« first day (465 days earlier)      last day (4516 days later) » 

12:00 AM
@MarkHenderson Serious
Although not that high
 
@RobMoir: Well, those were more innocent times, when all viruses did was destroy your hardware and laugh at your dispair
 
Good Night!
 
@TomOConnor what, you thought I was playing on your team? :)
 
I'd imagine he's serious all recent things considered. They give you some pretty good meds if you have a bad old case
night tom
 
One moment, modifying my avatar..
 
12:00 AM
@TomOConnor merry xmas!
 
@SimonSheehan good man. You'll need two hats
 
@pauska Yeah.. o.O
 
Yes, you must have a hat to chat
3
 
lol. I dread to think what would happen if i was on the good stuff
 
@SimonSheehan One of us. One of us!
 
12:01 AM
@pauska I think most people are until proven otherwise.
 
@Holocryptic 2/3rd inch kidneystone, right?
 
@JourneymanGeek - that goes for you too
 
@AdrianK Something like that. I'm no good at conversions
 
@TomOConnor that goes both ways!
 
@pauska Depends on your perspective.
 
12:02 AM
@Holocryptic Yeah, I'm old enough that I can't think in metric unless it's bolt sizes on my motorcycles.
 
@Holocryptic 2/3 of an inch is about 20mm I think
 
@MarkHenderson: I don't celebrate chrismas ;p Also, it is impossible to get a spottiswoode terrier to wear a hat
 
uploading now!
 
@MarkHenderson close enough. its 17mm
 
12:02 AM
@JourneymanGeek Hahah, I think you could try ;)
 
@JourneymanGeek Hmmm.... ok I'll issue you a pass then
 
seriously. bedtime! Goodnight! :D
 
@TomOConnor Cya
 
@TomOConnor night Tom
 
yawns
 
12:03 AM
@SimonSheehan: Its scientifically proven the only thing a spottiswoode terrier will wear is a collar. Primarily to keep its designated walker within an acceptable distance ;p
 
Avatar should be updated!
Soon anyway
Once gravatar kicks itself together ;)
 
takes a couple minutes
 
cool
 
@TomOConnor gnight
 
I think you need to re-load to get it to update
 
12:04 AM
@JourneymanGeek no, it happens after a few minutes
 
Nah, just gotta wait for it to populate to all the caches
 
I've seen it do it automatically, but you can make it go faster if you hard refresh
 
People already in chat need to ctrl+f5 to get your new avatar though
 
Ah okay.
 
@voretaq7 changed his hours ago and he's still got no hat on mine
 
12:05 AM
Wait, since when is it ctrl + f5? @MarkHenderson
Ah okay.
 
And as expected, I got approved to immediately start working on a configuration management system as soon as I get the other 12 things done first.
 
Refreshing my profile every few seconds :p
 
@AdrianK Hurry up and wait!
 
aaah just one more beer until bedtime
2
 
Lunch time for me, bbl
 
12:07 AM
@84104 The biggest problem is that I'm the only one around with the skills to understand and deploy this stuff, so I don't have much help.
 
@pauska I like how you think. Counting time with beer.
 
@Holocryptic I work with a guy who counts his paycheck in number of beers
He's a hero in that sense
I just CANT RESIST, this will be the last one
 
That's one way to look at it
 
@AdrianK: erg. Being the only guy sucks
 
Imagine having a wristwatch where it said "12 mins past boobs" or "15 mins past beer" ?
 
12:08 AM
notes i will probably be dismantling most of my little office set up next month due to downsizing :/
 
lawls
 
I hear you there @JourneymanGeek and @AdrianK, only kid in my classes with a clue on how to even use a computer :/
 
@JourneymanGeek sux...
 
Also, avatar has been updated.. it'll show up on your screens eventually ;)
 
@SimonSheehan You're good to go. Update my meta post
 
12:09 AM
@Holocryptic Sure will!
 
That's a brilliant gravatar, by the by
 
@Holocryptic: Unpaid tech support. And i have 6 obsolete systems, and only two monitors
 
@JourneymanGeek Yeah, it's nothing new. For awhile I was the only guy in the AMER region that knew the performance management data remediation product used by the US's largest wireless company
 
@AdrianK: thats bad practice
 
@AdrianK 0_o
 
12:10 AM
@Holocryptic Meta post updated!
 
Granted, i was actually trying to get someone to be able to cover the basics (that is to say 99% of what i do) and no one was interested
 
@JourneymanGeek Tell me about it. The dev that was supposed to get trained up was hired 5 weeks before the training was due to start and he had his wedding scheduled in India during that timeframe.
 
Gonna get a full size one of it
 
@JourneymanGeek im also losing my office next months, moving into open landscape together with the developers and a new sysadmin
 
@SimonSheehan hoorah. Welcome
 
12:11 AM
Haha, thanks :p
 
@pauska: we're 4 people + me + a dog. We're downsizing to 2 people and the dog, probably dumping the office space, though i have no idea how we're going to dispose of the room full of spares.
 
@JourneymanGeek "My dog ate my coworkers"?
3
 
shit. Dinner was ready an hour ago... back in a bit.
 
On the bright side, i can stop fretting over what happened if one of the computers goes down
 
We're probably going to dedicate one office for workbench/lab stuff/private phone calls etc
 
12:13 AM
@pauska: bad self marketing + bad economic climate
And we tend to get largish contracts, rarely, so cash flow is a bitch
 
@JourneymanGeek yeah I guessed that, just a bad sense of humor sometimes. Sorry.
 
If we for the one thats pending, we'd be able to keep the two people we have to let go longer
(though, i really wish we could upgrade our systems. Not asking for AD here, just stuff i can get spares for without raiding a scrapyard ;p)
 
@Holocryptic Whipped it together in photoshop in a higher resolution now ;) my wallpaper is set for the next 2 weeks or so
Loving how chat looks now :p
Would anyone here happen to know anything about networking a couple of computers together for file sharing?
I have heard you need either a router or switch... but honestly don't know the difference
 
@SimonSheehan I bet that people on the main site would if you hit the "ask a question" button :p
Ohhh, maybe not
You want a switch
What they call a "router" these days for 99.999% of the devices is an incorrect label
Networking 101:

- A switch allows your computers to talk to eacother
- A hub is a really crappy switch
- A router allows your network to talk to other networks
What they sell as a router these days is really a modem + router + switch
 
12:24 AM
@MarkHenderson Ah.. I've got all my terms confused probably :p. What I'm looking for doesn't need to connect to other networks, just to allow a few computers to talk to each other
 
@MarkHenderson: actually, they also have plain old router/switches
 
@SimonSheehan That's miniaturization for ya. It's just as easy to shove all that stuff onto a handful of chips nowadays, and cheaper.
 
also, hubs are primarily useful these days for snooping around
@SimonSheehan: how many?
 
@JourneymanGeek If you're too lazy to setup SPAN or whatever it's called.
 
@SimonSheehan Do these computers need to have shared internet access?
And yes, how many computers are we talking about?
 
12:26 AM
@MarkHenderson Well their all iMac's and Mac Mini's, about 6 of them, which all use WiFi connections right now strictly for internet access, but we'd like to start sharing files between them, ultimately using the Mini's just to house files
 
@84104: mostly running non SF grade hardware so.. that would be a yes. Also, my hub is somewhat legacy gear - its probably older than @SimonSheehan ;p
 
@SimonSheehan If they are all sharing internet access via the same wifi connection, you have everything you need already
 
Haha. Once again im the kid around here
 
File sharing will be slow, but it will work
 
@MarkHenderson It's on this crappy "guest" network my school runs.
 
12:27 AM
@JourneymanGeek That was an assessment not a disparagement. I've got a 10Mb hub that I still use from time to time.
 
To which it's internet connection is shared by about 400 machines.
 
@SimonSheehan Oh, right. Ok, well in that case you need a switch with at least 6 ports
But if these are machines on a school network, there's no guarantee that you will be able to make it work because the school may have locked them down
 
@84104: I just don't see any other practical use for a hub in any context
 
@MarkHenderson They aren't locked at all - I set them up myself :p
 
@JourneymanGeek That's because there isn't one? (rhetorical)
 
12:28 AM
@SimonSheehan Ok cool. So you need a switch with at least 6 ports. Now I don't know much about OSX so you might need to set up their IP addresses manually so they can talk to eachtoher, or maybe they will auto-configure
 
Yup ;p. Lazy sniffing is the only one i can think of
 
Your best bet is to hop on over to Ask Different, explain what you've got, and what you want to do, and they will be able to walk you through it
 
@MarkHenderson That part I can handle probably, I think they auto-configure mostly though. I wonder if I can use 2 connections though, and keep WiFi going.
It's not so much the system I'm worried about - its getting the right hardware and such.
 
@SimonSheehan Yes, just as long as they are on two different subnets, so if your wifi network is 192.168.0.1 then make your wired network 192.168.1.0 or something different
That's called Multi-Homing and is very common
 
Oh neat, that's awesome.
I recalled a few years ago I tried that on Windows XP and failed horrendously... probably was just too young to figure it out :p
 
12:31 AM
I gotta warn you though, server fault doesn't really accept questions about file sharing on OSX so if you run into trouble, ask different is your best bet
 
@MarkHenderson I figured as much - I can probably figure that one out. I just needed to know the networking aspect of it
Which I thought you guys might know
 
@SimonSheehan Yep, easy. You need a switch with at least 6 ports, and 6 cables to connect them. Done.
 
@MarkHenderson Pretty straight forward then, dandy!
Luckily for me I run all the Mac's, so I can easily modify it to work
 
@MarkHenderson Almost. What about addressing? Static or dhcp or dhcp-local failure?
 
@84104 Covered that, apparently osx can auto-configure
 
12:33 AM
I was using a crossover cable today and it seemed to auto-configure just fine
 
@MarkHenderson You mean 169.254.X.Y or L2 only?
 
@SimonSheehan Lucky you. When I started it was coax networks where htey were all strung together in a long line, and you had to manually set jumpers on the network cards for each computer to get the right IRQ/DMA and then fuck around getting the drivers installed into Windows 3.11 and DHCP wasn't in wide use, and NAT didn't exist, so then you had to get a SOCKS proxy and my god Im going all funny just thinking about it
@84104 No idea, don't use osx
 
@MarkHenderson Same. Was curious. Auto-magic is auto-magical.
 
@MarkHenderson I don't think I was alive during that time :P
 
@SimonSheehan that was 1995, and I was (counts backwards...) 11
But I had a Dad who was really really into networking and technology
And he wanted us to fuck off out of his office when we wanted to use the internet (good old 14.4kbps dial up)
 
12:35 AM
@MarkHenderson I was born in 1995.
 
A vampire tap (also called a piercing tap) is a device for physically connecting a station (i.e. a PC, a printer, or another device) to a network that uses 10BASE5 cabling. This device clamps onto and "bites" into the cable (hence the vampire name), forcing a spike through a hole drilled through the outer shielding to contact the inner conductor while other spikes bite into the outer conductor. From the vampire tap, a short cable called an AUI (Attachment Unit Interface) is connected directly from the tap to the network card in the PC. Vampire taps allow new connections to be made on a...
 
@SimonSheehan I'm just going to pretend I didn't read that, and I'll be just fine.
 
@84104 hahahah the NE2000 had an AUI port, never knew what it was for
 
Hahaha :p
 
@84104 vampire taps rocked. Thicknet was pretty neat stuff.
 
12:37 AM
@AdrianK I still find them in the ceiling from time to time.
 
@SimonSheehan yeah, that's the year I was able to start drinking legally.
 
I also remember when we got our first hard drive that was over 1Gb, a 1.2Gb WD (I still have it!) and my friend Bobby was so jelous he kicked me in the nuts
 
@84104 That's pretty cool. Probably has about 10" of dust on them.
 
@AdrianK is that 18 or 21?
 
@SimonSheehan HOLD THE PHONE BUDDY, ONLY ONE SF USER CAN BE BORN IN 1995....
 
12:38 AM
@MarkHenderson 21
 
@Jacob Uh oh...
 
@Jacob Apart from my boss and the sales guy, every single person in our office was born in 1985
 
lol. my first > 1gb hard drive was 4.3, since we're horrible at upgrading home equipment
 
@MarkHenderson Well it means I might lose my title as youngest SF member.
 
@Jacob What month are you born in?
 
12:40 AM
@JourneymanGeek Aah, 4.3Gb the size of my first SCSI disk. It was double height, fucking loud, LVD 80-pin and compared to todays disks incredibly slow
 
@MarkHenderson the first one I bought was 85MB. But I frequently used an XT with a 20MB as I was the student sysop for the school's BBS system in the late 80s & early 90s.
 
@SimonSheehan December
 
@AdrianK I think our first drive was 150Mb in a 486 SX 25 (without the math co-processor)
 
@Jacob You still win! January here ;)
 
I went from an Xt -> 486 -> PII -> pIV -> core2duo. I basically skip a generation or two
XT was for dad's masters primarily, and we're not a very geek household :/
 
12:41 AM
Yeah, I lost track in the early 90s. I don't do hardware.
 
I went 800mhz Athlon > core 2 quad.
 
@JourneymanGeek I went through a stage about 6-7 years ago where I built dual-socket workstations for myself, so I had two Athlon MP systems and then a dual Opteron system, and then by that stage quad-core processors were the norm and I was no longer special :(
 
@MarkHenderson Dual quad?
 
I remember the first time I got the hallowed 2 graphs in the task manager (windows 2000) and I felt so special
Now thinking back to it, I feel like a loser
@Jacob Nah too expensive and useless for what I do. Our servers have 8 and 10 cores each, that's enough
 
@MarkHenderson: I'm at the point where i want to build a new system, but its nearly impossible. Once i get my darned delayed degree, and a job, i probably will have to blow a few paychecks on something ever so slightly insane ;p
 
12:43 AM
@JourneymanGeek It's totally worth it. For the 6 months while your machine is kickarse anyway, and then when everyone else catches up it's just a sigh
 
@MarkHenderson: well, thats the thing, its not really the power of the machine, its the fact that i get to build it. And being elbow deep in a system is so damned relaxing
 
@JourneymanGeek Until it doesn't boot
 
And i'm the sort of person who'd quite happily get a box of random crappy systems, and throw it together into something that works.
oh, that is fun. And i've gotten very good at troubleshooting that
 
I once got incredibly pissed off because I literally broke a $900 Tyan dual-socket motherboard prising the heat-sink off because I stuck it on backwards
 
has had... oh 4-5 PSU failures this year ;p
 
12:46 AM
(I sent it back as DOA, and they replaced it!)
 
gnite gents
 
Cya later @AdrianK
 
@AdrianK Cya
 
@MarkHenderson: I'm mainly a hardware guy. I'm good at desktop stuff cause its what i mainly deal with, and a serverish guy cause its more challenging that desktops. Only so much i can learn on random re-purposed hardware. So... computers not booting is fun to me, as long as its not a critical system of some sort
 
@JourneymanGeek I totally get that. I've just become... disenchanted with desktop hardware these days, mainly because of the sheer number of troubles I have with them. It seems that if you have 500 servers and 100 desktops, you'll have 10x fewer problems with the servers than the desktops
 
12:53 AM
@MarkHenderson: better hardware, better OSes. I suppose you do deploy software centrally so, thats one less headache
 
I like hardware, mostly because my own hardware is usually decades behind and sucks :P
 
I'd happily build a personal system around server hardware if i had the need/funds. My own systems tend to last for at least 8 or so years before something beautifully catastrophic happens
 
Server stuff interests me for its complexity, but I don't get many chances to mess around
 
Actually I let the people here install their own software. We have a NAS loaded with the install files and they just ask me for a key when they need it. But we've only got 6 or so people in the office
@SimonSheehan I love looking at the inside of something like a Dell M910 blade. Four sockets, I think 32 DIMMs and two disks inside something the size of a laptop
 
@MarkHenderson Having smaller numbers probably makes it a LOT easier, I'd imagine.
@MarkHenderson Well, my friend got his hands on two HP server one day, and THAT was exciting
Sockets, DIMMS, many disk trays, and lots to mess with
 
12:56 AM
@SimonSheehan It does. We're a very small team, 6 of us, but the systems we support and deploy have hundreds, if not thousands of users (SaaS), but supporting those users is not my problem ;)
 
There's a picture of the server we had, x2
 
@SimonSheehan Ah, I know that server quite well. We had a few of them as ESX boxes
 
@MarkHenderson: in that case, its quite similar to mine. No real servers, and very old hardware. Last hardware failure i had, other than the monitors was... the PA dropping her system off the desk, and telling me, months later the PSU failed ;p
 
huh.. the lenovo x220 retails for about $1000 in the us, and $3000 in norway..
 
@pauska It's a joke, hey
 
12:57 AM
@MarkHenderson Oh really? It's quite old, but seems to run very well. Has no idea with ESX is
 
iTunes are also just as bad. They charged more than 3x the price for The Beatles complete set in Australia than they did in the US (and the $AU was higher than $US) and could offer no explanation other than they think we're stupid
@SimonSheehan ESX is what we used to use for virtualising. Now we use ESXi
 
@SimonSheehan Its a hardware level hypervisor
 
Those servers are a few yeqars old, but I thnik you can chock them up with 32Gb of RAM
You just need to remember that RAM for servers is usually different from the RAM for your desktop
 
@SimonSheehan Are you looking for servers?
 
Oh okay, neat. I only really know about software level virtualization. (Hence why im at Super user mostly)
@Jacob Nope.
@MarkHenderson We only had 1.5GB of RAM between the two machines... pretty meager.
 
12:59 AM
@SimonSheehan You're in so many chat rooms that my 12" laptop filled the screen to show it.. I had to close the chat and re-open it because of you. I hate you.
 

« first day (465 days earlier)      last day (4516 days later) »