I want to ask about my answer here:
https://stackoverflow.com/a/78498819/1718491
It has 4+ down-votes as "spam" and I'd like to ask if this really qualifies as "spam" or not. I wrote a detailed answer and linked to the SlickStack forum, a FOSS project I've been helping maintain for the past se...
> Bad keyword in body, potentially bad asn for hostname in body, potentially bad keyword in body ---------- Bad keyword in body - Position 32-44: /quickbooks- Potentially bad asn for hostname in body - enterprisequickbooks.com address 154.41.250.87 in ASN 47583 Potentially bad keyword in body - Position 32-54: /quickbooks-error-1603
@VLAZ That pattern looks like it's already caught by Blacklisted username Append -force to the command word(s) if you really want to add the pattern you provided.
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Potentially bad ip for hostname in answer, potentially bad ns for domain in answer, potentially bad keyword in answer, username similar to website in answer (76): Blueberry dying leaves, flowers by the boyo on gardening.SE
@tripleee That pattern looks like it's already caught by Potentially bad keyword in answer and Potentially bad keyword in body Append -force to the command word(s) if you really want to add the pattern you provided.
increasingly often, I see hosts where the results from SmokeDetector reveal a different IP address than what I got from Halflife. It would be useful if the diagnostics from Smokey always included the resolved IP address(es)
but then there are many things which would be useful if we only could find someone who is able to maintain and update metasmoke ...
@JeffSchaller A normalized version, {{'919876706621'}}, of that pattern is already on the number watchlist. You can use !!/bisect-number +91-9876706621 to determine which entries on the number lists match that pattern, which would tell you: Matched by +91-9876706621 on line 578 of watched_numbers.txt: +91-9876706621 found verbatim
@JeffSchaller That pattern may be a North American number. If it is, please use a format which starts with an optional 1 followed by possible separator text and has the main number in the format 971-785-5455 where - could be a single alpha character or any [\W_]*+. Alternately, you can add the comment (?#IS NorAm) to the end of the pattern to force also using the alternate normalized form, or (?#NO NorAm) if it's not a North American phone number and it's incorrectly recognized as one. Perhaps try !!/watch-number 971-785-5455. Append -force to the command word(s) if you really want to add the pattern you provided.
@Spevacus That pattern looks like it's already caught by Potentially bad keyword in answer and Potentially bad keyword in body Append -force to the command word(s) if you really want to add the pattern you provided.
@Spevacus Matched by [a-z0-9%-]*apk[a-z0-9%-]*+\.(?:[a-z0-9%-]++\.)*[a-z0-9%]{2,4}+\b(?<!\.(?:png|jpg|gif|svg)\b)(?<!\.(?:gz|sh)\b)(?<!\.(?:bat|git|jar|tar|txt|yml|zip)\b)(?<!\.(?:file|java)\b)(?<!\bwapka\.me\b)(?<!\bapkeh\.com\b)(?<!\btapkey\.io\b)(?<!\bapktom\.com\b)(?<!\bmapkit\.map\b)(?<!\bapkhigh\.com\b)(?<!\bapkcombo\.com\b)(?<!\bfreemodedapk\.com\b)(?<!\bmultiapkclub\.com\b)(?<!\bconfigure-apk-splits\.html\b)(?<!\bapkmirror\.com\b) on line 38315 of watched_keywords.txt
@Makyen That pattern looks like it's already caught by Mostly non-latin body and Mostly non-latin answer Append -force to the command word(s) if you really want to add the pattern you provided.
@Makyen That pattern looks like it's already caught by Mostly non-latin body and Mostly non-latin answer Append -force to the command word(s) if you really want to add the pattern you provided.
@SmokeDetector this user posted another answer with the same link, but failed to properly edit the URL so that it would work. Pretty sure this is spam.
@Vickel That pattern looks like it's already caught by Potentially bad keyword in answer and Potentially bad keyword in bodyThe regex contains an unescaped ".", which should be "\." in most cases. Append -force to the command word(s) if you really want to add the pattern you provided.
I want to ask about my answer here:
https://stackoverflow.com/a/78498819/1718491
It has 4+ down-votes as "spam" and I'd like to ask if this really qualifies as "spam" or not. I wrote a detailed answer and linked to the SlickStack forum, a FOSS project I've been helping maintain for the past se...
