« first day (1728 days earlier)      last day (3411 days later) » 

03:01
@Doorknob Also, newbie challenges that are tweaked a lot can easily get 10+ if fixed correctly
السلام عليكم
@Calvin'sHobbies true, but it's a start
translate: السلام عليكم
(from Arabic) Peace be upon you
@AlexA. Post a baby seal
03:02
How about "easy good questions" are questions with score >10 and votes < answers*3 or so.
@Calvin'sHobbies Yes, master.
The deed is done.
44.5% with score ≥ 10
34.0% [everything else]
21.5% closed/deleted with score < 0
3
that's in 2015
We have a lot of crap from the older days that wouldn't fly now but were fairly well received then.
How does the proportion of questions with score≥10 compare with other SEs?
Couldn't say, since the deleted:all search operator only works on sites where you're a mod
Puzzling is ~25%
but honestly if you're comparing yourself to Puzzling you're already doing something wrong
03:07
I wonder if the low questions-per-day influences people here to vote more.
not considering deleted questions:
PPCG: 60.3%
SO: 0.4%
CR: 6.6%
@Doorknob That's 10+?
yep
percentage of questions with 20+ answers:
score ≥10: 14.4%
score ≤10: 1.4%
Wow. 84% unaccounted for.
03:15
It is puzzling that you would compare us to Puzzling.
@Doorknob And how much of that 60.3% am I? ;D
oh snap
percentage of Calvin's questions scored ≥10: 90.3%
...nobody like my jokes..
only in 2015: 94.1%
percentage of Calvin challenges out of challenges scored ≥10 in 2015: 11.8%
03:19
:D
@AlexA. Now post a cute animal that no one has probably heard of
number of Calvin challenges scored <0, including deleted, all time: 1
sorry, that's ≤0
My two questions have a total combined score of 20. Yay, 100% of my questions are >= 10!
(....statistically speaking.....)
not sure about that... :P
Well, on average at least!
03:29
100% of my questions in 2015 have score 18.
dang
Oh hey @feersum, did you understand my explanation of the numbers?
I think so
@El'endiaStarman One possible transformation for any sturdy rectangle is to swap a row/column with any row/column that's an even distance away from it.
Did anyone mention this earlier?
I don't think so.
@feersum Have you tested this yet?
I'm saying that it preserves the sums.
Should be easy to mathematically prove.
03:38
For a program, this would be a lot more effiective criterion for weeding out duplicates than rotation/reflection.
> effiective
29 secs ago, by Alex A.
> effiective
 0  3  6  9
10 11  4  5
 1  2  7  8
Better.
what
45 secs ago, by Alex A.
32 secs ago, by Alex A.
23 secs ago, by Alex A.
9 secs ago, by Alex A.
7 secs ago, by Alex A.
1 min ago, by feersum
29 secs ago, by Alex A.
> effiective
03:41
1 min ago, by Alex A.
45 secs ago, by Alex A.
32 secs ago, by Alex A.
23 secs ago, by Alex A.
9 secs ago, by Alex A.
7 secs ago, by Alex A.
1 min ago, by feersum
29 secs ago, by Alex A.
> effiective
What what what
lol
Anyway...
I've had the same song stuck in my head all day
 0  9  6  3
10  5  4 11
 1  8  7  2
4 mins ago, by El'endia Starman
 0  3  6  9
10 11  4  5
 1  2  7  8
^ for comparison
03:44
Not that it's a bad song...
Sum of both is 24.
Looks like you might be right.
Is this the song that was stuck in your head?
@AlexA no, it's "forgot about Dre" buy Dr Dre
So for a grid of height H there are floor(H/2)! ceil(H/2)! permutations of rows, for example.
> buy
What is it with you and doctors?
03:46
Lol Swype
@feersum I think I have an idea of why this works. It's both because A B C and C B A work and because even grids are toroidal.
No, it works for odd grids too.
...[finds the 5x5 you posted two days ago]
Oct 20 at 1:27, by feersum
 0 24  1 23  2
 9 15  8 16  7
10 14 11 13 12
19  5 18  6 17
20  4 21  3 22
The distance-2 swap is easy to show just by adding the numbers
And can be iterated to any even distance.
 2 24  1 23  0
 7 15  8 16  9
12 14 11 13 10
17  5 18  6 19
22  4 21  3 20
Oh yeah, of course.
03:48
@TheDoctor Skype?
That looks like it'll be super useful.
@AlexA. No.
You think doges can Skype?
@El'endiaStarman Yes.
@AlexA why?
I meant Swype keyboard
@TheDoctor Skype keyboard?
No
Look it up
03:52
@feersum Odd swaps can be done if you flip them end-over-end!
@TheDoctor No
@El'endiaStarman example?
 4 22  1 23  0
 5 17  8 16  9
14 12 11 13 10
15  7 18  6 19
24  2 21  3 20
Holy cow, that'll be incredibly useful.
It's like you rotated just the 2x5 piece.
yeah
In this case, yes, but it'll work for any odd distance.
03:55
If we account for all the possible symmetries, there must be like 3 5x5 grids.
lol
I don't think it's quite that few.
Good night golf team
Certainly though, it cuts it down a lot.
G'night Doctor!
said with a British accent
rotation, reflection, subtraction from mn, even row swap, odd row swap
for even sizes, cyclic rotation of rows
Reflection is covered by row swaps.
err
Hmm. Is it?
03:57
is it?
there's also diagonal reflection for squares
Diagonal reflection is definitely covered by horizontal and vertical reflection.
There are only 8 symmetries of a square.
e, r, r^2, r^3, s, sr, sr^2, sr^3
what could be a minimal set of symmetry transformations from which the others are derived?
We need t find the group structure.
I've been pondering exactly that question myself.
I've been thinking of writing a program that finds cycles in sturdy squares. As in, you apply one transformation to get from A to B, and the same transformation goes from B to C, to ... to A.
This would highlight an element of the group because all elements will be equivalent to the identity if applied often enough in succession.
@feersum You can do this too for odd sizes; you just have to flip a row/column.
So cyclic rotation is a subset of row swaps.
04:03
But then the column was all upside down and whatnot.
Is that really the same?
22  1 23  0 24
17  8 16  9 15
12 11 13 10 14
 7 18  6 19  5
 2 21  3 20  4
Column cycling worked here.
Row cycling might fail, in fact.
Lemme try.
 2 21  3 20  4
22  1 23  0 24
17  8 16  9 15
12 11 13 10 14
 7 18  6 19  5
That was without a flip.
Sums still work out to 48!
No...
Not in the middle. Or the left.
I'm writing the program now ;)
We appear to have lost the Doctor. Someone call in a nurse.
04:09
...
thanks
FF finally fixed the permalink bug. \o/
\o/
Firefox? Don't you mean Iceweasel?
In 2006, a branding issue developed when Mike Connor, representing the Mozilla Corporation, requested that the Debian Project comply with Mozilla standards for use of the Thunderbird trademark when redistributing the Thunderbird software. At issue were modifications not approved by the Mozilla Foundation, when the name for the software remained the same. The Debian Project subsequently rebranded the Mozilla Firefox program, and other software released by Mozilla, so that Debian could distribute modified software without being bound by the trademark requirements that the Mozilla Foundation had invoked...
Interesting read ^
I don't use Debian, so no. :P
Haha, now my avatar is the Wikipedia logo.
So you're no longer upside-down half Brian Tompsett?
04:22
@Dennis For me, your avatar is this:
@Dennis Did you visit Wikipedia recently?
@feersum He was having weird browser issues with displaying his own avatar. I think it works for just about everyone but him.
^
@El'endiaStarman Yes, just now.
Interesting. Sounds like it might be affected by images you viewed last.
04:23
@AlexA. Is that what it's supposed to be?
Yes.
My Halloween avatar.
For Halloween he's going as a hundred million Chrome tabs open at once.
Note the inverted, dirty Wikipedia logo where the Cranberries ought to be.
It's worse than it looks. My browser only occupies the left half of the screen.
You have 9 gold, 79 silver, and 209 bronze badges. :O
o_O
Illuminati confirmed
Three kinds of badges, three 9s, 9 = 3*3, Half-Life 3 confirmed.
I never would of thought how difficult it was to come up with spin-off names to JavaScript. The best I've thought of is KavaScript (K comes after J) which sounds horrible.
Use a G.
GavaScript.
GuavaScript
04:34
EczemaScript
DjavaScript?
And watch as the jif versus gif wars start again...
HerpesScript
...where did herpes come from?!
04:35
I find the name GuavaScript oddly intriguing...
From ECMA, I presume.
@El'endiaStarman It's a hard "g" sound. Not like the peanut butter brand.
It isn't.
@AlexA. Its creators say it with a "j" sound.
04:36
@El'endiaStarman I don't give a shit.
For once you might actually find people who agree with you. :P
PHP, 13 bytes Alex is wrong Verifies all test cases. — Dennis ♦ 10 hours ago
ಠ_ಠ
It's "g" like in "gravy."
It's not "j" like in "Jeff."
04:37
Hm, djravy sounds funny.
Haha yes it does
Of course not. It's like the G in Geoff.
Or the G in Gibraltar.
(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻
Screw it, going with "avaScript"
04:38
Ok
TypoScript
ComputerScript
@TheDoctor Couldn't sleep? :P
CalculatorScript
Isn't there anyone who pronounces "gif" correctly? D:
AbacuScript
04:39
Alex is really famous now! Hot Network Questions!
@AlexA. We all do.
@Doorknob We agree on important issues. Surely you pronounce "gif" with a g like in gravy.
@RetoKoradi Too bad I'm now famous for being predominantly incorrect.
Still better than people thinking you're always wrong. ;)
04:41
Doorknob left the room. I'll take that as a jif.
> This challenge is to lift the spirits of our mod Alex A., who is usually wrong. Suppose you have a friend named Alex who needs help with basic logic and math
7
ಠ_ಠ
I just realized that.
What, you didn't read the little text at the top?
I did but the continuation of that with the beginning of the challenge didn't occur to me.
Well, unfortunately you're wrong about the pronunciation of "gif".
04:45
@RetoKoradi Don't do this to me, Reto. I thought we were like brothers. We spend every weekend together just hanging out. I confide in you.
Man, there's a whole web site about it: howtoreallypronouncegif.com
@RetoKoradi This is what I'm saying. I agree with this site. It's like "gift," not "Jif."
OK, if you're citing blog posts, you've clearly run out of arguments.
Don't look at me, Reto's the one who posted it. It just happens to be correct.
04:50
I'm looking at the website author. Who is wrong. And cites blog posts in a futile attempt to convince us otherwise.
The website author is correct. The GIF author is wrong.
Steve Wilkasdfksd.
More like Steve Liar.
That web site says that the creator of the format insists on jif. But then claims that the people who write the Oxford dictionary know better.
So what are you going to do if they redefine how Alex is pronounced?
It's a proper name. Creator's choice.
04:53
@RetoKoradi Who? My parents? I'd just go by my middle name.
No, the Oxford dictionary.
They don't define how to pronounce people's names, do they?
Sure they do. They're words like any other words.
Hm. Okay.
Well then it's settled. If the pronunciation of "Alex" is revised by the Oxford English Dictionary, I'll go by my middle name.
I had seriously considered that anyway off and on throughout my life because I rather dislike the name "Alex."
04:55
^ Beat me to it.
GIF will henceforth be known as I.
I am the GIF and the GIF is me.
what would people think of a new chat room to discuss golfing?
That's what this one is supposed to be for.
well, mostly
04:57
Actually it isn't. General discussion for codegolf.stackexchange...
yup
That's probably not such a bad idea, though I'm sure people will still discuss it in here as well.
If there are more chat rooms then you have to keep opening them all the time and stuff.
I'm actually not sure what The 19th Byte is supposed to be for, but I am sure we chat about everything but.
i'd find it easier to keep another chat open than to look through the transcript to see if there was golfing discussion i missed

« first day (1728 days earlier)      last day (3411 days later) »