« first day (2188 days earlier)      last day (2498 days later) » 

Gaurang Tandon
Gaurang Tandon
01:09
@Abcd did you flag this old question for closure? chemistry.stackexchange.com/q/70461
 
2 hours later…
Gaurang Tandon
Gaurang Tandon
03:26
"I am really sorry if this seems simple but I am a chem noob and I was out for a month and my teacher is behind schedule so he is giving us worksheets without teaching and i do not understand a lot"
best single sentence i've read in quite a while
Abcd
Abcd
03:46
@GaurangTandon yes I did....coz i ran into it while searching other stuff
And it's too broad
Gaurang Tandon
Gaurang Tandon
04:05
@Abcd alright, your reason is valid but we prefer that such old, abandoned questions be deleted instead; so, you should rather post a link to it in Spring Cleaning and cite the reason you feel it'd be deleted; closure wastes time of five people
as for this particular question, i downvoted it, and it'll be automatically roomba'ed in five days, so not an issue
it's good we clean up old stuff, but, closure isn't the best method for that
 
3 hours later…
Loong
Loong
07:35
@GaurangTandon dx.doi.org is not deprecated; it remains fully supported. The publisher uses it, too. And I simply copy it from my previous answers since there is no need to change it.
Gaurang Tandon
Gaurang Tandon
@Loong sorry, by deprecated i didn't mean the support is being removed. I meant to say they've "updated recommendations" from dx.doi.org to doi.org. I interpreted it as they prefer if people use the latter format. Anyway though, thanks for replying!
 
2 hours later…
M.A.R. ಠ_ಠ
M.A.R. ಠ_ಠ
10:05
@Secret No politics in this chat
Catalysts are hypocrites
Secret
Secret
10:30
Lol
 
7 hours later…
M.A.R. ಠ_ಠ
M.A.R. ಠ_ಠ
17:46
@Avnish if you hadn't posted the last message, you wouldn't have needed to delete the other two
@Avnish Cabbage much obliged. Welcome to the CLOSE VOTER GODWIN LAW CLIQUE WHO DON'T KNOW THE ANSWER OR THEY WOULDN'T HAVE CLOZED
Go get 'em, tig . . . Cabbage
 
2 hours later…
M.A.R. ಠ_ಠ
M.A.R. ಠ_ಠ
19:37
I posted a question on M&TV.
Chem is all like "why have you forsaken me?"
movies.stackexchange.com/questions/88300/… anyone watched Split?
 
3 hours later…
user280247
22:19
@pentavalentcarbon page 33 from electronic structure etc, by Foresman, you can find a chart (CPU seconds vs hydrocarbon), and a table also.
user280247
*a table with relevant info also.
M.A.R. ಠ_ಠ
M.A.R. ಠ_ಠ
22:40
12
Q: Left nav, responsive design, and theming next steps

Joe FriendIn the post entitled Ch-ch-ch-changes: Left nav, responsive design, & themes, I described a number of changes that are coming with the introduction of the left navigation bar. In addition to the navigation changes, we will be introducing responsive design and new theming across the Stack Exchange...

discussion design announcements left-nav
Nice!
@Mith I hate your Occam razor
Mithoron
Mithoron
:D
Don't like my insight Awww :D
@M.A.R.ಠ_ಠ Ehh, maybe there was something deeper behind it. In theory upcoming "Glass" could maybe shed some light
M.A.R. ಠ_ಠ
M.A.R. ಠ_ಠ
Maybe
Actually I just wanted to ask something so the annoying mod in the M&TV chat got off my case
Mithoron
Mithoron
Huh?
M.A.R. ಠ_ಠ
M.A.R. ಠ_ಠ
@Mithoron I have no idea how to respond
What part is huhhy?
Mithoron
Mithoron
@M.A.R.ಠ_ಠ This Ankit guy annoyed you?
M.A.R. ಠ_ಠ
M.A.R. ಠ_ಠ
22:55
@Mithoron well, we have a love-hate relationship
Mithoron
Mithoron
I answered once there but it was identification and got nuked from orbit with other ones
M.A.R. ಠ_ಠ
M.A.R. ಠ_ಠ
Snarky friendship
@Mithoron ooooooh, so you a movie nerd
Mithoron
Mithoron
:D
All around nerd ;)
M.A.R. ಠ_ಠ
M.A.R. ಠ_ಠ
Fellow movie geek, welcome to the cult
Which has one member
@Gau I see no name change. I think you decided to change underwear instead?
Back to sleep
Mithoron
Mithoron
Haha, watched some movies indeed but not that much for movie nerdness yet, I feel ;)
Annihilation wasn't bad, despite being quite different from novel
@M.A.R.ಠ_ಠ Good night then :)

« first day (2188 days earlier)      last day (2498 days later) »