Because w*w is not the limp sup of w*n, it is the limsup of w*n+m, and for any w*n+m I can find a later time at which the cell is on (specifically w*(n+1)+2).
(I mean technically w*w is the limsup of w*n, but it is not defined to be that.)
I think there have and can be a bit more interesting KotHs, but that doesn't make this one anywhere near bad by any means. I just don't want this to become what KotH is.
Because of the two different scores (security and game theory), there is a fairly good skill ceiling. I'm just worried about other KotHs taking the simplicity, but leaving behind the interesting title and skill ceiling.
Code trolling attracted a lot of low quality questions that were basically, "do X but trolling", rather than high quality questions. This time around, we can close any very similar koths as dupes, and, while they won't be new, they'll still be high-quality (or at least, not low quality if they want to stay open). Code trolling exploded overnight (like ~30 questions in a week or something crazy), this time around the bar for entry is high enough (writing a controller) that I doubt that'll happen
Regardless of the KotH's skill ceiling, it seems a lot of people had fun with it, and some of the best answers were by new users. I think that counts as a good challenge by most metrics you can think of :p
every once in a while a simple challenge to pull in new users is definitely good but too many makes it boring :P especially if it's the same type of simple approach
Cleaning KoTH
Clean up a 50x75 room with a JSbot before there is too much junk!
The Challenge
A 50x75 room is cluttered 375 items, each taking up 1 cell of space. Create a JSbot that takes an array as an input to clean up the room. If the bot is on a cell with junk in it, the junk is automaticall...
I see. I haven't really been on top of reviews until recently; it definitely counted pretty heavily against my candidate score and even after becoming a mod I tended to take most actions directly rather than from the review queue
I'm basically cheating, and fetching the page, which prevents it from having to run any JS or get images, so it can load the text quickly. I use regexp to parse a bit of the HTML for the lolz, then I can extract all of the necessary information using proper techniques.
once loading the tasks gets too fast it's limited by how fast you can process the review task itself at which point i worry that the speed competition will compromise quality/accuracy. but i trust y'all to focus on actually handling the task appropriately rather than trying to FGITW them
then if 3 people vote in favor in the review queue won't that cause it to leave the queue before the action is completed? does it take 3 reviews against the vote to dismiss it
lmao, okay so I am supposed to start my job today and i hadn't gotten any information this whole morning, and I just got an email and apparently my hiring manager was told i was starting next week even though i am starting today. wow. for one of my interviews, HR somehow forgot / missed something and the hiring manager didn't send me my interview meeting link either. i'm just getting really unlucky with this whole co-op employment thing
@cairdcoinheringaahing well, it wouldn't make sense for it to get 3 close votes and then just leave the queue so people forget about it and it doesn't get closed :P so i'd assume that's how it works.
Introduction
When playing Mario Kart the other day, an interesting question popped up when a Grand Prix with my 2 roommates, 9 AI drivers and myself seemed to be fairly close and therefore exciting until the very end.
We asked ourselves: How close can the point difference between first and last p...
For this, this is a test run with all of the sub+the example and the baseline I given: https://imgur.com/RmKN6W1 You can see the "return 1" is actually not scoring well, with total points of 1/3 of the highest one
We also had units on cricket and rugby, although the cricket was basically just baseball with tennis racquets, and I suspect the rugby was more football than rugby
@Razetime Wrong, Emigna is emignatic, not enigmatic :P
If someone gets suspended, kicking them out of the room is almost certainly not going to be enough. In this case, this same user had done the same thing a month ago, at which point I manually increased his suspension to 30 days.
Two blatant violations is sufficient; his account has been sown wit...
People in cricket run way more than people in baseball. Obviously, baseball is for lazy people
@Wezl Did you use tennis racquets, throw your bats to the ground to run, have the pitcher stand between the runner and batsman, and consider it a strike if someone hit the ball backwards?
Because if you didn't, you didn't play real American cricket :P
The thing is the challenge obviously has different mechanisms - if it were the exact same, I'd have deleted it probably. But the point is that the strategy is no different - go for a high number, but don't go too high. Equivalently, go for a low enough number without going too low and losing. The different mechanism doesn't bring a different approach set
in fact, I could copy like half of the solutions from the other question verbatim and the others probably take little editing to be competitive
Did y'all know you can kick users from the mobile chat UI? :D
I think that's pretty much the only "extended" functionality added to the mobile chat. You can't cancel stars, move messages or put the room into a timeout
I did not. That's surprising; the mobile interface has like almost nothing and usually I have to request desktop site if I can't just go to my computer instead lol
Ah. I was >95% certain it was spam from my initial scan due to a couple of keywords / key factors but I took a second read to make sure it was surely spam
I need to go to the bank and withdraw some money. I need to withdraw $30, $22 to pay my roommate for the internet and $8 for laundry. Since neither of these can make change, I need my $30 to be split into two partitions of the two sizes. That means when the teller asks me how I want my $30 I a...
basically, valid is +1, invalid is -1, and meh is -1/5. it's validated at +6 but i don't think it's known what the condition for invalidating it is; probably either it goes below a certain threshold or enough people vote without it hitting +6
i don't actually know what happens if i vote meh, and i don't remember if that option is even available. valid and invalid are both binding for moderators though
this would be a nice feature to have. i'd love to make a userscript, but flags are not that common and flagging is one of the few things you're not allowed to test in the sandbox lol
i usually just click to find the full transcript anyway. it's not important enough that i'd put work into implementing smth like that :P
even with a few lines of context, i'd probably still view the transcript to get a better sense of the message and its context, and if there are other things that need to be deleted or trashed
if it's in the taskbar you can use meta+X i think? but you need to target the item by its index in the taskbar and if you use it on something that's not open it'll open it so it's not the same
@pxeger i was going to say windows key + X at first but then i realized redwolf was talking about ubuntu :p even though i'm guessing the keyboard has a windows key and i would've been understood either way