« first day (2187 days earlier)      last day (138 days later) » 

4:00 PM
The quota_remaining property was not in the API response. Error: site is required at 16:00:16 UTC. Backing off on requests for the next 12 seconds. Previous URL: https://api.stackexchange.com/2.2/questions/3433983
The quota_remaining property was not in the API response. Error: site is required at 16:00:31 UTC. Backing off on requests for the next 12 seconds. Previous URL: https://api.stackexchange.com/2.2/questions/148091
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Potentially bad asn for hostname in body, potentially problematic ns configuration in body (2): Python/XML: proper way to retrieve node values? by Seb on stackoverflow.com
The quota_remaining property was not in the API response. Error: site is required at 16:01:00 UTC. Backing off on requests for the next 12 seconds. Previous URL: https://api.stackexchange.com/2.2/questions
fp- feedback received
The quota_remaining property was not in the API response. Error: site is required at 16:01:51 UTC. Backing off on requests for the next 12 seconds. Previous URL: https://api.stackexchange.com/2.2/questions/456323
The quota_remaining property was not in the API response. Error: site is required at 16:02:19 UTC. Backing off on requests for the next 12 seconds. Previous URL: https://api.stackexchange.com/2.2/questions/476564
The quota_remaining property was not in the API response. Error: site is required at 16:02:30 UTC. Backing off on requests for the next 12 seconds. Previous URL: https://api.stackexchange.com/2.2/questions/51459
 
At this point, my hypothesis is that it's a problem on SE's end of the SE API. Although, I still need to check recent commits on SD.
 
The quota_remaining property was not in the API response. Error: site is required at 16:02:41 UTC. Backing off on requests for the next 12 seconds. Previous URL: https://api.stackexchange.com/2.2/questions/1501769
The quota_remaining property was not in the API response. Error: site is required at 16:02:43 UTC. Backing off on requests for the next 12 seconds. Previous URL: https://api.stackexchange.com/2.2/questions/345954
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] No whitespace in answer (95): Checking in with the Lavender community by SF x on meta.SE
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Potentially bad keyword in body (1): Finding Element in json file with python by LikeMike on stackoverflow.com
The quota_remaining property was not in the API response. Error: site is required at 16:03:42 UTC. Backing off on requests for the next 12 seconds. Previous URL: https://api.stackexchange.com/2.2/questions
The quota_remaining property was not in the API response. Error: site is required at 16:04:15 UTC. Backing off on requests for the next 12 seconds. Previous URL: https://api.stackexchange.com/2.2/questions/209563
The quota_remaining property was not in the API response. Error: site is required at 16:05:09 UTC. Backing off on requests for the next 12 seconds. Previous URL: https://api.stackexchange.com/2.2/questions/149631
The quota_remaining property was not in the API response. Error: site is required at 16:05:48 UTC. Backing off on requests for the next 12 seconds. Previous URL: https://api.stackexchange.com/2.2/questions/3433926
The quota_remaining property was not in the API response. Error: site is required at 16:06:06 UTC. Backing off on requests for the next 12 seconds. Previous URL: https://api.stackexchange.com/2.2/questions
tpu- feedback received on Checking in with the Lavender community [MS]
The quota_remaining property was not in the API response. Error: site is required at 16:07:50 UTC. Backing off on requests for the next 12 seconds. Previous URL: https://api.stackexchange.com/2.2/questions/272056
The quota_remaining property was not in the API response. Error: site is required at 16:08:09 UTC. Backing off on requests for the next 12 seconds. Previous URL: https://api.stackexchange.com/2.2/questions/9343
fp- feedback received
 
In a userscript, I've confirmed seeing the type of response from SE which would result in the quota_remaining property messages we're getting. Thus, I'm fairly sure this is a problem on SE's side of the SE API.
Yep. Definitely.
 
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Offensive body detected, offensive title detected (97): Is it true that progressives opposed Fascism? by user52383 on skeptics.SE
The quota_remaining property was not in the API response. Error: site is required at 16:10:26 UTC. Backing off on requests for the next 12 seconds. Previous URL: https://api.stackexchange.com/2.2/questions/229948
The quota_remaining property was not in the API response. Error: site is required at 16:10:29 UTC. Backing off on requests for the next 12 seconds. Previous URL: https://api.stackexchange.com/2.2/questions
The quota_remaining property was not in the API response. Error: site is required at 16:10:58 UTC. Backing off on requests for the next 12 seconds. Previous URL: https://api.stackexchange.com/2.2/questions/123747
The quota_remaining property was not in the API response. Error: site is required at 16:11:29 UTC. Backing off on requests for the next 12 seconds. Previous URL: https://api.stackexchange.com/2.2/questions/222998
The quota_remaining property was not in the API response. Error: site is required at 16:12:05 UTC. Backing off on requests for the next 12 seconds. Previous URL: https://api.stackexchange.com/2.2/questions/3434105
The quota_remaining property was not in the API response. Error: site is required at 16:12:34 UTC. Backing off on requests for the next 12 seconds. Previous URL: https://api.stackexchange.com/2.2/questions/178271
fp- feedback received
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Misleading link, potentially bad ns for domain in answer, potentially bad keyword in answer (20): How to Build a Movie Library in WordPress 3.x by josh on wordpress.SE
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Mostly punctuation marks in answer (38): How to create an object from an Array of key-value pairs? by Tzach Bonfil on stackoverflow.com
The quota_remaining property was not in the API response. Error: site is required at 16:13:48 UTC. Backing off on requests for the next 12 seconds. Previous URL: https://api.stackexchange.com/2.2/questions
fp- feedback received on Query the soil map and data by polygon? [MS]
tpu- feedback received on you're all phucking kunts [MS]
 
4:15 PM
!!/watch joshdriod\.com
 
@Das_Geek You don't have code privileges, but I've created PR#3483 for you.
PR#3483 ("Das_Geek: Watch joshdriod\.com") opened by SmokeDetector
 
!!/approve 3483
 
The quota_remaining property was not in the API response. Error: site is required at 16:16:13 UTC. Backing off on requests for the next 12 seconds. Previous URL: https://api.stackexchange.com/2.2/questions/1501715
 
Prolly just NAA, yeah?
 
The quota_remaining property was not in the API response. Error: site is required at 16:16:35 UTC. Backing off on requests for the next 12 seconds. Previous URL: https://api.stackexchange.com/2.2/questions/467110
naa- feedback received
The quota_remaining property was not in the API response. Error: site is required at 16:20:12 UTC. Backing off on requests for the next 12 seconds. Previous URL: https://api.stackexchange.com/2.2/questions/375078
The quota_remaining property was not in the API response. Error: site is required at 16:20:18 UTC. Backing off on requests for the next 12 seconds. Previous URL: https://api.stackexchange.com/2.2/questions/991696
The quota_remaining property was not in the API response. Error: site is required at 16:20:23 UTC. Backing off on requests for the next 12 seconds. Previous URL: https://api.stackexchange.com/2.2/questions/72725
The quota_remaining property was not in the API response. Error: site is required at 16:20:37 UTC. Backing off on requests for the next 12 seconds. Previous URL: https://api.stackexchange.com/2.2/questions/551978
The quota_remaining property was not in the API response. Error: site is required at 16:22:55 UTC. Backing off on requests for the next 12 seconds. Previous URL: https://api.stackexchange.com/2.2/questions
The quota_remaining property was not in the API response. Error: site is required at 16:23:22 UTC. Backing off on requests for the next 12 seconds. Previous URL: https://api.stackexchange.com/2.2/questions/39562
Recovered from BrokenPipeError: [Errno 32] Broken pipe
The quota_remaining property was not in the API response. Error: site is required at 16:25:48 UTC. Backing off on requests for the next 12 seconds. Previous URL: https://api.stackexchange.com/2.2/questions/3434109
The quota_remaining property was not in the API response. Error: site is required at 16:25:49 UTC. Backing off on requests for the next 12 seconds. Previous URL: https://api.stackexchange.com/2.2/questions/10094
The quota_remaining property was not in the API response. Error: site is required at 16:25:53 UTC. Backing off on requests for the next 12 seconds. Previous URL: https://api.stackexchange.com/2.2/questions/147961
The quota_remaining property was not in the API response. Error: site is required at 16:26:12 UTC. Backing off on requests for the next 12 seconds. Previous URL: https://api.stackexchange.com/2.2/questions/178271
 
teward/Anubis received failover signal.
 
^ also, what the **** is going on?
 
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Potentially bad ns for domain in body (1): How many Luxury Yachts in Cabo? by Johnwick on meta.SE
Restart: API quota is 19929.
The quota_remaining property was not in the API response. Error: site is required at 16:26:44 UTC. Backing off on requests for the next 12 seconds. Previous URL: https://api.stackexchange.com/2.2/questions/3434153
The quota_remaining property was not in the API response. Error: site is required at 11:27:24 UTC. Backing off on requests for the next 12 seconds. Previous URL: https://api.stackexchange.com/2.2/questions/157957;157958;157959;157960;157961;157962;157963;157964;157965;157966;157967;157968;157969;157970;157971;157972;157973;157974;157975;157880;126555;142961
@Glorfindel Post 1: Already recently reported [ MS ]
The quota_remaining property was not in the API response. Error: site is required at 16:27:51 UTC. Backing off on requests for the next 12 seconds. Previous URL: https://api.stackexchange.com/2.2/questions/3434155
The quota_remaining property was not in the API response. Error: site is required at 16:28:29 UTC. Backing off on requests for the next 12 seconds. Previous URL: https://api.stackexchange.com/2.2/questions
The quota_remaining property was not in the API response. Error: site is required at 11:28:52 UTC. Backing off on requests for the next 12 seconds. Previous URL: https://api.stackexchange.com/2.2/questions
The quota_remaining property was not in the API response. Error: site is required at 16:29:11 UTC. Backing off on requests for the next 12 seconds. Previous URL: https://api.stackexchange.com/2.2/questions/70048
 
@Glorfindel It's an SE API problem on SE's site. I'm seeing it in multiple places/scripts/requests. I just posted on MSO: SE API is randomly giving “site is required” errors
 
The quota_remaining property was not in the API response. Error: site is required at 11:29:34 UTC. Backing off on requests for the next 12 seconds. Previous URL: https://api.stackexchange.com/2.2/questions/8315
The quota_remaining property was not in the API response. Error: site is required at 11:29:34 UTC. Backing off on requests for the next 12 seconds. Previous URL: https://api.stackexchange.com/2.2/questions
The quota_remaining property was not in the API response. Error: site is required at 16:30:06 UTC. Backing off on requests for the next 12 seconds. Previous URL: https://api.stackexchange.com/2.2/questions/253192
The quota_remaining property was not in the API response. Error: site is required at 16:30:14 UTC. Backing off on requests for the next 12 seconds. Previous URL: https://api.stackexchange.com/2.2/questions/551976
The quota_remaining property was not in the API response. Error: site is required at 11:30:45 UTC. Backing off on requests for the next 12 seconds. Previous URL: https://api.stackexchange.com/2.2/questions/551939
The quota_remaining property was not in the API response. Error: site is required at 16:30:24 UTC. Backing off on requests for the next 12 seconds. Previous URL: https://api.stackexchange.com/2.2/questions
The quota_remaining property was not in the API response. Error: site is required at 11:31:27 UTC. Backing off on requests for the next 12 seconds. Previous URL: https://api.stackexchange.com/2.2/questions/222997
The quota_remaining property was not in the API response. Error: site is required at 11:31:58 UTC. Backing off on requests for the next 12 seconds. Previous URL: https://api.stackexchange.com/2.2/questions/31837
The quota_remaining property was not in the API response. Error: site is required at 16:32:05 UTC. Backing off on requests for the next 12 seconds. Previous URL: https://api.stackexchange.com/2.2/questions/12837
The quota_remaining property was not in the API response. Error: site is required at 11:32:20 UTC. Backing off on requests for the next 12 seconds. Previous URL: https://api.stackexchange.com/2.2/questions/551988
The quota_remaining property was not in the API response. Error: site is required at 16:32:40 UTC. Backing off on requests for the next 12 seconds. Previous URL: https://api.stackexchange.com/2.2/questions
The quota_remaining property was not in the API response. Error: site is required at 16:33:00 UTC. Backing off on requests for the next 12 seconds. Previous URL: https://api.stackexchange.com/2.2/questions/513676
The quota_remaining property was not in the API response. Error: site is required at 11:33:20 UTC. Backing off on requests for the next 12 seconds. Previous URL: https://api.stackexchange.com/2.2/questions/75701
The quota_remaining property was not in the API response. Error: site is required at 16:33:04 UTC. Backing off on requests for the next 12 seconds. Previous URL: https://api.stackexchange.com/2.2/questions/63087
The quota_remaining property was not in the API response. Error: site is required at 11:33:37 UTC. Backing off on requests for the next 12 seconds. Previous URL: https://api.stackexchange.com/2.2/questions/3434153
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Offensive body detected, offensive title detected (97): Is it true that progressives opposed Fascism? ✏️ by user52383 on skeptics.SE
The quota_remaining property was not in the API response. Error: site is required at 11:34:12 UTC. Backing off on requests for the next 12 seconds. Previous URL: https://api.stackexchange.com/2.2/questions
The quota_remaining property was not in the API response. Error: site is required at 16:35:24 UTC. Backing off on requests for the next 12 seconds. Previous URL: https://api.stackexchange.com/2.2/questions/3434168
The quota_remaining property was not in the API response. Error: site is required at 16:36:04 UTC. Backing off on requests for the next 12 seconds. Previous URL: https://api.stackexchange.com/2.2/questions
The quota_remaining property was not in the API response. Error: site is required at 11:36:37 UTC. Backing off on requests for the next 12 seconds. Previous URL: https://api.stackexchange.com/2.2/questions/3433565
The quota_remaining property was not in the API response. Error: site is required at 16:36:38 UTC. Backing off on requests for the next 12 seconds. Previous URL: https://api.stackexchange.com/2.2/questions/1188485
The quota_remaining property was not in the API response. Error: site is required at 11:36:52 UTC. Backing off on requests for the next 12 seconds. Previous URL: https://api.stackexchange.com/2.2/questions/3434152
The quota_remaining property was not in the API response. Error: site is required at 16:36:50 UTC. Backing off on requests for the next 12 seconds. Previous URL: https://api.stackexchange.com/2.2/questions/3434152
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Offensive body detected, offensive title detected (97): Is it true that progressives opposed Fascism? by user40971 on history.SE
The quota_remaining property was not in the API response. Error: site is required at 16:37:00 UTC. Backing off on requests for the next 12 seconds. Previous URL: https://api.stackexchange.com/2.2/questions/1188486
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Offensive body detected, offensive title detected (97): Is it true that progressives opposed Fascism? by user40971 on history.SE
The quota_remaining property was not in the API response. Error: site is required at 11:37:53 UTC. Backing off on requests for the next 12 seconds. Previous URL: https://api.stackexchange.com/2.2/questions
The quota_remaining property was not in the API response. Error: site is required at 16:37:14 UTC. Backing off on requests for the next 12 seconds. Previous URL: https://api.stackexchange.com/2.2/questions/75708
 
4:38 PM
@Makyen great, thanks
 
The quota_remaining property was not in the API response. Error: site is required at 16:38:14 UTC. Backing off on requests for the next 12 seconds. Previous URL: https://api.stackexchange.com/2.2/questions/941052
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Potentially bad ns for domain in body (1): Huawei P9 lite enter bootloader without volume keys and access to system/recovery by miso2271 on android.SE
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Potentially bad ns for domain in body (1): Huawei P9 lite enter bootloader without volume keys and access to system/recovery by miso2271 on android.SE
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Offensive answer detected, toxic answer detected (158): Why the coefficient of volume expansion is three times the linear coefficient expansion? by user247211 on physics.SE
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Offensive answer detected, toxic answer detected (158): Why the coefficient of volume expansion is three times the linear coefficient expansion? by user247211 on physics.SE
CI on 8a95311 failed.
CI on 8a95311 failed.
CI on 8a95311 failed.
CI on 8a95311 failed.
CI on 8a95311 failed.
CI on 8a95311 failed.
CI on 8a95311 failed.
CI on 8a95311 failed.
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Blacklisted website in answer, blacklisted user (164): Unlocking a disabled iPhone ✏️ by Swift Shawen on apple.SE
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Blacklisted website in answer (93): Unlocking a disabled iPhone ✏️ by Swift Shawen on apple.SE
 
@ArtOfCode Not sure if this was how it was meant to work or not, but a whitelisted domain had a bad NS check
 
CI on 8a95311 failed.
CI on 8a95311 failed.
CI on 8a95311 failed.
CI on 8a95311 failed.
 
What? Why so many messages?
 
!!/location
 
4:50 PM
@ArtOfCode teward/Anubis
@ArtOfCode iBug/SandyShores
 
!!/standby teward
 
teward/Anubis is switching to standby
CI on 7071b48 succeeded. Message contains 'autopull', pulling...
[ SmokeDetector ] SmokeDetector started at rev 7071b48 (Makyen: typo" not in -autopull) (running on iBug/SandyShores, Python 3.7.4)
Restart: API quota is 15251.
 
@SmokeDetector fp- Probably need to un-blacklist the username "Raj"
 
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Offensive body detected, potentially bad keyword in body (45): Hey Ooto, Big bro! how8 go buddz? U help Mimi green? by BellLexxxieLemonSqueezie on stackoverflow.com
 
I've added code which should prevent SD from posting the "site is required" errors. We should revert those commits (2 commits (1, 2), because I made a typo and didn't double check things) once the problem with the SE API is fixed.
Rebooting MS
 
4:58 PM
!!/unblacklist (?-i:^Raj$)
!!/watch (?-i:^Raj$)
 
[ SmokeDetector ] Blacklists reloaded at rev c5ac87d (SmokeDetector: Auto unblacklist of (?-i:^Raj$) by Machavity) (running on iBug/SandyShores)
[ SmokeDetector ] Blacklists reloaded at rev aff3da8 (SmokeDetector: Auto watch of (?-i:^Raj$) by Machavity) (running on iBug/SandyShores)
[ SmokeDetector ] Blacklists reloaded at rev aff3da8 (SmokeDetector: Auto watch of (?-i:^Raj$) by Machavity) (running on iBug/SandyShores)
[ SmokeDetector ] SmokeDetector started in standby mode at rev aff3da8 (SmokeDetector: Auto watch of (?-i:^Raj$) by Machavity) (running on Makyen/Windows)
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Few unique characters in body, mostly punctuation marks in body (121): Mips single cycle ✏️ by puchosa on electronics.SE
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Potentially bad keyword in answer (1): Ubuntu 19.10, audio only from HDMI and not from Analogic by Zap on askubuntu.com
 
5:16 PM
!!/unwatch (?-i:^Raj$)
 
[ SmokeDetector ] Blacklists reloaded at rev cb76df8 (SmokeDetector: Auto unwatch of (?-i:^Raj$) by Makyen) (running on iBug/SandyShores)
 
@Makyen There are 10 pages of Raj usernames just on SO. The posts we've seen from the user this is trying to detect don't justify even watching the username.
@Machavity Thanks for moving that off the blacklist. However, I don't think we should even be watching it.
 
@Makyen k
 
5:19 PM
@Machavity User blacklisted (12368000 on stackoverflow.com).
fp- feedback received
tpu- feedback received on Unlocking a disabled iPhone [MS]
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Potentially bad keyword in body (1): Apache: 2 SSL certificates, same DocumentRoot by dasigrist on unix.SE
fp- feedback received
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Potentially bad ns for domain in answer, potentially bad keyword in answer (2): OpenGL & GLSL 3.3 on an HD Graphics 4000 under Ubuntu 12.04 by Jacob than on stackoverflow.com
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Mostly punctuation marks in body (27): mi programa no hace nada al compilar by javier armenta on es.stackoverflow.com
 
Huh, maybe I shouldn't use the Advnaced Flagging to give feedback
 
fp feedback received
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Potentially bad asn for hostname in body (1): Mathematics and science by HASIBUL AHSAN on physics.SE
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad keyword in answer, bad keyword with email in answer, bad phone number in answer, potentially bad keyword in answer (172): Professor falsely accusing me of cheating in a class he does not teach, two months after end of the class. What precautions should I take? by davon deanny on academia.SE
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Pattern-matching website in body (97): How do you authenticate an Azure Functions app to use Azure DevOps REST API? ✏️ by Ber K. on stackoverflow.com
 
6:13 PM
!!/watch billhackwizard(?:@gmail.com)?
 
@Das_Geek That pattern looks like it's already caught by Pattern-matching email in answer, Pattern-matching email in body, Bad keyword in answer, and Bad keyword in body; in addition, the regex contains an unescaped "."; in most cases, it should be "\."; append -force if you really want to do that.
 
!!/bisect (314) 635 7319
 
@Das_Geek '(314) 635 7319' is not caught by a blacklist or watchlist item.
fp feedback received
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Phone number detected in title (68): Adding 1474257977 bad clusters to bad cluster file by The Outlaw Alliance of Ohio on superuser.com
fp feedback received
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Pattern-matching website in answer (79): Microservice authentication between services by broughten on softwareengineering.SE
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Potentially bad ns for domain in body (1): USB to rs232 adapter ✏️ by Valentyn on hardwarerecs.SE
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Misleading link (18): Distorted normal map on smooth surface ✏️ by Caleb9 on blender.SE
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Potentially bad asn for hostname in body (1): FIR filter format - Brutefir - Volumio by Bart on dsp.SE
 
6:52 PM
teward/Anubis received failover signal.
Restart: API quota is 19612.
 
@Das_Geek Just so you know, !!/bisect does not test against watched or blacklisted numbers. You'll need to use !!/test, or one of it's variations.
 
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Potentially bad asn for hostname in body (1): GSAP + AdHelper Template results in 'lib is not defined' by Stuart Hart on stackoverflow.com
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Potentially bad keyword in body (1): Finding Element in json file with python ✏️ by LikeMike on stackoverflow.com
 
7:14 PM
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Potentially bad keyword in answer (1): How to purchase a license for FreeBSD? by Andreas Weigl on superuser.com
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Potentially bad keyword in answer (1): Isekai manga: Hero summoned a second time ✏️ by H otaku on scifi.SE
fp feedback received on How to purchase a license for FreeBSD? [MS]
 
@Makyen Got it, thanks
 
np
 
Aw man
Didn't want that reported, was just using the Advanced Flagging script
 
That seems to be a reply to this comment
 
7:26 PM
naa- feedback received
 
7:37 PM
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Few unique characters in answer, no whitespace in answer, repeating characters in answer (263): Are balanced groups important in D&D 5e? by user60215 on rpg.SE
tpu- feedback received
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Potentially bad asn for hostname in body (1): IBM Streams flow error in Python model operator: "No .pb file found in the saved model artifact" by Sazia on stackoverflow.com
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Mostly non-latin answer, potentially bad keyword in answer (50): solution on the time domain becomes "periodic" after the inverse fourier transform by user724947 on math.SE
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Mostly non-latin answer, potentially bad keyword in answer (50): Error bound for a PDE with a perturbation term by user724947 on math.SE
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Blacklisted username (91): How to add spaces to varchar datetime in SQL query? ✏️ by Raj on stackoverflow.com
fp feedback received
 
7:56 PM
@Makyen Er, didn't we remove that from the blacklist? ^^
 
That's what I thought, too
 
!!/rev
 
!!/pull
 
wow
 
8:00 PM
[ SmokeDetector ] SmokeDetector started at rev cb76df8 (SmokeDetector: Auto unwatch of (?-i:^Raj$) by Makyen) (running on teward/Anubis, Python 3.7.4)
Restart: API quota is 18811.
 
That's like, what, 7 commits behind?
How common is that?
 
@Machavity Yep. We just forgot that we normally need to do a !!/pull when we failover, unless we're experiencing an actual code problem.
 
oh, okay
 
@Das_Geek It's not uncommon for an instance in standby to be days, or even weeks, behind.
 
@Makyen Yeah I missed the standby part
I had thought Anubis was still active, since that was the one the host said was the better machine
 
8:04 PM
The standby instances are all almost up to date due to me pulling them all a few hours ago in an effort to determine if SD was the cause of the "site is required" error.
Which reminds me, I need to pull them all past the patch for not showing that error.
 
[ SmokeDetector ] SmokeDetector started in standby mode at rev cb76df8 (SmokeDetector: Auto unwatch of (?-i:^Raj$) by Makyen) (running on Makyen/EC2-linux)
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Offensive answer detected, potentially bad keyword in answer (79): Solving a system of ODEs with the Runge-Kutta method by user68422 on mathematica.SE
 
@SmokeDetector rude-
 
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Potentially bad asn for hostname in body (1): FIR filter format - Brutefir - Volumio by Bart on dsp.SE
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Potentially bad asn for hostname in body, potentially problematic ns configuration in body (2): Uploaded MP4 video does not play when ArrayBuffer is applied to MediaSource by coder99665 on stackoverflow.com
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Potentially bad asn for hostname in body, potentially problematic ns configuration in body (2): Python/XML: proper way to retrieve node values? ✏️ by Seb on stackoverflow.com
fp feedback received on FIR filter format - Brutefir - Volumio [MS]
fp feedback received on FIR filter format - Brutefir - Volumio [MS]
fp feedback received
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Potentially bad ns for domain in body (1): What causes voltage to increase from 12V to 36V as specified? by skmagiik on electronics.SE
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Misleading link (18): cisco config delayed apply? by Hunter Fuller on serverfault.com
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Misleading link (18): Distorted normal map on smooth surface ✏️ by Caleb9 on blender.SE
fp feedback received on cisco config delayed apply? [MS]
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Potentially bad ns for domain in body (1): USB to rs232 adapter ✏️ by Valentyn on hardwarerecs.SE
fp feedback received on Distorted normal map on smooth surface [MS]
fp feedback received on Distorted normal map on smooth surface [MS]
fp feedback received
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Link at end of answer, potentially bad ns for domain in answer (61): Do California process servers typically try phone calls before resorting to ambush? by user28509 on law.SE
fp feedback received on USB to rs232 adapter [MS]
fp feedback received on USB to rs232 adapter [MS]
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Pattern-matching website in answer (79): How can a restricted window for sql injections be abused? by Alex on security.SE
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Link at end of answer, potentially bad ns for domain in answer (61): Is process service on an old address valid? by user28509 on law.SE
 
8:48 PM
Wait, why is a #notspam-labelled site being caught?
 
tpu- feedback received
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Potentially bad keyword in answer (1): How to assign IAM role to users or groups by Prajwal on stackoverflow.com
naa feedback received
fp feedback received
fp feedback received
 
9:12 PM
!!/bisect cheatseries
 
@Das_Geek 'cheatseries' is not caught by a blacklist or watchlist item.
 
!!/bisect cheatsheetseries.owasp.org
 
@Das_Geek 'cheatsheetseries.owasp.org' is not caught by a blacklist or watchlist item.
 
Then why the heck was it caught
 
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Potentially bad keyword in body (1): Error when upload any file using the Responsive Filemanager by Marcelo on stackoverflow.com
fp feedback received
 
9:16 PM
@Das_Geek The detection reason was "Pattern-matching website in answer". That will be in findspam.py. You'll need to look there. To test it, you'll need to use !!/test, or one of that command's permutations.
 
Just found that on the wiki lol. Sorry for the clutter
@Makyen The "pattern matching" is what made me confused. It matched a site that was listed as #notspam
Maybe whitelist it so it's not checked?
 
fp feedback received
 
@Das_Geek You'd need to check to see if the #whitelist tag affects that reason. As far as I know, it's not implemented across the board on all reasons. I haven't checked to see on which reasons it's implemented.
 
Gotcha. Don't know where the list of exempted tests is, just that #whitelist will skip "most" checks
 
There won't be a list. You'd have to check the implementation of each detection.
 
9:28 PM
I thought I'd implemented it across all domain/ASN checks, but maybe not
 
Neither @Das_Geek nor I have actually checked. I was speaking hypothetically without having looked at the code for it or experimented.
It sounds like adding the domain to #whitelist should work then.
 
[ SmokeDetector ] SmokeDetector started at rev cb76df8 (SmokeDetector: Auto unwatch of (?-i:^Raj$) by Makyen) (running on iBug/SandyShores, Python 3.7.4)
Restart: API quota is 13947.
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Pattern-matching website in answer (79): How can a restricted window for sql injections be abused? by Alex on security.SE
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad keyword in answer, bad pattern in url answer, blacklisted website in answer, link at end of answer, potentially bad ns for domain in answer, +1 more (306): Change Panel Font Weight by cartergraves98 on askubuntu.com
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad keyword in answer, bad pattern in url answer, blacklisted website in answer, link at end of answer, potentially bad ns for domain in answer, +1 more (306): Change Panel Font Weight by cartergraves98 on askubuntu.com
 
!!/standby Sandy
 
[ SmokeDetector ] SmokeDetector started in standby mode at rev cb76df8 (SmokeDetector: Auto unwatch of (?-i:^Raj$) by Makyen) (running on iBug/SandyShores)
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad keyword in body, bad keyword in title, bad pattern in url body, blacklisted website in body, link at end of body, +4 more (685): Weight Loss Pills Reviews by cartergraves98 on askubuntu.com
 
@SmokeDetector k
@SmokeDetector k
 
!!/watch- 88115339(?#URL path)
 
10:13 PM
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Pattern-matching product name in body (98): Why are there no turboprop large passenger airliners? by clentinbon on aviation.SE
fp feedback received
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Potentially bad asn for hostname in answer, potentially bad keyword in answer (2): Программа для отправки смс-сообщений на java by Volodya Lombrozo on ru.stackoverflow.com
 
10:33 PM
[ charcoal-se.github.io ] continuous-integration/travis-ci/push success on c424d43: The Travis CI build passed
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Potentially bad keyword in body (1): Why is the word "impeding" used as synonym for "imminent"? by Emmanuel Oga on english.SE
fp feedback received
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Potentially bad asn for hostname in answer (1): Vehicles Data and Images API ✏️ by carspecs on opendata.SE
 
@SmokeDetector What? That was committed 3 days ago, and was live on the site at that time.
 
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Potentially bad keyword in answer (1): Vehicles Data and Images API by digi-T on opendata.SE
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Link at end of body, potentially bad ns for domain in body (100): Opinion on this Website by PA Memphis on superuser.com
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Potentially bad asn for hostname in answer (1): ¿Como ocultar la url en laravel cuando usas get para editar? by user148983 on es.stackoverflow.com
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Potentially bad keyword in body (1): How much is warpstone worth? by YuseqYaseq on rpg.SE
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Potentially bad keyword in answer (1): Road vehicles database by digi-T on opendata.SE
fp feedback received on Vehicles Data and Images API [MS]
fp feedback received on Vehicles Data and Images API [MS]
tp feedback received on Opinion on this Website [MS]
 
11:00 PM
!!/watch apartmentsnearme\.biz
 
PR#3484 ("Das_Geek: Watch apartmentsnearme\.biz") opened by SmokeDetector
@Das_Geek You don't have code privileges, but I've created PR#3484 for you.
fp feedback received on How much is warpstone worth? [MS]
fp feedback received
 
!!/approve 3484
!!/watch-force- co-recovery\.com
 
@Makyen That pattern looks like it's already caught by Pattern-matching website in answer and Pattern-matching website in body; append -force if you really want to do that.
[ SmokeDetector ] Blacklists reloaded at rev 8274259 (SmokeDetector: Auto watch of co-recovery\.com by Makyen) (running on teward/Anubis)
CI on 0f3e309 succeeded.
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Potentially bad keyword in body (1): CVE-2018-2783 - Can it be clarified on what the CVE here means? ✏️ by MatterixN on stackoverflow.com
 
!!/watch pelis24\.mobi
 
@Das_Geek You don't have code privileges, but I've created PR#3485 for you.
[ SmokeDetector ] SmokeDetector started in standby mode at rev aff3da8 (SmokeDetector: Auto watch of (?-i:^Raj$) by Machavity) (running on Makyen/Windows)
PR#3485 ("Das_Geek: Watch pelis24\.mobi") opened by SmokeDetector
fp feedback received
 
11:05 PM
@Das_Geek Why watch that when you gave FP feedback?
 
@Makyen I gave a reason on MS and GitHub. The post wasn't spam (wanted to solve an API request issue), but the site itself is for illegally streaming movies/shows
 
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Potentially bad keyword in answer (1): Whatsapp groupchat invite link not working by user12369586 on stackoverflow.com
fp feedback received
 
Is that sort of "pre-emptive" watching discouraged? It was my understanding that pretty much anything was fair game as long as it's just watching, and I wouldn't say it's unlikely for links to a streaming service to appear as spam later on.
 
11:22 PM
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Potentially bad keyword in answer (1): Wordpress speed loading problems by SEOEGC on stackoverflow.com
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Potentially bad keyword in answer (1): Is this timeline chart visualization possible in Google Data Studio? by user12369651 on stackoverflow.com
naa feedback received
 
11:38 PM
@SmokeDetector tp- Single case of undisclosed affiliation. User is the owner of the company recommended in the linked article (that's on an unsecure page? what?), and author of the linked article.
 
11:55 PM
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Potentially bad keyword in answer (1): Javac works java does not by l.grant on stackoverflow.com
 

« first day (2187 days earlier)      last day (138 days later) »