You shouldn't care, really

I didn't even read the comments - I don't care neither

There's a lot more interesting things to do :)

we all need to vent at some time.

the problem with doing it here in the SE chat rooms is, the Be Nice rule sometimes interferes. (just saying)

Do any of you watch the soccer world cup?

in either case, I've had my own share of people being evil and causing myself problems, even as a moderator. I usually go away and do other things when that happens :P

@BenoitEsnard I don't, but I know people who do.

Well, they won in 1966 if I remember correctly

And thay at least won a match yesterday :P

France has won in 1998, that's old too - but still present in our memories

la, la la, la, la, lalalalalala, la la, la, la

@JoshuaJones 4 times i think

Rugby has a lot of more dominant teams

Uruguay is 3, and I wouldn't call them dominant

2 times actually, I was wrong.

1930 & 1950.

1st & 4th world cups.

well, Italy have 4 cup, not oven in Russia

well, the first world cup was on Urugay

Russia has none, but managed to win 5 - 0 against Saudi Arabia in the opening match

1998 was in france

@Kepotx good old times

never did the calculation but it would be funny to see how much a team win when they are at home

I was too young to really see them in the time, but as you said, it's still present

I was 6. I don't remember any of the matches, but I remember everyone in front of their TVs.

That looked like an important day for sure.

I don't care about football, except the world cups, because I love stats.

@BenoitEsnard what do you mean by that?

I just don't care about soccer. :D

I just love world cups (and European one) because there are a lot of matches, so a lot of scores, and I love numbers.

oh

I don't do anything special with those numbers, but I still find them interesting.

@JoshuaJones I think you can use the magic link [security.se] in comments to link to Information Security

just a tip

Information Security

Oh, that works. Didn't know that.

@JoshuaJones the magic link he posted is transformed to a link to the homepage. :)

Actually:

These are shortcut to frequently used links

quite usefull

hm?

I admit I'm still proof-reading

Not sure I'll have a look

Need to re read the question

Your question is about the behaviour, so I think addressing this at the start makes sense

Now I'm probably gonna get some heat, but :shrug:

I've pinged mods, but they seem to be afk

Well, tigger isn't, but he's on mobile for now so can't

my pleasure

Don't mind me

I've been here for years

Oh, people do care.

Trust this

mhmm

Well, chat has always be a bit more 'tolerant' for venting, within reason.

in chat yes

on site? not sure

/help

ah

@JoshuaJones mhmm. That was good.

I don't think he ever did, did he?

Apologising

And mod-hammer strike

All has been moved to chat

Apologies it took me a wee while. I was travelling

@RoryAlsop at least it was taken care of :)

(travel is the bane of all of us mods' exsitence - people want instant gratification but sometimes we're traveling and can't :P)

ahah

@JoshuaJones The best thing if you feel you are getting riled up is just to step away from the keyboard/site for a bit

Flag it and one of the mods will get it

It's best if you don't let yourself be goaded into things

no worries - I still have a little cleanup to do

@JoshuaJones one of the trade-offs I have discovered. Moderating eats into your time for posting questions and answers

@JoshuaJones My rep graph clearly indicates each time I take on modding a new site :-)

the graph flattens out

@JoshuaJones The good thing is there is always more to learn. When the site was new I was often getting to questions first, with the best answer. Now there are loads of people way better than me.

@JoshuaJones I blame timezones

I get home from work and find so many things answered by (probably) US folks in their morning

me too. Morning. coffee break. lunch. coffee break. evening. night

To be honest, that's the sort of thing that would be great if everyone did it. Very few take the time to edit.

So thank you for that

I need to find time to browse the queues

Well, in fact I need to take time. I'm sure I have some

@JoshuaJones no problem. Have a good evening (I'm guessing European timezone)

yay - me too

probably did (sorry) - old brain. Forgets everything :-)

@RoryAlsop Well, editing is hard. Since my English is not perfect, I'm often reluctant to edit, because I don't want to add grammar errors in a post I could have misunderstood.

@BenoitEsnard it really is, yes. And as mentioned, if the poster or editor has language challenges, it is even harder

But when you can, it really helps

Sometimes I would prefer not having 2k+ reputation, and having my edits audited by others

I finally got a popular question (security.stackexchange.com/questions/187912/…) and someone marked it as a duplicate.

There's 1 close vote on it, presumably for the duplicate mark. As of right now, there's only this annoying box on top of the question telling me to edit my question. Do I need to do anything about it, or just ignore it? It's not a duplicate, is obviously not a duplicate, and given how much attention the question has gotten, I think most people also realize it's not a duplicate.

@YetAnotherRandomUser yup - don't worry about it

OK, cool.

@JoshuaJones Why did you post (basically) the same comment three times to this question? security.stackexchange.com/questions/188073/…

@JoshuaJones So far I'd say they're probably new and haven't realized this is a QA and not a forum

that one did seem rather vague and very off-topic, but their first question was at least relevant even if it was unclear