Telexfree (stylized as TelexFREE) is a trade name owned by Telexfree Inc, that became best known for its operations in Brazil held by Ympactus Comercial Ltda after it was involved in an ongoing investigation and trial for allegedly operating a Ponzi scheme, and later for having its operations suspended in USA by SEC under the charges of operating a billion dollar Ponzi and Pyramid schemes.
Telexfree Inc. owns the rights to the Telexfree brand worldwide. The company was created by Carlos Roberto Costa, Carlos Nataniel Wanzeler and James Matthew Merrill after the change of its former corporate name...
> On April 2014, an investigation in the United States confirmed that Telexfree worked under a Ponzi scheme and handled more than $1 billion worldwide.
> The Public Prosecutor of the Telexfree case (...) and the Judge (...) have reported death and kidnapping threats after the court's decision to freeze Telexfree assets and operations in Brazil
I remember back around 2013 everyone and their dogs was sooooo excited about this amazing opportunity to get free money!
People would sell their homes and spend all their life's savings.
Ir lazers aren't visible by the naked eye though, unless you have some sort of night vision. I've been wanting to build me a face melting ir lazer for unexpected visitors for quite sometime
The only time I've ever told someone to stop starring was then they starred some 20 random messages in a row, and did the same thing the next day... and the day after...
@bwDraco It's a judgement call. I can't really answer that, because I honestly have a bit more power to directly take action than you (...that I discovered today anyway), but assuming I couldn't move messages then...
If it's a NSFW onebox from someone active, I'd ask them to un-onebox first probably.
It's not abuse if you yell surprise first! Oh wait...
Going off Dave's suggestion I was actually tempted earlier to see how long I could go where I would write nothing and every reply would be by quoting a previous message
Hello, people. Suppose I have a JPG file, which I want to use in an example, but don't want to use the actual JPG file. Now, is file run on the JPG sufficient to produce something similar?
@Bob The JPG is long and thin. I'm trying to split it in half lengthways, and place the two pieces side by side, and convert it to a PDF (using TeX). But I'd like a substitute to work with.
They could go so far as to put Apple, Inc. on a denied entities list. This would bring their business to a screeching halt and send their stock tumbling through the floor.
The basis for this would be that Apple is actively aiding terrorists, no matter how ludicrous this claim may be.
For some reason, this Apple-FBI standoff could lead to a criminal charge against Apple. By providing encryption that cannot be broken and by refusing to backdoor iOS, Apple could conceivably be charged with providing material support for terrorism under the USA PATRIOT Act.
ya know this just displays everything we have always thought. all this STUFF in the systems has always had a backdoor. everytime 1-2 people refuse to put in the backdoor they either QUIT, or it makes the news.
My next wonder is Intel IME , NIC device that works when the hardware is in the "off" state and new "remote" program for the hardware itself.
Do i care if they want to nazi into my computer? NO, i just dont want them slowing it down :-)
Only a matter of time before the United States government charges Apple and/or its officers with an actual terrorism or related crime (including providing material support for terrorism) under the USA PATRIOT Act.
In American law, providing material support for terrorism is a crime prohibited by the USA PATRIOT Act and codified in title 18 of the United States Code, sections 2339A and 2339B. It applies primarily to groups designated as terrorists by the State Department. The four types of support described are “training,” “expert advice or assistance,” “service,” and “personnel.” In June 2010, the United States Supreme Court upheld the law in an as-applied challenge in the case Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project, but also left open the door for other as-applied challenges. The plaintiffs in the case had...
for all the people who ever said "intel,microsoft,facebook,twitter is Not spying on you your being rediculous" You were right, they are not spying on you, they are just Forced by "national security" to assist in the government being able to spy on you.
And the #1 problem which Nobody has discussed, POWER, knowing all insider information , for trading, business deals, new products. Sure they are supposed to keep it internal, but if you knew you could make 1 Million dollers, because technoink is comming out with a stock changing product, do you Sit on it?
Follow the money :-)
this is why the privacy breech is "unconstitional" but does anyone use that known argument? "national security" trumps the constitution.
Did you even read the android tag? "Unless the question is specifically regarding the device interacting with your computer questions are more likely to be better suited to android.stackexchange.com. For programming Android applications there is stackoverflow.com." — DavidPostill2 hours ago
Tags? while there might be much interest in high end users playing tag games, I dont even read the descriptions in them often
Cool, it was right there in ya face. but reading all the tags one applies, when much of it is known and "redundant repetions" most tags describe what is already known.
It is like reading your 15th device manuel, the repetitive parts about not dunking it in the toilet can be ignored :-)
Thank heaven for zsh. The completion is absolutely amazing.
It'll tell you what options your printer supports for lp.
I'm also glad I set the printer up to allow remote printing yesterday. I'm caught in a situation that costed me a lot of time and at least I can print from my cloud desktop on the field to save time.