« first day (644 days earlier)      last day (4314 days later) » 

11:01 PM
oooh it's 7 ... big bang theory is on
 
jrg
Never watched it.
 
@jrg you sir, have not lived
 
jrg
I've been disgusted with every TV show made in the past 5 years. (except for Pan Am)
 
it's nowhere near as sac-nerd-religious as never watching star wars @jokerdino nudge nudge
 
Hmm... shared memory isn't going to work with my event loop...
Back to JSON-RPC...
 
11:03 PM
well, big bang theory is a funny-ish fairly cerebral sitcom
@GeorgeEdison heh
 
Now if only I could find documentation for it...
 
looking for real documentation on gir Gtk feels about the same...
btw @jrg there are gir ruby bindings either in dev or working
 
jrg
9
Q: Ruby bindings for GTK+ 3?

DanielI’ve spent some time learning Ruby, and I wanted to move over to some GUI programming. GNOME 3 is the environment most appealing to me at the moment, so I thought I would have a look at GTK+ 3. However, the GTK+ 3 documentation’s Getting Started examples in C were quite off-putting. Are there les...

yeah, i've know about those. They are still a PITA to manage though.
 
yeah...i can imagine
although i find the flexibility of ruby to be more frustrating than enlightening most of the time
 
jrg
That's why I'm excited about jruby and swt, makes it a lot easier to deal with.
 
11:07 PM
yeah. i'm so anti-java it's not even funny
 
Hooray for Doxygen!
So there is documentation after all, I just have to generate it.
 
:) yeah... gir is still lacking even if you generate it
>>dir(Gtk) is my friend
 
jrg
Hulu seems to think that I'm A. in need of a Windows Phone, B. in need of a wife via ChristianMingle.com, and C. An IT pro that needs even more cloud backup.
 
You can select "not relevant" in the top bar
 
jrg
The only one that is slightly true is C, and even that is like "I've got enough already, thanks"
@aking1012 i've done that.
 
11:12 PM
This is getting worse - there are no examples anywhere.
 
@jrg surely B would apply also? :)
 
jrg
just sent me to car commercials. Don't need one of those either.
 
oh...i get car commercials a lot
 
jrg
@ajmitch LOL
 
@jrg beat me to it
 
jrg
11:13 PM
LOOK. A CREDIT CARD COMMERCIAL. THIS IS JUST LIKE TV!!
 
the alec baldwin one right?
 
jrg
Yup.
The lowes one is fun.
Always wanted to smash the bathroom into bits. :P
 
there are two of them. there's also one with the back deck
 
jrg
I haven't seen that one.
 
11:15 PM
@jrg oh you will
 
jrg
@GeorgeEdison face it, there are no docs. just go write your own, like i almost always do.
 
ᴅᴇᴀʀ ᴅᴇᴠᴇʟᴏᴘᴇʀs, WRITE DOCUMENTATION PLEASE!!!
 
you mean:
'''
'''
isn't documentation? it gets you passed the pylint check
^--intended to be a joke...
 
/**
  * TODO
  */
 
hehe...same thing
 
11:21 PM
Yeah, something useful like that.
 
you know what linux needs? a virtual network device that responds to arps for gateway so you can use bridged networking in virtualization software with no cable connected
 
jrg
That Time Warner commercial was funny.
@aking1012 oh please yeas please.
that won't win "Best User Experience" award, but it sure as heck would be useful.
 
it would definitely win the "most hackish workaround" award
 
MJB
Would it be possible to search all unclosed questions with X answers? Or all wikis?
 
jrg
There are details on how to do that here - askubuntu.com/search
 
11:37 PM
@bob I dropped a comment on your vnc question
 
bob
If I intercept all packets in input, and send their content through a raw socket destined to myself, will they be intercepted again ? What about output/prerouting/postrouting ?
@aking1012 ok thx i'll check it
 
Probably not. If memory serves the kernel drops everything it thinks could cause a loop like that
 
MJB
@jrg totally missed that, eventhough I knew about it. Thanks.
 
bob
@aking1012 I answered it.
@aking1012 the implicit question is, are you sure it would really cause a loop ?
@aking1012 I mean, if I send a packet to myself, does it go through the input chain ?
 
it seems like the kernel would drop/disregard before it got to even a divert-sockets rule unless you're in promisc
 

« first day (644 days earlier)      last day (4314 days later) »