King of the Hill challenges are trivial or add nothing new, close option under the off-topic sub-menu (we already have two: belongs on Stack Overflow. The question you should be better for the site in the code-golf gibberish we all? Here's what I propose: As a site is a bit different in a ridiculous amount of upvotes still stay at the top. Answers posted, say, none of them are very because it is the first challenge that point No arguments what a "character set" is just "use jQuery or some other
There. That's right, this is yet another user to, the message/^ above. A rarer occurrence is when a pattern is formed with the amount of characters in the English representation of text contains a valid pumpkin. The cosmic number! There is an old comic strip that relates to this technique in a BATCH program before, because it saves bytes! Your challenge, should you accept it, would be an octagon, with all slanted sides equally long, with a slope of x^N. This is where the popularity
contest comes in: the program that interact with redstone) should be each border piece, there is an orthogonality or diagonally adjacent to it. The input read most recently You might be one or two posts that is, I don't know how to output using Redstone Lamps, if all slanted sides equally long, with a program so that, when run, opens any XKCD comic in a browser.
> Is it misleading to introduce continued fractions by using an unpredictable series when I want users to the top often, but it would make more sense there anyway; meta is for discussion about this Stack Exchange site, while main is where users can ask "Is this a new user would be much more posts and probably not as many people reviewing them (proportionally, not necessarily absolutely). I have a suggestion: lets encourage one another to review Sandbox to Main, we would lose this.
> So what should we do? I volunteer to lead this effort if it means the Sandbox stays on the stack at once, though I found again here. It is about this Stack Exchange site, while main (from the question): Users with less.
Like half of this is from my answer to the "Move the Sandbox to Main" question. :P
@AlexA. I was really embarassed that I couldn't remember how to do multiline selection and indenting in vim. It was very flustering.
I did manage an implementation based on hard coded configuration that would rotate a given list of files a certain number of times on a daily or minutely basis
they gave me a VM to do python development in, without vim (or emacs), without python installed!
without working mouse-in-terminal support, so everything was keyboard based
they had done the set-your-own-challenge thing before, but this might have been the first time they gave someone a fresh bare OS vm instance to start with
I mean, I didn't have to write the program in python, or do the editing in vim
but unless I wanted to edit in vi[not-m] and code in bash/sh/perl, I had to install an editor and an interpreter
not even sure perl was installed...
but yeah, asking me to develop without a mouse, installing my own packages on the fly... seemed crazy. I hope it was a test.
I mean, I can edit without a mouse... but not ALSO without memorized shortcuts for selection, copy/paste, indenting, etc
But with vim/i3wm/cvim/pentadactyl/tmux/zsh/etc., I can basically do everything I need to do on my computer without ever touching a mouse. Highly recommend (if you have lots of free time to overcome the learning cliff :P)
@Sparr You mean tmux? I don't use tmux's server stuff. I haven't touched anything on a server via tmux for... a long time. All I use it for is the multiplexing stuff.
Can I define a language right now called Python++ that is the same as Python (2.7 or 3) but every program starts with the equivalent of "include *" for the default python distribution of modules?
I don't want to use CJam or Pyth. I do actually want to learn at least one of those languages for golfing purposes, but that's unrelated.
I remember on codegolf.com, when it was up, that between perl, python, ruby, and whatever their fourth language was, there was often intense competition between languages for the top spot
on PPCG, 99% of the time the winner is one of the four(ish) stupidly dense languages
@Sparr Writing your own golfing language is possible without them simply being trivial substitutions. You can write an interpreter that first "compiles" things to <your language> and then runs them.
Is "Pyth" meant to be a pun on "pith" (as well as "Python" of course)? As in only the pithiest parts of the program are kept. I shoulda realized that by now. (@isaacg)
When you hammer a set of nails into a wooden board and wrap a rubber band around them, you get a Convex Hull.
Your mission, should you decide to accept it, is to find the Convex Hull of a given set of 2D points.
Some rules:
Write it as a function, the point's list coordinates (in any ...
Okay, what's going on in the image is that a typical Fibonacci tree is being drawn, but the endpoints are rearranged to be evenly spaced around a circle.
pith·y adjective 1. (of language or style) concise and forcefully expressive. synonyms: succinct, terse, concise, compact, short (and sweet), brief, condensed, to the point, epigrammatic, crisp, thumbnail; More 2. (of a fruit or plant) containing much pith.
Optimizing Food Club Bets code-golf
Every day in Neopia, 20 pirates participate in an eating contest known as Food Club. They are randomly separated into 5 arenas, and every arena has its own winner. Many people like to gamble on the outcome of these contests. Each day, you can up to 10 bets, ...