« first day (2669 days earlier)      last day (316 days later) » 

4:49 AM
@gung from political science, probably this one citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/…
 
 
5 hours later…
 
4 hours later…
1:37 PM
Thanks, @CarlosCinelli. I can't get the link to open, though. Would you have a title or some other means I could try to get to it?
 
 
1 hour later…
3:00 PM
@gung: Clarke, (2005), "The Phantom Menace: Omitted variable bias in econometric research", Conflict Management & Peace Science, 22, pp 341–352
2
 
 
1 hour later…
4:20 PM
@Scortchi the paper is by cognitive scientists. and not ecologists. At this point I would settle for arcsine, or any transform, as opposed to untransformed percent correct.
 
4:52 PM
Yup, that's exactly the one! Thanks, @CarlosCinelli & @Scortchi.
 
 
7 hours later…
11:57 PM
@StrongBad: Well the arcsine square root transformation isn't so bad for binomial data when the counts are not too low, the sample sizes about the same, & the main problem with an ANOVA on untransformed data is therefore heteroskedasticity.
 

« first day (2669 days earlier)      last day (316 days later) »