« first day (1903 days earlier)      last day (3275 days later) » 

17:00
Sometimes, I wish I was American.
I could vote for Trump and watch the world burn.
@Simon That is why I'm voting for Trump.
Very responsible choice.
@ThomasPornin haha yes I read that book, I was also subtly referencing several Augustine's laws :)
like
> Ninety percent of the time things will turn out worse than you expect. The other 10 percent of the time you had no right to expect so much.
or
> One-tenth of the participants produce over one-third of the output. Increasing the number of participants merely reduces the average output.
@TildalWave You read books? What a nurd.
@Simon yes, crazy huh?
here's one more
> Regulations grow at the same rate as weeds.
and what's most funny about it is that Augustine actually "proved" it ustream.tv/recorded/47936690
17:10
> Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct, not tried it.
sadly, not many regulators actually know how to regulate, or what
Overregulation is pretty bad
Complete deregulation is worse
Complete deregulation is anarchy
Minor deregulation is probably a good thing
Pretty much
@AaronHall What's wrong with anarchy? You see, it works if all people are decent. The fact that we have regulations proves that they aren't.
17:14
@TildalWave What's wrong with anarchy? Hang on...
simplifying and/or consolidating the regulations that are out there would probably help far more than anything else given the current mess
just to reduce the amazing administrative costs of complying with those regulations
@MarkBuffalo Yes, what is wrong with it? Or have you been brainwashed into confusing it with things like ludism?
The prohibition in the US - was that a good thing or a bad thing? Did the regulations against alcohol prove people are indecent?
@MarkBuffalo server not found
17:15
sec
This is complete deregulation in action
Pure, unbridled capitalism
@MarkBuffalo ah no no, that's people
the technical answer to "why won't free market anarchy work?" is simply "because market failures exist"
don't defer the problem
@AaronHall don't quite understand the question
externalities, public goods, asymmetric information, etc etc
17:15
@TildalWave Yeah, that's people... so some regulation is needed
@MarkBuffalo I stand by what I said
They're talking politics in the DMZ - someone should probably go regulate that. :D
@MarkBuffalo It works if all people are decent. The fact that we have regulations proves that they aren't.
that's why this room exists, to keep the politics away from the important chatrooms
@TildalWave Agreed
17:16
@AaronHall Flag it if you want to see regulation at work.
eeehhhh let's not
less pessimistically: The fact that we have scarcity is why regulations are needed.
hahaha no, don't
@Ixrec Are you saying our chat room is not important?
this particular conversation does not appear to be
17:18
wtf @ companies that sign me up for their shitty newsletters and require me to make an account/log in to unsubscribe
@Ixrec scarcity is just fact, you're thinking of distribution of wealth
I think scarcity alone is enough to do it
look up
there's no scarcity in space
do we make use of it?
of course not
and when we will, it will be just the same as before
@TildalWave There is lots of scarcity in space. Just not of space. Lots of space in space.
I'm failing to see how this is relevant to organisms that do not live in the vacuum of space
17:19
ha you see, you're thinking of vacuum
alright....................
this is getting too nerdy for me
Here we can witness nurdz arguing in their natural habitat: Internet chat rooms.
I'm gonna go eat lunch somehow
space isn't vacuum
actually, that you stand where it isn't vacuum proves it
do you guys have something more on topic to discuss?
17:20
there's a lot more of this where it came from ;)
@Ixrec haha no
@Ixrec have you seen the room description?
maybe we need to regulate what's on-topic here ... oh, wait
ok I finished lunch and now there's the temptation to eat more... much more...
@Ixrec We have a topic?
17:23
Generally, subjects such as @AviD's incompetence are more accepted.
@Simon AviD is quite competent
Markus, don't suck up.
there is no need to suck up. there's nothing he can offer me! Hey AviD, get on skype, I need a favor
@MarkBuffalo I'm @AviD's new manager. If you want to talk to him on Skype, that'll be 50 bitcoin, in advance, and go ahead and make it payable to me.
@Xander I already spent all my bitcoins on secret NSA documents, sorry :(((
17:27
there's a restaurant near me that accepts bitcoin
@MarkBuffalo Too bad to be you then. I guess you'll have to figure it out on your own. Let me know when you have some bitcoin.
0
A: Which elliptic curve should I use?

MalTo Pornin: The "nothing up my sleeve" principle is about mathematics, not psychology. Partially is precisely that it might be "something up one's sleeve". It is psychology to posit that partial is not magiv waving. Anyway, I believe the case of possible subversion has been shown. You again, impl...

er what
not an answer
i flagged it, but it's such a weird rant
that feels like an excellent example of things that clearly do not answer the question yet the NaA flag will be rejected since you have to read the question to tell it doesn't answer it
17:33
not here, what are you talking about?
our mods can read
lost my 2 hard-won rep points downvoting idiots today
can someone unpin that if something upsets you, walk away BS?
thanks
it was an attack vector, too easy to upset people to make them walk away, isn't it?
@Ohnana y = x is an elliptic curve.... right?
17:40
@DavidFreitag idfk
it might be
fuckin math shit
@Ohnana It's not.
@DavidFreitag oh okay
@Ohnana To be elliptic it must be of degree 3.
i see, they're the disco man graphs
@ThomasPornin to be elliptic it has to be eccentric
all my curves are elliptic ;)
that looks like bash shell scripting
so there's a neat trick to figure out gihub languages, go to the HEAD of the repo (click on the repo name) then click on the colored line. it shows a band chart breakdown of languages
BASH Programming
@Ohnana I love that feature
Can't find the head
67.6% php, 18.5% javascript, 13.9% css
ahh shell 100%
17:58
@BobEbert Let me show you
@BobEbert you just click on the repo name
there you go
i couldn't think of a better way to phrase it
@MarkBuffalo You got a different result?
@BobEbert No, I was viewing another repo
18:13
WOOOOOOOHOOOOOOOOOOOOO!
@DavidFreitag WHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
Beers/Whisky on me
This sounds like a man who just got his Internet installed.
now that's a party
@Simon No not until tomorrow
18:13
o
What's the "WOOOOHOOOO" all about then?
comeon, what's made you so happy?
We just got back word from a customer we shipped one of the products I designed as a beta tester. It works PERFECTLY
@DavidFreitag YEAH!
Badass dude.
@DavidFreitag Feels good!
Congratulations to your face
18:14
Now you better get a raise for this
@MarkBuffalo we're not out of the woods yet, there's still a lot of work to be done before we can start shipping this product to actual customers
But this is extremely good news.
shit I can't delete that gif, sorry folks
@DavidFreitag i like it
it's mostly static and it loops so it's not that bad to look at
@Ohnana It's also a constant reminder of how excited I am
you should be
you did a good job
and people recognize it....
they RECOGNIZE it
18:19
@StuW Yeah either that or someone thinks you're super nervous
mumbles incoherently
@MarkBuffalo did you forget to take your meds again?
mutters under his breath
Eugh there's a hair on my tongue and it's not mine
18:22
@DavidFreitag This happens to me a lot.
@Xander seriously?
rubs palms together greedily
this will be easy
@MarkBuffalo Apparently so.
ffs, you need to pass a background check first
I can do that, but that's boring
@MarkBuffalo You should read the fine print that says anyone who succeeds either rots in a hole in some remote jungle prison, or works for the gov't forever
this would actually be extremely easy
I wonder how much they're offering
@DavidFreitag Sounds like both outcomes are pretty similar to me.
18:26
@Simon Yeah but you can't get a donut in the middle of a jungle
@MarkBuffalo Gotta pass the background check first. Maybe they'll tell you then.
> And if you're wondering whether the hackers might disrupt a critical piece of the Department of Defense's infrastructure, the agency says that hackers will target a predetermined system that's not part of its critical operations.
lame
@DavidFreitag Very true.
I thought they were literally inviting open haxoring
@MarkBuffalo ...then what the fuck is the point?
18:26
I almost shit myself in excitement
@MarkBuffalo I did, and I'm at work.
the things I was planning to do... I had it all planned out in my head
Are they offering rewards?
Or they're pretty much asking for slaves.
yeah but this is a really boring/dumb way to do it
dumb?
How is it dumb that they don't want to risk actual prod infrastructure?
18:28
@Simon Not really prod more like entire critical infrastructure of the US
lulz
Anyone else seen this? troyhunt.com/2016/02/…
@Simon because prod is a lot different
@MarkBuffalo the bit I thought was lame was the "pre-authorised" bit so really they just want a cheap/free pen tst
Feb 24 at 15:30, by Ohnana
http://www.troyhunt.com/2016/02/controlling-vehicle-features-of-nissan.html?m=1
18:29
@RоryMcCune Yeah, pretty much
@Simon It's dumb because it's not really testing anything.
@Simon Righto.
@DavidFreitag Exactly. The people are the problem for the most part
You're the people.
People provide more vectors than anything else
18:30
They are basically testing people on shit they designed that they already know has problems
@Iszi what the fuck
@Simon what the fuck
@Simon If you're not testing in prod, then you're not testing. Amirite?
white-box testing in prod is one thing
@Iszi lulz
@MarkBuffalo Did you hear about the same incident with Jeep? Dude got his brakes disabled on the highway
18:31
@DavidFreitag yeah, I found out how to do it
@MarkBuffalo rip
they fixed it
> GET https://[redacted].com/orchestration_1111/gdc/ACRemoteRequest.php?RegionCode=NE&‌​lg=no-NO&DCMID=&VIN=SJNFAAZE0U60XXXXX&tz=Europe/Paris
lmfao
ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahahahahahahahaha
@DavidFreitag Not quite the same. Per the article, the Leaf only allows access to telemetrics and climate control. Not actual vehicle control like start/stop or driving functions.
@Iszi Yeah well same sort of incident.
@MarkBuffalo wut
The worst is the fact that the VIN is enumerable.
18:34
@DavidFreitag Yeah, that was a given example of the API request to do some thing.
@Iszi Ah, heard about it on a podcast last week. More automotive derp-ery.
And if you want to target someone specifically, find his car and take a picture of his window.
@Simon Meh, why take over some random car when you can walk out to the parking lot and get a VIN of someone you might actually know?
:27969287 Stop trying to fiddle with some person's car
@Iszi Yup.
18:35
@Iszi Or just hit them with a $5 wrench
@Iszi you still wouldn't be stuck in a blizzard in it would you?
gonna go for a walk
@Iszi lulz
@MarkBuffalo look for some VIN numbers, right.
18:35
@RоryMcCune Since when are you lulzing?
That was your 9th lulz, congrats roro: chat.stackexchange.com/search?q=lulz&user=3249&room=151
@Iszi Also, because you have no ties to some random person. The cops might be able to find you based on who knows the person who got messed with.
@Simon ooh, I don't I'm super srs_face pentester, but I was suggesting that lulz are a motivation factor for some
@TildalWave If you were paying attention at all, you shouldn't. Highest direct physical risk is that someone might drain the battery while you're not using the car.
@RоryMcCune I seeeeeeee.
@Simon if it's possible some dude/dudette will do it from their bedroom for the lulz/acclaim on a forum somewhere/etc /etc
18:37
Now, highest indirect physical risk: Stalker takes the VIN of some gal he's got the hots for. Pulls telemetry data to figure out where she lives...
@Iszi Yes thanks for pasting the xkcd I was quoting
@Iszi Dude, have you checked what's the weather like up north? Imagine being stuck on the road in the middle of a blizzard, or just stuck and outside like -40 ... would you feel safe in it while some knob half way around the world plays with your AC and drains its battery? I mean it's potentially a deadly situation
batter
^_^
@Simon I wish someone would drain my batter ( ͜ಠ ᴥ ͜ಠ )
2
ô_ô
18:38
hahaha
@TildalWave Again, just pay attention. If you know the car at all, you know how far you can go on a certain percentage of charge. If you get in the car and it doesn't have that charge plus some wiggle room, you find somewhere to charge it or just don't go - and get your arse back inside meanwhile.
Oh no, I'm getting Dell ads? I'd rather get dildo ads.
@Simon What about Delldo ads?
@Iszi cyber-stalky stuff is just going to get worse. I reckon the next gen of smartphones will have sub-metre GPS once they get Galileo/beidou support that + IoT stuff controlled from phones and stalker-paradise!
@DavidFreitag Meeeeh.
18:40
@Iszi oh sure, stay up like probably a whole night and freezing while you pay attention to all the ways your car is trying to kill you... right. You know what? I'll just drive something else
heck people are doing "smart-locks" on their house controlled from phone... if that gets pwned, well you can imagine
@RоryMcCune Wanna get even worse? You don't even need to go into the parking lot for a VIN sometimes. Certain jurisdictions make the VIN public via court documents or even just traffic citations.
Yeah I don't like that at all, I'll keep using physical keys.
@RоryMcCune Yeah but at the same token pretty much every lock on a common door is pick-able sooooo...
@DavidFreitag sure but it requires geo-location to do. If you're a stalker, pwn the phone you get geo-location (know where they live) and access to lock
18:41
Those usually have a slot for a key anyway in case the electronic goes all bananas.
people get regularly stuck all night long on the road in blizzards, and there's little anyone can do about it... your and possibly your passengers lives depend on the car being able to provide power
@TildalWave Oh, I most certainly agree. What I was getting at, for current owners of the affected cars, is that an attacker's capability to catastrophically impact their lives via direct control of the vehicle is extremely limited and can be largely mitigated.
with a physical lock you have to find their door and then stand there mucking about with it
@RоryMcCune Sure, connectivity makes it easier, I'm just saying locks really are a false sense of security. That is unless you have really good locks (and most people do not)
Especially when compared to the friggin' Jeeps.
18:42
@RоryMcCune Yeah and as we all know, only Brits can muck about.
@Iszi well, I can think of an easy attack right now, and it doesn't take a genius to know what to do and when
@DavidFreitag sure not saying locks are good but that "cyber locks" make it actively worse
of course, I won't, but that doesn't guarantee others won't
they combine the crapness of ordinary locks, with the nice effect of pwn your phone == pwn your house
@TildalWave If "what" is @Simon's mom, and "when" is last night... already done by many.
18:43
hrrr hrrr
wot
@RоryMcCune Especially if the API allows someone to query for potential targets
@DavidFreitag yeah and we know how good IoT companies are at API security.....
then heck just activate your "smart CCTV" cameras wait till they know you're hooked up to your VR rig
and done
@Simon Derp. I just implied that your mom was involved in an orgy last night. And that bukkake may have taken place. Well, that last part wasn't so clearly implied before. But now it is.
@RоryMcCune Or cast pr0n to your chromecast when your parents are visiting
18:44
That was not a "I'm confused" wot.
@Iszi I think that's more explicit than implicit now, in more than one way
@Iszi The fuck is wrong with you.
@DavidFreitag yeah that's back into lulz territory tho'
@RоryMcCune Like @Simon's mom last night too, right?
re_wot
18:45
@DavidFreitag So many things.
NSFW - this made me laugh for nearly 10 minutes: youtube.com/watch?v=kOjUL8LwUsE&feature=youtu.be
@RoryAlsop How NSFW? Boobies?
@DavidFreitag nah - just swearing
RORO WHAT IS THAT NEW GRAVATAR
@RoryAlsop hey you changed your avatar!
18:46
lots opf swearing
I GOTTA GET USED TO IT NOW
FFS
oh - didn't mean to change it here - just for Deep Web
I got some nice VINs
@RoryAlsop You don't see your own avatar in the bottom left-hand corner?
@DavidFreitag still showing me the previous one
18:48
Anyone wanna buy some VINs? Please, man, I got these CHEESEBURGERS, man.
@DavidFreitag yes - exactly that
@RоryMcCune yup
@RoryAlsop Holy shit at 1:40!
Althought TBH it was new when I got here like 4 hours or so ago
18:49
@Iszi some of them are really bad
@RоryMcCune uuuuuggggggggh IoT
Internet of Things is going to be the death of me
Man, I don't think I ever realized before just how much switching the driving side can throw off your perspective on things. I'm having a hard time making sense of some of these situations without thinking too hard on 'em.
@MarkBuffalo Internet of Twinkies
I hope I can live long, but not long enough to not be uploaded into some database of humanity
Wow. "F*ing indicate!" Really? Never heard it called "indicating" before. More like, "Use your damn blinker!" or such.
They'll probably INNER JOIN me with some weirdo.
@Iszi That's an english thing.
@Iszi yup - British thing
Lots of British swearing :-)
@Iszi You guys don't call it a "flasher"?
in case you ever needed to know how to do it
@Simon that's something else
18:54
o pls roro I'm not talking about ta tas
@DavidFreitag I like that one
@Simon Well either tater tots or dangly bits
I like dangly things.
RORO THAT'S NOT YOUR USUAL AVATAR
@Simon Turn signal, blinker... that's about it.
@Iszi Weird. Most people will say "flasher" here, where did we get that?
18:56
@Simon but it is me
@Simon Reddit.
@RoryAlsop I'm not even sure :(
@Simon Must be your French side.
@DavidFreitag wat
@RoryAlsop It looks like an American football player
18:56
@Iszi Most-likely, yes.
@DavidFreitag It's a Viennese ball mask
Why is it that my flashers have always been big fat ugly women
2
Oh well
@RoryAlsop And you're wearing it on your face?!
@DavidFreitag I just hit CTRL+F5 and it changed, but still nothing out of the ordinary. Back to Doktor Mayhem.
@MarkBuffalo because that's the kind of place you visit?
18:57
@Iszi Back to? It was Doktor Mayhem before too...
@Iszi I'm fairly sure this wasn't the exact avatar though.
@DavidFreitag hahahahaha - I just got that
@RoryAlsop :]
@DavidFreitag But didn't he have a Bobba Fett mask or something?
@RoryAlsop I've had old ladies flash me. I don't know why
18:57
@Simon In my Gravatar list I appear to have 13 different Doktor Mayhem pictures
@Iszi No...?
@RoryAlsop Freak.
@Iszi yes...
@Iszi That was during Christmas you donut.
@RoryAlsop My gravatar is full of futurama characters.
With and without santa hats.
18:58
@Simon I blame caching. And lots of it.
I'll be walking by, and they'll look out at the window at me... and I'll look at them... suddenly flashed by these disgusting, fat, droopy... things.
I just want to throw up
Don't be oldist.
@MarkBuffalo You should throw up, maybe it will teach them a lesson.
@MarkBuffalo @RoryAlsop's balls?
This has happened at least 3 times
...it was the same person every time though
18:59
@Iszi Please stop, you're just being disgusting, and not funny.
dayum dovid totally had enough of your shit

« first day (1903 days earlier)      last day (3275 days later) »