@BillDubuque The only thing I find objectiinable is the scope, which seems rather larger than you’re describing, and I wanted to see if anyone else felt the same.

@rschwieb I have better things to do than quibble about minor edits. Good night.

I think part of the reason the question stayed largely the same for 8+ years is that most people did not find it very misleading.

@rschwieb Au contraire, the reason is that "most people" aren't familiar with the esoteric topic of divisibility theore in non-domains

theore -> theory

Which is why I dug up that & other) papers a couple decades ago and frequently mentioned it on sci.math & here to help correct common misconceptons.