« first day (3301 days earlier)      last day (1864 days later) » 

Max Vernon
Max Vernon
05:12
twitter.com/iCatija/status/1218394829945819136?s=19
 
4 hours later…
Philᵀᴹ
Philᵀᴹ
09:23
Mornin’
McNets
McNets
10:01
MOning
Paul White Reinstate Monica
Paul White Reinstate Monica
10:35
in Tavern on the Meta on Meta Stack Exchange Chat, 12 hours ago, by George Stocker
To be clear about Shog: he didn’t know the GoFundMe was coming. He didn’t know i would do that. I spoke to him the night before it started and found out several things, but the relevant one was they were going to give him 8 weeks severance with onerous conditions for 10 years work
also Jon Ericson wrote jlericson.com/2020/01/17/leaving_stack.html which is quite revealing
2
McNets
McNets
10:52
dba.stackexchange.com/review/close/146519
@PaulWhiteReinstateMonica Why a question of 2013 with 33 upvotes appears now in the close queue?
Sorry, I've misread the date
But yet do not understand why it appears in the review queue,
Paul White Reinstate Monica
Paul White Reinstate Monica
Someone cast a fresh close vote
So just the usual process
McNets
McNets
Yep, I can see the votes history
Paul White Reinstate Monica
Paul White Reinstate Monica
@McNets The bit you can see just shows how reviewers voted, you can't see who cast votes outside of review (which obviously includes the first vote to close)
McNets
McNets 
Laurenz Albe reviewed this Jan 13 at 22:39: Close
Paul White Reinstate Monica
Paul White Reinstate Monica
Yes exactly. That was not the first vote to close that started the review.
McNets
McNets
11:02
@PaulWhiteReinstateMonica I suppose this is the first close vote
Paul White Reinstate Monica
Paul White Reinstate Monica
No
McNets
McNets
no?
Paul White Reinstate Monica
Paul White Reinstate Monica
Nope
McNets
McNets
Ok
Paul White Reinstate Monica
Paul White Reinstate Monica
Votes are mostly private
McNets
McNets
11:03
Sounds fair
Paul White Reinstate Monica
Paul White Reinstate Monica
The review list shows 3 votes to close, but the question shows close (4)
So even though review is completed, the question might still be closed by one more vote
It just wouldn't come via review
McNets
McNets
ok, thank you @PaulWhiteReinstateMonica
Paul White Reinstate Monica
Paul White Reinstate Monica
no worries
 
3 hours later…
Max Vernon
Max Vernon
13:43
I VtC'd it (to finish off the process) and have now voted to re-open it, since it seems valuable to me, and the answer is good
McNets
McNets
13:58
@MaxVernon may I know why VtC and then reopen it again?
Max Vernon
Max Vernon
The close clears it from the review queue and also allowed me to then vote to reopen it.
It was a mercy-killing if you will, with intemt to resurrect
McNets
McNets
14:16
@MaxVernon ok
 
3 hours later…
Tom V - Team Monica
Tom V - Team Monica
16:47
@McNets it was on hnq which might explain the voting
Andriy M
Andriy M
17:20
@McNets Also, it's not from 2013, it's from Monday this week
@MaxVernon As Paul said, the review had already been completed. Once McNets cast the third vote to keep it open, it was out of the review queue.
But seeing four close votes on a question can certainly be annoying, that I can understand
 
1 hour later…
McNets
McNets
18:26
@AndriyM yes, as I said, I've misread the date
Andriy M
Andriy M
@McNets Oh, you did say that, and it was immediately afterwards, too. Sorry
Evan Carroll
Evan Carroll
GOOD SATURDAY, @AndriyM
McNets
McNets
19:12
@AndriyM no worries

« first day (3301 days earlier)      last day (1864 days later) »