« first day (2067 days earlier)      last day (2769 days later) » 

7:00 PM
^
 
180
A: What are the “spam” and “rude or abusive” (offensive) flags, and how do they work?

KipWhat makes something spam and when should I flag it? A post should be marked as spam ONLY when it contains an unsolicited advertisement. It should NOT be marked as spam when: The answer contains no useful information, such as an answer that says “I don't care about your problem”. Flag an answ...

 
blablabla
 
@TùxCräftîñg boom post exploded
 
@kirbyfan64sos No, far too readable for Perl. — Arcinde Aug 17 '15 at 18:54
CMC: Understand or flag this
 
> how convert 4 color object to single color in indesign?
 
7:10 PM
how convert 4 color object to single color in indesign?
ah ninja'd
 
@TùxCräftîñg The real challenge is selecting the text.
 
0
Q: We need to talk about Chat

mınxomaτI would start this post with something along the lines of "without naming names", but I think it's time to pinpoint the issues we currently face in chat and take action. This is a follow-up to The state of chat. This post aims to identify specific problems and specific problematic users. Because...

 
@Dennis start from the first character of the final line and drag to the end of the first line
 
It's finally there.
Meta hates me.
Goodbye, chat.
 
Hmm. Apparently, there's a "#hearingprivilege" event going on on Facebook where deaf people share their experiences about how hearing people have it easier. It seems to me like many of them are really "#Englishprivilege" or "#notdisabledprivilege".
 
7:21 PM
It seems fairly obvious to me that people who can hear would have it easier....
 
I think it's safe to ignore hashtags/drama that contain "privilege".
 
@quartata Well, unless Bieber's on the radio.
 
@mınxomaτ #hearthbleedprivilegeescalation
 
@orlp Safe to ignore because it's too long to be popular. #heartbleed is sufficient.
 
@NewMetaPosts I do feel like this needed to be said but the naming names part doesn't really sit right with me anyways....
 
7:22 PM
Also, it seems fairly obvious that every chat room in the room hates me.
 
@zyabin101 #stopcreatingdrama
 
@mınxomaτ Yeah, the "privilege" part already put me in a negative state of mind towards it, but I took a look anyway.
 
@mınxomaτ #heartbleed? Sounds like some new virus.
 
Here, the hashtag that has to be said to everyone.
 
7:23 PM
30 secs ago, by TùxCräftîñg
@zyabin101 #stopcreatingdrama
 
@El'endiaStarman requesting screencap of moderator UI
 
@TimmyD really big security flaw in SSL
 
To everyone on the internet.
 
@TimmyD Probably a good strategy to spread awareness. :D
 
@TimmyD ehhh
 
7:23 PM
@uoɥʇʎPʎzɐɹC .....why?
 
@TimmyD you might want to google heartbleed
 
@TùxCräftîñg Also, please don't reply with message one boxes.
 
Heartbleed is a security bug in the OpenSSL cryptography library, which is a widely used implementation of the Transport Layer Security (TLS) protocol. It was introduced into the software in 2012 and publicly disclosed in April 2014. Heartbleed may be exploited regardless of whether the party is using a vulnerable OpenSSL instance for TLS as a server or a client. It results from improper input validation (due to a missing bounds check) in the implementation of the TLS heartbeat extension, thus the bug's name derives from heartbeat. The vulnerability is classified as a buffer over-read, a situation...
 
@El'endiaStarman there are so many things you can do... how do they fit it in such a small space?
 
@orlp I'm fairly certain he's joking...
 
7:24 PM
Holy crap, I was totally just joking.
 
@Geobits :O
you can read my mind too?
 
:D
 
@TùxCräftîñg link and then "." to prevent oneboxing
 
@orlp Sometimes. It's harder across an ocean, but reception is generally better at night.
 
Because everyone hates me.
 
7:25 PM
@Geobits alright
 
@quartata Yeah, I don't particularly like it, but I'm not sure if the post would be any better without.
 
I'm thinking of a real number between 0 and 1
 
@zyabin101 stop making that up
 
@orlp 0.5
 
I mean, I'd hope an Exchange administrator would be aware of heartbleed
 
7:25 PM
@orlp 0.333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333‌​333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333‌​333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333
 
> something something answering for others
 
@quartata it was all over the news
 
@TùxCräftîñg plz no
 
> something something answering for others
 
I'm gotta go to the Woods of Lurking and tame downgaots. See you around.
 
7:26 PM
.o/
 
zyabin101 the Hated, 2015 — 2016
<br />
 
@orlp 1/pi
@zyabin101 plz no drama
 
@betseg 1/3
 
Note to self. Tack a /s on the end of future sarcastic posts.
 
7:26 PM
@TùxCräftîñg 0.(3) would've been ok too
 
@TimmyD you should always do that /s
I'm never sarcastic though /s
 
@El'endiaStarman I needed to cite recent incidents. Now all of these are replies to user XYZ, so why not name the problem. That's why I stripped the "@..." from the quotes. Feel free to edit the names out, but then please edit the @ back in.
 
In [5]: type(1/pi)
Out[5]: sympy.core.power.Pow
u wot m8
In [7]: pi**-1 == 1/pi
Out[7]: True
 
@TùxCräftîñg pi^-1
 
nvm til
 
7:29 PM
Does this chat support unicode?
 
ÿᴇσ
 
Ýéş
 
Cause you can also do the 0.3 with the little line above it.
 
0.⁻3?
 
Yea but it isn't on the keyboard
 
7:30 PM
use a compose key
 
Too hard to memorize
 
<Compose>+^+- = ⁻
<Compose>+e+' = é
^ rly hard to memorize
 
Oh it's shift+altgr in Xorg
TIL
 
<!DOCTYPE html>
 
@zyabin101 Dude, I still like you. I wish there was more friendliness your own responses, though.
But I still think you're a decent contributor when you work at it
 
7:35 PM
Ooh, very nice words.
 
@zyabin101 <html>
 
But I'm not really back.
 
@zyabin101 <script>alert("ROFL");</script></html>
 
I think after multiple cases of "please work on this flaw in the way you chat" requests without any attempt at improvement, it starts to get on people's nerves
 
@Sherlock9 Saying things like "every hates me" (facebook equivalent would be "I'm ugly"), is fishing for compliments. Feeding into that behavior won't improve anything.
7
 
7:38 PM
Fair enough
I'm going back to working on my Sandbox post then
 
@mınxomaτ -1 for not calling it "We need to chat about Chat" :D
 
@TimmyD I don't want to steal that from someone who wants to talk about the chat tag ;-)
 
̅3
Well, I was close
 
Fish kiss?
 
haha
 
7:41 PM
Jul 23 at 18:33, by TùxCräftîñg
so i am creating a 7-dimensional language
i still dont created it
brb
 
@TùxCräftîñg you can make multidimensional brainfuck
it's like regular brainfuck
except it adds ^ and v
 
irb(main):004:0> 2**7
=> 128
not so brb
 
Have we had a challenge like the following -- given an input of directions, e.g., 1 is north, 2 is north-east, 3 is east, etc., output an ASCII map of the traversal. Like what you'd see in an old Zork-style game. I swear we had one like this, but I can't seem to find it.
 
^ rotates the tape to an orthogonal axis
v undoes the rotation
 
@mınxomaτ I'm not fishing for compliments.
 
7:42 PM
@TimmyD I think so, but it might have been the reverse (output the directions given the map).
 
> Everyone hate me in this chat room. I am leaving.
 
Well... go on. leave.
 
@zyabin101 Although being melodramatic isn't always fishing for compliments, it has a similar effect on the mood of the room
 
Can someone point me to how to use Python's "%*c" format string? I swear I saw it used last week, but I can't find it.
 
the fuck is this
TypeError: * wants int
xD
 
7:45 PM
"%d"%(num) is my guess
 
@Sherlock9 No, to format em all at once. The whole tuple
 
@Dennis Could you please pull 05AB1E?
 
@mbomb007 * always does the same thing
 
@Adnan Done.
 
"%*_" % (a, b) where a is an integer is the same as "%a_" % b
 
7:46 PM
I want to know what things (feeds, chatbots, ...) might keep the Woods of Lutking in touch with the outside world of PPCG, TNB, but without making it my personal webpage.
 
@TùxCräftîñg you know what it wants.. give it to it
4
 
@Dennis Thanks :)
 
"%5d" % 10 gives 10 left-padded until 5 width
 
in nethack * is a gem. do this mean gems want numbers? :O
 
@Dennis, would it be easier, instead of asking in chat, to just pull every language once a week or once a day automatically?
 
7:47 PM
@orlp Ohhhh, yeah I remember seeing that.
 
"%*d" % (5, 10) also does that
 
Yeah, I may be able to use that. But probably not shorter than what I'm doing.
 
but if you want variable padding
"%*d" % (n, 10)
 
@Sherlock9 Without proper sandboxing, that's more or less equivalent to give all language authors the server password.
TIO v2 will have automatic updates though.
 
Aww, what's the harm in that?
 
7:48 PM
> tfw no sandboxing
 
@Dennis i like that
lemme make a new "lang"
can you pull?
 
I don't see a problem, just make the password *******...oh wait, the chat makes passwords stars I forgot.
 
@betseg Later, but I'll give you the password now. It's nicetry without spaces.
4
 
@Yodle Really?! Lemme try: 123456.
 
@Dennis but but
 
7:49 PM
@Yodle Huh? No, you had it right. The password is *******
 
there are no spaces in nicetry
@Geobits hunter2?
 
@Dennis Interesting. Did you mention any ETA on TIO v2 yet?
 
@Dennis Don't you use public key auth anyways
 
@orlp You can see that?? You're not even a mod :/
 
@Geobits no I just copy pasted your stars
 
7:50 PM
With the understanding that asking for ETA for most software projects is often futile :P
 
***************
oh it works
 
@orlp Ooooh, I didn't know that worked. Well, fail for me :(
 
@Geobits only mods can see passwords?
 
@flawr xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx‌​xxxxxxxxxxxxD
 
@flawr Without using the copy/paste exploit orlp just mentioned anyway :/
 
7:52 PM
@Sherlock9 I hope to be able to release a beta version in October.
 
@Geobits But what if the passwort actually comprises only stars?
 
Looking forward to it
 
You and me both. I'll sleep better once everything is sandboxed.
 
@flawr Hmm. I want to say that's insecure, but I'm guessing nobody would ever even try that :D
 
Yeah, not sure if best or worst idea ever.
 
7:54 PM
@Downgoat Have you given any thought to something like Cheddar on Rails
 
Cheddar on Crackers
 
^
was about to say this
 
@quartata I like fast food, but that's overdoing it.
5
 
Quick question: what's the site's current attitude on accepting answers? (Yes, no, only under certain conditions?)
 
I want script script to the monochrome text box Like MTSCRIPT — tiyammohammadi 1 min ago
 
7:55 PM
@DLosc Basically, "wait a week, at least".
 
@DLosc or don't accept at all
 
@DLosc You have two choices: accept the answer with the best score or don't accept anything.
 
@DLosc In the past I've usually accepted answers after some time (about a week). I'm leaning toward not accepting in the future, but I'm unsure. Assuming you mean [code-golf] questions. For anything else, I'll continue accepting as usual.
 
@DLosc i personally accept answers when my challenge is inactive for some days
 
7:57 PM
@DLosc It seems like there are three competing camps, though. Those that say you should accept the "winner" (i.e., shortest for a code-golf) after a period of time, those that say that defeats the purpose of an open competition, and those that say the accepted answer should be what the challenge author thinks is best, regardless of scoring.
 
All that password stuff reminded me of that one stack exchange (or maybe reddit) post of that sysadmin who was working with a 3rd party company where the guy was telling him he needs to provide a list of all the users' usernames and passwords in the company. I can't seem to find that post now, but it was pretty funny.
 
@DLosc If you're asking about the ethics of accepting your own answer, I would just keep it open if it were mine.
 
Thanks for all the answers! I ask here because some meta posts recently have been leaning more towards "The green checkmark isn't really helpful to PPCG, let's just not use it." Also because yes, the current shortest answer is my own answer.
 
@DLosc I'm strongly in favour of removing the accept feature but while we still have it, I generally accept after a week or so and then update acceptance if a better submission comes in.
 

« first day (2067 days earlier)      last day (2769 days later) »