« first day (1854 days earlier)      last day (2990 days later) » 

11:01 PM
You know why there are no special natural numbers?
 
There is.
0.
 
2 is very special.
 
Well suppose there are special numbers. Then there is a lowest special number. But the number just below would be the greatest non-special number before all special numbers, which would make it special again.
Contradiction.
 
Why does there have to be a lowest special number?
 
@El'endiaStarman yes
 
11:04 PM
Why not just have one special number?
 
0
A: Golf you a quine for great good!

Martin BüttnerHexagony, side-length 17, 816 bytes 91250627933831033109634829712834565455412069432020065704278399756087178230762277125635578427213654706765465797426862029105708357479465872311311201940261051361759476965184870901148800588564251490070481766450679117131225753002267668700130843271268947484185795853...

2
 
(I just noticed that I should have asked "why are all natural numbers special, or not special")
@CᴏɴᴏʀO'Bʀɪᴇɴ If there is just one, then it is the lowest.
 
And that makes it special.
 
I'm gonna take my first steps in C/Cpp soon!
 
11:09 PM
Cpp?
C++?
 
yap!
I'm excited and terrified at the same time.
 
I used to be a C++ master
 
Back when C++ was simple? ;)
 
I suspect I'm gonna stay a C++ slave forever.
 
back when I wasn't using java :p
but it also got a lot more complicated in the meantime
 
11:15 PM
How long have you been using it for?
#noplanecrash
 
C++? from about 1998 to 2007 and only occasionally after that
 
0
Q: How to install non-Continuum packages in Anaconda

user51693I have installed Anaconda and currently using Spyder IDE. I am trying to install a package (IbPy -> https://github.com/blampe/IbPy) so that it can be used in Spyder. So far I tried pip install ibpy, as well as conda install ibpy, but without success since the package is not available in the an...

 
@NewMainPosts This guy is clearly doing it wrong. The point of Anaconda is to have all packages known to man from the beginning, so you don't need to get any more.
 
@flawr very disappoint :p
 
^
@MartinBüttner Who won the bet?
 
11:23 PM
@aditsu Wooah. 1998 I think I was just able to write my name.
 
@RikerW I'm not done yet :P
 
I was writing my name in 1991 :p
or if you mean on paper, around 1984
 
@RikerW currently Helka Homba, but he's really far off... however, I think I might approach his guess but probably not pass it, so I guess he might remain the winner.
 
List of current bets? I remember mine was around 197.5 or so.
 
0
A: Make a code square with your favorite word

9cHeruinr96aPython - 19 null=1234;print(""" null is nothing""") null="""headerstuff nullaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa nullaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa nullaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa nullaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa nullaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa nullaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa nullaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa nullaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa nullaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa nullaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa nullaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa null...

 
11:29 PM
23 RikerW
35 TimmyD
120 Mego
193.5 El'endia Starman
273 Conor O'Brien
300 Sp3000
478 Helka Homba
1296 Sherlock9
(Sp also added that might first attempt would be more than 1000, but that I'd end up around 300)
 
@ZachGates It's that same kid. Spamming it seems
Or maybe not, idk
 
@MartinBüttner @El'endiaStarman Bets? What bets?
 
2 days ago, by Martin Büttner
Okay, with the latest improvement to my Labyrinth quine I'm not fairly confident I can write the first Hexagony quine (which I'll probably tackle later this week). I'm taking bets how small it's going to be. Ping me if you have a guess. (I'll come up with a prize for the closest guess later.)
 
@VoteToClose How short/long Martin's Hexagony quine will be.
Ninja'd because I decided to add "/long". -_-
 
@VoteToClose I believe you were banned at that time? :p
 
11:33 PM
@AandN No he wasn't.
 
Oh
 
VTC posted a message a couple minutes after Martin's.
And you can scroll up and see a few more from him. :P
 
@MartinBüttner wha?
oh
 
@El'endiaStarman Oh, that's true haha
 
well that's enough for tonight... I'll try to do side-length 16 over the weekend... and maybe come up with a better technique, but currently I'm out of ideas.
 
11:35 PM
@MartinBüttner It must be mentally exhausting
writing a quine like that
 
@ZachGates VTD'd.
 
wait
where is the char combo thing for hexagony?
 
> haxagony
 
the what?
 
The agony of hacks.
O.o Interesting autocorrect.
 
11:36 PM
> haxors
 
ಠ_ಠ someone added it to my replacements list
 
4 mins ago, by Martin Büttner
the what?
 
the thing that gives two-letter character combos to print a character
 
it's the bottom link in that answer. replace the 46 with any character code you want to generate
a neater version is in the HW answer: codegolf.stackexchange.com/a/57600/8478
 
I wonder if an NTFJ quine is possible.
 
11:44 PM
is NTFJ Turing-complete?
 
^ If NTFJ is Turing complete then yes quines must be possible
 
It's pretty much turing complete.
 
@CᴏɴᴏʀO'Bʀɪᴇɴ Then yeah quines can be done
 
11:50 PM
Should be interesting.
 
In mathematics, a fixed-point theorem is a result saying that a function F will have at least one fixed point (a point x for which F(x) = x), under some conditions on F that can be stated in general terms. Results of this kind are amongst the most generally useful in mathematics. == In mathematical analysis == The Banach fixed-point theorem gives a general criterion guaranteeing that, if it is satisfied, the procedure of iterating a function yields a fixed point. By contrast, the Brouwer fixed-point theorem is a non-constructive result: it says that any continuous function from the closed unit...
relevant
 
@flawr :(
 
Personally, I never liked writing quines >_>
 
11:56 PM
^
 
Perhap's that's why I'm always amazed at quines.
BTW I'm making the or programming language.
 
or?
 

« first day (1854 days earlier)      last day (2990 days later) »