@gung from political science, probably this one citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/…

@StrongBad: Are ecologists the only ones who didn't know that the arcsine is asinine?.

@gung: Clarke, (2005), "The Phantom Menace: Omitted variable bias in econometric research", Conflict Management & Peace Science, 22, pp 341–352

@Scortchi the paper is by cognitive scientists. and not ecologists. At this point I would settle for arcsine, or any transform, as opposed to untransformed percent correct.

Yup, that's exactly the one! Thanks, @CarlosCinelli & @Scortchi.

@StrongBad: Well the arcsine square root transformation isn't so bad for binomial data when the counts are not too low, the sample sizes about the same, & the main problem with an ANOVA on untransformed data is therefore heteroskedasticity.