« first day (973 days earlier)      last day (2660 days later) » 

8:00 PM
Did you solve any from 4?
 
It's done, I'm about to start 5
 
Wait, you solved 4? Nice - that tripped a lot of people up
 
I told you, I'm fast at logic puzzles :P
 
I can hardly wait.
 
Even not knowing the rules?
 
8:01 PM
5.4 - destroyer of hopes.
 
Good luck on set 5, and I mean that sincerely.
 
@Deusovi Well, no, I know what the rule is now.
 
Muahahaaaa
Famous last words.
Let us know when you hit 5.4
I'm still stuck there.
 
Sid
Ok, tell me now what is Set 4. I can't sleep otherwise.
 
@Deusovi Has anyone else gotten to 6 do you know?
 
8:02 PM
@Rubio Don't think so.
 
Sid
PLEASE. Puppy Eyes
 
Haha, clever clever, I see what he did in set 1
 
Hm?
Oh, the "sneak-peeks" of future symbols?
 
With the symbols
 
Yep, all those symbols will become important.
 
8:05 PM
hmm, interesting change of pace
 
Set 5? Have you figured out the rules?
 
I have one rule for sure, (the one used in set 1-4) but I need to figure out the expansion placed in 5
 
0
Q: My second Add-A-Gram

Ertai87OK, my last one was solved in like 30 seconds, let's try for a better one. A pirate's favourite word inside the leader of an ancient pantheon inside moved quickly inside espouse one's opinions violently inside to increase one's skill level inside rice-and-cheese-based French food inside increase...

 
That's where everyone else is stuck right now.
 
geez Deus. ^ fast enough?
 
8:10 PM
?
 
I answered a question in 17 seconds.
 
ah
 
it shows 73 seconds to me
 
Er, apparently a minute and 13 seconds. I guess the time since posting didn't update until I refreshed the page.
 
well - post to answer
still, that's barely enough time to read and type :)
You're gonna give that OP a complex.
 
8:14 PM
Still haven't beaten my old record of 37 seconds, unfortunately.
 
Let me give you an "easy" riddle, according to my 5-year-old daughter. "What is yellow, white and orange"?
 
An orange?
 
A chair.
And what is "white and orange"?
 
@incesterror21 Where do you get your oranges that they're yellow white and orange? Please tell me you've not been eating those.
Wrong reply, :P
 
Well there's white and orange inside
 
8:17 PM
The answer to the second is a "clown fish".
According to her.
 
True, hadn't through about the inside
@MariaDeleva closed as too broad :P
 
Well, we can excuse her - she is just 5. :D
 
I know
 
Her riddles are always like that. :D
 
NO EXCUSES. THE CLOSEHAMMER OF JUSTICE SHOWS NO MERCY.
 
8:19 PM
@Deusovi I bow to you. :D
 
#dontBeNiceToChildren
 
hhahaha :)
And did you know that when the pig grows big, it becomes a bull? Another one of her deductions. :D
Children can be hilarious
 
apparently
 
I love children.
Juicy and tender.
with new potatoes and a nice red wine.
 
Juicy? I hope you do not eat them :D
Yeah, wine solves all my problems, too. :D
 
8:23 PM
@dcfyj, how's set 5 going for you?
 
I've a modest proposal for you, one that helped me solve some of my problems.
 
Not finding the balancing numbers
 
@Rubio do tell
 
meh. I hate when I type those backwards.
 
Ah, I haven't heard of this proposal. Seems funny. :)
 
Sid
8:28 PM
Hey @Deusovi, Can you give me some example of a cryptic clue with two wordplays and no def?
 
No, because that's not a proper cryptic clue.
 
@MariaDeleva It's rather famous.
 
Or is it infamous?
 
@Rubio, well, I guess it is not so famous in my country - have no idea why...
I have heard the author, but not the work.
 
0
Q: I need help solving this riddle! It's driving me crazy!

Hobbit78Both a noun and a verb, but issued in a tiny blurb. An airplane today, trash tomorrow, all of these require a bit of power. Delivered via server, mail or store; throw it away, or use it some more.

 
8:33 PM
Hey Sp!
 
Hey :)
 
@Sp3000: Have you tried Witless yet? It's pretty good.
18
Q: WITLESS - A Puzzling Journey

TheGreatEscaperIMPORTANT! READ ME: The only 'puzzle' parts of this are the links, titled 'Set X', 'Inscription X', or 'Constellation X'. Everything else is flavortext, apart from this readme section, although the flavortext does tell you that the meaning of the inscriptions is not supposed to be deduced until...

 
@Ankoganit [h]OP[e] + TIM + IS + T[his]?
 
@Sp3000 That's gotta be it!
@Ankoganit: I loved that clue.
 
Probably not any time soon unfortunately, took a quick glance yesterday when I saw you guys solving though :P
 
8:42 PM
You should try to solve it! It's a lot of fun.
 
ONce I knew the rule 1-4 were easy, 5 is still evading me though
 
That's where everyone else is stuck right now - I'm writing up my (partial) answer, and calling that one "The Second Roadblock".
(The first is set 4.)
 
I had no issues with set 4, is the rule perspective change the same?
 
Hm? The rule perspective change?
 
Well, the rule never actually changes, just your perspective of it
 
8:45 PM
Huh. That was clueing taking the heart of hope? I totally didn't read that into it
 
As you've probably guessed, you should be learning the meaning of the square.
 
of course
 
I think the meaning of it is - 5.4 .... and, back to square one
 
@Sp3000 I just noticed, but what's the definition?
 
@dcfyj The whole thing! It's an &lit clue.
 
8:46 PM
@dcfyj it's a &lit. the whole thing is the def
 
ah
 
hence the ! at the end
 
Yeah, I don't read into those
Makes me surprised I ever solved one
 
Cryptics are fun! You should do more of them. :P
 
I'm pretty ok at building them, solving (like most other puzzles) not so much
 
8:50 PM
Hey Chris!
 
First few sets seem simple enough, will have to sit down and try some other time though (will probably be busy soon, and you know why :P)
 
@Sp3000 Yep! I'm leaving for Boston in a few hours.
 
Because you sir, have a C4 to write :P
 
That too.
 
(or ma'am)
 
8:51 PM
Should I wait for confirmation first?
 
That's definitely correct.
 
@Sp3000 May as well start writing, no?
 
True :P
 
Gives you more time to make it epic :P
Let's not make it rotten though, right @Deusovi?
 
He gave an az126 hash of 121 somewhere
 
8:53 PM
I'm not apologizing for that clue.
 
lol, I'm not saying you should
 
it has 121 for its az126
 
@Deusovi Anywhere but here, it would probably be considered too obscure.
 
cool, sounds good to me
 
It would, afterall, ruin your evil appearance
 
8:54 PM
so - even if it wasn't obviously right, it is now :)
 
Gonna need to transcript to see what you're talking about :P gimme a sec...
 
@Sp3000 I can tell you
"It makes wet god - disgusting! (6)"
previous C4
 
Nov 23 '16 at 16:27, by dcfyj
answer: Rotten (rot10)
 
it's a double def!
ROTTEN and ROT-TEN
 
I'm positive someone other than myself solved that
 
8:55 PM
Sconibulus did
 
I believe I was simply reiterating
 
@dcfyj I think the above quotation was just the explanation.
 
5 hours ago, by Ankoganit
Alright, the A1Z26 sum is 121 and I'm off for now
 
Nov 23 '16 at 16:17, by Sconibulus
@Deusovi I think I hate you
see, that's how you can tell he solved it
(that and the answer right afterwards)
 
I'd have a question mark instead of an exclamation mark but otherwise seems fine, although a longer pair of words would have been fairer :P
 
8:56 PM
Well, I gave the words verbatim in the clue. And I found those manually. :P
 
I'd be concerned if you didn't give them verbatim :P
 
I mean, I could've used synonyms to clue them.
That'd be unfair though.
 
Just a tad
 
Very much so, hence why I'd be concerned :P (given the unexpected mechanic, it'd be like an indirect anagram if you synonym'd it)
 
Pretty sure it'd be worse than that
 
8:58 PM
I've done unexpected mechanics with synonyms before.
"Trained to weave stiff footwear (8)" was one of my favorites.
 
Sid
@Deusovi You are not permitted to solve my latest puzzle. :-)
 
Fair enough!
 
Go SP!
 
If weave does what I think it does (opposite of odd/even) then that's fine, since it clues what to do with the letters. But "it makes" is a backwards inference.
 
@Sp3000 Yep. COLD + SHOE --> SCHOOLED
 
9:01 PM
Nice :)
 
I still think that one was mean :)
 
"It [verb characteristic of object being described]" is an alternate, sometimes acceptable form of definition.
Here, [verb COOBD] is "makes _ [into] _".
(Oh, and thanks! I loved how well the surface reading there worked)
 
I guess I'm fine with it because I know a friend who weaved FBI with ARC :P
 
heh, clever :P
@Sid I don't remember seeing any of those clues. Am I just being forgetful again?
 
Sid
Oh, The final clue is the perfect one. :-)
 
9:06 PM
Ah, alright!
 
Sid
Which they have to find out.
Okay, I gotta sleep. It's 2:30 local time here. I hope my puzzle would be solved by the time I get up.Good bye. :-)
 
0
Q: Metacryptic Puzzle (Part 1)

SidOkay, this is stolen from Matt's Metacryptic puzzle. Former PM, a backless Camera with an opposing kill. (7) Exertion without myself gets a headless era;Puzzling? (7) Affection is the body of the toil mixed with the heartless villainy. (4) 7 is the number of letters of the final word.

 
Nice Rubio
Now to parse the first one properly
Why did he delete?
 
9:21 PM
I.. don't know?
@Silenus Why delete yours?
 
I'm pleasantly surprised that WITLESS hasn't been solved yet
 
@Volatility Deus is getting there
everyone else is stuck on set 5
or earlier
 
Yep!
I'm at the summit.
It's hard.
 
@ChrisCudmore can you delete your comment to remove the spoilers
i added what he had, I'm trying to finish the construction for #1 and have no idea how hehe
@Deusovi or anyone, any idea how to get ON from "an opposing kill" ? (or, possibly, any rightward substring of AMERON)
 
Nope.
I only looked at the final (meta-) clue there.
 
9:34 PM
done
 
it's obviously right, but I have no idea how he got to CAMERON with the wordplay
 
Could opposing be a reversal? Can we get a left substring of NOREMA from KILL?
 
@Rubio David Cameron, former PM of UK
David William Donald Cameron, PC (/ˈkæmᵊrÉ™n/; born 9 October 1966) is a British politician who was the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom from May 2010 to July 2016. He served as the Leader of the Conservative Party from December 2005 to July 2016, and was Member of Parliament for Witney from June 2001 to September 2016. Cameron identifies as a One-Nation Conservative, and has been associated with both economically liberal and socially liberal policies. Born in London to wealthy upper middle-class parents, Cameron was educated at Heatherdown School, Eton College, and Brasenose College, Oxford...
 
Who was his opposition leader?
 
The definition is fine. We need the wordplay.
 
9:39 PM
Yeah, my bad
 
The Leader of Her Majesty's Most Loyal Opposition (more commonly known as the Leader of the Opposition) is the politician who leads the official opposition in the United Kingdom. The Leader of the Opposition by convention leads the largest party not within the government: where one party wins outright this is the party leader of the second largest political party in the House of Commons. The current Leader of the Opposition is Jeremy Corbyn, leader of the Labour Party, who was elected to the leadership of the Labour Party on 12 September 2015. The Leader of the Opposition is normally viewed as...
There's a chart in there.
Nothing jumps out.
 
Huh. So weird.
We don't often find ourselves with the right answer and no clue how to show it :)
 
Seems like you're looking for a word that could mean NO
Opposing flips it
Maybe?
 
Witless partial answer posted.
 
oh
i got it
 
9:42 PM
Hey @Rand!
 
@Silenus Ah, OK. Makes sense.
Evening all.
 
@Deusovi can we take a peek at 5? >.<
 
I've posted hints for the sets too.
 
Ah ok
 
That feeling when the definition of the &lit you have in mind isn't quite correct...
 
9:44 PM
You may find my first hint for #5 to be useful.
(Please, use the hints sparingly.)
 
@Deusovi Flagged for swearing on the starboard :-P
 
@Randal'Thor Have you tried that puzzle? You'll see exactly why I swore. :P
(And besides, I don't think there's any rule against it as long as it's not excessive.)
 
Which puzzle was it?
 
Witless.
 
@Deusovi I was just kidding :-)
 
9:45 PM
(I know!)
20
Q: WITLESS - A Puzzling Journey

TheGreatEscaperIMPORTANT! READ ME: The only 'puzzle' parts of this are the links, titled 'Set X', 'Inscription X', or 'Constellation X'. Everything else is flavortext, apart from this readme section, although the flavortext does tell you that the meaning of the inscriptions is not supposed to be deduced until...

 
Blimey.
TL;DR.
 
puzzles that you have to learn the rules of as you solve.
 
@Deusovi There are only two bears currently asking me rather insistently for the answers to Set 5, but they seem to be growing increasingly agitated. Is it ok if I peek?
 
Twelve sets of five puzzles each. The fifth set tripped everyone up because of a new symbol being introduced. I solved it after a long time.
 
I had several ideas. One, maybe, would work, but it feels so wrong, and I don't want to push on without having a good feel there.
 
9:47 PM
Does it give a unique solution to all 5?
@Rubio I suppose that's acceptable, as long as they've made it clear that the promise of those solutions is what's keeping you alive.
 
I think it did. I was toying with it yesterday, haven't really looked again today
 
I'm curious to see what it was.
 
it had to do with symmetries and intersections.
 
Nope.
 
9:49 PM
make it a real url?
 
Add http://.
 
that's how you do it
 
Very good
 
huh.
Huh!
 
Huh?
 
9:50 PM
read the cleartext for 5
 
Did you get it? Or was my hint just surprising?
Yep, I know.
 
didn't expect that. :)
well - more correctly - I considered it, then discarded it as I didn't know what else it would be
 
Hey @Deusovi, I need some help polishing a cryptic clue - can I shoot you an email about it (and prevent you from being able to post an answer when it goes up)?
 
@Randal'Thor Is that second one your real motive? :P
(yeah, sure!)
 
It's good enough for me. I'm gonna start cc:ing you on every puzzle I do. ;)
 
9:52 PM
Heh.
 
(Actually I think I'm safe. I'm trying to remember if you've even answered any of mine, and I'm drawing a blank)
 
Every time I'm thinking of something for set 5, 1.2 screws me up :P
 
I answered Koffka Words.
 
I'm very pleased with the overall theme of this puzzle, and the surface reading of most of the clues - there's just one which isn't really up to scratch.
 
@boboquack Maybe 1.2 isn't the best control then.
 
9:53 PM
Now to find your email address from however long ago the metapuzzle email was ...
 
It's on my profile.
deusovi@mail.com
 
There, you've gone and given me the solution.
 
Oh yeah you did. And you sort of answered Christmas Words, but that one's not actually fully answered yet
 
Needs a spoilertag on that.
:-P
 
Huh?
 
9:54 PM
@Deusovi Though I'm sure @TheGreatEscaper wouldn't make something that wasn't supposed to help...
 
@Deusovi The solution to the puzzle of "finding Deusovi's email address".
 
@Randal'Thor Oh. :P
@boboquack I never said he would.
Right now, just focus on set 5.
 
@Deusovi That's why I'm using it as a control. And it's so annoying, trying to find something symmetrical in () and ()
Okay...
 
0
Q: What is a Powerful Wordâ„¢?

Mike QThis is based on the What is a Word/Phraseâ„¢ series of Phraseâ„¢ and Wordâ„¢ puzzles, started by JLee. If a word follows a certain rule, then I call it a Powerful Wordâ„¢. If it violates this rule, then it is not a Powerful Wordâ„¢. Use the example word lists below to find the rule. Powerful Wordâ„¢, N...

0
Q: What are your first steps when attempting to solve a puzzle?

SneaksterWhen you begin undertaking a puzzle, be it long or short, mathematical or not, where do you begin? Do you start by making a bank of known information, or do you try to find patterns? What works best for you?

0
Q: Rendering the number 10,958 with the string 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Bernardo Recamán SantosBrazilian mathematician Inder Taneja has found a way of expressing every number between 1 and 11,1111, except 10,958, by inserting mathematical operators in between the numbers 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 and evaluating the expression. He did so using the four basic arithmetic operations, exponentiation, c...

 
goldurnit
 
9:58 PM
CCCC: Cruciverbalist's song about Australian automobile (9)
In case we need it. Lacking in ideas so archive diving.
 
I was close to figuring the squares out, too
 
@Deusovi Sent!
 
Oh no, Aussie trivia.
@Rubio What happened?
 
Oh, did someone solve Will's CCCC?
 
@Randal'Thor Yeah, last night
 
9:59 PM
What does CCCC mean again?
 
chat cryptic clue chain
 
CCCC: CCCC (20)
 
the game in chat we play where whoever solves a cryptic clue posts another one
 
That's not a cryptic clue. :P
 
10:00 PM
@Sp3000 You're Aussie, right? (I think I remember you from way back in the Old Daysâ„¢ of Puzzling, unless I'm getting you mixed up with someone else.)
 
@Deusovi when I mentioned symmetries I actually was referring to exactly the right thing, just in a hazy way
I just didn't connect the other bit to it
 
@boboquack You're allowed to do whatever you want.
The rules never change: only your interpretation of them.
 
@Randal'Thor Yes I am :)
 
Right now, focus on set 5.
 
@Rubio HIVELESS?
 
10:02 PM
yah
don't blame me ;)
 
I think I'll have to train harder in order to solve all those things you're talking about!
 
Wow Rand, those restrictions you mentioned are fairly strict. I assume it does have to be that answer, too?
 
interesting. so @Deusovi I guess I don't get this after all, because the idea I had worked for 5.2 but not 5.1 lol
 
@Rubio Interesting! I'm curious to hear about it.
 
I have no idea what they are talking about, and I have been here for half a year...
3
 
10:05 PM
Hm? I can explain things.
Probably.
 
Never mind, I'll stay with my simple riddles!
 
that was for you @Deusovi :)
 
@Deusovi I'd kind of like it to be, but it's not necessary; those other restrictions are more important.
 
or is your plaintext hint entirely literal?
 
My plaintext hint is completely literal.
 
10:08 PM
I'm just bad at cryptic clues :)
2
 
That first half of the idea you had goes against my hint.
 
Yes, clearly. hehe
 
@Randal'Thor So other words are possible too? Your clue structure would be possible, but the surface reading might be bad.
 
I think just given that hint, there's only one possible solution for 5.1. I have no idea how to interpret it though :/
 
I think 5.1 has to have a, well, straightforward solution
 
10:11 PM
right
 
@Deusovi Hang on, I'll send you another email.
 
I'm just not clear (yet) what the new toy is doing in there (yet)
 
Heh, "toy".
 
More like "toyer"
 
ohhhhh.
 
10:12 PM
Oh?
 
OHHhhhh.
 
Oh!
 
oh :/
 
It's what makes 5.2 and 5.3 solutions unique, isn't it?
 
Well, considering that all the solutions are unique...
 
10:13 PM
Well, yes, but if they weren't there at all, those two wouldn't be unique
 
That's a true statement, yes.
 
but it tells you which of the possibilities is the right one
 
I will now do a brute-force on 5.2 and 5.3
 
Yes, that logically follows from the other statements.
 
Hmm I get the feeling I might have done something slightly off with my CCCC
 
10:15 PM
Have you figured out what the symbol means yet?
 
I think so? hehe
 
Does it make the set unique?
 
interestingly enough, it makes me still have questions on 5.1, but - yes
 
Wait, really?
 
CCCC: Cruciverbalist's song about gold automobile (9)
 
10:17 PM
Ah, Australian = gold = AU
 
^^ definitely fine now, but I've just given some letters away...
 
yep :P
 
Yeah AU = Australian doesn't quite cut it
 
yeah I don't think that would have been legit
 
Australia, maybe, but not Australian
 
10:18 PM
I had that as a possible bit, but was thinking more AUS.
 
I had the clue with gold originally but wanted to switch it up, not realising what I did :P
 
@Randal'Thor: The above message is for you.
 
@Deusovi do eyes care about all 4 directions?
 
I'm not going to answer that question.
 
Whatever. I thought you might have an error there. I'm not going to tell you then.
 
10:24 PM
@Sp3000 Should have done "Australian online", like I did for PT a while back ;-)
 
You're reading my solution? D:
I mean, it's possible that I have an error. Still though, you should be solving for yourself :c
 
Why would someone put something on the internet if they didn't want people to read it...
 
@incesterror21 To get rep?
:-P
 
@Randal'Thor I think in the context Australian might still work, but didn't want to risk it while I'm away :P
 
I'm reading it because I don't have time to solve it but still want to see how well it's done!
 
10:25 PM
I think this puzzle is worth getting through on your own, even if the answer is right there
 
@Randal'Thor I think Deusovi will get all of the rep available
 
It takes through, what, set 4 max to see how well it was done :)
Everything after that just magnifies it
 
@Randal'Thor Online's a nice way though
 
What do you think of my feedback section here? Too harsh?
8
A: Edward and Bruce

rand al'thorEdward and Bruce After spending quite a while researching Robert the Bruce, his younger brother Edward Bruce, and other related historical figures, I hit upon the idea of considering Turning my back on you A la a dramatic insult Like Edward and Bruce QUWZTF Z'QAQ UXTRO SXURM YYYQZ MMMD' ...

 
@Randal'Thor I think you captured my frustration at looking at that puzzle
Required hints aren't hints, they're essential elements to the puzzle and should be given as such.
 
10:29 PM
Yep, agreed
 
I mean, it looked like it could be a great puzzle.
It just ... didn't live up to its potential, sadly.
I'm tempted to switch my upvote to a downvote.
 
Enigma posted up a set of puzzles that were all similarly inscrutable
I hope the rest are better, but I fear they're not
(and this is why I don't upvote until a puzzle is solved, with rare exceptions)
 
Please see the feedback section I just edited into my answer - and apologies in advance if it feels too harsh :-) I suggest you un-spoiler-tag Hint 1, as the puzzle isn't really solvable without it. — rand al'thor 21 secs ago
@Rubio I get that rationale, but with some puzzles you really can tell their quality as soon as they're posted.
Like your Puzzling Times, for instance.
 
Well. Like I said, with rare exceptions :)
5½ hours to hint 1 on the Times for anyone keeping tabs
 
10:53 PM
0
Q: Jon Mark Perry's Grid Logic Puzzle

rand al'thorConsider the following puzzle type proposed by Jon Mark Perry. Start with a square grid of arrows, each one pointing in one of the four cardinal directions. For example: You start at the top left. You travel 1 step in the direction of the arrow you are on. Continue until you reach ...

 

« first day (973 days earlier)      last day (2660 days later) »