@SmokeDetector This was previously reported, so none of the detections are mentioned (i.e. we're already watching quite a bit of the content of this post).
@TetsuyaYamamoto Definitely NAA. Technically spam (undisclosed affiliation). After commenting, I would normally give them some time to edit in disclosure prior to flagging as spam.
That is, if it was actually an answer. Given that it's NAA, flagging as spam right off is fine, IMO.
@TetsuyaYamamoto The user now has 7 recent posts. All of which contain undisclosed affiliation. None actually answer the question (i.e. all are link-only NAA).
@undo If you would be so kind as to delete the 5 reports that are duplicates, that I just created as a result of a copy & paste issue, I'd appreciate it.
!!/report stackoverflow.com/a/52049032stackoverflow.com/a/52049082 "Multiple recent posts with undisclosed affiliation. User has posted multiple additional, near duplicate, answers a significant time after comments requesting disclosure were posted. Answers are basically, link-only."
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Blacklisted website in body, pattern-matching website in body, potentially bad ns for domain in body, potentially bad keyword in body, potentially bad keyword in title: is cenforce 150 best in life by Lisa Resnick on magento.SE
can you @Undo a tag deletion I did yesterday in a burst of clean-up frenzy? I deleted a couple of tags from Metasmoke which probably contained useful (if small) amounts of posts
@TetsuyaYamamoto That pattern looks like it's already caught by Potentially bad keyword in body and Potentially bad keyword in answer; append -force if you really want to do that.
@tripleee That pattern looks like it's already caught by Mostly non-latin answer and Mostly non-latin body; append -force if you really want to do that.
@tripleee That pattern looks like it's already caught by Pattern-matching website in body and Pattern-matching website in answer; append -force if you really want to do that.
@iBug That pattern looks like it's already caught by Pattern-matching website in body and Pattern-matching website in answer; append -force if you really want to do that.
@iBug Blacklisted applemacsupportnumbers\.com
CI on 7c3a4d1 succeeded. Message contains 'autopull', pulling...
@SmokeDetector This is another case where the HTML version indicates a different issue than can be seen in the Markdown. The Markdown shows some HTML, which, because it wasn't in code format, was stripped prior to rendering it to the HTML version.
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad keyword in body, blacklisted website in body, body starts with title and ends in url, link at end of body, pattern-matching website in body: HCA inside the frame however, by tenuytarnamiy on askubuntu.com
@tripleee The OP is asking a debugging question. Not a "how do I do this" question. Those are usually solved by showing the OP what they did wrong in their code. If the OP's code is to much effort to fix, then you can just say something diplomatic and provide your own solution. You can also provide your own solution in addition to explaining what the OP did wrong. Just presenting your own solution with no comment about the OP's code isn't what the OP is asking for.
@Shree That pattern looks like it's already caught by Pattern-matching website in answer and Pattern-matching website in body; append -force if you really want to do that.
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad keyword in body, blacklisted website in body, pattern-matching product name in body, pattern-matching website in body, potentially bad keyword in body: To Achieve The Large Volume Patient? by babardrow on graphicdesign.SE
tpu- by Makyen
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad keyword in body, blacklisted website in body, pattern-matching website in body, potentially bad ns for domain in body, potentially bad keyword in body: wide stance we now want by user300198 on apple.SE
@TetsuyaYamamoto @iBug @SurajRao Are you all sure about tpu on this MS post. That version was the result of an edit by a moderator to remove the spam link. You may have been attempting to add that feedback to one of the two earlier versions.
@TetsuyaYamamoto That pattern looks like it's already caught by Potentially bad keyword in body and Potentially bad keyword in answer; append -force if you really want to do that.
@TetsuyaYamamoto Body - Scam aimed at microsoft customers. Keywords: number, support
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad keyword in body, bad keyword in title, blacklisted website in body, body starts with title and ends in url, link at end of body, +4 more: purefit keto qualified in on sure in by Mues on askubuntu.com
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad keyword in body, bad keyword in title, bad keyword in username, bad pattern in url body, blacklisted website in body, +3 more: Anadrole Reviews by Anadrole Reviews on meta.SE
@doppelgreener That pattern looks like it's already caught by Potentially bad keyword in body and Potentially bad keyword in answer; append -force if you really want to do that.
@SmokeDetector I'd argue that this isn't quite bad enough that this is R/A - the user did try to ask a question (albeit they did a very bad job of it), and on an almost-correct site (a per site meta would have been more appropriate), but I don't think it's bad enough to warrant a red flag.
