Hey guys, I have a guy who is chain posting a link to a GitHub repo. Can I list him in SD for spam? Have been flagging his stuff, but he's been doing it going on some 20 mins
So, I've read through the Wiki... I think... and I don't know that I've seen any notes on whether it makes sense for multiple people to give feedback on the same report. I do see that some reports have multiple validations/invalidations on metasmoke, though I suppose that can be attributed to some people using scripts and others responding in various chat rooms.
@TetsuyaYamamoto That pattern looks like it's already caught by Pattern-matching website in answer and Pattern-matching website in body; use !!/watch-force if you really want to do that.
@Catija you can if you want to, you don't have to if you don't want to. Multiple feedbacks doesn't have any effect on how the report is handled (at the moment), but adding additional feedbacks might be helpful down the line if someone wants to do some analysis
@tripleee That pattern looks like it's already caught by Blacklisted website in answer and Blacklisted website in body; use !!/blacklist-website-force if you really want to do that.
it would be nice if we could set a timeout on some watches to have them removed automatically (or conversely, a way to mark some as "permanent until further notice")
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad keyword in body, bad keyword in title, blacklisted website in body, pattern-matching website in body, repeated URL at end of long post: Slimfire-forskolin incalculable by havep on apple.SE
@ArtOfCode can we add something about manually reporting the spam here, especially if the post doesn't have a low score already (which means it's probably autoflagged)? Most people won't have !!/report privileges, but just posting a link here should suffice, we almost have 24/7 coverage by regulars.
Oh, and I do downvote spam posts sometimes for reasons described here.
@AJ it works for me, but I have switched from GreaseMonkey to ViolentMonkey after a tip by DavidPostill. The only problem right now is that the 'flags' tab is shown twice. GreaseMonkey was still partially active :x
@Glorfindel the scope of the post doesn't really seem to be about promoting Charcoal at all so I don't see where we would want to mention that, or Charcoal at all
@AJ That pattern looks like it's already caught by Bad ns for domain in answer and Bad ns for domain in body; use !!/watch-force if you really want to do that.
@tripleee That pattern looks like it's already caught by Bad ns for domain in body and Bad ns for domain in answer; use !!/watch-force if you really want to do that.
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] URL-only title, bad NS for domain in body, bad NS for domain in title, blacklisted website in body, blacklisted website in title, +2 more: x4up.org/ultra-omega-burn/ by niyt on askubuntu.com
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad keyword in body, bad keyword in title, bad pattern in URL body, blacklisted website in body, link at end of body, +1 more: Max trim 365 reviews by jasmisandel on meta.SE
room topic changed to Charcoal HQ: Where diamonds are made, smoke is detected, and we break things by developing on production. 76,000 true positives and counting. [Recursive] oneboxes are awesome. Handy links: charcoal-se.org, github.com/Charcoal-SE, charcoal-se.org/blaze [best-bad-practices] [dev-on-prod] [panic-driven-development] [plastic-knives]
