ok, I thought you wanted to remove it from this question. Now I understand you want to remove it entirely.
@amWhy I think it is a useful tag, because issues related appeared several times in questions on meta and this make them easier to find. (Of course, this is a judgment call.)
BTW I would be perfectly ok with chat-stars tag, if we have enough question about them. For example, on meta.SE there are now more than 100 questions in the tag chat-stars.
Haha of course it depends.. Remember I used one unambiguous NAA as a test case. It was pinned since 26 Jul for 2 weeks but didn't get any downvotes (which it didn't already have) so it still cannot be deleted.
It seems it's easier to just ping interested helpers directly to notify them of bad posts.
So if one instance where things did not work exactly as expected is sufficient, than almost everything can be considered as failed attempt.
@user21820 I would prefer not to receive such pings. (I do check this room for new messages.) But if there are users of this room who do not mind such pings, surely go ahead.
Maybe the difference is that when you consider "clear NAA", sometimes I am not entirely sure. To give a more extreme example, do you think that MH would agree with all of your closures and votes to delete?
However, the c.r.u.d.e. room (or any room you decide to replace it with) should not be dependent on a single user.
Anyway, even if you consider this room as failed attempt, I'd personally think that it would be a bit hasty simply to abandon it and let it freeze - if not for other reason, it's mentioned in many places on meta as one of options for issues liker reopening and similar stuff.
@MartinSleziak No it's not; there are a few of us that ping each other.
@MartinSleziak I only ask for help to close/delete what I feel are justifiable as bad posts (based on SE guidelines or based on mathematical content).
Also, if I abandon this room it doesn't imply I'm letting it freeze. Rather it is no longer up to me to keep it active or let it freeze. After all, if nobody wants to come here then what can we do?
Unless you explicitly ask me to keep it active, I won't purposely post something here to do so.
Though you could post something here and ping me, and I'll respond as always. =)
@MartinSleziak No I don't. I'm just stating a fact. I participate in this room solely because of its intended purpose. It failed to achieve that in my eyes. So I stop participating temporarily. Nothing to do with you. It's you who said I would be hasty if I let this room freeze.
Then it was a miscommunication because your statement was "[...] even if you consider [...], I'd personally think that it would be a bit hasty [...]" and suggested to me that despite my consideration it would be hasty (for me) to ... So never mind.
@MartinSleziak And of course, that suggestion of that tag was in a sense a joke, too. :)
Well, @MartinSleziak I still plan on visiting this chatroom daily. Personally, I don't think two-weeks is sufficient as "an experiment" of using CRUDE. I do believe that posting question/answers which one finds problematic here is more transparent than using "This is the Realm of SimplyBeautifulArt's" chatroom to do so in a rather limited circle. And indeed, @MartinSleziak This is one concern I have had for awhile, the issue I wanted to address you, and @DanielFischer about privately.
Just curious @MartinSleziak. I'm surprised by the difference in the ratios tags/(questions asked) with respect to math.se (very high average number of posts per tag), and that same ratio on meta. I really think that too many tags on meta actually hinders efforts to search. I'll plan to study the tags, and compare number of questions tagged under a tag, over the total number of questions asked on meta. We should not need more than 240 tags on meta.
On the other hand, perhaps I am comparing apples with oranges (tags on main, and tags on meta.)
