx}
\begin{document}
\(X=\)\(\begin{bmatrix} 1&a&b \\ 0&1&c \\ 0&0&1 \end{bmatrix}\)


\vspace{5mm}\vspace{10mm}

\(Y=\)\(\begin{bmatrix} 1&d&e \\ 0&1&f \\ 0&0&1 \end{bmatrix}\)\vspace{10mm}\vspace{10mm}

\(X\times Y =\begin{bmatrix} 1&a+d&b+af+e \\ 0&1&c+f \\ 0&0&1 \end{bmatrix}\) the product of upper triangular matrices is another upper triangular. thus \(H\) is closed under multiplication\vspace{10mm}\vspace{10mm}
since only you and me are here I can post latex with no problems :D
@LeakyNun part d) left I need to show that xy is not equal to yx
 
ok
 
how to type not euqal to
found it <<
 
\ne
 
\documentclass[10pt,a4paper]{article}
\usepackage[latin1]{inputenc}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{amsfonts}
\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage{graphicx}
\begin{document}
\(X=\)\(\begin{bmatrix} 1&a&b \\ 0&1&c \\ 0&0&1 \end{bmatrix}\)


\vspace{5mm}\vspace{10mm}

\(Y=\)\(\begin{bmatrix} 1&d&e \\ 0&1&f \\ 0&0&1 \end{bmatrix}\)\vspace{10mm}\vspace{10mm}

\(X\times Y =\begin{bmatrix} 1&a+d&b+af+e \\ 0&1&c+f \\ 0&0&1 \end{bmatrix}\) the product of upper triangular matrices is another upper triangular. thus \(H\) is closed under multiplication\vspace{10mm}\vspace{10mm}
this is the full version now :D
 

« first day (2599 days earlier)      last day (2425 days later) »