« first day (434 days earlier)      last day (3101 days later) » 

03:03
@DamkerngT. I agree. There is a typo in that sentence.
03:13
I say that because of the tone of the context.
"After years of uncertainty and upheaval allowed ISIS militants to gain a foothold in the country, the U.S. has begun carrying out airstrikes to try and oust them" is a nutral sentence.
But "After years of uncertainty and upheaval that/which allowed ISIS militants to gain a foothold in the country, the U.S. has begun carrying out airstrikes to try and oust them" is critical.
Now look at this one: Fixing Libya is going to take more than a few raids as these five graphics explain.
This is the sentence coming exactly after the sentence in question.
It is trying to evedently prove that the airstrikes are not enough at all. Giving me the feeling that the writer means now it's too late to fix everything up just by some airstrikes. That we shouldn't have let the problem to grow this big during the years of uncertainty.
But I may be totally wrong!
03:46
Szia Everyone!
04:15
@Avicenna What does critical mean here?
Oh. Critical context info.
@JimReynolds hi
Have you ever created a Cover Letter?
04:31
Yes
04:50
@Cra
I am going to write one
I saw a very attractive job posted in SO
I want to grab that chance somehow. So, my writing style will have a great impact on applying for a oversea vacancy
Once I'm done writing the whole letter, I'll ping you just to review it :)
Are you japanese?
I'm a Sri Lankan
05:20
@DamkerngT. @Man_From_India is mealable.
05:42
@JimReynolds will you be able to have a look at my cover letter now?
:)
05:57
@Cra Maybe. My email is in my profile. We generally don't do proofreading or give this kind of writing advice in here.
@JimReynolds no, I will just paste the link here.
@JimReynolds Does "mealable" mean something that can be considered as a meal ? o_O :D
@Cardinal To me, yes. I've long wanted to eat MFI
@JimReynolds It seems that your Normal has been changed ?
Including his toenails, which I would soften by long boiling.
06:00
AHhh
Environment is very influential !
It changes people !
It's important to try new things
@JimReynolds I think you opened the link. did you?
did you or didn't you ?
the issue is
06:05
:-)
@Cra posted on your company website
for the position of JAVA...
Posted at (give URL)
06:11
Word of the day: down comer
Still isn't in Urban Dictionary!
Sawasdee khrap!
@JimReynolds I actually wrote it as company website
a hyperlink
06:26
I answered a question; #GHL
0
A: Which form of verb (2nd or 3rd) is in these two sentences?

CardinalAs a learner I would say, in your two sentences the verb is the linking verb is. After linking verbs you can use either an adjective or a noun phrase. The important thing is that a past participle can play three main different roles: they can an interdependent adjective (both attributive and p...

@CrazyNinja What company? The company that's hiring, or a job listing company?
company = CurrencyFair
Would they be your employer?
user227867
06:36
@JimReynolds looks very handsome.
@JasperLoy has good taste
@CrazyNinja You removed your link
Hello Meysam
Why do you delete that link?
Does it include personal information?
or Private?
@Cardinal I thought, it should be something personal
06:44
@JimReynolds :D
@CrazyNinja I regret why I didn't check that :D (Just kidding)
Sawasdee Khrap !
hahaha... that's funny :p
Sawasdee khrap!
@CrazyNinja That is fun or funny ?
@DamkerngT. @Cardinal you are most welcome to provide any feedback on my cover letter
8 mins ago, by Crazy Ninja
@JimReynolds http://hastebin.com/ranewuximo.vbs
06:48
Ugh, .vbs!
Will it run something adversary?
I was thinking alike
:D
@CrazyNinja Make sure you don't forget your articles. Feel is probably too informal.
@JimReynolds :O
ohh... alright
noted :)
I feel think that my skills and ... ?
@JimReynolds That's my idea. I mean they are in a way noting the fault of letting the situation to get out of control.
06:56
@Avicenna Without that/which, the sentence sounds wrong (ungrammatical) to me, like something a reporter writes in haste.
@CrazyNinja think is probably still too informal, considering the tone of your letter.
It is a nutral one when I read it, I mean without that.
A better choice may be believe, but you already use it in another sentence. A possible quick fix is to use believe in this sentence, and use nothing in the other.
@DamkerngT. yup. That's why I avoid using believe again.
I cant remember the verb which has the same meaning as inject and vaccinate using a syringe. Ockulate ?
It doesn't seem neutral for you?
07:01
No, it simply sounds ungrammatical, or carelessly written.
The that gives implies a more cause and effect relation.
Hmm... TRomano's answer says all three are grammatical, but doesn't say anything useful for further analysis. I guess it's relatively safe to assume that, to him, all three variances mean the same.
Which is quite surprising.
@DamkerngT. if feel doesn't fit in there, what would be a good word in that case?
5 mins ago, by Damkerng T.
A better choice may be believe, but you already use it in another sentence. A possible quick fix is to use believe in this sentence, and use nothing in the other.
believe, and delete I believe in another sentence.
Make sense?
@CrazyNinja Feel is used to mean think in todays English. But not in formal English.
07:06
Maybe this kind of that-omission is another language change.
Must be a relatively recent one.
I removed the latter section and replaced that feel with believe
(Like its for it's, your for you're, their for they're, and so on. They're all based on sounds.)
In that case after is not a conjunction I guess. It's a time preposition.
@CrazyNinja Yay!
@DamkerngT. I'm going to send it, Did you see any other corrections that needs to be done?
07:08
@Avicenna My problem with the sentence is that a) if we claimed that it's grammatical, it'd essential become After years allowed that, they has begun this, and b) I asked myself, does it make sentence in English to say years allowed something.
Yes, I found it: inoculate
Verb: inoculate ‎(third-person singular simple present inoculates, present participle inoculating, simple past and past participle inoculated)
  1. (transitive, immunology) To introduce an antigenic substance or vaccine into the body to produce immunity to a specific disease. [from a. 1722]
  2. (transitive, by extension) To safeguard or protect something as if by inoculation.
  3. To add one substance to another; to spike.
  4. The culture medium was inoculated with selenium to investigate the rate of uptake.
  5. To graft by inserting buds. [from c. 1420]
(10 more not shown…)
@CrazyNinja No, just articles and believe. And, oh! maybe the capitalization in your address!
"My background includes working as developer/ Engineer for the last 3 years. CurrecyFair would be a place that will bring a whole new experience to improve my skills while contributing to the organization."
@Cardinal Congrats!
@CrazyNinja I'm okay with it.
Thank you
07:12
Developer/Engineer looks better than developer/ Engineer, I think.
@Avicenna What were we talking about?
@JimReynolds This question:
2
Q: "After years of uncertainty and upheaval allowed ISIS militants"

bart-lebyAfter years of uncertainty and upheaval allowed ISIS militants to gain a foothold in the country, the U.S. has begun carrying out airstrikes to try and oust them. Source: http://edition.cnn.com/2016/08/04/africa/libya-chaos-in-graphics/index.html Don't you think that there is "that" omitted in...

@Cardinal innoculate
Thanks I already found it.
Are you sure about the double n?
07:14
@DamkerngT. Just say it. No think, feel, believe. I'm qualified for the position because ....
@JimReynolds Backbiting a piece of an article.
"qualify" is my favorite verb, my adorable ambitransitive verb :D
@JimReynolds That makes sense! I forgot that the recipient is (presumably) a native speaker of English.
@JimReynolds we have a professional interviewee!
@Cra My skills are suited for the position because I landed that spacecraft on that comet using only a microwave oven and rubber bands.
07:17
lol
@Avicenna Correction: That's a nutty one . . . .
@DamkerngT. ISIS are a group of people, actually savage beasts.
Yes years of procrastination allowed them
@JimReynolds neutral I meant.
@Avicenna That's not the part that concerned me.
07:20
So why allowed is not proper?
@Avicenna What? Are you asking me?
@Cardinal I put an extra n because I thought you might not see the first one. You aren't a very good reader.
(If I said, That's not the part concerned me, it would be ungrammatical, but I wonder if it will sound ungrammatical to TRomano.)
@Avicenna Can years allow something?
@JimReynolds Exactly
I suppose that we can argue that it can, but it struck me as unnatural last night.
07:22
@DamkerngT. It's not years, but years of uncertainty == procrastination
@Cardinal Even so. (Don't forget that the head of years of uncertainty is years.)
nods
But we can ask ourselves this as well, Can years of uncertainty allow something by itself?
@Cardinal I was asking @DamkerngT.
@DamkerngT. I think that has this connotation After US did nothing ....
07:25
Maybe I was just thinking too much, running into an unexpectedly phrased clause.
Perhaps, since I hear about those disgusting people too much, It was easy for me to form that Idea. Shrug
@DamkerngT. figuratively yes.
@DamkerngT. I believe it's a typo. But my reason is not a grammatical one.
@JimReynolds Pehaps, I suffer from"Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder", a little bit
@Avicenna If it's grammatical, and I think we can argue that it's grammatical, they shouldn't have any difference in meaning.
I think it has a difference.
07:31
She is someone we like vs. She is someone that/which/who/whom we like -- essentially the same.
I couldn't listen to my teachers when I was a student except in two courses that they really provoked my senses. Theology and Physics. It costed me a lot ... . But, since I was able to attain good and moderate grades no one get suspected :( , let it go buddy, I don't wanna talk about it
I am a little busy with other things. Let me do them and then come back.
> After weeks of static and interference made him want to throw the damn phone against a brick wall, he decided to take it into the shop for repair.
(A sentence by TRomano. Weeks made something in this one. So I guess, it's natural enough, though I don't know how common it is. Time heals, but can time allow or make someone do something? I don't know.)
@DamkerngT. Years in storage allowed the wine to mellow.
@JimReynolds How did you think of that sentence?
07:38
@Cardinal I do, for certain. Moderately.
I mean, is this allowed durative or punctual? Is it an activity or state?
@DamkerngT. I accept it unreservedly
@JimReynolds How long did the weeks make him want that?
@DamkerngT. Huh? I was looking at the phone sentence
@JimReynolds My allowed is for your wine sentence.
I know you meant TRomano's sentence by unreservedly.
07:42
It's an event verb
The hole let the water escape.
Now we're getting somewhere!
Kind of a weird animal.
I think allowed makes me think of something state-like.
07:43
It is somewhat state-like.
Let's avoid the original sentence in our question (because it involves the news), and use yours instead.
No agent. Not an action.
> (a) After years in storage allowed the wine to mellow, he sold all the wine he had.
> (b) After years in storage that allowed the wine to mellow, he sold all the wine he had.
0
Q: Could you please tell me?

OhoudCould you please tell me how to start learning English from movies and I would like to recommend movie to start with? I think English movies include

I think I can make sense of (a) if I think of allow as an action-like activity.
07:45
I'm not liking b
(which didn't occur to me until you confirmed it)
@JimReynolds liking ?
I like (b) because it allows me to think of allow as something state-like.
Yes, so years can do things. Be agentic.
The years have addled my mind.
@JimReynolds It still is durative to me in this one.
07:47
The years took their toll.
Same.
After years took their toll, the building begins to collapse. -- Does this make sense?
Yum. Durien.
@DamkerngT. Yes. Probably needs a determiner.
The years
Weird. I expect something punctual with after.
After that event happened, this happens. -- fine with me
After Mike ate his lunch, the bird bagan to sing.
After that event was going on for years, this happens -- weird.
@JimReynolds Punctual. Either he started eating it or finished eating it.
07:51
@DamkerngT. Oh. Sorry. Begins is unlikely.
@JimReynolds I guess you expected that collapse is punctual, perhaps? :D
After the mouse ate his cheese, he hunts for more food.
Punctual.
Let's try to bend it a little.
Not a normal coordination.
After the mouse stayed there, eating his cheese, he hunts for more food.
07:54
To bend, let's make the snack a pretzel.
Hmm... actually it works for me, even though stayed is durative.
Argh! Aktionsart is so hard!
I don't know your terms.
@DamkerngT. Not so likely. In a special context, maybe.
A typical example to demonstrate this subtle feature of language (the English language, at least):
> He ate an apple in five minutes.
> He ate an apple for five minutes.
^
Couldn't you have used durien?
Well, apple is customary, I should think. :P
08:04
It sounds like durative and I love them so
Customs here won't let you bring in apples.
BTW, it's durian. (Yummy!)
@JimReynolds Huh? You must be joking!
Yes. Playing with your word customary.
Anyway, do you think any of them sound wrong?
Apple & apple?
No. Mean different things.
Let me try again:
> a) He ate the apple in five minutes.
b) He ate the apple for five minutes.
08:07
Both ok. Different meanings.
Oh! One is marked infelicitous in grammar books.
Let me try another example:
But as we recently discussed, no He was late for 5 minutes.
> a) She left after the bell rang.
b) She was leaving after the bell rang.
Both ok.
Interesting!
08:09
B means in the process of
All b are wrong if you want to use them to mean all a
Can we be in a process of something right after something just happened?
How about this? He finished his apple for five minutes.
After the war ended, he was collecting what of his belongings remained in his bomb-damaged home.
After years carried on the war, he was collecting what of his belongings remained in his bomb-damaged home.
Infelicitous. (Finished apple)
Right. That was my point about our After years ... question.
It wasn't clear until your example made me think of aktionsart.
08:13
Right. It's logically about what years can do.
They can render robot models obsolete.
Or maybe people models aren't as strict as robot had thought.
Lol
Well said
(What's the point to learn English, then? If anything goes! :P)
The problem is kids nowadays.
I hereby declare that 'What's the point to learn English' is as acceptable as 'What's the point in learning English'! --signed: a robot :P
08:15
They cause lots of problems.
@DEAD ahem.
Whatever makes your fun centers hum, robot!
@JimReynolds AFV is one possiblity!
So funny and cute.
Just like me.
Donald J for president!
Question for moderator nominees: What steps would you take to make ELL more Jim Reynolds-like?
@DEAD @snailplane @ColleenV
An answer by a non-nominee: Step 1) Change ELL to JELL. :P
Step 2) Change JELL to GAOL 'cause they sound the same
Step 3) Change GAOL to GOAL 'cause we love typos.
Now everyone reaches their goals!
08:25
@DamkerngT. O.O
Did someone slap an IBM silliness emulator on you?
Well, I thought reaching our goals this way was more Jim Reynolds-like. :D
@DamkerngT. I am here.
08:35
bows
thanks.
@Avicenna What's our discussion, again?
Announcement: We are now in the presence of Avicenna The Wise!
A-ha! @JimReynolds I think I can come up with an odd-sounding example:
That adding emphasise to the sentence we were discussing.
08:37
> a) After 4 years in college which was a tough time, she started a new life.
> b) After 4 years in college was a tough time, she started a new life.
@DamkerngT. Everything you say sounds odd, so I think you can. :D
@JimReynolds :D Avicenna who tries to be wise.
@JimReynolds Haha! I suppose that's true, too!
@Avicenna See??? THAT'S wisdom itself!
Now tell me (b) is ungrammatical.
08:38
@DamkerngT. Oh. A asks me for commas, but not strongly.
Quote of the day by @JimReynolds Trying to be wise is of wisdom!
b is a no-no
@JimReynolds Why?
It's "After CLAUSE, CLAUSE", right? Why is it a no-no?
After birds were blue, she started a new life.
TRomano's examples:
08:40
A should be like this: After 4 years in college, which was a tough time, she started a new life.
> (c) After weeks of static and interference made him want to throw the damn phone against a brick wall, he decided to take it into the shop for repair.
(d) After weeks of static and interference that made him want to throw the damn phone against a brick wall, he decided to take it into the shop for repair.
@Avicenna You have to argue that with StoneyB. :D
It's extra info.
Doesn't make sense to think of years doing that (making themselves be a tough time).
@Avicenna I suppose you're okay with After 4 years in college that was a tough time, she started a new life, right?
So we need to commas.
08:42
Years don't do that.
@JimReynolds But (c) is okay! :D
Weeks can cause someone to lose patience.
We think this way.
@DamkerngT. It's like the one I said needs comma.
Oh, so you're okay with After 4 years in college, that was a tough time, she started a new life, then?
Years don't be a tough time.
08:44
@JimReynolds We have the same sense in Parisian.
@JimReynolds But it can be, can't it?
@DamkerngT. If you mean period by time, yes, it's OK.
@Avicenna I think that alternative is incorrect.
Agentically, as an actor, they cannot be something.
@DamkerngT. How and why?
08:47
@JimReynolds Just a quick reality check, is this okay: Four years in college was her tough time?
@Avicenna We don't put a comma before that when we use a that-clause to describe the noun it modifies, don't you think?
Uh.... ok-ish
So, years can be a tough time, right?
Determiner in front of four.
Huh? Tell me more about the determiner you're thinking about.
Her four years in college was her tough time.
It implies st like her toughest time, considering her other times.
08:50
Hmm... I'm fine with both alternatives, with or without her in front of four.
@JimReynolds She could have a tough life.
It could pass unnoticed in context.
What was your tough time?
You mean when?
How could you answer?
@DamkerngT. It's not about that, it's about being defining or nondefining relative clause.
Good question!
08:55
@Avicenna But by thinking about "defining or nondefining relative clause", you actually already got that involved.
And how can we know part of a sentence said by some other speaker was meant as defining or non-defining?
If it's nondefining we tend to use which and not that.
It reads like extra info in your example.
@Avicenna Yes. I guess you have that kind of idea in mind (so did Jim), which was why I said you have to argue that with StoneyB.
@Avicenna But I did not use it that way.
And we can ask her too. ;-)
I don't have to because I can remember his answers about this topic.
(But don't ask me which answers! Searching for an answer on ELL? I'd better go find a pokemon!)
By her I refered to your sentence!

« first day (434 days earlier)      last day (3101 days later) »